Safety and Tolerability of a ‘Refrigeration-free’ Formulation of Interferon Beta-1b - Results of a Double-blind, Multicentre, Comparative Study in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting or Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Baum ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Interferon Beta ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Relapsing Remitting

Hopelessness Ratings in Relapsing-Remitting and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott B. Patten ◽  
Luanne M. Metz
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Interferon Beta ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Exact Probability ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Trial Participants ◽  
Over Time

Objective: Two recent randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trials of interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis have obtained hopelessness ratings using the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). One of these studies, the PRISMS trial, evaluated interferon beta-1a in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Another, the SPECTRIMS trial, evaluated the same medication in secondary progressive (SP) MS. The objective of this analysis was to compare levels of hopelessness in persons with RRMS and SPMS, and to describe changes over time in the clinical trial participants. Method: Raw data from each clinical trial was obtained from the sponsor of the trials (Serono). Median BHS ratings, and the proportions at or above the BHS cut-point of 10 were calculated over a two (PRISMS) or three (SPECTRIMS) year period. Results: The analysis included n = 532 clinical trial participants. Ratings of hopelessness were higher in SPMS clinical trial participants (SPECTRIMS) than in the RRMS group (PRISMS) at baseline (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.0035). Furthermore, ratings of hopelessness were higher during follow-up than at baseline, in the SPMS group (McNemar's exact probability, p = 0.0015), but not in the RRMS group (McNemar's exact probability, p = 0.65). Depression was strongly associated with hopelessness in both RRMS ( z = 4.13, p < 0.001) and SPMS ( z = 5.24, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Hopelessness is associated with SPMS, and may increase over time in this group. Hopelessness may influence suicide risk in people with MS and may potentially have an impact on coping and quality of life. Additional research is necessary to define the clinical implications of hopelessness in persons with this condition.

Toxicity in a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial with D-penicillamine and metacycline in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Dubois ◽  
M B D'Hooghe ◽  
K De Lepeleire ◽  
P Ketelaer ◽  
G Opdenakker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gelatinase B ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Secondary Progressive

The serine proteinase tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and the metalloproteinase gelatinase B (MMP-9) have recently been demonstrated in MS lesions. Both enzymes are interconnected in an enzyme cascade which contributes to destruction of the blood brain barrier and demyelination and both enzymes are inhibited by D-penicillamine. Metacycline was shown in in vitro experiments to inhibit gelatinase B. The combination of peroral D-penicillamine plus metacycline was evaluated in a double-blind placebo-controlled way in two groups of 10 patients suffering from secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. The major objectives of this pilot trial were to examine the safety of this combination and the possibility of blinding, while the effect on disease progression was considered as a secondary endpoint. Over a follow-up period of 1 year and in this selected patient group, there was no significant improvement in the Expanded Disability Status Scale score (EDSS) as compared with that of the placebo-control group. Toxicity was too high to consider additional trials with this combination of metalloproteinase inhibitors. Although peroral treatment is by most MS patients acknowledged as a major improvement in treatment compliance, one has to await the development of more selective and efficaceous protease inhibitors than those used in the combination therapy described here.

Interferon beta for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loredana La Mantia ◽  
Laura Vacchi ◽  
Carlo Di Pietrantonj ◽  
George Ebers ◽  
Marco Rovaris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Interferon Beta ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive

scholarly journals Onset of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is not influenced by current relapsing multiple sclerosis therapies

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 205521731878334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Coret ◽  
Francisco C Pérez-Miralles ◽  
Francisco Gascón ◽  
Carmen Alcalá ◽  
Arantxa Navarré ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Disease Modifying Therapies ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis Patients ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Background Disease-modifying therapies are thought to reduce the conversion rate to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Objective To explore the rate, chronology, and contributing factors of conversion to the progressive phase in treated relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Methods Our study included 204 patients treated for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis between 1995 and 2002, prospectively followed to date. Kaplan–Meier analysis was applied to estimate the time until secondary progressive multiple sclerosis conversion, and multivariate survival analysis with a Cox regression model was used to analyse prognostic factors. Results Relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients were continuously treated for 13 years (SD 4.5); 36.3% converted to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis at a mean age of 42.6 years (SD 10.6), a mean time of 8.2 years (SD 5.2) and an estimated mean time of 17.2 years (range 17.1–18.1). A multifocal relapse, age older than 34 years at disease onset and treatment failure independently predicted conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis but did not influence the time to reach an Expanded Disability Status Scale of 6.0. Conclusions The favourable influence of disease-modifying therapies on long-term disability in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis is well established. However, the time to progression onset and the subsequent clinical course in treated patients seem similar to those previously reported in natural history studies. More studies are needed to clarify the effect of disease-modifying therapies once the progressive phase has been reached.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document