scholarly journals Fitting mechanistic epidemic models to data: A comparison of simple Markov chain Monte Carlo approaches

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1956-1967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Li ◽  
Jonathan Dushoff ◽  
Benjamin M Bolker

Simple mechanistic epidemic models are widely used for forecasting and parameter estimation of infectious diseases based on noisy case reporting data. Despite the widespread application of models to emerging infectious diseases, we know little about the comparative performance of standard computational-statistical frameworks in these contexts. Here we build a simple stochastic, discrete-time, discrete-state epidemic model with both process and observation error and use it to characterize the effectiveness of different flavours of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques. We use fits to simulated data, where parameters (and future behaviour) are known, to explore the limitations of different platforms and quantify parameter estimation accuracy, forecasting accuracy, and computational efficiency across combinations of modeling decisions (e.g. discrete vs. continuous latent states, levels of stochasticity) and computational platforms (JAGS, NIMBLE, Stan).

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Li ◽  
Jonathan Dushoff ◽  
Ben Bolker

AbstractBackgroundSimple mechanistic epidemic models are widely used for forecasting and parameter estimation of infectious diseases based on noisy case reporting data. Despite the widespread application of models to emerging infectious diseases, we know little about the comparative performance of standard computational-statistical frameworks in these contexts. Here we build a simple stochastic, discrete-time, discrete-state epidemic model with both process and observation error and use it to characterize the effectiveness of different flavours of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques. We use fits to simulated data, where parameters (and future behaviour) are known to explore the limitations of different platforms and quantify parameter estimation accuracy, forecasting accuracy, and computational efficiency across combinations of modeling decisions (e.g. discrete vs. continuous latent states, levels of stochasticity) and computational platforms (JAGS, NIMBLE, Stan).ResultsModels incorporating at least one source of population-level variation (i.e., dispersion in either the transmission process or the observation process) provide reasonably good forecasts and parameter estimates, while models that incorporate only individual-level variation can lead to inaccurate (or overconfident) results. Models using continuous approximations to the transmission process showed improved computational efficiency without loss of accuracy.ConclusionSimple models of disease transmission and observation can be fitted reliably to simple simulations, as long as population-level variation is taken into account. Continuous approximations can improve computational efficiency using more advanced MCMC techniques.


Agriculture ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 606
Author(s):  
Alaa Jamal ◽  
Raphael Linker

Particle filter has received increasing attention in data assimilation for estimating model states and parameters in cases of non-linear and non-Gaussian dynamic processes. Various modifications of the original particle filter have been suggested in the literature, including integrating particle filter with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (PF-MCMC) and, later, using genetic algorithm evolutionary operators as part of the state updating process. In this work, a modified genetic-based PF-MCMC approach for estimating the states and parameters simultaneously and without assuming Gaussian distribution for priors is presented. The method was tested on two simulation examples on the basis of the crop model AquaCrop-OS. In the first example, the method was compared to a PF-MCMC method in which states and parameters are updated sequentially and genetic operators are used only for state adjustments. The influence of ensemble size, measurement noise, and mutation and crossover parameters were also investigated. Accurate and stable estimations of the model states were obtained in all cases. Parameter estimation was more challenging than state estimation and not all parameters converged to their true value, especially when the parameter value had little influence on the measured variables. Overall, the proposed method showed more accurate and consistent parameter estimation than the PF-MCMC with sequential estimation, which showed highly conservative behavior. The superiority of the proposed method was more pronounced when the ensemble included a large number of particles and the measurement noise was low.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document