scholarly journals Improving access to oral healthcare for people experiencing homelessness is good for public health

2022 ◽  
Vol 142 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-12
Author(s):  
Robert Witton ◽  
Martha Paisi
Keyword(s):  
BMJ ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 319 (7216) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Gibbs ◽  
N. Thalange
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
David Pencheon ◽  
Sonia Roschnik ◽  
Paul Cosford

This chapter will help you understand the relationships between health, health care, sustainability, climate change, and carbon reduction, locally and globally. The specific objectives of the chapter are to help you make the case for action by showing how health, health care, sustainable development, and climate change are linked positively such that what is good for mitigating climate change is also good for health and health care today, translate science into policy and practice and help move research and action about climate science into policy and practice, and engage a wide range of stakeholders and appreciate that, as in much public health practice, appropriate action comes from involving a diverse group of people through genuine engagement.


2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise C. Ivers ◽  
Evan S. Garfein ◽  
Josué Augustin ◽  
Maxi Raymonville ◽  
Alice T. Yang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 272-288
Author(s):  
James F. Childress

This chapter examines triage in a public health crisis resulting from a bioterrorist attack. Systems of triage, whether informal or formal, generally have an implicit or explicit utilitarian rationale—they are usually designed to produce the greatest good for the greatest number under conditions of scarcity. It is important to distinguish medical utility from social utility and, within the latter, between broad and narrow social utilitarian judgments. Judgments of broad social utility recognize the differential social value of people’s lives, whereas judgments of narrow social utility recognize the differential value of specific social functions and roles and assign priority to the individuals discharging certain functions and performing certain roles. Judgments of broad social utility infringe the egalitarian principle of equal regard in a way that judgments of medical utility do not. It is not justifiable to use broad social utility as a basis for rationing in general or in an emergency, but it is possible to justify triage based on medical utility and also on narrow social utility. Public trust will be essential in any public health crisis—hence, the public needs to have confidence that the procedures and standards of triage are fair and are fairly implemented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document