Re: Updates in the management and future landscape of urothelial carcinoma

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522098083
Author(s):  
J Sarkis ◽  
J Assaf

Immunotherapy is gradually revolutionizing bladder cancer treatment. In this extensive review published by Hanna et al. in your journal, the authors presented recent studies that are trying to challenge the standard platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment of metastatic bladder cancer by chemoimmunotherapy. However, upfront pembrolizumab, atezolizumab and durvalumab association with standard of care chemotherapy did not improve overall survival when compared to chemotherapy alone. We hereby highlight a study that was not included in this review, the INDUCOMAIN trial, by discussing its results and its future implications on immunotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer.

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Amano ◽  
Hideki Iijima ◽  
Shinichiro Shinzaki ◽  
Taku Tashiro ◽  
Shuko Iwatani ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy for patients with metastatic duodenal and jejunal adenocarcinoma (mDJA) are unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab and to explore immunohistochemical markers that can predict the efficacy of bevacizumab for patients with mDJA. Methods This multicentre study included patients with histologically confirmed small bowel adenocarcinoma who received palliative chemotherapy from 2008 to 2017 at 15 hospitals. Immunostaining was performed for vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), TP53, Ki67, β-catenin, CD10, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, and mismatch repair proteins. Results A total of 74 patients were enrolled, including 65 patients with mDJA and 9 with metastatic ileal adenocarcinoma. Patients with mDJA who received platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab as first-line treatment tended to have a longer progression-free survival and overall survival than those treated without bevacizumab (P = 0.075 and 0.077, respectively). Multivariate analysis extracted high VEGF-A expression as a factor prolonging progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.30–0.91). In mDJA patients with high VEGF-A expression, those who received platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab as a first-line treatment had significantly longer progression-free survival and tended to have longer overall survival than those treated without bevacizumab (P = 0.025 and P = 0.056, respectively), whereas no differences were observed in mDJA patients with low VEGF-A expression. Conclusion Immunohistochemical expression of VEGF-A is a potentially useful biomarker for predicting the efficacy of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy for patients with mDJA.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Amano ◽  
Hideki Iijima ◽  
Shinichiro Shinzaki ◽  
Taku Tashiro ◽  
Shuko Iwatani ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy for patients with metastatic duodenal and jejunal adenocarcinoma (mDJA) are unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab and to explore immunohistochemical markers that can predict the efficacy of bevacizumab for patients with mDJA.Methods: This multicentre study included patients with histologically confirmed small bowel adenocarcinoma who received palliative chemotherapy from 2008 to 2017 at 15 hospitals. Immunostaining was performed for vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), TP53, Ki67, β-catenin, CD10, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, and mismatch repair proteins.Results: A total of 74 patients were enrolled, including 65 patients with mDJA and 9 with metastatic ileal adenocarcinoma. Patients with mDJA who received platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab as first-line treatment tended to have a longer progression-free survival and overall survival than those treated without bevacizumab (P = 0.075 and 0.077, respectively). Multivariate analysis extracted high VEGF-A expression as a factor prolonging progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.91). In mDJA patients with high VEGF-A expression, those who received platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab as a first-line treatment had significantly longer progression-free survival and tended to have longer overall survival than those treated without bevacizumab (P = 0.025 and P = 0.056, respectively), whereas no differences were observed in mDJA patients with low VEGF-A expression. Conclusion: Immunohistochemical expression of VEGF-A is a potentially useful biomarker for predicting the efficacy of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy for patients with mDJA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8586-TPS8586
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Forde ◽  
Anna K. Nowak ◽  
Peey-Sei Kok ◽  
Chris Brown ◽  
Zhuoxin Sun ◽  
...  

TPS8586 Background: Standard first line treatment for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is platinum-based chemotherapy with pemetrexed. Two recent, single-arm, phase 2 trials (DREAM1 and PrE05052) combining the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab and standard first line cisplatin and pemetrexed (CP) exceeded pre-specified criteria for proceeding to phase 3. DREAM3R aims to determine the effectiveness of adding durvalumab to first line CP chemotherapy in advanced MPM. Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with advanced MPM will be randomised (2:1) to EITHER durvalumab 1500 mg every 3 weeks plus doublet chemotherapy (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for 4-6 cycles, followed by durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient withdrawal; OR doublet chemotherapy alone for 4-6 cycles, followed by observation. The target sample size is 480 patients (320 durvalumab, 160 control) recruited over 27 months, with follow up for an additional 24 months. This provides over 85% power if the true hazard ratio for overall survival is 0.70, with 2-sided alpha of 0.05, assuming a median survival of 15 months in the control group. Key inclusion criteria: MPM of any histological subtype; measurable disease as per RECIST 1.1 modified for mesothelioma (mRECIST 1.1) without prior radiotherapy to these sites; ECOG PS 0-1; and, adequate hematologic, renal, and liver function tests. Key exclusion criteria: prior systemic anticancer treatment for MPM; diagnosis based only on cytology or fine needle aspiration biopsy; contraindication to immunotherapy; and conditions requiring immunosuppressives or corticosteroids. Stratification: Age (18-70 years vs. > 70), sex, histology (epithelioid vs. non-epithelioid), and region (USA vs. ANZ). The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival; objective tumour response (by mRECIST 1.1 and iRECIST); adverse events; health-related quality of life; and healthcare resource use. Tertiary correlative objectives are to explore and validate potential prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers (including features identified in the DREAM and PrE0505 studies, PD-L1 expression, tumour mutation burden, nuanced genomic characteristics, and HLA subtypes) in tissue and serial blood samples. An imaging databank will be assembled for validation of radiological measures of response, and studies of possible radiomic biomarkers in mesothelioma. Clinical trial information: NCT04334759. and ACTRN 12620001199909.


2011 ◽  
pp. 247-256
Author(s):  
Jacques Bernier

The burden of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) on healthcare systems is expected to rise in line with projected increases in population sizes in general, and the relative proportion of elderly individuals in particular, underlining the need for effective, well tolerated treatment strategies. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted IgG1 monoclonal antibody, cetuximab, is the only EGFR-targeted agent currently approved for use in the treatment of SCCHN. Adding cetuximab to standard first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN significantly improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80; P = 0.04), progression-free survival (HR 0.54; P\0.001) and response rates (odds ratio 2.33; P\0.001), compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone. This was the first time in 30 years that a significant increase in overall survival had been achieved over platinum- based therapy alone and established cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as the new standard first-line treatment approach for recurrent and/or metastatic disease. In locally advanced SCCHN, cetuximab plus radiotherapy significantly improved locoregional control (HR 0.68, P = 0.005) and overall survival (HR 0.74; P = 0.03) compared to radiotherapy alone. In both recurrent and/or metastatic disease and locally advanced disease, adding cetuximab to standard therapy was generally well tolerated and did not affect patients’ quality of life. The clinical benefits seen with the addition of cetuximab to standard chemotherapy or radiotherapy make it one of the most significant advances made in SCCHN treatment in recent years.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Jacques Bernier

The burden of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) on healthcare systems is expected to rise in line with projected increases in population sizes in general, and the relative proportion of elderly individuals in particular, underlining the need for effective, well tolerated treatment strategies. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted IgG1 monoclonal antibody, cetuximab, is the only EGFR-targeted agent currently approved for use in the treatment of SCCHN. Adding cetuximab to standard first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN significantly improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80; P = 0.04), progression-free survival (HR 0.54; P\0.001) and response rates (odds ratio 2.33; P\0.001), compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone. This was the first time in 30 years that a significant increase in overall survival had been achieved over platinum- based therapy alone and established cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as the new standard first-line treatment approach for recurrent and/or metastatic disease. In locally advanced SCCHN, cetuximab plus radiotherapy significantly improved locoregional control (HR 0.68, P = 0.005) and overall survival (HR 0.74; P = 0.03) compared to radiotherapy alone. In both recurrent and/or metastatic disease and locally advanced disease, adding cetuximab to standard therapy was generally well tolerated and did not affect patients’ quality of life. The clinical benefits seen with the addition of cetuximab to standard chemotherapy or radiotherapy make it one of the most significant advances made in SCCHN treatment in recent years.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document