Questions, Answers, and Research on the Education of Exceptional Children

1983 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert J. Prehm ◽  
Barbara B. Mcloone

This article addresses three questions: What is research? What contribution has research made to special education? Why should I read research? Research is a process in which one asks questions, seeks answers to those questions in such a way that someone else could easily follow the same procedures, and shares the answers. The purpose of all research is to describe and to understand; special education research shares that purpose. Examples of research contributions to special education from medicine, psychology, and sociology are presented. Unique characteristics and contributions of special education research include the range of research methods used, the role of testing, the degree to which principles from parent disciplines are validated, and the reciprocal relationship that exists between researchers in special education and those in other disciplines. The purpose of reading research and supporting research endeavors is to accumulate knowledge as a basis for improving practice.

1976 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 244-252 ◽  

Thirty special educators, some of whom have worked in the field for over 50 years, were interviewed by telephone. Each was asked to identify milestone events and pioneers in special education and to describe the development and role of teacher education, research, and The Council for Exceptional Children over the years. Crucial issues and needs in the field today were identified by the group and their responses were synthesized into the first of a series of articles celebrating the Bicentennial.


2003 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-250
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Scruggs ◽  
Margo A. Mastropieri

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney A. Leboeuf ◽  
Benjamin Brumley ◽  
John W. Fantuzzo ◽  
Cody A. Hostutler

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Lucas ◽  
Suzy D’Enbeau

Teaching novice qualitative researchers how to move beyond first-cycle themes is a challenging endeavor. In this essay, we articulate four harmful habits that tend to impede our success: moving too quickly, privileging product over process, providing cursory coverage of analytic technique and artistry, and overlooking the role of synthesis in qualitative research. As a step toward replacing harmful habits with more healthy ones, we offer a number of practical suggestions for reimagining the qualitative research methods curriculum.


2020 ◽  
pp. 102-109
Author(s):  
Svetlana Alekseevna Raschetina ◽  

Relevance and problem statement. Modern unstable society is characterized by narrowing the boundaries of controlled socialization and expanding the boundaries of spontaneous socialization of a teenager based on his immersion in the question arises about the importance of the family in the process of socialization of a teenager in the conditions of expanding the space of socialization. There is a need to study the role of the family in this process, to search, develop and test research methods that allow us to reveal the phenomenon of socialization from the side of its value characteristics. The purpose and methodology of the study: to identify the possibilities of a systematic and anthropological methodology for studying the role of the family in the process of socialization of adolescents in modern conditions, testing research methods: photo research on the topic “Ego – I” (author of the German sociologist H. Abels), profile update reflexive processes (by S. A. Raschetina). Materials and results of the study. The study showed that for all the problems that exist in the family of the perestroika era and in the modern family, it acts for a teenager as a value and the first (main) support in the processes of socialization. The positions well known in psychology about the importance of interpersonal relations in adolescence for the formation of attitudes towards oneself as the basis of socialization are confirmed. Today, the frontiers of making friends have expanded enormously on the basis of Internet communication. The types of activities of interest to a teenager (traditional and new ones related to digitalization) are the third pillar of socialization. Conclusion. The “Ego – I” method of photo research has a wide range of possibilities for quantitative and qualitative analysis of the socialization process to identify the value Pillars of this process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document