Central venous catheters and arrhythmia: Two unusual cases

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982091532
Author(s):  
R Haridian Sosa Barrios ◽  
David Lefroy ◽  
Damien Ashby ◽  
Neill Duncan
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
High Velocity ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Fluoroscopic Guidance ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Insertion Procedure ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Tip Position

Jugular Tesio lines (TesioCaths; MedCOMP, Harleysville, PA, USA) are frequently used as permanent vascular accesses in haemodialysis patients. During the insertion procedure, arrhythmias are a relatively common complication, usually related to an excessively advanced catheter tip, without major consequences. We present two cases of life-threatening arrhythmias triggered by the Tesio catheter eccentric high-velocity jet of blood resolved after reposition of the catheter without further episodes, despite both lines being inserted under real-time ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance. We believe dialysis lines should be checked for tip position even when long-standing to prevent relevant complications due to catheter sliding.

scholarly journals Do You Know Your Lines?

2017 ◽  
Vol 01 (03) ◽  
pp. 161-167
Author(s):  
Vamsidhar Rachapalli ◽  
Pankaj Sharma ◽  
Sheo Kumar ◽  
Mangerira Uthappa
Keyword(s):  
Interventional Procedure ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Due Diligence ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Skin Antisepsis ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Patient Preparation ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
The Right

AbstractThe use of central venous catheters has become ubiquitous in the clinical practice. While a majority of them are easy to insert, many consider it a mundane interventional procedure. However, it is important to ensure that the right catheter is selected for the right patient. In addition, due diligence should be observed during site selection and catheter securement. This article briefly but concisely covers various aspects of venous catheter insertion ranging from catheter selection, patient preparation, choice of skin antisepsis to catheter tip position. This article, however, does not deal with the actual steps involved in the insertion of various catheters.

Ideal Position of Central Venous Catheters: Length of Catheter in Relation to Height of Patient

1994 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-89
Author(s):  
Kanchi Muralidhar ◽  
Krishna Acharya ◽  
Prasantha Dash
Keyword(s):  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Seldinger Technique ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Ideal Position ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Group A ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Right

One hundred patients of either sex undergoing elective cardiac operation were divided randomly into 2 groups. In both groups, the right internal jugular vein was cannulated using the Seldinger technique and multilumen central venous catheters. The length of catheter inserted in Group A was height of the patient in centimeters divided by 10, and Group B height in centimeters divided by 12. Ideal catheter tip position could be obtained in 94% of the patients in Group B, but only 36% in Group A ( p < 0.001).

A bedside rescue method for retrieving retained guidewires: The ‘Suck Out’ technique

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982094345
Author(s):  
Maryanne Z A Mariyaselvam ◽  
Vikesh Patel ◽  
Adam Sawyer ◽  
James A Richardson ◽  
Jonathan Dean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Patient Harm ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Never Event ◽  
Benchtop Model

Background: Central venous catheter guidewire retention is classed as a ‘never event’ in the United Kingdom, with the potential for significant patient harm. If the retained guidewire remains within the central venous catheter lumen, bedside techniques may facilitate guidewire retrieval. However, these techniques may be ineffective if the guidewire has already passed below skin level. We investigated a novel ‘suck out’ technique for bedside guidewire retrieval and compared this against traditional retrieval methods. Methods: Simulation 1: in a benchtop model, seven different central venous catheters had their corresponding guidewire placed in the last 2 cm of the catheter tip which was immersed horizontally in fluid. A 50-mL syringe was attached to the distal lumen central venous catheter hub and suction applied for 5 s, and the distance of guidewire retraction was recorded. Simulation 2: a central venous catheter guidewire was intentionally retained within the catheter at either 5 cm above or below skin level in a pigskin model. Simple catheter withdrawal, catheter clamping withdrawal and the ‘suck out’ method were compared for efficacy using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Simulation 1: retained guidewires were retracted by 13 cm on average. Simulation 2: when guidewires were retained 5 cm above skin level, all retrieval methods were 100% effective; however, when retained 5 cm below skin level, simple catheter withdrawal was ineffective, clamping and withdrawal was only 10% effective and the ‘suck out’ technique was 90% effective (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The ‘suck out’ technique can effectively retract guidewires retained within central venous catheter lumens and demonstrates superiority over traditional methods of retained guidewire extraction in simulated models.

scholarly journals The Position of Central Venous Catheters Inserted through Arm Veins: A Preliminary Report

1974 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Woods ◽  
Jean Lumley ◽  
W. J. Russell ◽  
R. D. Jack
Keyword(s):  
Preliminary Report ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Blood ◽  
Open Heart Surgery ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Open Heart ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Venous Blood ◽  
Catheter Tip

Fifty-three central venous catheters were followed up by radiography or direct observation during open-heart surgery. Forty of these were satisfactorily positioned for recording central venous pressure or for sampling central venous blood. Radiography showed that the catheter tip was in an unsatisfactory position in 21 per cent of cases. It is recommended that radiographic confirmation of the site of the catheter tip be obtained as a routine and if necessary the catheter can be re-positioned and another radiograph taken.

Precision in Central Venous Catheter Tip Placement: A Review of the Literature

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 112-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Hostetter ◽  
Nadine Nakasawa ◽  
Kim Tompkins ◽  
Bradley Hill
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
Landmark Technique ◽  
The Ideal

Abstract Background: Long term venous catheters have been used to deliver specialized therapies since 1968. The ideal tip position of a central venous catheter provides reliable venous access with optimal therapeutic delivery, while minimizing short-and long-term complications. Ideal position limits have evolved and narrowed over time, making successful placement difficult and unreliable when depending exclusively on the landmark technique. Objective: To review and analyze contemporary literature and calculate an overall accuracy rate for first attempt placement of a PICC catheter in the ideal tip position. Methods: Key PICC placement terms were used to search the database PubMED-indexed for MEDLINE in June and October, 2009. The selection of studies required: a patient cohort without tip placement guidance technology; a documented landmark technique to place catheter tips; data documenting initial catheter placement and, that the lower third of the SVC and the cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) were included in the placement criteria. With few exceptions, articles written between 1993 and 2009 met the stated selection criteria. A composite of outcomes associated with tip placement was analyzed, and an overall percent proficiency of accurate catheter tip placement calculated. Results: Nine studies in eight articles met the selection criteria and were included for analysis. Rates of first placement success per study ranged from 39% to 75%, with the majority (7/9) being single center studies. The combined overall proficiency of these studies calculated as a weighted average was 45.87%.

scholarly journals A Study of Malposition of Central Venous Catheter – A Comparative Study between Ultrasound Guided and Anatomical Landmark Technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-281
Author(s):  
Lalit Kumar Rajbanshi ◽  
Sambhu Bahadur Karki ◽  
Batsalya Arjyal
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Internal Jugular Vein ◽  
Subclavian Vein ◽  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Anatomical Landmark ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Landmark Technique

Introduction: Central venous catheterization is a routine procedure for long-term infusion therapy and central venous pressure measurement. Sometimes, the catheter tip may be unintentionally placed at the position other than the junction of superior vena cava and right atrium. This is called malposition and can lead to erroneous pressure measurement, increase risk of thrombosis, venous obstruction or other life threatening complications like pneumothorax, cardiac temponade.Objectives: This study aimed to observe the incidence of the malposition and compare the same between ultrasound guided catheterization and blind anatomical landmark technique.Methodology: This study was a prospective comparative study conducted at the intensive care unit of Birat Medical College and Teaching Hospital for two-year duration. All the catheterizations were done either with the use of real time ultrasound or blind anatomical landmark technique. The total numbers of central venous catheterization, the total incidences of malposition were observed. Finally the incidences were compared between real time ultrasound guided technique and blind anatomical landmark technique.Results: In two-year duration of the study, a total of 422 central venous cannulations were successfully done. The real time ultrasound was used for 280 cannulations while blind anatomical landmark technique was used for 162 patients. The study observed various malposition in 36 cases (8.5%). The most common malposition was observed for subclavian vein to ipsilateral internal jugular vein (33.3%) followed by subclavian to subclavian vein (27.8%) and internal jugular to ipsilateral subclavian vein (16.7%). In four patients the catheter had a reverse course in the internal jugular vein while the tip was placed in pleural cavity in three cannulations. There was coiling of the catheter inside left subclavian vein in one patient. The malposition was significantly reduced with the use of the real time ultrasound (P< 0.001). However there is no significant difference in the incidence of the various malposition between ultrasound guidance technique and blind anatomical landmark technique when compared individually.Conclusion: The malposition of the central venous catheter tip was common complication with the overall incidence of 8.5%. The most common malposition was subclavian vein to internal jugular vein. The use of real time ultrasound during the catheterization procedure can significantly reduced the risk of malposition.Birat Journal of Health SciencesVol.2/No.3/Issue 4/Sep- Dec 2017, Page: 277-281

A New Formula-Based Measurement Guide for Optimal Positioning of Central Venous Catheters

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phllip Lum
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Insertion Sites ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
New Formula ◽  
Percutaneous Insertion

Abstract Purpose: To validate the formula-based central venous catheter (CVC) length measurement “tailored” to individual's height and access site for predicting optimum SVC tip position. Method: A prospective study of 3 percutaneous insertion sites (PICC, SCC and JC). Formula-based “LUM'S CVC MEASUREMENT GUIDE” was used to determine the catheter length. Results: Overall, 97% (373) of the total 382 insertions were successfully placed with CVC tip in the distal SVC (SVC between carina and atrio-cava junction) location. Conclusion: The “tailored fit” formula to individual patient height is a reliable tool to predict CVC length. Appropriate catheter length can greatly reduce the guesswork and possibility of complications related to tip malposition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document