Cabozantinib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in adults following prior vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy: clinical trial evidence and experience

Cabozantinib is an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that potently inhibits MET and AXL, both associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), next to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, KIT, FLT3 and RET. Chronic treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeting sunitinib upregulates MET and AXL in RCC, indicating that cabozantinib may be particularly effective in patients with advanced RCC whose disease progressed on prior VEGFR-targeted treatment. Cabozantinib (60 mg once daily) has been investigated in comparison to everolimus (10 mg once daily) in a phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 658 patients with advanced RCC of whom 71% had received one prior and 29% had received at least two prior lines of VEGR-targeted therapy. This study demonstrated highly significant improved progression-free survival of 7.4 months versus 3.9 months with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41–0.62] in favour of cabozantinib. Cabozantinib also showed a superior overall survival of 21.4 months versus 16.5 months (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.53–0.83). Objective response rate was higher in cabozantinib-treated patients, 17% versus 3%. Clinical benefit was shown in all subgroups of patients, including in patients with bone or visceral metastases. The safety profile was acceptable with manageable side effects. Based on this study, cabozantinib is a highly effective approved second-line treatment option for patients with advanced RCC with a manageable toxicity profile. Other recently approved second-line agents include checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab and VEGF-targeting agent lenvatinib combined with everolimus. In the absence of predictive markers as well as head-to-head comparisons of these three recently approved treatments, the choice between these drugs in second-line treatment will probably be made based on comorbidities, tolerability of previous treatment and presence of high tumour burden with rapidly progressive disease. Future pretreatment assessment of MET and AXL tumour aberration may aid clinicians to make a rational choice between currently approved second-line treatment options.

Download Full-text

Treatment options in advanced renal cell carcinoma after first-line treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Canadian Urological Association Journal ◽

10.5489/cuaj.4292 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 10 (11-12) ◽

pp. 242 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Naveen S. Basappa

Keyword(s):

Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽

Targeted Therapy ◽

Growth Factor ◽

Renal Cell ◽

Vascular Endothelial ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Line Setting ◽

Endothelial Growth Factor

Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) was introduced a decade ago, and since then a number of therapeutic options have been developed. Vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy is the widely accepted first-line option for mRCC. After progression, treatment in the second-line setting has typically been with either axitinib or everolimus. However, with the advent of several new agents demonstrating efficacy in the second-line setting, including nivolumab, cabozantinib, and the combination of lenvatinib and everolimus, the treatment paradigm has shifted toward these novel therapies with improved patient outcomes.

Download Full-text

Docetaxel As Monotherapy or Combined With Ramucirumab or Icrucumab in Second-Line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: An Open-Label, Three-Arm, Randomized Controlled Phase II Trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2015.65.0218 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (13) ◽

pp. 1500-1509 ◽

Cited By ~ 54

Author(s):

Daniel P. Petrylak ◽

Scott T. Tagawa ◽

Manish Kohli ◽

Andrea Eisen ◽

Christina Canil ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽

Growth Factor ◽

Urothelial Carcinoma ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Growth Factor Receptor ◽

Vascular Endothelial ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma ◽

Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of docetaxel monotherapy or docetaxel in combination with ramucirumab (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antibody) or icrucumab (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 antibody) after progression during or within 12 months of platinum-based regimens for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle (arm A), docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV plus ramucirumab 10 mg/kg IV on day 1 of a 3-week cycle (arm B), or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 plus icrucumab 12 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle (arm C). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 140 patients were randomly assigned and treated in arms A (n = 45), B (n = 46), or C (n = 49). PFS was significantly longer in arm B compared with arm A (median, 5.4 months; 95% CI, 3.1 to 6.9 months v 2.8 months; 95% CI, 1.9 to 3.6 months; stratified hazard ratio, 0.389; 95% CI, 0.235 to 0.643; P = .0002). Arm C did not experience improved PFS compared with arm A (1.6 months; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9; stratified hazard ratio, 0.863; 95% CI, 0.550 to 1.357; P = .5053). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events (arms A, B, and C) were neutropenia (36%, 33%, and 39%), fatigue (13%, 30%, and 20%), febrile neutropenia (13%, 17%, and 6.1%), and anemia (6.7%, 13%, and 14%, respectively). Conclusion The addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel met the prespecified efficacy end point for prolonging PFS in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving second-line treatment and warrants further investigation in the phase III setting.

Download Full-text

Large Skin Ulcer and Delayed Wound Healing around a Colostomy in a Patient with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 Inhibitor Therapy

Case Reports in Oncology ◽

10.1159/000500412 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 370-375 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Koichi Taira ◽

Yuji Nadatani ◽

Shinji Hirano ◽

Kiyoshi Maeda ◽

Yasuhiro Fujiwara

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽

Growth Factor ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Growth Factor Receptor ◽

Vascular Endothelial ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Endothelial Growth Factor ◽

Large Skin

Ramucirumab is an antiangiogenic agent targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF)-2 that has been approved for second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. VEGF-targeted therapy has various distinctive adverse effects owing to its antitumour effects. However, little is known with regard to its skin toxicity, such as its ability to cause skin ulcers. We report a case of large skin ulceration around a colostomy and delayed healing caused by ramucirumab. A 58-year-old patient diagnosed with rectal cancer with liver and lung metastases. He was administered folinic acid, fluorouracil (5-FU), and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and bevacizumab as first-line treatment. A laparoscopic colostomy was performed for suspected worsening of the bowel obstruction. He was then administered folinic acid, 5 fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and ramucirumab as second-line treatment after surgery. However, dehiscence and a small skin ulceration caused by ramucirumab developed around the colostomy which increased in size and became necrotic; therefore, he was administered only FOLFIRI, without ramucirumab. The ulcer decreased in size slightly with surgical debridement and showering. He resumed FOLFIRI and ramucirumab.

Download Full-text