Airway Management in Critical Care - New Guidelines, Old Problems

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. McGrath ◽  
E. O'Donohoe ◽  
C. Waldmann
Resuscitation ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. S56
Author(s):  
A. Iglesias-Vazquez ◽  
A. Rodriguez-Nuñez ◽  
L. Sanchez-Santos ◽  
L. Chayan-Zas ◽  
M.V. Barreiro Díaz ◽  
...  

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S2) ◽  
pp. S104-S107
Author(s):  
Scott MacDonald ◽  
George Kovacs ◽  
Tobias Witter ◽  
Yves Leroux ◽  
Steven Crocker ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 390A
Author(s):  
DANIEL FEIN ◽  
FIORE MASTROIANNI ◽  
NADER ESFAHANI ◽  
ARIEL SHILOH ◽  
LEWIS EISEN

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarrod M. Mosier ◽  
Joshua Malo ◽  
John C. Sakles ◽  
Cameron D. Hypes ◽  
Bhupinder Natt ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yan Xiao ◽  
Colin F. Mackenzie ◽  
F. Jacob Seagull ◽  
Mahmood Jaberi

Patient monitoring devices are designed to assist users in obtaining information on the patient and life-support equipment status. Most of the these devices have built-in visual and auditory alarms, which are to help the user to manage attention allocation. In this presentation we describe an analysis of the interaction between care providers and the monitoring devices during an anesthetic procedure (airway management) for trauma patients in the real environment. The videotapes of 47 cases were analyzed by coding the activities in silencing auditory alarms. In majority of the cases (87%) alarms could be heard yet only a small portion of the cases (6%) contained patient status events that signified by the alarm conditions. Care providers were frequently forced to interrupt clinical tasks to silence alarms. The differences in silencing frequency and rapidity among different monitoring devices suggest that alarms could be designed to be less intrusive and more tolerable, thus making the monitors easier to manage in critical care settings


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoonsun Mo ◽  
Anthony E. Zimmermann ◽  
Michael C. Thomas

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine current delirium practices in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting and evaluate awareness and adoption of the 2013 Pain, Agitation, and Delirium (PAD) guidelines with emphasis on delirium management. Design, Setting, and Participants: A large-scale, multidisciplinary, online survey was administered to physician, pharmacist, nurse, and mid-level practitioner members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) between September 2014 and October 2014. A total of 635 respondents completed the survey. Measurements and Main Results: Nonpharmacologic interventions such as early mobilization were used in most ICUs (83%) for prevention of delirium. A majority of respondents (97%) reported using pharmacologic agents to treat hyperactive delirium. Ninety percent of the respondents answered that they were aware of the 2013 PAD guidelines, and 75% of respondents felt that their delirium practices have been changed as a result of the new guidelines. In addition, logistic regression analysis of this study showed that respondents who use delirium screening tools were twice more likely to be fully aware of key components of the updated guidelines (odds ratio [OR] = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20-3.60). Conclusions: Most critical care practitioners are fully aware and knowledgeable of key recommendations in the new guidelines and have changed their delirium practices accordingly.


Author(s):  
Adel Hamed Elbaih ◽  
Adel Hamed Elbaih ◽  
Mohammad Assef Mousa

Background: Intubation is daily process in hospitals, it’s insertion of tube to secure an airway, nonemergent intubation is done in well controlled circumstances, while emergent intubation is not. Most emergency intubated are cardiac or respiratory arrest patients. Intubation helps to secure airway for patient breathing, also could protect from aspiration. Most common complications are: esophagus intubation and hypotension. This research will be divided into two main topics, emergency intubation as a whole, and unrecognized esophagus intubation as a complication. Emergency intubation discuss: knowledge about the procedure, equipment needed, airway assessment, preoxygenation, difficulties and risks, outcomes. While Unrecognized esophagus intubation will be discussed as complication in ER settings, point to clear: Epidemiology, tools of detection, equipment, human and environmental bias and consideration for cardiac arrest patients. Finishing with a conclusion and recommendation. Therefore, we aim to look into the common pitfalls that both medical students and new physicians face in the recognition, diagnosis, and Emergency Airway Management. Targeted Population: Airway cardiorespiratory arrest patients who are requiring urgent management in the ED, with emergency physicians for teaching approach protocol. Aim of the Study: Appropriate for assessment and priorities for Airway cardiorespiratory arrest patients by training protocol to emergency physicians. Based on patients’ causes of Airway injuries. Methods: Collection of all possible available data about the Esophageal Intubation as Complications in the Emergency department. By many research questions to achieve these aims so a midline literature search was performed with the keywords “critical care”, “emergency medicine”, “principals of airway management”, “Esophageal Intubation as Complications”. Literature search included an overview of recent definition, causes and recent therapeutic strategies. Results: All studies introduced that the initial diagnosis of Esophageal Intubation as Complications is a lifesaving conditions that face patients of the emergency and critical care departments. Conclusion: Intubation in emergency settings require a good preparation, available equipment (e.g. ready cart for all time), and supportive anatomical airway of the patient. Following a checklist will improve outcomes, prevent malpractice and complications. Preoxygenation and RSI play major roles for successful intubations with decrease risk of complications. Follow procedure steps, and expect difficult intubation for any patient, so consider LEMON mnemonic to evaluate risk of difficulty, and after 3 attempts try a different technique or equipment. More training and education are essential to decrease congenital and equipotential mistakes/errors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document