scholarly journals Children With ADHD Symptoms: Who Can Do Without Specialized Mental Health Care?

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Levelink ◽  
Frans J. M. Feron ◽  
Edward Dompeling ◽  
Dorothea M. C. B. van Zeben-van de Aa

Objective: A new Dutch Child and Youth Act should reduce specialized mental health care for children with symptoms of ADHD. Characteristics of children referred to a specialized ADHD clinic are explored to give direction to this intention. Method: Data of 261 children who underwent a multidisciplinary best practice evaluation (including rating scales, and demographic, psychological, and somatic findings) were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to find predictive variables for the need of specialized mental health care. Results: Collected data were heterogeneous. (Sub)clinical total scores on the Teacher Report Form (TRF) and Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) were predictive variables for specialized mental health care. Also children with divorced parents were more often referred to specialized care. Conclusion: (Sub)clinical scores on the CBCL and TRF increased the need for specialized care, but comprehensive assessment of every child with ADHD symptoms was necessary to differentiate between levels of care.

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-471
Author(s):  
Linda A. E. Laheij-Rooijakkers ◽  
Paul T. van der Heijden ◽  
Arjan C. Videler ◽  
Daniel L. Segal ◽  
Sebastiaan P. J. van Alphen

ABSTRACTObjectives:Current guidelines recommend highly specialized care for patients with severe personality disorders (PDs). However, there is little knowledge about how to detect older patients with severe PDs. The aim of the current study was to develop an age-specific tool to detect older adults with severe PDs for highly specialized mental health care.Design:In a Delphi study, a tool to detect adults with severe PDs for highly specialized mental health care was adjusted for older adults based on expert opinion. Subsequently, the psychometric properties of the age-specific tool were evaluated.Setting:The psychometric part of the study was performed in two Dutch highly specialized centers for PDs in older adults.Participants:Patients (N = 90) from two highly specialized centers on PDs in older adults were enrolled.Measurements:The age-specific tool was evaluated using clinical judgment as the gold standard.Results:The Delphi study resulted in an age-specific tool, consisting of seven items to detect older adults with severe PDs for highly specialized mental health care. Psychometric properties of this tool were evaluated. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the questionnaire was characterized by sufficient diagnostic accuracy. Internal consistency of the tool was sufficient and inter-rater reliability was moderate.Conclusions:An age-specific tool to detect older adults with severe PDs was developed based on expert opinion. Psychometric properties were evaluated showing sufficient diagnostic accuracy. The tool may preliminarily be used in mental health care to detect older adults with severe PDs to refer them to highly specialized care in an early phase.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian McKenna ◽  
Jeremy Skipworth ◽  
Krishna Pillai

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. H. Kiing ◽  
Heidi M. Feldman ◽  
Chris Ladish ◽  
Roopa Srinivasan ◽  
Craig L. Donnelly ◽  
...  

Developmental, behavioral, and emotional issues are highly prevalent among children across the globe. Among children living in low- and middle-income countries, these conditions are leading contributors to the global burden of disease. A lack of skilled professionals limits developmental and mental health care services to affected children globally. Collaborative Office Rounds are interprofessional groups that meet regularly to discuss actual cases from the participants' practices using a non-hierarchical, peer-mentoring approach. In 2017, International Interprofessional Collaborative Office Rounds was launched with several goals: to improve the knowledge and skills of practicing child health professionals in high and low resourced settings regarding developmental and mental health care, to support trainees and clinicians in caring for these children, and to promote best practice in diagnosis and management of these conditions. Five nodes, each comprised of 3–4 different sites with an interprofessional team, from 8 countries in North America, Africa, Asia, and South America met monthly via videoconferencing. This report describes and evaluates the first 2 years' experience. Baseline surveys from participants (N = 141) found that 13 disciplines were represented. Qualitative analysis of 51 discussed cases, revealed that all cases were highly complex. More than half of the cases (N = 26) discussed children with autism or traits of autism and almost all (N = 49) had three or more themes discussed. Frequently occurring themes included social determinants of health (N = 31), psychiatric co-morbidity (N = 31), aggression and self-injury (N = 25), differences with the healthcare provider (N = 17), cultural variation in accepting diagnosis or treatment (N = 19), and guidance on gender and sexuality issues (N = 8). Participants generally sought recommendations on next steps in clinical care or management. A survey of participants after year 1 (N = 47) revealed that 87% (N = 41) had expectations that were completely or mostly met by the program. Our experience of regular meetings of interprofessional groups from different countries using distance-learning technology allowed participants to share on overlapping challenges, meet continuing educational needs while learning about different approaches in high- and low-resourced settings. International Interprofessional Collaborative Office Rounds may prove a useful strategy for increasing the work force capacity for addressing developmental, behavioral, and emotional conditions worldwide. More systematic studies are needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Daigle ◽  
Abraham Rudnick

This paper presents an organizational (ambulatory) case study of shifting mental health care from in-person to remote service delivery due to the current (COVID-19) pandemic as a rapid quality improvement initiative. Remotely delivered mental health care, particularly using synchronous video and phone, has been shown to be cost-effective, especially for rural service users. Our provincial specialized mental health clinic rapidly shifted to such remote delivery during the current pandemic. We report on processes and outputs of this rapid quality improvement initiative, which serves a purpose beyond pandemic circumstances, such as improving access to such specialized mental health care for rural and other service users at any time. In conclusion, shifting specialized mental health care from in-person to remotely delivered services as much as possible could be beneficial beyond the current pandemic. More research is needed to optimize the implementation of such a shift.


Medical Care ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1099-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet R. Hankin ◽  
Larry G. Kessler ◽  
Irving D. Goldberg ◽  
Donald M. Steinwachs ◽  
Barbara H. Starfield

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 428-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh Griffiths

This paper will outline some of the long-standing problems and new challenges facing acute in-patient care, some of the recommendations for change and various difficulties encountered in trying to improve the situation. It will describe how a collaborative approach (led by the Northern Centre for Mental Health, the Centre for Best Practice in Leicester and both the Northern and Yorkshire and the Trent regional offices) can bring about tangible and measurable change for the better and what lessons there may be for the management and delivery of mental health care in the future.


2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Margret Scheil

Individual Program Planning is an action research tool that facilitates consumer-oriented service provision. It is basedon four guiding principles to promote constructive interaction between consumers, significant others and services.Agreements for action are cooperatively developed in relation to the identification of issues. These are documented andmonitored in the form of ongoing meetings. The process supports coordination and accountability of activity betweenthose significant to treatment outcome across the continuum of care.


2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 375-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narmandakh Altanzul ◽  
Luvsandorj Erdenebayar ◽  
Chee Ng ◽  
Sandag Byambasuren ◽  
Nalin Sharma ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document