An anthropometric and cephalometric study to correlate facial form to pharyngeal airway in Class I and Class II malocclusions

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-93
Author(s):  
Sarabjeet Singh ◽  
Kavita Mehta ◽  
Navreet Sandhu ◽  
Abhishek Sharma
2013 ◽  
Vol 01 (03) ◽  
pp. 163-168
Author(s):  
Navreet Sandhu ◽  
Sarabjeet Sandhu ◽  
Kavita Mehta ◽  
Rita Kashyap

Abstract Introduction: Ever since the time of Edward H. Angle, the effects of upper airway obstruction have been recognized in the field of craniofacial biology. Because of the close relationship between the pharynx and the dentofacial structures, a mutual interaction is expected to occur between the pharyngeal structures and the dentofacial pattern, and therefore justifies orthodontic interest. The purpose of this study was to compare the upper and lower pharyngeal widths and nasopharyngeal area in class I and class II malocclusion patients. Methods: The study sample consisted of 48 subjects of age group 18-26 years, divided into 2 groups : class I(n=24) and class II(n=24). Pharyngeal airways were assessed according to Mc Namara's analysis and Handelman and Osborne method of measuring pharyngeal widths and nasopharyngeal areas. Results: Independent t –test showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.01) in upper aerial width and nasopharyngeal airway area between two groups, showing that in class II cases upper aerial width is narrower and nasopharyngeal area is small when compared to class I cases. Conclusion: Conclusion of the study was that upper aerial width and nasopharyngeal airway area of class II cases were smaller than Class I cases. It was observed that mandibular position with respect to cranial base had an effect on pharyngeal airway.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 414-417
Author(s):  
Dr. Benaaz Meherwan Asudaria ◽  
Dr. Chandulal Jadav ◽  
Dr. Srinivasulu ◽  
Dr. Sunkara VV Manikanta Swamy ◽  
Dr. Gouthami Mothe

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (s1) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Irinel Panainte ◽  
Victor Suciu ◽  
Krisztina-Ildikó Mártha

Abstract Background: Previous studies regarding various types of malocclusions have found correlations between the angle of the base of the skull and prognathism. Aim of the study: This cephalometric study sought to investigate the function of the cranium base angle in different types of malocclusion on a group of Romanian subjects. Materials and methods: Forty-four cephalometric radiographs were selected from patients referred to orthodontic treatment. The cephalometric records were digitized, and with the CorelDRAW Graphics Suite X5 software 22 landmarks have been marked on each radiograph. A number of linear and angular variables were calculated. Results: The angle of the base of the skull was found to be higher in Class II Division 1 subjects compared to the Class I group. The cranial base lengths, N-S and S-Ba, were significantly larger in both categories of Class II malocclusion than in Class I patients, but measurements were comparable in Class I and Class III. The SNA angle showed no considerable variation between Class I subjects and the other groups. SNA-SNP was significantly increased above Class I values in Class II Division1 and Class II Division 2 groups. No significant dissimilarities were observed for these lengths between Class I and Class III patients. Conclusions: The angle of the cranium base (S-N-Ba, S-N-Ar) does not have a major role in the progression of malocclusion. In Angle Class II malocclusion the SNA angle is increased, and SNB is increased in malocclusion Class III. The anterior skull base length is increased in Class II anomalies. The length of the maxillary bone base is increased in Class II malocclusions type; in Class III type of malocclusion the length of the mandible bone is increased.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document