The forearm basilic vein looped transposition fistula as a tertiary option for upper limb vascular access

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 596-601
Author(s):  
Maciej Zielinski ◽  
Nicholas Inston ◽  
Zbigniew Krasinski ◽  
Marcin Gabriel ◽  
Grzegorz Oszkinis
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
False Aneurysm ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Arterial Diameter ◽  
Male Predominance ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Introduction: The forearm basilic vein can serve as an option for haemodialysis access but may not be possible in cases where the wrist arteries are unsuitable. In this setting, the forearm basilic vein can be used in a looped transposition with a brachial artery anastomosis. Aims: The aims of this study were to assess the outcome of forearm basilic vein looped transposition as an option for vascular access. Material and methods: Data from January 2007 to December 2010 were prospectively collected and analysed. Outcome measures were operative success, complications, maturation and primary and secondary patency following 5 years of follow-up. Results: From a total of 583 patients receiving autologous vascular access for haemodialysis, 24 (4.1%) underwent a forearm basilic vein looped transposition. The median age was 60 years (range, 27–80 years), with a slight male predominance (13 male:11 female). Mean follow-up was 34 months (1–60 months). Two patients died and other three were transplanted with subsequent fistula closure. All procedures were successful (100%); however, maturation failure occurred in one case (4.2%). No serious perioperative complications were observed. In two cases, we observed late false aneurysm formation requiring intervention. Primary patency at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years was the following: 77%, 62%, 21% and 10%, whereas secondary patency was the following: 81%, 71%, 61% and 32%, respectively. Conclusion: Autologous forearm basilic vein looped transposition is an effective surgical procedure for the creation of access for haemodialysis. This may be a useful option in patients with compromised peripheral arterial diameter or flow and should be considered in patients with a suitable forearm basilic vein.

P1339ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA AND BASILIC VEIN TRANSPOSITION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS ON HEMODIALYSIS: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinant Bhargava ◽  
Priti Meena ◽  
Ambrish Satwik ◽  
Apurv Srivastava ◽  
A K Bhalla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Elderly Population ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
New Delhi ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background and Aims With the increase in the line expectancy of chronic kidney disease in the older population (>60 years), the numbers requiring haemodialysis is progressively rising. The elderly population may be different from the younger in terms of non-suitable vessels for access creation, non-maturation, and vascular calcifications, and this may alter the outcomes of use of arteriovenous fistula (AVF). This study was conducted to analyse the outcomes of AVF in elderly patients (>60 years). Method Retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Nephrology at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi. Patients of more than 60 years of age in whom AVF was created from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2016 were included in the study. Follow-up data of 3.5 years was analysed. The primary endpoint was to assess primary and secondary patency rates. Results A total of 300 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 63.8 years. Radiocephalic AVF (RCAVF) was the most common site of [69.8% (n = 210)], followed by brachiocephalic (BCAVF) in 25.2% (n = 75) and basilic vein transposition (BVT) in 5% (n = 15). At 12 months, overall survival of the AVF was 66.8%. At 42 months, the primary patency rate of RCAVF, BCAVF, and BVT was 50.6%, 52.6%, and 50.4% respectively. The commonest cause of access failure was thrombosis (20.4%) followed by non-maturation (9%). Vascular access abandonment was found least in BCAVF. Conclusion AVF remains the preferred vascular access for haemodialysis in the elderly population. Brachiocephalic AVF has higher primary and secondary patency rates. Thrombosis and failure of maturation are major concerns in the elderly AVF.

scholarly journals Two-stage forearm brachio-basilic loop arteriovenous graft for hemodialysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 146 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 316-319
Author(s):  
Branislav Donfrid ◽  
Olivera Lozance ◽  
Zvezdan Stefanovic ◽  
Aleksandar Jankovic ◽  
Nada Dimkovic
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Brachial Artery ◽  
Duplex Sonography ◽  
Distal Region ◽  
Original Method ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Chronic Hemodialysis ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Basilic Vein

Introduction. The autologous radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the best vascular access for patients on chronic hemodialysis. In some patients with inadequate blood vessels, it is necessary to create proximal AVF, or arteriovenous grafts. High percentage of primary graft failure is noted in cases where diameters of the brachial artery and the basilic vein are insufficient. The aim of this work was to introduce a new surgical technique for arteriovenous creation in patients with inadequate blood diameter. Case outline. The authors have proposed implantation of brachio-basilic polytetrafluoroethylene AV forearm loop graft in two acts. In the first act, the native brachio-basilic AVF was created in the distal region of the arm by side-to-end anastomosis. Three to four weeks after the first act, significant dilatation of brachial artery and basilic vein was noted (confirmed by the use of color duplex sonography technique). During the second act, polytetrafluourethylene graft was implanted by end-to-end anastomosis on the dilated basilica vein. Conclusion. AV graft that was created in two acts has sufficient blood flow without early or late complications. Primary patency was 30 months and secondary patency was 50 months. As an original method in the current literature, we recommend it in different clinical settings when there are no better alternatives for vascular access.

MILLER Banding Procedure for Treatment of Dialysis Access–Related Steal Syndrome, Pulmonary Hypertension, and Heart Failure

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110562
Author(s):  
Ahmad Alqassieh ◽  
Patrick B. Dennis ◽  
Veena Mehta ◽  
June Shi ◽  
Angello Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Dialysis Access ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Steal Syndrome

A Minimally Invasive Limited Ligation Endoluminal-assisted Revision (MILLER) banding procedure has been used for treating patients with dialysis access–related steal syndrome (DASS) and high-flow vascular access–related pulmonary hypertension (PHT) and heart failure (HF). We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing the MILLER procedure performed for DASS, HF, and PHT from our Vascular Access Database from September 2017 to October 2019. Outcomes included primary patency of banding, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency, using time-to-event analyses with Kaplan-Meier curves and life tables to estimate 6- and 12-month rates. A total of 13 patients (6 men and 7 women, mean age 60 ± 14 years) underwent the MILLER procedure, 6 patients for DASS and 7 patients for pulmonary hypertension and heart failure (PHT/HF). Technical success was achieved in all patients. The longest duration of follow-up was 28 months (median 12 months [IQR 7, 19]). One patient died at 1 month after the intervention due to stroke. One patient developed access thrombosis of the graft 3 days after the procedure. Repeat banding was required in 1 patient 8 months after the first procedure. The 6-month primary patency rate of banding following this procedure was 83% while the 12-month rate was 66%. The 6- and 12-month secondary patency rates were 87% and 75%, respectively. The MILLER procedure can be performed for DASS and PHT/HF with improvement of symptoms and good long-term patency rates. Additional interventions to maintain patency and efficacy are required on long-term follow-up.

Comparison Between Transposed Brachiobasilic Fistula and Arteriovenous Graft for Upper Limb Arteriovenous Access in Patients on Hemodialysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 153857442096925
Author(s):  
Chen-Ting Cheng ◽  
Yuan-Chen Chang ◽  
Ka-Wai Tam ◽  
Yu-Chun Yen ◽  
Yu-Chen Ko
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Arteriovenous Graft ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Arteriovenous Access ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Background: Creating and maintaining a functioning arteriovenous access is essential for long-term hemodialysis patients. Transposed brachiobasilic fistula (BBF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) becomes an option when radiocephalic or brachiocephalic fistula cannot be created or fails. This study compared the patency and complications between BBFs and AVGs among patients on hemodialysis. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in Shuang Ho Hospital, Taiwan, from November 2015 to May 2020. All the operations were done by a single surgeon. Primary outcomes were primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency of the BBF and AVG groups. Secondary outcomes were incidence of complications and reinterventions. Results: Of the 144 consecutive patients, 20 and 124 patients underwent BBF and AVG creation, respectively. Median follow-up time was 19.2 months. Primary patency at 1 and 2 years were 67% and 19% in the BBF group and 44% and 16% in the AVG group (P = 0.126). Primary-assisted patency at 1 and 2 years were 82% and 54% in the BBF group and 54% and 30% in the AVG group (P = 0.012). Secondary patency at 1 and 2 years were 100% and 82% in the BBF group and 81% and 67% in the AVG group (P = 0.078). The incidence of complication was significantly higher in the AVG than in the BBF group (1.7 per patient-year vs 0.93, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Compared with the AVG group, BBF group showed better primary-assisted patency, less complication and intervention rates. Therefore, BBF is a reliable option for patients with exhausted cephalic veins if basilic vein is available for reconstruction.

scholarly journals Basilic Vein Transposition Used as a Tertiary Vascular Access for Hemodialysis: 15 Years of Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. OJCS.S34837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Róbert Novotný ◽  
Marcela Slavíková ◽  
Jaroslav Hlubocký ◽  
Petr Mitáš ◽  
Jan Hrubý ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Patient Database ◽  
Arteriovenous Access

Introduction The quality of the life in patients requiring long term hemodialysis is directly proportional to the long-term patency of their vascular access. Basilic vein transposition for vascular access (BAVA) represents a suitable option for creating a tertiary native vascular access for hemodialysis on the upper extremities for patients requiring long term hemodialysis. The purpose of the study is to compare BAVAs with arteriovenous grafts (AVG). Method Data collection was based on selecting all of the patients with BAVA created in the time period in between January 1996 and August 2011. A questionnaire was created and sent to the selected hemodialysis centers. The resulting set of data was statistically analyzed and evaluated. Results In the time period between 1 January 1996 and August 2011, arteriovenous access for hemodialysis was created in 6754 patients (7203 procedures in total). Out of these patients, 175 BAVAs were created. Our patient database of those undergoing the BAVA procedure consisted of 98 females (56%) and 77 males (44%) with an average age of 64.5 years. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 60% (105 patients). Primary patency after 12 months was 68.8%, 24 months 59.7%, 36 months 53.8, 48 months 53.8%, and 60 months 50%. Primary assisted patency after 12 months was 89.9%, 24 months 84.6%, 36 months 77.8%, 48 months 77.9%, 60 months 70.8%. Secondary patency after 12 months was 89.4%, 24 months 86.9%, 36 months 81%, 48 months 78.9%, 60 months 75.7%. Twenty-nine BAVAs (16.5%) were obliterated. Conclusion Patients benefit from this type of procedure due to the longer patency of a native arteriovenous access, as well as a lower incidence of infectious complications.

Long-Term Outcomes of Staged Basilic Vein Transposition for Hemodialysis Access in Children

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 366-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Kfoury ◽  
Christopher J. Demaree ◽  
Mun J. Poi ◽  
Jesus M. Matos ◽  
Carlos F. Bechara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Hemodialysis Access ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Av Fistula ◽  
Functional Maturation

Introduction Children requiring long-term hemodialysis often face significant challenges due to their young age and small-vessel caliber for arteriovenous (AV) access creation. In this study, we report our experience of staged basilic vein transposition (BVT) in pediatric patients. Methods All patients undergoing staged BVT at a tertiary care pediatric hospital from 2003 to 2015 were reviewed. Indications for staged BVT included inadequate cephalic conduit or failed AV fistula using cephalic vein. Pertinent clinical variables were analyzed to determine treatment outcomes. Results Forty-two children (24 males, 57%) underwent 46 staged BVT during the study period. Median age was 12.8 ± 4.8 years (range 3-18). The mean weight was 47 ± 5.1 kg (range, 13-126 kg), with four children (10%) weighing ≤20 kg. Mean operative times for initial brachiobasilic AV fistula and staged BVT were 39 ± 12 minutes and 66 ± 17 minutes, respectively. Mean follow-up period was 5.4 ± 1.8 years. Functional maturation was achieved in 93% of BVTs. Early fistula thrombosis within 30 days following BVT occurred in four patients (10%). Late BVT thrombosis occurred in 13 patients (31%). Primary patency rates at 2 years and 4 years were 78% and 72%, respectively. Secondary patency rates at 2 years and 4 years were 86% and 82%, respectively. Conclusions Staged BVT is a durable and reliable autologous hemodialysis access in children who do not have adequate cephalic venous conduit.

Endovascular bypass for salvage of vascular access in hemodialysis catheter-consigned patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 585-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Chiung-Yu Chen ◽  
Mei-Jui Weng ◽  
Huei-Lung Liang
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Hemodialysis Catheter ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: This study was performed to retrospectively assess the efficacy of percutaneous creation of an intervascular bypass with or without stent graft deployment (endovascular bypass) for salvage of abandoned vascular access sites in hemodialysis catheter-consigned patients. Methods: Salvage of abandoned vascular access sites was attempted in 16 patients with hemodialysis catheters. These vascular access sites were salvaged using endovascular bypass techniques to redirect the access flow to a nonarterialized vein as a new outflow conduit or cannulation segment. The postintervention primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates of the access site and bypass were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The procedural and clinical success rates were both 100%. The postintervention primary patency rate of the bypass and access site at 360 days was 75.7 ± 12.5% and 56.8 ± 14.9%, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 461.9 days (range: 121–900 days). No major complications were observed. One bare bypass tunnel rupture and one pseudoaneurysm were noted during the procedure. Conclusion: Salvage of abandoned vascular access sites for hemodialysis catheter-consigned patients can be technically feasible and clinically successful using endovascular bypass techniques in selected patients when surgical revision is not considered or is not possible.

scholarly journals Simultaneous Hybrid Treatment of Multilevel Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2865
Author(s):  
Felice Pecoraro ◽  
David Pakeliani ◽  
Salvatore Bruno ◽  
Ettore Dinoto ◽  
Francesca Ferlito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Common Femoral Artery ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Background: Hybrid treatments (HT) aim to reduce conventional open surgery invasiveness and address multilevel peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Herein, the simultaneous HT treatment in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is reported. Methods: Retrospective analysis, for the period from May 2012 to April 2018, of patients presenting multilevel PAD with CLTI addressed with simultaneous HT. The outcomes of these interventions were measured the following metrics: early technical successes (within 30 days following treatment) and late technical successes (30 days or more following treatment) and included mortality, morbidity symptoms recurrence, and amputation. Survival and patencies were estimated. The median follow-up was 43.77 months. Results: In the 45 included patients, the HT consisted of femoral bifurcation patch angioplasty followed by an endovascular treatment in 38 patients (84.4%) and endovascular treatment followed by a surgical bypass in 7 patients (15.6%). Technical success was 100% without perioperative mortality. Eight (17.8%) patients presented early complications without major amputations. During the follow-up, seven (15.6%) deaths occurred and six patients (13.3%) experienced symptoms recurrence, with five of those patients requiring major amputation. An estimated survival time of 5 years, primary patency, and secondary patency was 84.4%, 79.2%, and 83.3% respectively. Conclusions: Hybrid treatments are effective in addressing patients presenting with multilevel PAD and CLTI. The common femoral artery involvement influences strategy selection. Larger studies with longer-term outcomes are required to validate the hybrid approach, indications, and results.

A retrospective review of basilic and cephalic vein-based fistulas

Vascular ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anantha K Ramanathan ◽  
Nader D Nader ◽  
Maciej L Dryjski ◽  
Hasan H Dosluoglu ◽  
Gregory S Cherr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Cephalic Vein ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Maturation Time ◽  
Hospital System

This study compares outcomes of basilic and cephalic vein fistulas for hemodialysis. A retrospective review of arteriovenous fistulas in a university hospital system was performed using charts and hemodialysis records. Patency and demographic data were assessed with life table analysis. One hundred fifty-six patients (88 males; 68 females) underwent creation of 172 autogenous fistulas (mean age 61 years; mean follow-up 78 weeks). There were 101 basilic vein transpositions and 71 cephalic vein fistulas. Primary patency did not differ significantly, while assisted primary patency was significantly better for basilic vein fistulas at one year (73% versus 53%: P = 0.024). Secondary patency was significantly better for basilic fistulas through three years (58% versus 52%; P = 0.027). Primary failure (thrombosis before access or failed maturation) was significantly higher for cephalic than basilic fistulas (28% versus 13%; P = 0.01). Maturation time, usage time and complications were not significantly significant. Thirty-three (33%) basilic vein-based fistulas and 12 (17%) cephalic vein fistulas required revision during follow-up. Basilic vein-based fistulas perform as well as or better than cephalic vein-based fistulas in terms of patency, maturation time, and usage time and complication rates, though requiring more re-interventions.

Evaluation of heparin-bonded ePTFE grafts for forearm loop vascular access: Comparison between Gore® PROPATEN vascular graft and ACUSEAL vascular graft

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982199852
Author(s):  
Takeshi Baba ◽  
Takao Ohki ◽  
Koji Maeda ◽  
Eisaku Ito ◽  
Masamichi Momose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Vascular Graft ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Arteriovenous Graft ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Group A ◽  
Different Characteristics

Background: This retrospective study evaluates the clinical outcomes of two heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts, PROPATEN and ACUSEAL (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA), for forearm loop vascular access. Methods: We prospectively collected data on 60 patients who had undergone arteriovenous graft of the forearm loop type between January 2015 and December 2019. The primary endpoints were graft primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates. Secondary endpoints were time to first cannulation and postoperative complications. Results: We enrolled 36 patients in the PROPATEN group (Group P) and 24 in the ACUSEAL group (Group A). All procedures were successful without any 30-day mortality. The median times to first cannulation were 16.5 days and 3 days in Groups P and A, respectively ( p < 0.001). Mean follow-up periods were 13.4 ± 14.5 and 17.3 ± 9.3 months, respectively. Primary patency rates were 81% and 64%, respectively, at 6 months, and 60% and 40%, respectively, at 12 months ( p = 0.008). Assisted primary patency rates were 96% and 83% at 6 months, 91% and 73% at 12 months, and 81% and 35% at 24 months ( p = 0.044). Secondary patency rates were 96% and 81% at 12 months, and 87% and 62% at 24 months ( p = 0.207). As a remote-period complication, disruption of the luminal layer of the graft was observed in two patients (4.2%) in Group A due to puncture and thrombectomy. Conclusions: Although the ACUSEAL graft offers the advantage of early cannulation, its primary and assisted primary patency outcomes were inferior to those of the PROPATEN graft. It is important for physicians to be aware of the different characteristics of each graft to select the best option for each patient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document