Antidepressants in Cancer Pain

1991 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 42-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto E. Panerai ◽  
Mauro Bianchi ◽  
Paola Sacerdote ◽  
Carla Ripamonti ◽  
Vittorio Ventafridda ◽  
...  

Studies conducted in recent years have helped define the role of antidepressant drugs in the management of cancer pain. The anti-nociceptive action of these agents seems to be independent of beneficial effect on depression or mood. Among antidepressant drugs, those of the tricyclic class are preferred when an analgesic effect is sought. Their primary application is for pain due to nerve injury, so-called “neuropathic pain”. Although the co-administration of tricyclic antidepressants may increase plasma morphine concentrations, any potentiation of morphine analgesia is thought not to be due to an increased bioavailability of the opiate, but to an intrinsic analgesic effect of antidepressants. On this basis, the use of antidepressants in combination with opioids for the treatment of cancer pain is suitable when a component of deafferentation is present or when there is concomitant depressive illness.

1999 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 1382-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuo Yamamoto ◽  
Yoshihiko Sakashita

Background Cholecystokinin-B receptor activation has been reported to reduce morphine analgesia. Neuropathic pain is thought to be relatively refractory to opioids. One possible mechanisms for a reduced effect of morphine on neuropathic pain is the induction of cholecystokinin in the spinal cord by nerve injury. The authors evaluated the role of the spinal cholecystokinin-B receptor on morphine analgesia in two rat neuropathic pain models: chronic constriction injury and partial sciatic nerve injury. Methods A chronic constriction injury is created by placing four loosely tied ligatures around the right sciatic nerve. A partial sciatic nerve injury was created by tight ligation of one third to one half of the right sciatic nerve. All drugs were injected intrathecally 7 and 11 days after the nerve injury. The effect of the drugs was reflected in the degree of paw withdrawal latency to thermal nociceptive stimulation. The paw withdrawal latencies of injured and uninjured paws were measured 5, 15, 30, and 60 min after the drugs were injected. Results In the chronic constriction injury model, intrathecal morphine increased the paw withdrawal latencies of injured and uninjured paws. PD135158, a cholecystokinin-B receptor antagonist, potentiated the analgesic effect of morphine on injured and uninjured paws. In the partial sciatic nerve injury model, the effect of morphine on the injured paw was less potent than that on the uninjured paw, and PD135158 potentiated the morphine analgesia in the uninjured paw and had only a minor effect on the morphine analgesia in the injured paw. Conclusions The effectiveness of morphine for thermal hyperalgesia after nerve injury depends on the type of nerve injury. The role of the cholecystokinin-B receptor in morphine analgesia in thermal hyperalgesia after nerve injury also depends on the type of nerve injury.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Kopsky ◽  
Remko Liebregts ◽  
Jan M. Keppel Hesselink

Central neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common debilitating symptom, which is mostly treated with tricyclic antidepressants or antiepileptics. Unfortunately, the use of these drugs is often limited due to adverse events. We investigated the analgesic effect of topical amitriptyline 5% and 10% cream in a patient with central neuropathic pain due to MS. The analgesic effect of topical amitriptyline cream on neuropathic pain was dose related. To evaluate whether this analgesic effect is due to the active compound or placebo, we conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled n-of-1 study with amitriptyline 5% cream and placebo. The instruction was to alternate the creams every week following the pattern ABAB, with an escape possibility of amitriptyline 10% cream. The result was a complete pain reduction after application of cream B, while most of the time cream A did not reduce the pain. The patient could correctly unblind both creams, determining B as active. She noted that in the week of using the active cream no allodynia was present, with a carryover effect of one day.


2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Young Tae Jeon ◽  
Kwang Suk Seo ◽  
Young Jin Ro ◽  
Young Jin Lim ◽  
Seong Won Min ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Ripamonti ◽  
Chiara Ticozzi ◽  
Ernesto Zecca ◽  
Carlos H. Rodriguez ◽  
Franco De Conno

Ketorolac is a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) having a potent nonopioid analgesic activity. Administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSI), its analgesic efficacy has been documented in the treatment of somatic and visceral cancer pain whilst it has been shown to be ineffective in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Here is a description of a cancer patient with neuropathic pain unresponsive to anticonvulsant or antidepressant drugs administered in association or not with oral opioids but who was successfully treated with ketorolac alone via CSI. Furthermore, the analgesia lasted over 75 days of treatment without any significant renal and gastric side effects.


Neuroreport ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (17) ◽  
pp. 941-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deniz Bagdas ◽  
Hasret Yucel-Ozboluk ◽  
Fulya Orhan ◽  
Ozkan Kanat ◽  
Naciye Isbil-Buyukcoskun ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Folkesson ◽  
Per Hartvig Honoré ◽  
Ole J. Bjerrum

AbstractA high proportion of patients suffering from neuropathic pain do not receive satisfactory pain relief from their current treatment, due to incomplete efficacy and dose-limiting adverse effects. Hence, one strategy to improve treatment outcome is the use of a combination of analgesic drugs. The potential benefits of such approach include improved and prolonged duration of analgesic effect and fewer or milder adverse effects with lower doses of each drug. Gabapentin is recommended as a first-line drug in the treatment of neuropathic pain, and has recently been demonstrated to act on supraspinal structures to stimulate the descending noradrenergic pain inhibitory system. Hypothetically, the analgesic effect of gabapentin may be potentiated if combined with a drug that prolongs the action of noradrenaline.In this study, gabapentin was co-administered with the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine, and subsequently evaluated for its effect on mechanical hypersensitivity in the rat spared nerve injury model of neuropathic pain. In this model, two branches of the sciatic nerve (the tibial and common peroneal nerves) are ligated and cut, leaving the third branch (the sural nerve) intact to innervate the hind paw of the animal. Treatment-induced ataxia was tested in order to exclude biased effect measurements. Finally, the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin was investigated alone and in combination with venlafaxine to elucidate any alterations which may have consequences for the pharmacological effect and safety.The overall effect on nerve injury-induced hypersensitivity of co-administered gabapentin (60 mg/kg s.c.) and venlafaxine (60 mg/kg s.c.), measured as the area under the effect-time curve during the three hour time course of testing, was similar to the highest dose of gabapentin (200 mg/kg s.c.) tested in the study. However, this dose of gabapentin was associated with ataxia and severe somnolence, while the combination was not. Furthermore, when administered alone, an effect delay of approximately one hour was observed for gabapentin (60 mg/kg s.c.) with maximum effect occurring 1.5 to 2.5 h after dosing, while venlafaxine (60 mg/kg s.c.) was characterised by a rapid onset of action (within 30 min) which declined to baseline levels before the end of the three hour time of testing. The effect of co-administered drugs (both 60 mg/kg s.c.), in the doses used here, can be interpreted as additive with prolonged duration in comparison to each drug administered alone. An isobolographic study design, enable to accurately classify the combination effect into additive, antagonistic or synergistic, was not applied. The pharmacokinetics of gabapentin was not altered by co-administered venlafaxine, implying that a pharmacokinetic interaction does not occur. The effect of gabapentin on the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine was not studied, since any alterations are unlikely to occur on the basis of the pharmacokinetic properties of gabapentin.In conclusion, the results from this preclinical study support the rationale for improved effect and less adverse effects through combination therapy with gabapentin and venlafaxine in the management of neuropathic pain.


1998 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice L Arruda ◽  
Raymond W Colburn ◽  
Amy J Rickman ◽  
Maria D Rutkowski ◽  
Joyce A DeLeo

2019 ◽  
Vol 709 ◽  
pp. 134375
Author(s):  
Yun Zou ◽  
Yumeng Cao ◽  
Yuqi Liu ◽  
Xinyi Zhang ◽  
Jinbao Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document