Open surgery versus nonoperative treatments for paediatric trigger thumb: a systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 719-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Farr ◽  
F. Grill ◽  
R. Ganger ◽  
W. Girsch
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Joint Motion ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Trigger Thumb ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Results Of Surgery

The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the outcome of interphalangeal (IP) joint motion in children undergoing open surgical release, splinting, and passive exercising therapy for the treatment of paediatric trigger thumb. We conducted an online literature search of seven major databases. Only studies with a mean follow-up of at least 12 months were considered for inclusion. Seventeen retrospective studies and one prospective study met all the inclusion criteria. They reported on the results of surgery (634 children, 759 thumbs), splinting (115 children, 138 thumbs), and passive exercising (89 children, 108 thumbs). The mean follow-up periods were 59 (surgery), 23 (splinting), and 76 months (exercising), respectively. Full IP joint motion without residual triggering was achieved in 95% of all children undergoing surgery, in 67% of children treated with continuous splinting, and 55% after passive exercising. Based on the low level of evidence available, it seems that open surgery resulted in more reliable and rapid outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment.

scholarly journals Failed Latarjet procedure: a systematic review of surgery revision options

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Buda ◽  
Riccardo D’Ambrosi ◽  
Enrico Bellato ◽  
Davide Blonna ◽  
Alessandro Cappellari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Shoulder Stabilization ◽  
Recurrent Instability ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes

Abstract Background Revision surgery after the Latarjet procedure is a rare and challenging surgical problem, and various bony or capsular procedures have been proposed. This systematic review examines clinical and radiographic outcomes of different procedures for treating persistent pain or recurrent instability after a Latarjet procedure. Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Ovid databases with the combined keywords “failed”, “failure”, “revision”, “Latarjet”, “shoulder stabilization” and “shoulder instability” to identify articles published in English that deal with failed Latarjet procedures. Results A total of 11 studies (five retrospective and six case series investigations), all published between 2008 and 2020, fulfilled our inclusion criteria. For the study, 253 patients (254 shoulders, 79.8% male) with a mean age of 29.6 years (range: 16–54 years) were reviewed at an average follow-up of 51.5 months (range: 24–208 months). Conclusions Eden–Hybinette and arthroscopic capsuloplasty are the most popular and safe procedures to treat recurrent instability after a failed Latarjet procedure, and yield reasonable clinical outcomes. A bone graft procedure and capsuloplasty were proposed but there was no clear consensus on their efficacy and indication. Level of evidence Level IV Trial registration PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020185090—www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/

Criteria for Return to Play After Hip Arthroscopy in the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110389
Author(s):  
Martin S. Davey ◽  
Eoghan T. Hurley ◽  
Matthew G. Davey ◽  
Jordan W. Fried ◽  
Andrew J. Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
The Mean

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common pathology in athletes that often requires operative management in the form of hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To systematically review the rates and level of return to play (RTP) and the criteria used for RTP after hip arthroscopy for FAI in athletes. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature, based on the PRISMA guidelines, was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Studies reporting outcomes after the use of hip arthroscopy for FAI were included. Outcomes analyzed were RTP rate, RTP level, and criteria used for RTP. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Results: Our review found 130 studies, which included 14,069 patients (14,517 hips) and had a mean methodological quality of evidence (MQOE) of 40.4 (range, 5-67). The majority of patients were female (53.7%), the mean patient age was 30.4 years (range, 15-47 years), and the mean follow-up was 29.7 months (range, 6-75 months). A total of 81 studies reported RTP rates, with an overall RTP rate of 85.4% over a mean period of 6.6 months. Additionally, 49 studies reported the rate of RTP at preinjury level as 72.6%. Specific RTP criteria were reported in 97 studies (77.2%), with time being the most commonly reported item, which was reported in 80 studies (69.2%). A total of 45 studies (57.9%) advised RTP at 3 to 6 months after hip arthroscopy. Conclusion: The overall rate of reported RTP was high after hip arthroscopy for FAI. However, more than one-fourth of athletes who returned to sports did not return at their preinjury level. Development of validated rehabilitation criteria for safe return to sports after hip arthroscopy for FAI could potentially improve clinical outcomes while also increasing rates of RTP at preinjury levels.

Endoscopic Resection of Different Types of Talocalcaneal Coalition

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1082-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wael Aldahshan ◽  
Adel Hamed ◽  
Faisal Elsherief ◽  
Ashraf Mohamed Abdelaziz
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Talocalcaneal Coalition ◽  
Short Term Study ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Mean ◽  
American Orthopaedic

Background: The purpose of this study was to describe the technique of endoscopic resection of talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) by using 2 posterior portals and to report the outcomes of endoscopic resection of different types and sites of TCC. Methods: An interventional prospective study was conducted on 20 feet in 18 consecutive patients who were diagnosed by computed tomography to have TCC for which nonoperative treatment had failed and endoscopic resection was performed. The patients were divided into groups according to the site of the coalition (middle facet or posterior facet) and according to type (fibrous, cartilage, or bony). The mean follow-up period was 26 months (range, 6-36). Results: The average preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score was 57.7 (range, 40-65), and the average preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score was 7.8 (range, 6-8). The average postoperative AOFAS hindfoot score was 92.4 (range, 85-98; P < .01). The average postoperative VAS score was 2.4 (range, 1-4). All patients showed no recurrence on postoperative lateral and Harris-Beath X-ray until the end of the study. Conclusions: Endoscopic resection of TCC was an effective and useful method for the treatment of talocalcaneal coalition. It provided excellent outcomes with no recurrence in this short-term study. Resection of the fibrous type had a better outcome than resection of cartilage and bony types. Endoscopic resection of the posterior coalition had a better outcome than resection of the middle coalition. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.

Effect of Syndesmotic Implant Removal on Dorsiflexion

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 499-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Briceno ◽  
Timilien Wusu ◽  
Philip Kaiser ◽  
Patrick Cronin ◽  
Alyssa Leblanc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Final Analysis ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean

Background: There is limited evidence that syndesmotic implant removal (SIR) is beneficial. However, many surgeons advocate removal based on studies suggesting improved motion. Methodologic difficulties make the validity and applicability of previous works questionable. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ankle dorsiflexion after SIR using radiographically measured motion before and after screw removal utilizing a standardized load. Methods: All patients undergoing isolated SIR were candidates for inclusion. Dorsiflexion was measured radiographically: (1) immediately before implant removal intraoperatively, (2) immediately after removal intraoperatively, and (3) 3 months after removal. A standardized torque force was applied to the ankle and a perfect lateral radiograph of the ankle was obtained. Four reviewers independently measured dorsiflexion on randomized, deidentified images. A total of 29 patients met inclusion criteria. All syndesmotic injuries were associated with rotational ankle fractures. There were 11 men (38%) and 18 women (62%). The mean, and standard deviation, age was 50.3 ± 16.9 years (range 19-80). Results: The mean ankle dorsiflexion pre-operatively, post-operatively, and at a 3-month follow-up was 13.7 ± 6.6 degrees, 13.3 ± 7.3 degrees and 11.8 ± 11.3 degrees, respectively ( P = .466). For subsequent analysis, 5 patients were excluded because of the potential confounding effect of retained suture button devices. Analysis of the remaining 24 patients (and final analysis of 21 patients who had complete 3-month follow-up) demonstrated similar results with no statistically significant difference in ankle dorsiflexion at all 3 time points. Conclusion: Removal of syndesmotic screws may not improve ankle dorsiflexion motion and should not be used as the sole indication for screw removal. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study.

The use of dynamic external fixation in the treatment of dorsal fracture subluxations and pilon fractures of finger proximal interphalangeal joints

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Abou Elatta ◽  
F. Assal ◽  
H. M. Basheer ◽  
A. F. El Morshidy ◽  
S. M. Elglaind ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Motion ◽  
Stable Fixation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Finger Motion ◽  
Pilon Fractures

The aim of this study was to review the outcome of the treatment of finger proximal interphalangeal joint dorsal fracture subluxations and pilon fractures with a modified external fixator. We treated 36 patients (36 fingers). We assessed the ranges of motion and patient satisfaction. At final follow-up, 23 patients had no pain; 11 had pain in the cold; and two also had mild pain. None had moderate or severe pain. The mean range of proximal interphalangeal joint motion was 86° (60°–100°). The mean total active range of finger motion was 244° (range 200°–265°). This system is simple, cheap and relatively easily applied. It gives stable fixation that allows early mobilization. Level of evidence: IV

Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow at minimum 48-month mean follow-up demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes with low complication and revision rates: systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. jisakos-2021-000614
Author(s):  
Martin S Davey ◽  
Eoghan T Hurley ◽  
Mohamed Gaafar ◽  
John G Galbraith ◽  
Hannan Mullett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

ImportanceTears of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow occur predominantly as an overuse injury, most commonly affecting throwing athletes, particularly baseball players. UCL reconstruction (UCLR) has been described as an effective treatment modality in the short term.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to systematically review the evidence in the literature to ascertain the clinical outcomes, complication and revision rates in baseball players following UCLR of the elbow at a minimum of 48 months of follow-up.Evidence reviewTwo independent reviewers performed a search of the literature based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the EMBASE, PubMed and Scopus databases. Clinical studies were included if they reported outcomes of baseball players at a minimum of 48 months following UCLR.FindingsOur review included 8 studies including 1104 baseball players (1105 elbows) at mean 69.9 months (48–205) following UCLR. The majority of baseball players were pitchers (92.3%), with a mean age of 22.2 years (13–42). At final follow-up, the overall return to play (RTP) was 95.3%%, with 85.3% returning at pre-injury level. In addition, the mean reported Conway-Jobe score was 86.8%, the revision rate was 6.0% with postoperative neuropathy reported in 2.4% of patients. A total of 479 (43.4%) were professional baseball players, with an overall RTP rate of 97.5% and 82.3% managing to RTP at their pre-injury level. The mean number of career years following UCLR was 4.7 years (0–22).Conclusion and relevanceUCLR provides excellent patient-reported and clinical outcomes to patients at medium-term follow-up with low complication and revision rates. In addition, high rates of RTP at pre-injury level and career longevity were reported by baseball players following UCLR.Level of evidenceLevel IV; Systematic Review

scholarly journals Knee laxity and functional knee outcome after contralateral ACLR are comparable to those after primary ACLR

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Cristiani ◽  
Sofia Viheriävaara ◽  
Per-Mats Janarv ◽  
Gunnar Edman ◽  
Magnus Forssblad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tibial Translation

Abstract Purpose To evaluate and compare knee laxity and functional knee outcome between primary and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Patients who underwent primary and subsequent contralateral ACL reconstruction (ACLR) at Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, from 2001 to 2017, were identified in our local database. The inclusion criteria were: the same patients who underwent primary and contralateral hamstring tendon or bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft ACLR and no associated ligament injuries. The KT-1000 arthrometer, with an anterior tibial load of 134 N, was used to evaluate knee laxity preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up. Results A total of 326 patients with isolated primary and contralateral ACLR met the inclusion criteria (47.9% males; mean age at primary ACLR 23.9 ± 9.4 years and contralateral ACLR 27.9 ± 10.1 years). The arthrometric laxity measurements were available for primary and contralateral ACLR for 226 patients. The mean preoperative and postoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT), as well as the mean ATT reduction from preoperatively to postoperatively, did not differ significantly between primary and contralateral ACLR. The KOOS was available for primary and contralateral ACLR for 256 patients. No significant differences were found preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up between primary and contralateral ACLR for any of the five KOOS subscales. Conclusion The findings in this study showed that anterior knee laxity and functional knee outcome after contralateral ACLR are comparable to those after primary ACLR. It is important for clinicians to counsel patients about their expectations after contralateral ACLR. This study shows that the results after contralateral ACLR in terms of knee laxity and functional knee outcome are predictable and likely to be comparable to those after primary ACLR. Level of evidence Level III.

Comparison of outcomes of three surgical approaches for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty using a surface-replacing implant

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 608-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elvira Bodmer ◽  
Miriam Marks ◽  
Stefanie Hensler ◽  
Stephan Schindele ◽  
Daniel B. Herren
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Joint Motion ◽  
Extension Deficit ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Volar Approach ◽  
The Mean

The objective was to compare outcomes of the volar, Chamay and tendon splitting approaches for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty using a surface-replacing implant (CapFlex-PIP). One-hundred prospectively documented patients with a 2-year follow-up were included. Range of proximal interphalangeal joint motion, the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and complications were analysed. Between baseline and follow-up, mean proximal interphalangeal joint motion increased for the volar (53° to 54°), Chamay (38° to 53°) and tendon splitting (40° to 61°) approaches. The volar approach yielded the greatest flexion and the highest extension deficit. The mean brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores at baseline and 2 years were 45 and 74 (volar), 45 and 66 (Chamay) and 41 and 75 (tendon splitting). Seven patients in the Chamay group and two in the volar group required a reoperation consisting of teno-/arthrolysis. The tendon splitting approach tended to result in the best outcomes that were associated with fewer complications compared with the volar and Chamay approaches. Level of evidence: IV

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis Versus Microfracture of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596712095928
Author(s):  
Jun-Ho Kim ◽  
Jae-Won Heo ◽  
Dae-Hee Lee
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Common Procedure ◽  
Subjective Score ◽  
The Mean

Background: Microfracture (MFx) is the most common procedure for treating chondral lesions in the knee; however, initial improvements decline after 2 years. Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) may overcome this shortcoming by combining MFx with collagen scaffolds. However, the outcomes of AMIC and MFx in the knee have not been compared. Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of AMIC and MFx over a minimum 2-year follow-up. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases identified studies of patients who underwent AMIC or MFx and that reported validated clinical outcome measure and/or radiological evaluation findings at a follow-up of ≥2 years. There were 2 reviewers who performed study selection, a risk of bias assessment, and data extraction. Results: Overall, 29 studies were included in this systematic review. The mean improvement on the Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and visual analog scale for pain did not differ significantly between the 2 procedures. The mean improvement on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score was significantly greater in the AMIC (45.9 [95% CI, 36.2-55.5]) than in the MFx (27.2 [95% CI, 23.3-31.1]) group ( P < .001). In addition, the mean magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue score was significantly higher in the AMIC (69.3 [95% CI, 55.1-83.5]) versus MFx (41.0 [95% CI, 27.3-54.7]) group ( P = .005), and the mean adequate defect filling rate on magnetic resonance imaging scans was significantly better in the AMIC (77.3% [95% CI, 66.7%-87.9%]) versus MFx (47.9% [95% CI, 29.2%-66.6%]) group ( P = .008) (odds ratio, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.07-2.33]). Conclusion: No significant differences in clinical outcomes, except for the IKDC subjective score, were found between the AMIC and MFx groups. Greater improvement in IKDC subjective scores and magnetic resonance imaging findings were seen in patients treated with AMIC compared with MFx at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

scholarly journals Return to sport after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 771-778
Author(s):  
Julie Küffer ◽  
Mohy E. Taha ◽  
Pierre Hoffmeyer ◽  
Gregory Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Sport Activity ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder ◽  
Mean Time

The main goal of this study was to determine the rate of return to sport (RTS) after shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. All clinical studies written in English, French or German, with a level of evidence of 1 to 4, and evaluating return to sport after shoulder arthroplasty, were included. A total of 23 studies were included with 2199 patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty (HA), anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Mean age was 68 years (range 18 to 92.6), sex ratio (male:female) was 1:1.5. The surgery was performed on the non-dominant/dominant shoulder in 1:1.8 cases. The mean follow-up was 4.2 years. The rate of RTS was 75.5% with a mean time of 7 months. It was 77.4% for TSA, 75% for RSA and 71.2% for HA (P = non-significant). RTS after shoulder arthroplasty is high, regardless the type of arthroplasty, with a trend for a higher rate after TSA. Patients who were able to maintain a sport activity preoperatively had a greater chance of RTS after arthroplasty. Failure to RTS seems to be mostly linked to the severity of the underlying condition and length of preoperative disability. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:771-778. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200147

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document