scholarly journals Primary oral manifestation of Langerhans cell histiocytosis refractory to conventional therapy but susceptible to BRAF-specific treatment: a case report and review of the literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591987801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Neckel ◽  
Andrej Lissat ◽  
Arendt von Stackelberg ◽  
Nadine Thieme ◽  
Mohemed-Salim Doueiri ◽  
...  

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We report on a rare case of its primary oral manifestation that was treated successfully with the BRAF-specific agent, vemurafenib, after insufficient standard LCH treatment. This case underlines the importance of proper diagnosis and the evaluation of targeted therapy as a valuable tool in LCH treatment. Furthermore, the close collaboration of surgeons, oncologists, and dentists is mandatory to ensure adequate treatment, restore the stomatognathic system in debilitating post-treatment situations, improve quality of life, and ensure effective disease control in infants and young patients.

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. S16-S17
Author(s):  
M. Madhuchandan ◽  
J. MuruguSarasu ◽  
Dewan Pooja ◽  
Gomber Sunil ◽  
Mahajan Supriya

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e229483
Author(s):  
Samapika Routray ◽  
Amit Kumar Adhya ◽  
Joseph John ◽  
Punit Dikhit

A 6-year-old child with an episodic history of ulcerations over buccal mucosa was found to have severe inflammation on the palatal aspect of permanent first molars with grade 2 mobility bilaterally. Radiographical features were suggestive of bone loss around permanent molars extending to the distal aspect of the deciduous first molars. The clinical and radiographical findings were indicative of periodontal degeneration without any apparent cause visible intraorally. Further biopsy was done from the rashes present on the malar prominences, which showed nodular aggregates of atypical cells in superficial dermis. These large histiocytic cells with vesicular nuclei and nuclear grooves were immunopositive for CD1a and S100, concluding the diagnosis of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. For treatment, patient was referred to Department of Haemato-oncology and chemotherapy was suggested as per protocol.


Author(s):  
Lina Fadil ◽  
Emtenan Almajid

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disease, formally known as histiocytosis X that is characterized by abnormal proliferation of histiocytes derived from bone marrow (Langerhans cells), joined with leucocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, plasma cells and giant multi-nucleated cells causing tissue destruction. One of the first signs of LCH is oral manifestation, in some cases, the oral cavity may be the only affected area. With the chance of oral lesion incidence in LCH being 77%.Initial symptoms are generally nonspecific, which can easily cause misdiagnoses.The purpose of reporting this case is to discuss the features of LCH clinically and radiographically and in the role of the dentist when diagnosing such lesions for a proper management.An 11-year-old boy reported a complaint of swelling in the left side of the lower jaw that is asymptomatic and had been gradually increasing in size for the past 6 months without any improvements. After preforming a biopsy and diagnosing the lesion as LCH, the patient was then treated with a dose of vinblastine (6 mg/m2 intravenous bolus) for 24 weeks as a total period. Two years follow up; the patient showed no sign of recurrence and is in good general condition. In conclusion, reporting this case serves as documentation of the proper route of clinical assessment and diagnosis of LCH with the best possible treatment as guidance.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1041-1041
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Rizzo ◽  
Michelina Santopietro ◽  
Gianluca Sfaciotti ◽  
Marco Brunori ◽  
Luisa Cardarelli ◽  
...  

The knowledge of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) is based on pediatric studies. Adults with LCH are usually treated with pediatric protocols. In 2001, guidelines for adults with LCH (GIMEMA LCH 2001) were proposed, in order to standardize the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for this category of patients. The aims of this retrospective study are: a) to evaluate the role of a multidisciplinary assessment in adults with LCH, according to the GIMEMA LCH 2001 guidelines, and b) to analyze the results obtained with the GIMEMA LCH 2001 guidelines and those obtained with pediatric protocols. Pts aged >18 years with a diagnosis of LCH (S-100+, CD1a+, CD207+) managed at our Institution since 1985 to 2018 were considered. As diagnostic and treatment approaches, two different strategies were used over time: the GIMEMA LCH 2001 guidelines and the pediatric protocols. The GIMEMA LCH 2001 guidelines included a multidisciplinary diagnostic work-up with complete odontostomatologic, pulmonary and endocrinologic assessments; treatment strategy consisted of: wait and see or local therapy in unifocal single system (SS), indomethacin in bone multifocal SS and vinblastine combined with low-dose prednisone (PDN) in multi-system (MS), PDN in pulmonary honey-combing disease (PHCD) and cladribine in central nervous system involvement. DAL-HX 83 and 90, LCH-I and LCH II were the pediatric protocols utilized over time. Response to treatment was defined as complete (CR) or intermediate (IR). Persistence of the symptoms and/or appearance of new lesions were defined no response (NR). Progression was considered the appearance of symptoms and/or new lesions after initial response. One-hundred-thirty-one LCH pts (females 72, males 59) with a median age at diagnosis of 36 years (range 18 - 71) were considered. Median follow up was 43 months (range 12 - 330). One-hundred-seven patients were managed according to the GIMEMA LCH 2001 guidelines, 16 of them previously treated with a pediatric protocol. Pulmonary and/or oral involvements were identified in 31/107 (29%) and 12/107 (11%) patients, respectively, 5/16 (31%) and 3/16 (19%), respectively, of previously treated asymptomatic patients. Ninety-one newly diagnosed patients (median age at diagnosis: 36 years) were treated according to the GIMEMA LCH 2001 guidelines and 40 (median age at diagnosis: 33 years) were managed with pediatric protocols. All patients treated with the GIMEMA LCH 2001 were evaluable for response. In particular, all patients with SS-LCH achieved a response (100%), that was complete in 20/26 (76.9%) unifocal-SS and in 10/14 (71.4%) multifocal-SS. All but one patient with MS-LCH reached a response that was complete in 22/45 (48.9%). Of 6 pts with PHCD, 5 had a IR and one a CR. No pt presented CNS involvement at initial diagnosis. Thirty-nine of 40 pts managed with pediatric protocols were evaluable for response. All 13 pts with SS-LCH had a response that was complete in 6 (46.1%). Among 26 patients with MS-LCH, 3 of them with organ risk involvement achieved a response, that was complete in 1, while among 23 patients without organ risk, 12 (52.2%), 8 (34.8%) and 3 (13%) had a CR, IR and NR, respectively. Overall, 12 patients were lost to follow-up. Disease progression was recorded in 47/95 pts (49.5%) after a median time of 19 months (range: 6-147 months). The progression-free survival at 43 months was significantly better for patients treated according to the GIMEMA LCH 2001 guidelines compared to those managed with pediatric protocols, 67% (IC95% 53.14 - 80.86%) vs 48% (IC95% 31.37 - 64.63%), respectively (p 0.005). Overall, 7 deaths were recorded, 5 in patients treated with the pediatric protocols. The overall survival at 43 months, was similar in patients managed with the GIMEMA LCH 2001 guidelines and in those treated with pediatric protocols (97.9%, CI 95%: 93.75% - 100% and 97.3%, (IC95% 91.96% - 100%). BRAF V600E mutation was found in 13/35 (37%) evaluable cases. No differences in response and outcome between BRAFV600E-mutated patients and those not-mutated were found. Our experience in a large cohort of LCH adults shows that a multidisciplinary approach is useful in identifying organ involvement in adults, including those asymptomatic. This is critical for an adequate treatment. Moreover, guidelines specific for adults with LCH proved efficacy in improving the outcome in this category of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.M. Jantien Vrijmoet-Wiersma ◽  
Vicky M. Kooloos ◽  
Hendrik M. Koopman ◽  
Annemarie M. Kolk ◽  
Ingrid van der Laan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Luz ◽  
Daniel Zweifel ◽  
Martin Hüllner ◽  
Marco Bühler ◽  
Martin Rücker ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Davidson ◽  
J. Gordon McComb ◽  
Ira Bowen ◽  
Mark D. Krieger

Object The goal of this study was to review a large series of patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) who had craniospinal lesions to assess the long-term course, outcome, and efficacy of treatment of the disease. Methods Forty-four patients with LCH who presented to a single pediatric neurosurgical department between 1976 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Results This series included 29 boys and 15 girls, ranging in age from 2 months to 13 years, with a mean follow-up duration of 4.5 years. Twenty-seven patients (61%) had unifocal bone lesions, 12 (27%) had multifocal bone disease, 2 (5%) had solitary hypothalamic–pituitary axis lesions, and 3 (7%) had multiple organ involvement at presentation. Five (19%) of the 27 patients with unifocal bone disease and 4 (33%) of the 12 patients with multifocal bone disease had delayed development of new bone lesions during the follow-up period. The time to development of new bone lesions ranged from 1 month to 1 year. Two of the 3 patients with multiple-organ LCH died. Patient age ≤ 2 years at the time of initial presentation was a risk factor for both initial multifocality and eventual dissemination. In all patients with initial multifocal bone involvement or later dissemination of unifocal bone disease, LCH was controlled by chemotherapy, except for 2 who were treated by surgery alone. Three patients had histological evidence of spontaneous resolution of their lesions. Conclusions Patients with unifocal LCH can be effectively treated with surgery alone. Very young patients are more likely to have multifocal disease and disseminations, and will usually require chemotherapy to control their disease. Spontaneously regressing lesions need not be resected; however, a biopsy procedure can be performed for diagnostic purposes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document