A chronogram for postglacial soil-landscape change from the Palliser Triangle, Canada

The Holocene ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem J. Vreeken
2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-344
Author(s):  
Koen P Overmars ◽  
Peter H Verburg ◽  
Martha M Baker ◽  
Igor Staritsky ◽  
Fritz Hellmann

2019 ◽  
Vol 947 (5) ◽  
pp. 54-62
Author(s):  
M.D. Bogdanova ◽  
M.I. Gerasimova ◽  
V.A. Snytko

Professor Maria Glazovskaya (1912–2016) – an outstanding geographer, geochemist and soil scientist, made a prominent contribution to the formation and development of several aspects of thematic mapping both in conceptual and methodological issues. These aspects, namely, soil, landscape- and soil-geochemical, as well as ecological mapping, were derived from the knowledge on soils combined with the concepts of geochemical migrations facilities for certain chemical elements in soils and landscapes. Methodology of compilation of such maps presumes purposeful interpretation of diverse soil and landscape features, their expert evaluation and forecast of response reactions of soils and landscapes to certain technogenic loads. Maria Glazovskaya proposed innovative approaches to thematic mapping enabling her to compile original maps. She introduced the principle of “prognostic information capacity of natural factors”, which means that properties of landscape components contain information appropriate for evaluating the resilience of natural systems. The ideas and methods proposed by Maria Glazovskaya are now implemented in basic and applied thematic mapping.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewey W. Dunnington ◽  
◽  
Ian S. Spooner ◽  
Christopher E. White ◽  
Graham A. Gagnon

Author(s):  
Maud Laurent ◽  
Melanie Dickie ◽  
Marcus Becker ◽  
Robert Serrouya ◽  
Stan Boutin
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Morgan Robertson ◽  
Susan M. Galatowitsch ◽  
Jeffrey W. Matthews
Keyword(s):  

Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Mihai Mustățea ◽  
Ileana Pătru-Stupariu

Human–wildlife interactions (HWI) were frequent in the post-socialist period in the mountain range of Central European countries where forest habitats suffered transitions into built-up areas. Such is the case of the Upper Prahova Valley from Romania. In our study, we hypothesized that the increasing number of HWI after 1990 could be a potential consequence of woodland loss. The goal of our study was to analyse the effects of landscape changes on HWI. The study consists of the next steps: (i) applying 450 questionnaires to local stakeholders (both citizens and tourists) in order to collect data regarding HWI temporal occurrences and potential triggering factors; (ii) investigating the relation between the two variables through the Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA); (iii) modelling the landscape spatial changes between 1990 and 2018 for identifying areas with forest loss; (iv) overlapping the distribution of both the households affected by HWI and areas with loss of forested ecosystems. The local stakeholders indicate that the problematic species are the brown bear (Ursus arctos), the wild boar (Sus scrofa), the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the grey wolf (Canis lupus). The number of animal–human interactions recorded an upward trend between 1990 and 2018, and the most significant driving factors were the regulation of hunting practices, the loss of habitats, and artificial feeding. The landscape change analysis reveals that between 1990 and 2018, the forest habitats were replaced by built-up areas primarily on the outskirts of settlements, these areas coinciding with frequent HWI. The results are valid for both forest ecosystems conservation in the region, wildlife management, and human infrastructures durable spatial planning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document