The Labor Force Attachment of Discouraged Workers

1987 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
LONNIE K. STEVANS ◽  
CHARLES A. REGISTER ◽  
PAUL W. GRIMES
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 85-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet S. Netz ◽  
Jon D. Haveman

Author(s):  
Frank Stricker

Main arguments are discussed and key concepts are defined to help readers later on and to preview the book’s effort to evaluate mainstream paradigms, one of which is that 4 percent unemployment is full employment. Flaws in the idea of frictional unemployment are sketched. This chapter stresses the importance of discouraged workers and other jobless people outside the labor force. Truly full employment requires more jobs than people needing jobs, short periods for finding work, and real wages rising 2 percent per year. These conditions have been rare. The final argument is that neoliberalism and unregulated markets cannot bring full employment. Government job programs are essential.


1985 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lonnie K. Stevans ◽  
Charles Register ◽  
Paul Grimes

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 242-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya S. Byker

I analyze the effects of short-duration paid parental leave on maternal labor supply. Using monthly longitudinal data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation, my event-study research design estimates impacts of paid leave laws in California and New Jersey on women's labor-force outcomes around childbirth. I find that paid leave laws are associated with a substantial increase in labor-force attachment in the months directly around birth. While US-style short-duration leave is unlikely to change prolonged exits from the labor force, my findings imply that paid leave laws induce some women stay more attached to jobs, particularly low-skill women.


Social Forces ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 1005-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Alon ◽  
D. Donahoe ◽  
M. Tienda

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M Brooks

There has been a persistent gap in the poverty rate between urban and rural areas of the United States. Much of this gap has be attributed to industrial composition, however employment composition also likely plays a key role. Underemployment and labor force non-participation have been become significant issues in rural areas. This study uses data from the Current Population Survey for 1970 to 2018 to understand how poverty rates among 6 employment groups —(1) not in the labor force, (2) discouraged workers, (3) unemployed workers, (4) low hours workers, (5) low income workers, and (6) adequately employed workers— can explain the persistent gap in poverty between urban and rural areas. Demographic standardization and decomposition techniques reveal that majority of the poverty gap is explained by differences in poverty rates for the employment groups. Rural individuals in all employment group have higher poverty rates than urban individuals in the same group. Analysis also shows that if rural America had either the employment structure or the employment specific poverty rates of urban America than poverty rates would be much lower in rural areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document