Impact of care pathway-based approach on outcomes in a specialist intellectual disability inpatient unit

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Devapriam ◽  
Regi Alexander ◽  
Rohit Gumber ◽  
Judith Pither ◽  
Satheesh Gangadharan
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cora Cravero ◽  
Vincent Guinchat ◽  
Jean Xavier ◽  
Camille Meunier ◽  
Lautaro Diaz ◽  
...  

We report the case of a young boy with nonverbal autism and intellectual disability, with a rare de novo 1q21.3 microdeletion. The patient had early and extreme self-injurious behaviours that led to blindness, complicated by severe developmental regression. A significant reduction in the self-injurious behaviours and the recovery of developmental dynamics were attained in a multidisciplinary neurodevelopmental inpatient unit. Improvement was obtained after managing all causes of somatic pains, using opiate blockers and stabilizing the patient’s mood. We offered both sensorimotor developmental approach with therapeutic body wrap and specific psychoeducation adapted to his blindness condition for improving his communication abilities.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran Purandare ◽  
Anusha Wijeratne

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the impact of a changing commissioning landscape on the provision of specialist acute inpatient care from the perspective of a small category 2 unit in London. Design/methodology/approach – The authors conducted a retrospective survey of all referrals to the unit in 2012 and 2013. Findings – There has been an increase in the referrals and admissions to the unit with referrals covering a wider catchment area. This has resulted in a doubling of the average distance between the unit and the respective catchment areas that patients and their relatives have to travel. The majority of admissions were transfers from mainstream mental health services. There has been a reduction in the mean length of stay. Research limitations/implications – This survey looks at trends in one category 2 unit in an outer London Borough and therefore, limits generalisability. The data collection was retrospective and there was no information on patients requiring admission but not being referred to the unit. Practical implications – There continues to be a need for category 2 admission units to serve the needs of a small group of patients with intellectual disability presenting with mental health needs and behavioural problems. Consideration needs to be given to the entire mental health and challenging behaviour care pathway, including the small but crucial element of specialist inpatient management if services are to remain local and responsive to the needs of this group of patients and their carers. Social implications – An ill-planned reduction in the number of specialist inpatient units without viable community services, risks perpetuating a situation where patients and their relatives have to travel long distances to obtain appropriate specialist help. Longer geographical distances could also potentially hamper closer liaison between the unit and the community services, thereby reducing the degree of oversight and prolonging the transition and discharge process. Originality/value – This survey highlights the impact of recent commissioning and service changes on delivery of specialist in patient services for adults with intellectual disability in the immediate aftermath of the Winterbourne Review.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-114
Author(s):  
Gareth Hickman ◽  
Su Thrift ◽  
Chénelle Taylor

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe in detail the treatment pathway utilised in a male medium and low secure intellectual disability (ID) service. Over the preceding five years, service users have followed the outlined treatment pathway. The current paper offers case study material to illustrate the care pathway.Design/methodology/approachThe treatment pathway is described and two case examples are provided, illustrating participation in the pathway. Evaluative data are provided on length of hospitalisation, direction of pathway at discharge and risk reduction as assessed by the HCR-20, SVR-20 and HONOS Secure measures.FindingsThe case examples provided document the assessment and treatment of two male offenders with ID, outlining their treatment pathways, subsequent reductions in assessed risk and their successful community discharge.Originality/valueA comprehensive treatment pathway is outlined together with the theoretical rationale, with illustrative case examples.


Author(s):  
Julie Abraham ◽  
Kiran Purandare ◽  
Joanne McCabe ◽  
Anusha Wijeratne ◽  
Evelina Eggleston ◽  
...  

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Cécile Méjécase ◽  
Christopher M. Way ◽  
Nicholas Owen ◽  
Mariya Moosajee

Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A or DYRK1A, contributes to central nervous system development in a dose-sensitive manner. Triallelic DYRK1A is implicated in the neuropathology of Down syndrome, whereas haploinsufficiency causes the rare DYRK1A-related intellectual disability syndrome (also known as mental retardation 7). It is characterised by intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder and microcephaly with a typical facial gestalt. Preclinical studies elucidate a role for DYRK1A in eye development and case studies have reported associated ocular pathology. In this study families of the DYRK1A Syndrome International Association were asked to self-report any co-existing ocular abnormalities. Twenty-six patients responded but only 14 had molecular confirmation of a DYRK1A pathogenic variant. A further nineteen patients from the UK Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project were identified and combined with 112 patients reported in the literature for further analysis. Ninety out of 145 patients (62.1%) with heterozygous DYRK1A variants revealed ocular features, these ranged from optic nerve hypoplasia (13%, 12/90), refractive error (35.6%, 32/90) and strabismus (21.1%, 19/90). Patients with DYRK1A variants should be referred to ophthalmology as part of their management care pathway to prevent amblyopia in children and reduce visual comorbidity, which may further impact on learning, behaviour, and quality of life.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam Gulati ◽  
Stephen Quigley ◽  
Valerie Elizabeth Murphy ◽  
Evan Yacoub ◽  
John Bogue ◽  
...  

PurposeIndividuals with an intellectual disability (ID) form a significant minority in the Irish prison population and worldwide prison populations. There is growing recognition that specialist services for such individuals are in need of development. The purpose of this paper is to propose a care pathway for the management of individuals with an ID who present in prison, based on expert elicitation and consensus.Design/methodology/approachA convenience sample of professionals with a special interest in forensic intellectual disabilities was invited to participate in a Delphi exercise. In total, 12 agreed to participation and 10 subsequently completed the study (83.3 per cent). Expert views were elicited using a semi-structured questionnaire. Content analysis was completed using NVivo 11 software. A care pathway was subsequently proposed, based on the outcomes of the analysis, and circulated to participants for debate and consensus. A consensus was reached on management considerations.FindingsTen experts across a range of disciplines with a combined experience of 187 years participated in the study. Current provision of care was seen as limited and geographically variable. The vulnerability of prisoners with ID was highlighted. The need for equivalence of care with the community through multidisciplinary input and development of specialist secure and residential placements to facilitate diversion was identified. Consensus was achieved on a proposed care pathway.Originality/valueThis study proposes a care pathway for the assessment and management of prisoners with an ID and is, therefore, potentially relevant to those interested in this topic internationally who may similarly struggle with the current lack of decision-making tools for this setting. Although written from an Irish perspective, it outlines key considerations for psychiatrists in keeping with international guidance and, therefore, may be generalisable to other jurisdictions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S584-S585
Author(s):  
V. Chester ◽  
R. Alexander

Introduction“Head banging” is a common form of self-harm, linked to numerous negative outcomes including significant brain damage. However, little research has investigated the prevalence and correlates of head banging behaviour in clinical populations.MethodHead banging episodes were identified from the incident records (n = 5417) of two inpatient forensic services (one intellectual disability and one mental health), using relevant search terms. Rates were compared between individual patients, by gender, diagnosis and level of security. Incident accounts were analysed qualitatively using thematic analysis.ResultsTwo hundred and twenty nine incidents of head banging were recorded, occurring approximately every three days in each service. The prevalence of the behaviour between individual patients varied widely, ranging from one to 38 incidents within one year. Women and patients with intellectual disability appeared more likely to engage in head banging. Qualitative incident reports indicated that head banging was associated with mental distress, anger, and psychotic experiences.DiscussionHead banging occurs frequently in forensic services, and has documented associations with traumatic brain injury in affected individuals, thus negatively impacting progress through the care pathway and treatment outcomes. Further research should investigate short and long term management strategies and treatment approaches, in order to minimise harm.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document