Comparison of ranibizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser in treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 690-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelda Buyru Özkurt ◽  
Sezen Akkaya ◽  
Sibel Aksoy ◽  
Mert Hakan Şimşek
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: To compare the effects of intravitreal ranibizumab injection and yellow (577 nm) subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in patients with macular edema following non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion. Methods: The medical records of 51 patients who underwent intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 mg) injection or subthreshold micropulse laser for the treatment of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion were retrospectively reviewed. Subthreshold micropulse laser was administered with a 10% duty cycle, 100 μm spot diameter, 200 ms exposure time. The patients received an injection or laser treatment at baseline and were, then, retreated as needed and were followed for 12 months. The mean best corrected visual acuity changes over the follow-up and the decrease in the mean central macular thickness were evaluated. Results: A total of 27 and 24 patients were assigned to intravitreal ranibizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser subgroups, respectively. The mean number of treatment was 3.81 of intravitreal ranibizumab group and 1.5 of subthreshold micropulse laser group (p < 0.05). The subgroups were similar with regard to the mean score of best corrected visual acuity at baseline, at 1, 6, and 12 months (p > 0.05). The decrease in the mean central macular thickness was significant in both intravitreal ranibizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser groups at 1, 6, and 12 months than that of values at baseline (p < 0.05). No new ocular or systemic adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Our study results showed that intravitreal ranibizumab or yellow subthreshold micropulse laser treatment for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion was not found to be superior to each other for reducing macular thickness and increasing visual acuity for 1-year period. Based on these results, subthreshold micropulse laser may be a useful alternative approach in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Macular vessel reduction as predictor for recurrence of macular oedema requiring repeat intravitreal ranibizumab injection in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (10) ◽  
pp. 1367-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiji Hasegawa ◽  
Yohei Takahashi ◽  
Ichiro Maruko ◽  
Akiko Kogure ◽  
Tomohiro Iida
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Macular Oedema ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Initial Visit ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
The Mean

AimTo determine whether there are factors that can predict the frequency of recurrences of macular oedema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of 31 eyes with treatment-naïve macular oedema associated with BRVO. All eyes received an intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injection and were followed with a pro re nata protocol for at least 12 months. A reinjection of ranibizmab was performed when the central foveal thickness was ≥300 µm. At 1 month after IVR injection, the macular vessel reduction was calculated by comparing the vessel density in the optical coherence tomography angiography in the BRVO involved half to that in the non-involved half.ResultsThe mean visual acuity improved from 0.35±0.27 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) units (20/45; Snellen) at initial visit to 0.06±0.15 logMAR units (20/23) at 12 months (p<0.0001). During 12 months, the mean number of IVR injections was 3.8±1.8. Multivariate regression analysis showed that a greater macular vessel reduction at 1 month after initial IVR injection was significantly a negative predictor of frequency of IVR injections (β=−0.5065, p=0.0082). The visual acuity and the central foveal thickness at the initial visit or at 1 month after initial IVR injection were not predictive factors for frequency of IVR injections.ConclusionsPatients with BRVO with a large macular vessel reduction at 1 month after an initial IVR injection have fewer recurrences and thus lower frequency of IVR injections during 12 months.

scholarly journals Visual acuity after intravitreal ranibizumab with and without laser therapy in the treatment of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion: a 12-month retrospective analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1565-1570
Author(s):  
Reiko Umeya ◽  
◽  
Toshimitsu Kasuga ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Interaction Terms ◽  
Vein Occlusion

AIM: To identify factors contributing to visual improvement after treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and to assess the interaction between laser therapy and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had been treated for BRVO-related ME at our hospital. Records were traceable for at least 12mo, and evaluated factors included age, sex, medical history, smoking history, treatment methods, foveal hemorrhage, and change in visual acuity. Treatments included laser therapy, IVR, sub-Tenon’s capsule injection of triamcinolone (STTA), a combination, or no intervention. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and interaction terms were used to assess the clinical efficacy of the treatments, and odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (34 men, 39 women; 73 eyes) with a mean age of 69.4±12.1y were included. Patients who underwent IVR monotherapy, laser monotherapy, and STTA+laser had significantly higher best corrected visual acuity at 12mo compared to baseline (P<0.001, <0.001, and 0.019, respectively). Logistic regression analysis without interaction terms found that IVR was a significant visual acuity recovery factor (adjusted OR: 3.89, 95%CI: 1.25-12.1, P=0.019). Adjusted OR using an interaction model by logistic regression was 16.6 (95%CI: 2.54-108.47, P=0.003) with IVR treatment, and 8.25 (95%CI: 1.34-50.57, P=0.023) with laser treatment. No interaction was observed (adjusted OR: 0.07, 95%CI: 0.01-0.75, P=0.029). CONCLUSION: IVR contributes to improvements in visual acuity at 12mo in ME secondary to BRVO. No interaction is observed between laser therapy and IVR treatments.

scholarly journals Relationship between metamorphopsia and inner retinal microstructure following intravitreal ranibizumab injection for branch retinal vein occlusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimi Sugiura ◽  
Fumiki Okamoto ◽  
Tomoya Murakami ◽  
Shohei Morikawa ◽  
Takahiro Hiraoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Number Of Injections

AbstractTo evaluate the effects of intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) on metamorphopsia in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and to assess the relationship between metamorphopsia and inner retinal microstructure and other factors. Thirty-three treatment-naïve eyes of 33 patients with macular edema caused by BRVO with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. The degree of metamorphopsia was quantified using the M-CHARTS. Retinal microstructure was assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) at the first month after resolution of the macular edema (early DRIL) and at 12 months after treatment (after DRIL) was studied. Central retinal thickness (CRT), and status of the external limiting membrane as well as ellipsoid zone were also evaluated. IVR treatment significantly improved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CRT, but the mean metamorphopsia score did not improve even after 12 months. Post-treatment metamorphopsia scores showed a significant correlation with pre-treatment metamorphopsia scores (P < 0.005), the extent of early DRIL (P < 0.05) and after DRIL (P < 0.05), and the number of injections (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the post-treatment mean metamorphopsia score was significantly correlated with the pre-treatment mean metamorphopsia score (P < 0.05). IVR treatment significantly improved BCVA and CRT, but not metamorphopsia. Post-treatment metamorphopsia scores were significantly associated with pre-treatment metamorphopsia scores, the extent of DRIL, and the number of injections. Prognostic factor of metamorphopsia was the degree of pre-treatment metamorphopsia.

scholarly journals Ranibizumab in Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion – 24 Months Of Treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-198
Author(s):  
Markéta Středová ◽  
Alexandr Stepanov ◽  
Jan Studnička ◽  
Jana Nekolová ◽  
Naďa Jirásková
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Common Clinical Practice ◽  
Baseline Visual Acuity ◽  
Ranibizumab Treatment

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab treatment for macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retina vein occlusion (BRVO) after 24 months. Materials and Methods: This study included 39 eyes of 39 patients with ME associated with BRVO treated at the Ophthalmology Department of Faculty Hospital in Hradec Kralove. The average age of included patiens was 69,3 years, the mean duration of symptoms before treament was 5,4 months, the mean baseline visual acuity (VA) was 54,6 ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letters, the mean baseline central retinal thickness (CRT) was 544,9 μm. At 64,1% patients a retinal laserphotocoagulation was performed before intravitreal ranibizumab. After one year, the study was discontinued by 17 patiens, the remaining 22 patients were observed for 24 months. Initially, there were 3 doses of intravitreal ranibizumab administered in monthly intervals, further injections were applied according to PRN (pro re nata) regiment. Patients were examined at baseline and then at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months from initiation of the treatment. In this study, the effect of ranibizumab on functional and morphological parameters of the affected eye was monitored, the safety of this treatment was also evaluated. During the follow-up, a statistically significant improvement in VA was achieved in every visit in comparison to baseline parameters, the mean VA gain at the 3 month visit was 12,1 ETDRS letters (p < 0,001), at 6 months 12,5 letters (p < 0,001), at 9 months 10,5 letters (p < 0,001), at 12 months 12,5 (p < 0,001), at 24 months 8,6 letters (p < 0,05). There was a statistically significant decrease in CRT as well in the 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months visits, namely 249,0 μm (p < 0,001), 185,2 μm (p < 0,001), 187,0 μm (p < 0,001), 214,8 μm (p < 0,001) and 205,2 μm (p < 0,001). The average number of doses administered to a patient was 4,9 within 12 months and 7,1 within 24 months. The treatment had greater effect in younger patients with shorter duration of symptoms and baseline VA of less than 55 ETDRS letters (6/24 or worse. Nor serious, neighter long-term adverse events occured, only occasional intraocular pressure elevation after intravitreal application was found. Conclusion: Our results from common clinical practice are consistent with the results of large clinial trials, we confirmed particularly good treatment efficacy in younger patients with shorter duration of macular edema and poorer baseline visual acuity. The safety of ranibizumab treatment was confirmed.

scholarly journals Subthreshold Micropulse Photocoagulation for Persistent Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion including Best-Corrected Visual Acuity Greater Than 20/40

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiji Inagaki ◽  
Kishiko Ohkoshi ◽  
Sachiko Ohde ◽  
Gautam A. Deshpande ◽  
Nobuyuki Ebihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Disease Onset ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Best Corrected Visual Acuity

To assess the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation (SMDLP) for persistent macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) > 20/40, thirty-two patients (32 eyes) with macular edema secondary to BRVO were treated by SMDLP. After disease onset, all patients had been followed for at least 6 months prior to treatment. Baseline Snellen visual acuity was used to categorize the eyes as BCVA ≤ 20/40 (Group I) or BCVA > 20/40 (Group II). Main outcome measures were reduction in central macular thickness (CMT) in optical coherence tomography (OCT) and BCVA at 6 months. In the total subject-pool at 6 months, BCVA had not changed significantly but CMT was significantly reduced. Group I exhibited no significant change in CMT at 3 months but exhibited significant reductions at 6 and 12 months. Group II exhibited a marginally significant reduction in CMT at 3 months and a significant reduction at 6 months. In patients with persistent macular edema secondary to BRVO, SMDLP appears to control macular edema with minimal retinal damage. Our findings suggest that SMDLP is an effective treatment method for macular edema in BRVO patients with BCVA > 20/40.

scholarly journals Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) pattern of macular edema and visual acuity in recent-onset branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in a tertiary hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 89-93
Author(s):  
Kiran Shakya ◽  
Ram Prasad Pokhrel ◽  
Om Krishna Malla
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Spectral Domain ◽  
Hypertensive Group ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Best Corrected Visual Acuity

Background: Macular edema is the common sight-threatening condition following branch retinal vein occlusion. Objective: To find spectral domain optical coherence tomography characteristics of macular involvement and visual acuity in the patients with branch retinal vein occlusion Methodology: This is a cross-sectional study; consecutive new cases of branch retinal vein occlusion diagnosed at the ophthalmology department of Kathmandu Medical College, Kathmandu were carried out from November 2016 to October 2017. All subjects were divided three groups with normotensive/controlled hypertension, stage 1 hypertension (systolic pressure >140 mm Hg or diastolic pressure >90mm Hg) and Stage 2 hypertension (systolic pressure >160 mm Hg or diastolic pressure >100 mm Hg).The macular edema was evaluated by taking best corrected visual acuity and spectral domain optical coherence tomography for measurement of central foveal thickness. Results: Forty patients with forty eyes were enrolled. Mean age was 58.5 years SD ± 9.98 years. Stage 1 and stage 2 hypertensive groups had significantly worse best corrected visual acuity and more thickness of central foveal thickness than normotensive/controlled group (p<0.001). The best corrected visual acuity and central foveal thickness were successively worse among normotensive group, stage 1 hypertensive group and stage 2 hypertensive group (between normotensive/controlled group and stage 1 hypertensive group, p = 0.032 and 0.002 respectively and between stage I hypertensive group and stage 2 hypertensive group, p= 0.013 and 0.09 respectively). Conclusion: Control of hypertension could be a main contributing measure to lower incidence of branch retinal vein occlusion and the severity of macular edema.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document