Baseline visual acuity and interdigitation zone as predictors in idiopathic epiretinal membranes: A retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212093209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Filipe Fernandes ◽  
Keissy Sousa ◽  
Inês Azevedo ◽  
Petra Gouveia ◽  
Gil Calvão-Santos ◽  
...  

Objective: Determine which functional and anatomical characteristics may be predictors of final visual acuity in patients with idiopathic ERM (iERM) submitted to pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with ERM and internal and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects: Patients with iERM submitted to PPV between 2016 and 2017. Methods: Data regarding the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the characteristics of the retinal layers observed in SD-OCT were collected preoperatively and until 12 months postoperatively. Central macular thickness (CMT), disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness, integrity of subfoveal external limiting membrane (ELM), ellipsoid zone (EZ), and interdigitation zone (IZ) were evaluated. Results: A total of 128 eyes with iERM from 121 patients were included. BCVA improved significantly ( p < 0.001). Significant improvement of BCVA, CMT, DRIL, ONL, ELM, and EZ were obtained. The final IZ was not different from baseline until the end of the study. A significant correlation was observed between the baseline BCVA, EZ, IZ, and the postoperative BCVA ( p < 0.001). However, only the baseline BCVA and the integrity of the subfoveal baseline IZ were predictive factors for final BCVA ( p < 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: PPV provides a significant improvement of BCVA and retinal anatomy recovery in iERM eyes. Baseline IZ didn’t change during the 12 months following surgery. Baseline BCVA and subfoveal IZ at baseline were prognostic factors for the final BCVA.

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e046264
Author(s):  
Abraham Olvera-Barrios ◽  
Michael Seltene ◽  
Tjebo F C Heeren ◽  
Ryan Chambers ◽  
Louis Bolter ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo examine the association of sociodemographic characteristics with attendance at diabetic eye screening in a large ethnically diverse urban population.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingScreening visits in the North East London Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (NELDESP).Participants84 449 people with diabetes aged 12 years or older registered in the NELDESP and scheduled for screening between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2018.Main outcome measureAttendance at diabetic eye screening appointments.ResultsThe mean age of people with diabetes was 60 years (SD 14.2 years), 53.4% were men, 41% South Asian, 29% White British and 17% Black; 83.4% attended screening. Black people with diabetes had similar levels of attendance compared with White British people. However, South Asian, Chinese and 'Any other Asian' background ethnicities showed greater odds of attendance compared with White British. When compared with their respective reference group, high levels of deprivation, younger age, longer duration of diabetes and worse visual acuity, were all associated with non-attendance. There was a higher likelihood of attendance per quintile improvement in deprivation (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.08), with increasing age (OR per decade, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.19), with better visual acuity (OR per Bailey-Lovie chart line 1.12; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.14) and with longer time of NELDESP registration (OR per year, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.03).ConclusionEthnic differences in diabetic eye screening uptake, though small, are evident. Despite preconceptions, a higher likelihood of screening attendance was observed among Asian ethnic groups when compared with the White ethnic group. Poorer socioeconomic profile was associated with higher likelihood of non-attendance for screening. Further work is needed to understand how to target individuals at risk of non-attendance and reduce inequalities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-69
Author(s):  
Mohammed Iqbal ◽  
Amr Mounir ◽  
Khaled Abd-Elaziz ◽  
Omar M. Said

Purpose: To evaluate long-term visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes of KeraRings intrastromal implantation combined with accelerated transepithelial cross-linking for management of different stages of progressive keratoconus. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 70 eyes of 70 patients with Amsler-Krumeich grades 1 to 4 keratoconus. They were divided into two groups: group-A included 37 eyes with grades 1-2 keratoconus, and group-B included 33 eyes with grades 3-4 keratoconus. Both groups underwent combined Keraring implantation with TCXL treatment. The main outcome measures included the preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, refraction, keratometry readings, and pachymetry. Results: At postoperative month 60, group-B exhibited significantly higher values of all mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere/cylinder/spherical equivalent/defocus equivalent (DEQ), and K1/K2/Kaverages/Kmax parameters compared to that of group A. However, group-A exhibited better stability of postoperative improvements. Keratoconus progression (KCP) was greater in group-B (45.5%) than group-A (10.8%). Two eyes revealed segments' migration while one eye showed tunnel vascularization and opacification with segments' migration. Conclusion: The diagnostic criteria of preoperative-KCP are not adequate for the diagnosis of postoperative-KCP following ICRS implantation. UDVA and K average posterior seemed to be more sensitive parameters than K max in documenting early postoperative-KCP. We suggest that deterioration of UDVA≥0.10 log MAR and/or K average posterior ≥0.25 D are highly suspicious of post-ring implantation keratoconus progression (PR-KCP). The occurrence of two of the following parameters: Kmax≥0.50 D, Kaverageanterior≥0.50 D, K average posterior ≥0.25 D, or pachymetry≥1.5% thinning, is diagnostic of PR-KCP. The occurrence of two or more of the following parameters: Kmax≥0.50 D, Kaverageanterior≥0.50 D, Kaverageposterior ≥0.25 D, pachymetry≥ 1.5% thinning or UDVA≥0.10 logMAR, is diagnostic of PR-KCP. We also suggest that Kmax≥0.75 D alone is diagnostic of PR-KCP.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1161
Author(s):  
Amrit K. Kamboj ◽  
Amandeep Gujral ◽  
Elida Voth ◽  
Daniel Penrice ◽  
Jessica McGoldrick ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Fustolo-Gunnink ◽  
R. Vlug ◽  
V. Smits-Wintjens ◽  
E. Heckman ◽  
A. Te Pas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document