scholarly journals Management of anaemia in oncohaematological patients treated with biosimilar epoetin alfa: results of an Italian observational, retrospective study

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Rosti ◽  
Mario Petrini ◽  
Alberto Bosi ◽  
Piero Galieni ◽  
Daniele Bernardi ◽  
...  

Background: Many patients with solid tumours or nonmyeloid haematopoietic tumours develop symptomatic anaemia, which has a major impact on quality of life (QoL). The efficacy of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in improving QoL and reducing blood transfusions has been widely demonstrated. Binocrit® (biosimilar epoetin alfa) is an ESA indicated in the European Union for treating chemotherapy-induced anaemia. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Binocrit® on haemoglobin (Hb) levels in anaemic cancer patients in Italian clinical practice. Methods: The ANEMONE study was a national, longitudinal, retrospective, multicentre observational study. Patients had to be 18 years or older, with a solid tumour or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease or multiple myeloma, receiving chemotherapy, and treated with Binocrit® to manage chemotherapy-induced anaemia. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with a Hb increase ⩾1 g/dl during the first 4 weeks and with a Hb increase ⩾2 g/dl during the first 12 weeks. Results: A total of 245 patients were enrolled and 215 patients were evaluable for statistical analysis. In the first 4 weeks, 49.3% of patients showed an increase in Hb of ⩾1 g/dl: 45.5% in patients with solid tumours and 52.1% in patients with haematological malignancies. In the first 12 weeks, 51.6% of patients showed an increase in Hb of ⩾2 g/dl (48.4% solid tumours, 54.2% haematological diseases). Treatment with Binocrit® was well tolerated. Conclusions: These results confirm the effectiveness and safety of Binocrit® for chemotherapy-induced anaemia in routine practice in patients with solid tumours, lymphoma and myeloma.

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002453
Author(s):  
So-Young Yang ◽  
Sun-Kyeong Park ◽  
Hye-Rim Kang ◽  
Hye-Lin Kim ◽  
Eui-Kyung Lee ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo explore differences in end-of-life healthcare utilisation and medication costs between patients with haematological malignancies and patients with solid tumours.MethodsData on deceased patients with cancer were selected from the sample cohort data of health insurance claims from 2008 to 2015 in South Korea. They were categorised into two groups: patients with haematological malignancies and patients with solid tumours. Longitudinal data comprised the patient-month unit and aggregated healthcare utilisation and medication cost for 1 year before death. Healthcare utilisation included emergency room visits, hospitalisation and blood transfusions. Medication costs were subdivided into anticancer drugs, antibiotics, opioids, sedatives and blood preparation. Generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate differences between the two groups and time trends.ResultsOf the 8719 deceased patients with cancer, 349 died from haematological malignancies. Compared with solid tumours, patients with haematological malignancies were more likely to visit the emergency room (OR=1.36, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.69) and receive blood transfusions (OR=5.44, 95% CI 4.29 to 6.90). The length of hospitalisation of patients was significantly different (difference=2.49 days, 95% CI 1.75 to 3.22). Medication costs, except for anticancer treatment, increased as death approached. The costs of antibiotics and blood preparations were higher in patients with haematological malignancies than in those with solid tumours: 3.24 (95% CI 2.14 to 4.90) and 4.10 (95% CI 2.77 to 6.09) times higher, respectively.ConclusionsPatients with haematological malignancies are at a higher risk for aggressive care and economic burden at the end of life compared with those with solid tumours. Detailed attention is required when developing care plans for end-of-life care of haematological patients.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4001-4001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Voronina ◽  
Mario Ojeda-Urib ◽  
Charles Dauriac ◽  
Laurent Voillat ◽  
Camille Aubron-Olivier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: OncoBOS is a national, prospective, non-interventional, longitudinal, observational study describing biosimilar epoetin alfa (Binocrit®) use in routine practice in France in patients receiving chemotherapy treatment (CT) for solid tumors, lymphoma or myeloma. This sub-analysis focuses on the management of CIA in patients with MM. Patients and methods: Patients ≥18 years with MM, CIA and eligible for treatment with Binocrit® were included in this analysis. Patients characteristics, data on CIA and its management and predominant factors considered by the physician in prescribing Binocrit® were recorded at baseline, 3-4 weeks and 12 (± 1) weeks later. Hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes assessed included the proportion of patients achieving a Hb increase ≥1 and ≥2 g/dL, and the mean Hb change from baseline. Results: 99 patients with MM (mean age 71.1 years) from 20 sites were recruited from September 2011 to April 2014. 54.5% of subjects were male. Mean and median baseline Hb levels were 9.4 g/dL and 10 g/dL, respectively. The mean increase in Hb level was 1.1 g/dL after 1 month and 2.2 g/dL after 3 months (p<0.001 vs baseline) of Binocrit® treatment. A Hb increase ≥1 g/dL was achieved by 57.6% of patients at week 3-4 and 78.0% at week 12; a Hb increase ≥2 g/dL was achieved by 22.2% and 60.4% of patients at the same time points. Patients received a median dose of 30,000 IU Binocrit® once weekly. Four of the 99 patients (4.0%) required a dose increase; 3 of these patients had their dose doubled during the treatment period. Transfusion rates remained stable at 12.1% and 9.6% at week 3-4 and week 12, respectively. Oral and intravenous (IV) iron supplementation rates were low: oral iron was received by 1.0% and 2.2% of patients at week 3-4 and week 12, respectively; 1.0% and 1.1% of patients received IV supplementation at the same time points. Of note, these low rates could be explained by the fact that iron status (serum ferritin and transferrin saturation coefficient) was assessed in only 32.3% of subjects at baseline. Physicians considered quality of life (59.6%), fatigue (20.2%) and avoidance of blood transfusion (13.1%) as predominant factors in the rationale for anemia management and treatment. Over the treatment period, one treatment-related adverse reaction was recorded, which was not considered serious. Conclusion: This sub-analysis indicates that Binocrit®, used in routine practice, is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of CIA in patients with MM receiving CT. Disclosures Voronina: Sandoz: Investigator Other. Ojeda-Urib:Sandoz: Honoraria. Dauriac:Sandoz: Investigator Other. Voillat:Sandoz: Investigator Other. Aubron-Olivier:Sandoz: Employment. Fernet:Sandoz: Employment. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fitoussi:Sandoz: Honoraria.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 742-742
Author(s):  
Jean Philippe Metges ◽  
Jean-Pierre Crumbach ◽  
Daniela Petran ◽  
Vincent Boulanger ◽  
Otilia Stamerra ◽  
...  

742 Background: OncoBOS is a prospective, non-interventional study describing Binocrit use in routine practice in France in patients receiving chemotherapy treatment (CT) for solid tumors, lymphoma, or myeloma. This interim sub-analysis focuses on patients with CC, receiving usual chemotherapeutic agents. Methods: Patients ≥18 years with CC, CIA, and eligible for treatment with Binocrit were included in this analysis. Patients characteristics, data on CIA and its management, and predominant factors considered by the physician in prescribing Binocrit were recorded at baseline (BL), 3-4 weeks and 12 (±1) weeks later. Hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes assessed included the proportion of patients achieving a Hb increase ≥1 and ≥2 g/dL, and the mean Hb change from BL. Results: 96 patients with CC (51 males [53.1%], mean age 68.5 years) from 28 sites were recruited from September 2011 to April 2014. Mean and median BL Hb levels were 9.9 g/dL and 10 g/dL, respectively. The mean increase in Hb level was 1.2 g/dL after 1 month and 1.7 g/dL after 3 months (p<0.001 vs. BL) of Binocrit treatment. A Hb increase ≥1 g/dL was achieved by 56.8% of patients at week 3-4 and 77.6% at week 12; a Hb increase ≥2 g/dL was achieved by 17.9% and 47.4% of patients at the same time points. Patients received a median dose of 30,000 IU Binocrit once weekly. Four of the 96 patients (4.2%) required a dose increase. Transfusion rates remained low at 2.1% and 1.1% at week 3-4 and week 12, respectively. Oral and intravenous (IV) iron supplementation rates were low: oral iron was received by 4.2% and 4.7% of patients at week 3-4 and week 12, respectively; 15.6% and 9.3% of patients received IV supplementation at the same time points. Physicians considered quality of life (49%), fatigue (24%), and avoidance of blood transfusion (15.6%) as predominant factors in the rationale for CIA management. Over the treatment period, no treatment-related adverse reaction was recorded. Conclusions: This sub-analysis indicates that Binocrit, used in routine practice, is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of CIA in patients with CC, whatever CT received.


Author(s):  
Antonio Sarría-Santamera ◽  
Lorena Pinilla-Navas ◽  
Patricia González-Soriano ◽  
Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia ◽  
Teresa Moreno-Casbas ◽  
...  

(1) Background: The gap between research findings and their application in routine practice implies that patients and populations are not benefiting from the investment in scientific research. The objective of this work is to describe the process and main lessons obtained from the pilot practices and recommendation that have been implemented by CHRODIS-PLUS partner organizations; (2) Methods: CHRODIS-PLUS is a Joint Action funded by the European Union Health Programme that continues the work of Joint Action CHRODIS-JA. CHRODIS-PLUS has developed an Implementation Strategy that is being tested to implement innovative practices and recommendations in four main areas of action: health promotion and disease prevention, multimorbidity, fostering quality of care of patients with chronic diseases, and employment and chronic conditions; (3) Results: The Three-Stages CHRODIS-PLUS Implementation Strategy, based on a Local Implementation Working Group, has demonstrated that it can be applied for interventions and in situations and contexts of great diversity, reflecting both its validity and generalizability; (4) Conclusions: Implementation has to recognize the social dynamics associated with implementation, ensuring sympathy toward the culture and values that underpin these processes, which is a key differentiation from more linear improvement approaches.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 479-479
Author(s):  
Jean Philippe Metges ◽  
Jérôme Desramé ◽  
Vincent Bourgeois ◽  
Otilia Stamerra ◽  
Jean-Loup Mouysset ◽  
...  

479 Background: OncoBOS is a prospective, non-interventional study describing Binocrit use in routine practice in France in patients receiving chemotherapy treatment (CT) for solid tumors, lymphoma or myeloma. This interim sub-analysis focuses on patients with PC. Methods: Patients ≥18 years with PC, CIA and eligible for treatment with Binocrit were included in this analysis. Patients characteristics, data on CIA and its management and predominant factors considered by the physician in prescribing Binocrit were recorded at baseline (BL), 3-4 weeks and 12 (± 1) weeks later. Hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes assessed included the proportion of patients achieving a Hb increase ≥1 and ≥2 g/dL, and the mean Hb change from BL. Results: 59 patients with PC (32 females (54.2%), mean age 68.3 years) from 22 sites were recruited from September 2011 to April 2014. Mean and median BL Hb levels were both 10 g/dL. The mean increase in Hb level was 1.1 g/dL after 1 month and 1.2 g/dL after 3 months (p<0.001 vs BL) of Binocrit treatment. A Hb increase ≥1 g/dL was achieved by 48.3% of patients at week 3-4 and 54.2% at week 12; a Hb increase ≥2 g/dL was achieved by 25.9% and 35.4% of patients at the same time points. Patients received a median dose of 30,000 IU Binocrit once weekly. Three of the 59 patients (5.1%) required a dose increase. Transfusion rates remained stable at 11.9% and 15.1% at week 3-4 and week 12, respectively. Oral and intravenous (IV) iron supplementation rates were low: oral iron was received by 1.7% and 0% of patients at week 3-4 and week 12, respectively; 20.3% and 13.2% of patients received IV supplementation at the same time points. Of note, iron status was assessed in only 11.9% of subjects at BL. Physicians considered quality of life (37.3%), fatigue (25.4%) and avoidance of blood transfusion (10.2%) as predominant factors in the rationale for CIA management. Over the treatment period, three treatment-related adverse reactions (non-serious) were recorded. Conclusions: This sub-analysis indicates that Binocrit, used in routine practice, is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of CIA in patients with PC.


Plants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 370
Author(s):  
Arkadiusz Artyszak ◽  
Dariusz Gozdowski ◽  
Alicja Siuda

Water shortage and drought are a growing problem in Europe. Therefore, effective methods for limiting its effects are necessary. At the same time, the “field to fork” strategy adopted by the European Commission aims to achieve a significant reduction in the use of plant protection products and fertilizers in the European Union. In an experiment conducted in 2018–2020, the effect of the method of foliar fertilization containing silicon and potassium on the yield and technological quality of sugar beet roots was assessed. The fertilizer was used in seven combinations, differing in the number and time of application. The best results were obtained by treating plants during drought stress. The better soil moisture for the plants, the smaller the pure sugar yield increase was observed. It is difficult to clearly state which combination of silicon and potassium foliar application is optimal, as their effects do not differ greatly.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2311
Author(s):  
Eleonora Gaetani ◽  
Fabiana Agostini ◽  
Luigi Di Martino ◽  
Denis Occhipinti ◽  
Giulio Cesare Passali ◽  
...  

Background: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) needs high-quality care and multidisciplinary management. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most non-urgent clinical activities for HHT outpatients were suspended. We conducted an analytical observational cohort study to evaluate whether medical and psychological support, provided through remote consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic, could reduce the complications of HHT. Methods: A structured regimen of remote consultations, conducted by either video-calls, telephone calls, or e-mails, was provided by a multidisciplinary group of physicians to a set of patients of our HHT center. The outcomes considered were: number of emergency room visits/hospitalizations, need of blood transfusions, need of iron supplementation, worsening of epistaxis, and psychological status. Results: The study included 45 patients who received remote assistance for a total of eight months. During this period, 9 patients required emergency room visits, 6 needed blood transfusions, and 24 needed iron supplementation. This was not different from what was registered among the same 45 patients in the same period of the previous year. Remote care also resulted in better management of epistaxis and improved quality of life, with the mean epistaxis severity score and the Euro-Quality of Life-Visual Analogue Scale that were significantly better at the end than at the beginning of the study. Discussion: Remote medical care might be a valid support for HHT subjects during periods of suspended outpatient surveillance, like the COVID-19 pandemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document