Modified linear discriminant analysis approaches for classification of high-dimensional microarray data

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1674-1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Xu ◽  
Guy N. Brock ◽  
Rudolph S. Parrish
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Linear Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Microarray Data ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
Linear Discriminant

Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 117693510700300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadège Dossat ◽  
Alain Mangé ◽  
Jérôme Solassol ◽  
William Jacot ◽  
Ludovic Lhermitte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Linear Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Supervised Classification ◽  
Protein Profiling ◽  
Clinical Proteomics ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
Classification Methods ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Supervised Classification Methods

A key challenge in clinical proteomics of cancer is the identification of biomarkers that could allow detection, diagnosis and prognosis of the diseases. Recent advances in mass spectrometry and proteomic instrumentations offer unique chance to rapidly identify these markers. These advances pose considerable challenges, similar to those created by microarray-based investigation, for the discovery of pattern of markers from high-dimensional data, specific to each pathologic state (e.g. normal vs cancer). We propose a three-step strategy to select important markers from high-dimensional mass spectrometry data using surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) technology. The first two steps are the selection of the most discriminating biomarkers with a construction of different classifiers. Finally, we compare and validate their performance and robustness using different supervised classification methods such as Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Neural Networks, Classification Trees and Boosting Trees. We show that the proposed method is suitable for analysing high-throughput proteomics data and that the combination of logistic regression and Linear Discriminant Analysis outperform other methods tested.

scholarly journals A comprehensive simulation study on classification of RNA-Seq data

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gokmen Zararsiz ◽  
Dinçer Göksülük ◽  
Selçuk Korkmaz ◽  
Vahap Eldem ◽  
Gözde Ertürk Zararsız ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Linear Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Simulation Study ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Number Of Genes ◽  
Expression Rate

RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is a powerful technique for thegene-expression profiling of organisms that uses the capabilities of next-generation sequencing technologies.Developing gene-expression-based classification algorithms is an emerging powerful method for diagnosis, disease classification and monitoring at molecular level, as well as providing potential markers of diseases. Most of the statistical methods proposed for the classification of geneexpression data are either based on a continuous scale (eg. microarray data) or require a normal distribution assumption. Hence, these methods cannot be directly applied to RNA-Seq data since they violate both data structure and distributional assumptions. However, it is possible to apply these algorithms with appropriate modifications to RNA-Seq data. One way is to develop count-based classifiers, such as Poisson linear discriminant analysis and negative binomial linear discriminant analysis. Another way is to bring the data hierarchically closer to microarrays and apply microarray-based classifiers.In this study, we compared several classifiers including PLDA with and without power transformation, NBLDA, single SVM, bagging SVM (bagSVM), classification and regression trees (CART), and random forests (RF). We also examined the effect of several parameters such asoverdispersion, sample size, number of genes, number of classes, differential-expression rate, andthe transformation method on model performances.A comprehensive simulation study is conducted and the results are compared with the results of two miRNA and two mRNA experimental datasets. The results revealed that increasing the sample size, differential-expression rate, and number of genes and decreasing the dispersion parameter and number of groups lead to an increase in classification accuracy. Similar with differential-expression studies, the classification of RNA-Seq data requires careful attention when handling data overdispersion. We conclude that, as a count-based classifier, the power transformed PLDA and, as a microarray-based classifier, vst or rlog transformed RF and SVM clas sifiers may be a good choice for classification. An R/BIOCONDUCTOR package, MLSeq, is freely available at https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/MLSeq.html .

scholarly journals Linear discriminant analysis based on gas chromatographic measurements for geographical prediction of USA medical domestic cannabis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramia Z. Al Bakain ◽  
Yahya S. Al-Degs ◽  
James V. Cizdziel ◽  
Mahmoud A. Elsohly
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Linear Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Principal Components ◽  
Supervised Classification ◽  
Geographical Origin ◽  
Active Components ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Sample Extraction ◽  
Analytical Range

AbstractFifty four domestically produced cannabis samples obtained from different USA states were quantitatively assayed by GC–FID to detect 22 active components: 15 terpenoids and 7 cannabinoids. The profiles of the selected compounds were used as inputs for samples grouping to their geographical origins and for building a geographical prediction model using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The proposed sample extraction and chromatographic separation was satisfactory to select 22 active ingredients with a wide analytical range between 5.0 and 1,000 µg/mL. Analysis of GC-profiles by Principle Component Analysis retained three significant variables for grouping job (Δ9-THC, CBN, and CBC) and the modest discrimination of samples based on their geographical origin was reported. PCA was able to separate many samples of Oregon and Vermont while a mixed classification was observed for the rest of samples. By using LDA as a supervised classification method, excellent separation of cannabis samples was attained leading to a classification of new samples not being included in the model. Using two principal components and LDA with GC–FID profiles correctly predict the geographical of 100% Washington cannabis, 86% of both Oregon and Vermont samples, and finally, 71% of Ohio samples.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document