Microbial contamination of light curing units: a pilot study

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 217-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Janoowalla ◽  
K. Porter ◽  
ACC Shortall ◽  
FJT Burke ◽  
RL Sammons
2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 241-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Bhanot ◽  
Sriharsha Rao ◽  
Shobha Sharma ◽  
Edmond S Malka ◽  
Monica Ghitan ◽  
...  

phygmomanometers are frequently contaminated with bacteria and are implicated in the transmission of microbes. A pilot study was conducted to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of using a physical barrier device in reducing rates of microbial contamination of sphygmomanometer cuffs. Blood pressure recordings were made with and without a disposable plastic device on healthy individuals to ensure that it did not interfere with the accuracy of readings. Baseline rates of microbial colonisation of sphygmomanometer cuffs were obtained over a six week period. For six weeks the device was applied to patients’ arms before measuring blood pressure, and sphygmomanometer cuffs were recultured during the intervention period. No difference was found in blood pressure recordings with and without the device. No difference in rates of bacterial contamination was observed during the intervention phase of the study. A disposable plastic device acting as a physical barrier may not reduce surface contamination of sphygmomanometer cuffs.


Odontology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rutger Matthes ◽  
Lukasz Jablonowski ◽  
Birte Holtfreter ◽  
Christiane Pink ◽  
Thomas Kocher

AbstractPeri-implantitis is caused by microbial contamination and biofilm formation on the implant surface. To achieve re-osseointegration, the microbes must be completely removed from the surface. Adjunctive to mechanical cleaning, chemical treatment with enzymes or other substances could optimise the treatment outcome. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of different enzymes, a surfactant, and a chelator in destabilising dental polymicrobial biofilm. The biofilm destabilising effect of the glycosidases α-amylase, dextranase, DispersinB®, and lysozyme, as well as the proteinase subtilisin A, and the nuclease Benzonase®, the chelator EDTA, and the surfactant cocamidopropyl betaine were investigated on biofilms, inoculated with plaque on rough titanium discs. The test and the control solutions were incubated for 15 min at 36 °C on biofilms, and loosened biofilm mass was removed by shear stress with a shaker. Fluorescence-stained biofilms were microscopically analysed. Acceptable cell tolerability concentrations of test substances were determined by the MTT (tetrazolium dye) assay on the MG-63 cell line. A statistically significant biofilm destabilising effect of 10% was shown with lysozyme (2500 µg/ml).


Author(s):  
Ines B. Moura ◽  
Duncan Ewin ◽  
Mark H. Wilcox

Abstract Using a bacteriophage to represent microbial contamination, we investigated virus transmission to the hospital environment following hand drying. The use of paper towels resulted in lower rates of virus contamination on hands and clothing compared with a jet air dryer and, consequently, lower contamination of multiple hospital surfaces.


1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. Taji ◽  
A. H. Rogers

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-71
Author(s):  
José Henrique Nascimento Souza-Junior ◽  
André Farias Andrade ◽  
Luiz Evaristo Ricci Volpato ◽  
Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto ◽  
Aurélio Rosa da Silva Junior ◽  
...  

AbstractPhotoactivated composite resins are among the most widespread restorative materials in dentistry, particularly in cosmetic dentistry. To obtain the best properties of the material, the resins must have their polymerization reaction initiated by means of the light-curing device, which activates the photoinitiators present in the composites. For this process to occur in the desired way, it is essential that the light-curing device emits light at the intensity necessary to properly activate the photoinitiators. Thus, a pilot study was carried out to assess the light intensity emitted by the light-curing devices used in a school clinic. To assess the light intensity emitted by the devices, a radiometer was used. Twenty-four light-curing devices were evaluated, 13 Optilight Max devices, 8 Optilight LD MAX 440 devices, 3 Emitter C. devices. All the devices had an emitted light below 400 mW / cm² and 67% of the devices had intensity above 300 mW/cm². The average light emission values of the light-curing devices were Optilight Max 334mW/cm², Emitter C 275mW/cm², Optilight LD MAX 440 296mW/cm². It was concluded that no light-curing device emitted light at the recommended intensity (400 mW/cm²), two thirds of the devices emitted light in intensity above the minimum required for photopolymerization of composite resin increments of up to 2mm and one third emitted light in intensity below the required minimum. There was no difference among the light-curing device models tested in this study. Keywords: Photoinitiators, Dental. Dental. Tooth. Composite Resins. ResumoAs resinas compostas fotoativadas estão entre os materiais restauradores mais difundidos em odontologia, particularmente na odontologia estética. Para obtenção das melhores propriedades do material, as resinas precisam ter sua reação de polimerização iniciada por meio do fotopolimerizador, que ativa os fotoiniciadores presentes nos compósitos. Para que esse processo ocorra da forma desejada, é fundamental que o fotopolimerizador emita a luz na intensidade necessária para ativar adequadamente os fotoiniciadores. Assim, foi realizado um estudo piloto para avaliadar a intensidade da luz emitida pelo fotopolimerizadores utilizados em uma clínica-escola. Para avaliar a intensidade da luz emitida pelos dispositivos, foi utilizado um radiômetro. Vinte e quatro fotopolimerizadores foram avaliados, 13 aparelhos Optilight Max, 8 aparelhos Optilight LD MAX 440, 3 aparelhos Emitter C. Todos os dispositivos tiveram a luz emitida em intensidade inferior a 400 mW/cm² e 67% dos dispositivos apresentaram intensidade acima de 300 mW/cm². As médias de valores de emissão de luz dos fotopolimerizadores foram, Optilight Max 334mW/cm², Emitter C 275mW/cm², Optilight LD MAX 440 296mW/cm²Concluiu-se que nenhum fotopolimerizador emitiu luz na intensidade recomendada (400 mW/cm²), dois terços dos aparelhos emitiram luz em intensidade acima da mínima necessária para fotopolimerização de incrementos de resina composta de até 2mm e um terço emitiu luz em intensidade abaixo da mínima necessária. Não houve diferença entre os modelos de fotopolimerizador testados neste estudo. Palavras-chave: Fotoiniciadores Dentários. Dente. Resinas Compostas.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1000-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tânia Claro ◽  
Marese O'Reilly ◽  
Stephen Daniels ◽  
Hilary Humphreys

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document