Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 117693510700300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadège Dossat ◽  
Alain Mangé ◽  
Jérôme Solassol ◽  
William Jacot ◽  
Ludovic Lhermitte ◽  
...  

A key challenge in clinical proteomics of cancer is the identification of biomarkers that could allow detection, diagnosis and prognosis of the diseases. Recent advances in mass spectrometry and proteomic instrumentations offer unique chance to rapidly identify these markers. These advances pose considerable challenges, similar to those created by microarray-based investigation, for the discovery of pattern of markers from high-dimensional data, specific to each pathologic state (e.g. normal vs cancer). We propose a three-step strategy to select important markers from high-dimensional mass spectrometry data using surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) technology. The first two steps are the selection of the most discriminating biomarkers with a construction of different classifiers. Finally, we compare and validate their performance and robustness using different supervised classification methods such as Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Neural Networks, Classification Trees and Boosting Trees. We show that the proposed method is suitable for analysing high-throughput proteomics data and that the combination of logistic regression and Linear Discriminant Analysis outperform other methods tested.

Author(s):  
Ramia Z. Al Bakain ◽  
Yahya S. Al-Degs ◽  
James V. Cizdziel ◽  
Mahmoud A. Elsohly

AbstractFifty four domestically produced cannabis samples obtained from different USA states were quantitatively assayed by GC–FID to detect 22 active components: 15 terpenoids and 7 cannabinoids. The profiles of the selected compounds were used as inputs for samples grouping to their geographical origins and for building a geographical prediction model using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The proposed sample extraction and chromatographic separation was satisfactory to select 22 active ingredients with a wide analytical range between 5.0 and 1,000 µg/mL. Analysis of GC-profiles by Principle Component Analysis retained three significant variables for grouping job (Δ9-THC, CBN, and CBC) and the modest discrimination of samples based on their geographical origin was reported. PCA was able to separate many samples of Oregon and Vermont while a mixed classification was observed for the rest of samples. By using LDA as a supervised classification method, excellent separation of cannabis samples was attained leading to a classification of new samples not being included in the model. Using two principal components and LDA with GC–FID profiles correctly predict the geographical of 100% Washington cannabis, 86% of both Oregon and Vermont samples, and finally, 71% of Ohio samples.


Author(s):  
Ullrich Heilemann ◽  
Roland Schuhr

SummaryThis paper examines changes of the (West) German business cycle from 1958 to 2004. It starts with a multivariate linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based decomposition of the cycle into 4 phases (upswing, upper turning point, downswing, lower turning point). After examining inter-cyclical changes of the cycle, i.e. changes of the weights of the 12 macroeconomic variables employed for classification, the question of intra-cyclical changes is addressed. This is done by using DLDA, a new dynamic variant of LDA which exploits the time series character of the data used to analyse changes of the multivariate structure of the cycle. The DLDA results exemplify that the transition from one to the next phase is much smoother and more continuous than might be expected. Within the sample examined these movements vary as well as the weights attributed to the classifying variables. In a methodological perspective DLDA turns out to be a promising broadening of classification methods.


2003 ◽  
Vol 51 (25) ◽  
pp. 7227-7233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco Biasioli ◽  
Flavia Gasperi ◽  
Eugenio Aprea ◽  
Daniela Mott ◽  
Elena Boscaini ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 3667-3672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Beneito-Cambra ◽  
José Manuel Herrero-Martínez ◽  
Ernesto F. Simó-Alfonso ◽  
Guillermo Ramis-Ramos

1978 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Dillon ◽  
Matthew Goldstein ◽  
Leon G. Schiffman

Buyer usage behavior data are used to compare the relative performance of a linear discriminant analysis and several multinomial classification methods. The potential shortcomings of each of the procedures investigated are cited, and a new method for determining the contribution of a variable to discrimination in the context of the multinomial classification problem also is presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document