Use of intracavitary-ECG for tip location of femorally inserted central catheters

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982098286
Author(s):  
Mark D Weber ◽  
Adam S Himebauch ◽  
Thomas Conlon
Keyword(s):  
Ultrasound Guidance ◽  
Case Series ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Complementary Method ◽  
Wave Characteristics ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Central Access ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
Central Catheters

Femorally inserted central catheters (FICCs) are frequently required for central access in children. Ultrasound can accurately locate the catheter tip in most cases and its use is increasing in clinical vascular access practice. In patients with poor acoustic windows, intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC-ECG) is an alternative to ultrasound-guidance for FICC positioning. A case series of three patients demonstrate methods of FICC positioning in children. The first patient had excellent acoustic windows and ultrasound-guided FICC positioning is described in conjunction with IC-ECG measurements. The following two patients had poor acoustic windows, thus IC-ECG guided FICC tip position. The use of FICCs in children has increased in recent years. Ultrasound has emerged as a reliable method of assessing FICC tip location. IC-ECG is an accurate and complementary method of assessing FICC tip location, but can be a primary method when ultrasound is not available or cannot directly visualize the catheter. IC-ECG P-wave characteristics identify optimal tip position at the inferior cavoatrial junction and are different from characteristics at the superior cavoatrial junction.

The diagnostic value of intracavitary electrocardiogram for verifying tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters in cancer patients: A retrospective multicenter study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 636-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Yu ◽  
Ligui Wu ◽  
Ling Yuan ◽  
Robert Dawson ◽  
Rongmei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
P Wave ◽  
Wave Surface ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
Surface Electrocardiogram ◽  
Central Catheters ◽  
Retrospective Multicenter Study

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of intracavitary electrocardiogram for verifying tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters in cancer patients during follow-up period. Methods: From March 2015 to October 2015, 126 patients involved in eight hospitals who underwent peripherally inserted central catheter placement received intracavitary electrocardiogram and chest X-ray to verify position of the catheter tip during follow-up period. Their intracavitary electrocardiogram was compared with surface electrocardiogram to judge catheter tip landing zone in one of three different anatomical zones. The amplitude of intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave and the ratio of intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave/surface electrocardiogram P wave were measured and showed correlation with catheter tip position confirmed by chest X-ray. Based on chest X-ray principle, all the cases were assigned into three intracavitary electrocardiogram groups to explore the optimal cut-off values for intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave and intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave/surface electrocardiogram P wave by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic. Results: No technique-related complications or adverse events occurred in this study. The matching rate between intracavitary electrocardiogram and chest X-ray method was 93.7%. The optimal cut-off values for intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave were set from 3.15 to 3.75 mV, and intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave/surface electrocardiogram P wave from 1.65 to 3.25. Conclusions: It is demonstrated in this retrospective multicenter study that the intracavitary electrocardiogram method for verifying tip position of peripherally inserted central catheter during follow-up period is feasible and accurate in all adult patients with cancer.

Real-time ultrasound-guided placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheter without fluoroscopy

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 609-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soshi Nakamuta ◽  
Toshihiro Nishizawa ◽  
Shiori Matsuhashi ◽  
Arata Shimizu ◽  
Toshio Uraoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Ultrasound Guidance ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Central Catheters

Background and aim: Malposition of peripherally inserted central catheters placed at the bedside is a well-recognized phenomenon. We report the success rate of the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters with ultrasound guidance for tip positioning and describe the knacks and pitfalls. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical case charts of 954 patients who received peripherally inserted central catheter procedure. Patient clinical data included success rate of puncture, detection rate of tip malposition with ultrasonography, adjustment rate after X-ray, and success rate of peripherally inserted central catheter placement. Results: The success rate of puncture was 100% (954/954). Detection rate of tip malposition with ultrasonography was 82.1% (78/95). The success rate of ultrasound-guided tip navigation was 98.2% (937/954). The success rate of ultrasound-guided tip location was 98.0% (935/954). Adjustment rate after X-ray was 1.79% (17/952). The final success rate of peripherally inserted central catheter placement was 99.8% (952/954). Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance for puncturing and tip positioning is a promising option for the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters. Ultrasound guidance could dispense with radiation exposure and the transfer of patients to the X-ray department.

Electrocardiography-controlled central venous catheter tip positioning in patients with atrial fibrillation

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 528-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Folkert Steinhagen ◽  
Maximilian Kanthak ◽  
Guido Kukuk ◽  
Christian Bode ◽  
Andreas Hoeft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
The Right

Introduction: A significant increase of the p-wave of a real-time intracavitary electrocardiography is a reliable and safe method to confirm the central venous catheter tip position close to the atrium. However, conflicting data about the feasibility of electrocardiography exist in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: An observational prospective case–control cohort study was set up to study the feasibility and accuracy of the electrocardiography-controlled central venous catheter tip placement in 13 patients with atrial fibrillation versus 10 patients with sinus rhythm scheduled for elective surgery. Each intervention was crosschecked with ultrasound-guided positioning via right supraclavicular fossa view and chest radiography. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular venipuncture of the right subclavian vein and guidewire advancement were performed. A B-mode view of the superior vena cava and the right pulmonary artery was obtained to visualize the J-tip of the guidewire. The central venous catheter was advanced over the guidewire and the electrocardiography was derived from the J-tip of the guidewire protruding from the central venous catheter tip. Electrocardiography was read for increased p- and atrial fibrillation waves, respectively, and insertion depth was compared with the ultrasound method. Results: Electrocardiography indicated significantly increasing fibrillation and p-waves, respectively, in all patients and ultrasound-guided central venous catheter positioning confirmed a tip position within the lower third of the superior vena cava. Conclusion: Electrocardiography-guided central venous catheter tip positioning is a feasible real-time method for patients with atrial fibrillation. Combined with ultrasound, the electrocardiography-controlled central venous catheter placement may eliminate the need for postinterventional radiation exposure.

scholarly journals PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETERS IN ORTHOPEDIC PATIENTS: EXPERIENCE FROM 1023 PROCEDURES

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
THAIS QUEIROZ SANTOLIM ◽  
ANDRÉ MATHIAS BAPTISTA ◽  
ARLETE MAZZINI MIRANDA GIOVANI ◽  
JUAN PABLO ZUMÁRRAGA ◽  
OLAVO PIRES DE CAMARGO
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Complete Information ◽  
Intravenous Therapy ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Long Course ◽  
Orthopedic Patients ◽  
Patients Experience ◽  
Central Catheters ◽  
De Medicina

ABSTRACT Objectives The advantages of using a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in hospitalized patients make this device very important for intravenous therapy. This study describes the use of PICCs at the Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology at the Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo over the last 10 years. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 1,057 medical records and included 1,023 medical files with complete information on the punctured vein, diagnosis, duration of catheterization, complications, and catheter tip positioning. Results Seven hundred and twenty PICCs (70.4%) were considered successfully positioned, and mean duration of catheterization was 34.3 days. The basilic vein was used in 528 (51.6%) patients, while 157 (15.4%) catheters were removed due to complications. No cases of catheter-related thrombosis or infection were found. Eight hundred and sixty-six (84.6%) patients completed their treatment with PICC in place. Conclusion PICC is a safe intravenous device that can be successfully utilized for medium- and long-course intravenous therapy in hospitalized and discharged orthopedic patients. Level of Evidence IV; Case series.

scholarly journals Peripherally inserted central catheter in newborns: association of number of punctures, vein, and tip positioning

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thaís Aquino Carneiro ◽  
Keline Soraya Santana Nobre ◽  
Fernanda Cavalcante Fontenele ◽  
Ana Paula Melo Façanha ◽  
Roberta Pinheiro Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Data ◽  
Maternity Hospital ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Convenience Sampling ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
Central Catheters ◽  
Indications For Use

ABSTRACT Objective: to assess the use of peripherally inserted central catheters regarding the neonate’s profile, indications for use, and catheterized vein; the relation between the number of puncture attempts and vein; and assessment of the catheter tip position. Method: documentary, descriptive, retrospective, quantitative study, developed in a tertiary maternity hospital in Ceará. A total of 3,005 PICC insertion formularies was included and 1,583 were excluded due to incomplete data, with a convenience sampling of 1,422 insertions being obtained. Results: There were 1,200 (84.4%) newborns with gestational age below 37 weeks; 781 (54.9%) males; Apgar score above 7 in the first (628–44.2%) and fifth minutes (1,085–76.3%); and weight between 1,000 and 1,499 grams on the day of insertion (417–29.3%). Antibiotic therapy had 1,155–53.8% indications for insertion; the basilic was the most used vein (485–34.1%); basilic and cephalic veins had lower median puncture attempts and 1,124–79% insertions were centrally positioned. Conclusion: The results of this research highlight the continuous need to improve technical-scientific knowledge to qualify actions in neonatology.

Ultrasound to Localize the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Tip Position in Newborn Infants

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Ling Ren ◽  
Hong-Lei Li ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Ya-Juan Chen ◽  
Man Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Newborn Infants ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Ultrasound Localization ◽  
The Past ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
The Right ◽  
Central Catheters ◽  
The Ideal

Objective To evaluate the application of ultrasound for the localization of the tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in newborn infants. Study Design This study was a retrospective analysis on ultrasonic localization for PICC placement conducted in our department over the past 2 years. Ultrasonic localization was performed immediately after PICC placement in all neonatal patients. Successful PICC placement was confirmed if the PICC tip position was located at the inferior/superior cavoatrial junction. Chest X-ray localization was performed on 32 infants immediately after ultrasound examination to compare the accuracy of ultrasound localization. Results Of the 186 patients, 174 (93.5%) had successful PICC placement on the first attempt. In 11 (5.9%) patients, the catheter tip was placed beyond the ideal location as follows: too deep (in the right atrium) in 4 patients, too shallow in 4 patients, and malpositioned in 3 patients. Both the sensitivity and the specificity of ultrasound for identifying PICC tip localization were 100%. Complications occurred in 2.7% of this group of patients. Conclusion Ultrasonic localization of the PICC tip position is a timely, accurate, and reliable method and can identify the catheter tip with high accuracy. This method could be widely applied in neonatal wards.

scholarly journals Correct Positioning of the Venous Port-A-Cath Catheter: Comparison of Intravascular Electrocardiography Signal from Guidewire and Sodium Bicarbonate Flushed Catheter

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. I. Cheng ◽  
K. S. Chu ◽  
L. T. Chen ◽  
C. S. Tang
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Bicarbonate ◽  
Guide Wire ◽  
Wave Pattern ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Baseline Drift ◽  
Ecg Signals ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
A Prospective Study

A prospective study comparing the efficacy of wire-conducted intravascular ECG (IVECG) signal and signal from the port with a sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO 3 ) flushed catheter to correctly place a catheter tip was carried out in 100 patients. The correct position of the catheter tip was confirmed as follows: with technique G, the IVECG signal was conducted from a guide wire to identify the tip position. With technique P, the IVECG signal was conducted from the port with a NaHCO 3 (0.8 mmol/ml) flushed catheter to ascertain the tip position. Each patient received both technique G and technique P in a randomized sequence. The quality of IV-ECG signals, which included baseline drift, P wave pattern and QRS wave pattern, were assessed for ten seconds. Satisfactory quality of these IVECG signals was observed in all of the patients with technique P and 90 of the 100 patients with technique G, and this difference was significant (P=0.001). There was no obvious difference between the techniques in catheter tip placement time or the measured optimal catheter length. The incidence of atrial premature contractions was higher with technique G than with technique P (13% vs 2%; P=0.003). Therefore, technique P is a practical alternative for correctly placing the catheter tip of a Port-A-Cath.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document