Hybrid treatment of a post-EVAR aortoenteric fistula

Vascular ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Sörelius ◽  
Magnus Sundbom ◽  
Kevin Mani ◽  
Anders Wanhainen
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortoenteric Fistula ◽  
Flap Coverage ◽  
Hybrid Treatment ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Aneurysm Wall ◽  
Local Antibiotic ◽  
Acute Event

This report presents a case of secondary aortoenteric fistula after endovascular aortic repair in a fragile patient: The fistula developed due to aneurysm shrinkage and remodeling of the stent graft, resulting in a kink eroding through the aneurysm wall into the duodenum. The aortoenteric fistula was successfully treated with a hybrid procedure with endovascular aortic repair, followed by open enteroraphy and omental flap coverage of the stent graft and local antibiotic irrigation. Despite the presence of the stent graft in a previously infected field, the patient has recovered from the acute event with no septic recurrence or hemorrhage during four years of follow-up.

High Wall Stress May Predict the Formation of Stent-Graft–Induced New Entries After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 571-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Menichini ◽  
Selene Pirola ◽  
Baolei Guo ◽  
Weiguo Fu ◽  
Zhihui Dong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Large Population ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Wall Stress ◽  
Ct Images ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Type B Dissection

Purpose: To explore the potential role of morphological factors and wall stress in the formation of stent-graft–induced new entries (SINE) based on computed tomography (CT) images after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Case Report: Two female patients aged 59 years (patient 1) and 44 years (patient 2) underwent TEVAR for type B dissection in the chronic (patient 1) or subacute (patient 2) phase. CT scans at 3-month follow-up showed varying degrees of false lumen thrombosis in both patients. At 14-month follow-up, a SINE was observed in patient 1 while the dissected aorta in the other patient remained stable. Morphological and finite element analyses were performed based on the first follow-up CT images. The computational results showed that the SINE patient had higher stent-graft tortuosity than the non-SINE patient and much higher wall stress in the region close to the distal SINE. Conclusion: This case study suggests that high stent-graft tortuosity can lead to high wall stress, which is potentially linked to the formation of SINE. Further large population-based studies are needed to confirm this preliminary finding.

scholarly journals In-hospital and mid-term outcome after complex endovascular aortic repair with fenestrated and branched stent-grafts

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Makaloski ◽  
D Broger ◽  
S Weiss ◽  
S Jungi ◽  
D Becker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Renal Arteries ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Mesenteric Arteries ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Aortic Repair

Abstract Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate in-hospital and mid-term outcome after complex endovascular aortic repair with fenestrated and branched stent-grafts (fEVAR / bEVAR). Methods This is a single-center retrospective analysis from a prospectively collected database of all patients treated electively with fEVAR or bEVAR for para/suprarenal (PAA) and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) between September 2010 and June 2019. In-hospital and mid-term mortality, major adverse events and re-interventions were assessed. Results Fifty-one patient (84% male) with a mean age of 74±7 years were analysed. Eighteen patients (35%) had TAAA, four patients (8%) suprarenal, and 29 patients (57%) pararenal aortic aneurysms. Mean aneurysm diameter was 64±8 mm. Thirty-eight patients (75%) underwent fEVAR and 13 patients (25%) bEVAR. A total of 157 target vessels were incorporated: 22 celiac trunks (CT), 40 superior mesenteric arteries (SMA), 92 renal arteries (RA), two separate hepatic arteries and one splenic artery. No in-hospital death or stroke was recorded. One patient suffered from early postoperative paraplegia and did not recover and one had paraparesis after 38 days and recovered completely. Six patients (12%) with patent renal arteries experienced acute postoperative kidney injury; one required temporary dialysis. Five in-hospital re-interventions were stent-graft related (four bridging stents angioplasty and one iliac leg extension) and seven re-interventions were not stent-graft related. Mean follow-up was 19±17 months. Eleven patients (22%) died during follow-up: nine were not aortic-related and two were unknown. The Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 81% and 77%, respectively. Five renal stents (5%, 5/92) occluded during follow-up: three were successfully recanalized and two remained occluded. Ten stents (three CT, five SMA, and two RA stents required relining after 13±16 months postoperatively, resulting with estimated primary assisted patency at 2 years of 100%, 100%, 93%, and 95% for the CT, SMA, right RA and left RA, respectively. Conclusion Complex endovascular aortic repair with fEVAR / bEVAR for PAA and TAAA is safe with very low early mortality and morbidity. In-stent stenosis/occlusions occurred within the first two years. However, primary assisted patency was high. A surveillance program to detect potential stent-graft related complications is mandatory.

Hypogastric Artery Stenting for Chronic Intermittent Spinal Cord Ischemia After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 801-804
Author(s):  
Catharina Gronert ◽  
Nikolaos Tsilimparis ◽  
Giuseppe Panuccio ◽  
Ahmed Eleshra ◽  
Fiona Rohlffs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Ischemia ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Neurological Symptoms ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Hypogastric Artery ◽  
Lower Extremity Weakness ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
The Right

Purpose: To report a case of chronic intermittent spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and its successful treatment using hypogastric artery stenting. Case Report: A 79-year-old patient presented in May 2013 with a thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) and a contained rupture. He urgently underwent TEVAR that covered 274 mm of descending thoracic aorta without immediate postoperative signs of acute SCI. At 3-month follow-up, he reported repeating incidents of sudden lower extremity weakness leading to a fall with a humerus fracture. A neurological consultation revealed the tentative diagnosis of intermittent SCI caused by TEVAR and initially recommended a conservative approach. During the following year there was no clinical improvement of the symptoms. Computed tomography angiography showed a high-grade stenosis of the right hypogastric artery, which was stented in November 2014 to improve the collateral network of spinal cord perfusion. Following treatment, the patient had no further neurological symptoms; at 32 months after the reintervention, the imaging follow-up documented a patent stent and continued exclusion of the TAA. Conclusion: Intermittent neurological symptoms after TEVAR should be suspected as chronic intermittent SCI. The improvement of collateral networks of the spinal cord by revascularization of the hypogastric artery is a viable treatment option.

Evaluation of Aortic Zone 2 Proximal Landing Accuracy During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Following Carotid-Subclavian Revascularization

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-360
Author(s):  
Sally H. J. Choi ◽  
Gary K. Yang ◽  
Keith Baxter ◽  
Joel Gagnon
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Common Carotid Artery ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Average Distance ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Technical Accuracy ◽  
Corrective Procedures

Background: Adequate seal for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) commonly requires landing in zone 2, but can prove to be challenging due to the tortuous and angulated anatomy of the region. Objectives: Our objective was to determine the proximal landing accuracy of zone 2-targeted TEVARs following carotid-subclavian revascularization (CSR) and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective review of patients that underwent CSR for zone 2 endograft delivery at a tertiary institute between January 2008 and March 2018 was conducted. Technical outcomes were assessed by examining the incidence of intraoperative corrective maneuvers, 1a endoleaks and reinterventions. Distance to target and incidence of LSA stump filling were examined as radiographic markers of landing accuracy. Results: Zone 2-targeted TEVAR with CSR was performed in 53 patients for treatment of dissections (49%), aneurysms (30%) or trauma (21%). Nine (17%) cases required intraoperative corrective procedures: 5 (9%) proximal cuffs due to type 1a endoleak and 4 (8%) left common carotid artery (LCCA) stenting due to inadvertent coverage. Cases performed using higher resolution hybrid fluoroscopy machine compared to mobile C-arm were associated with increased proximal cuff use (OR 8.8; 95% CI 1.2-62.4). Average distance between the proximal edge of the covered graft to LCCA was 8 ± 1 mm and larger distances were not associated with higher rates of 1a endoleak. Twenty-eight (53%) cases of antegrade LSA stump filling were noted on follow-up imaging, but were not associated with higher rates of reinterventions (OR 0.8, 95% CI [0.2-4.6]). Three (6%) patients had a stroke within 30 days and 4 (8%) patients expired within 1 month. Intraoperative corrective maneuvers, post-operative 1a endoleak and reinterventions were not associated with higher rates of stroke or mortality. Conclusion: Using current endografts and imaging modalities, zone 2-targeted TEVARs have suboptimal technical accuracy.

scholarly journals Primary aortoenteric fistula following endovascular aortic repair due to type II endoleak

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 1164-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
James T. McPhee ◽  
David I. Soybel ◽  
Robert K. Oram ◽  
Michael Belkin
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortoenteric Fistula ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Type Ii Endoleak ◽  
Aortic Repair

A Case of Successful Endovascular Aortic Repair of Primary Aortoenteric Fistula Without Aortic Explantation

2022 ◽  
pp. 152660282110677
Author(s):  
Joshua Winston ◽  
Thomas Lovelock ◽  
Thomas Kelly ◽  
Thodur Vasudevan
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortoenteric Fistula ◽  
Patch Repair ◽  
Oral Antibiotics ◽  
Omental Patch ◽  
Oral Fluconazole ◽  
Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
The Third ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
History Of

Purpose: The objective of this study is to report a case of a primary aortoenteric fistula successfully treated with endovascular repair without aortic explant. Case Report: A 48-year-old man presented with a 24-hour history of hematemesis and malena. A computed tomography (CT) abdomen and pelvis demonstrated a 6 cm infrarenal aortic aneurysm with periaortic stranding and contrast enhancement within the lumen of the third part of the duodenum. The patient underwent emergency Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR). The patient was discharged on day 8 of his admission on oral antibiotics. He returned 7 weeks postindex procedure and underwent a laparotomy with omental patch repair of the aortic defect. Intraoperative cultures grew candida albicans, and the patient was discharged on lifelong oral Fluconazole and Amoxycillin-Clavulanic Acid. At 18 months postoperatively, the patient was clinically stable with improved appearances on CT aortogram. Conclusion: We discuss the use of EVAR without aortic explant as a possible treatment option in the management of patient with primary aortoenteric fistulae. This may potentially avoid the significant morbidity and mortality associated with aortic explant in suitable candidates without perioperative signs of sepsis.

Outcomes of open and endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms

Vascular ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
África Duque Santos ◽  
Andrés Reyes Valdivia ◽  
María Asunción Romero Lozano ◽  
Enrique Aracil Sanus ◽  
Julia Ocaña Guaita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Surgery ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Abdominal Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Repair Group

Objective Reports on inflammatory aortic abdominal aneurysm treatment are scarce. Traditionally, open surgery has been validated as the gold standard of treatment; however, high technical skills are required. Endovascular aortic repair has been suggested as a less invasive treatment by some authors offering good results. The purpose of our study was to report our experience and outcomes in the treatment of inflammatory aortic abdominal aneurysm using both approaches. Material and methods A retrospective review and data collection of all patients treated for inflammatory aortic abdominal aneurysm between 2000 and 2015 was done in one academic center. Diagnosis of inflammatory aortic abdominal aneurysm was based on preoperative CT-scan imaging. Type of treatment, postoperative and long-term morbidity and mortality are described. Abdominal compressive symptoms (hydronephrosis) severity and relief after treatment are described. Results Thirty-four patients with intact inflammatory aortic abdominal aneurysm were included. Twenty-nine (85.3%) patients were treated by open means and the remaining five (14.7%) with endovascular aortic repair. Nearly 90% were considered high-risk patients. Median follow-up was 46 months (range 24–112). The two groups were comparable, except for the age and preoperative hydronephrosis. There was no statistical significance in blood transfusion requirements, intensive care hospitalization, 30-day and long-term mortality between the two groups. Preoperative hydronephrosis was diagnosed in four (13.8%) patients in the open surgery group and three (60%) patients in the endovascular aortic repair group. Improvement of hydronephrosis was recognized in three out of the four patients in the open repair group and two out of the three in the endovascular aortic repair group. Renal function remained stable in both groups during follow-up. Conclusions Open surgery remains a safe and valid option for the treatment of inflammatory aortic abdominal aneurysm. Although our study included a small number of patients with endovascular aortic repair treatment, results are promising. Further randomized controlled studies may be necessary to assess long-term effectiveness of endovascular aortic repair treatment in this disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document