scholarly journals A phase III, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of carboxyamidotriazole plus chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592096584
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Si ◽  
Jinwan Wang ◽  
Ying Cheng ◽  
Jianhua Shi ◽  
Liying Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Background: Carboxyamidotriazole (CAI), a calcium channel blocker, inhibits tumor cell proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis. This trial aimed to determine whether CAI combined with conventional chemotherapy could prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: Patients were assigned into groups (3:1 ratio) to receive either chemotherapy + CAI or chemotherapy alone. Cisplatin (25 mg/m2) was administered by intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, and 3, and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle for four cycles. CAI was administered at 100 mg daily with concomitant chemotherapy; this treatment was continued after chemotherapy was ceased until serious toxicity or disease progression had occurred. PFS was the primary endpoint, and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, overall survival (OS), and quality of life. Results: In total, 495 patients were enrolled in the trial: 378 in the chemotherapy + CAI group and 117 in the chemotherapy + placebo group. PFS was significantly greater in the chemotherapy + CAI [median, 134 days; 95% confidence interval (CI) 127–139] than in the chemotherapy + placebo (median, 98 days; 95% CI: 88–125) group, with a hazard ratio of 0.690 (95% CI: 0.539–0.883; p = 0.003). There was no difference in the OS rates of both groups. The ORR was greater in the chemotherapy + CAI group than in the chemotherapy + placebo group (34.6% versus 25.0%, p = 0.042). Adverse events of ⩾grade 3 occurred more frequently in the CAI group [256 (68.1%) versus 64 (55.2%); p = 0.014]. Conclusion: CAI + platinum-based chemotherapy prolonged PFS and could be a useful therapeutic option to treat NSCLC. Clinical Trial Registration: chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20160395

Randomized Phase III Placebo-Controlled Trial of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With or Without the Vascular Disrupting Agent Vadimezan (ASA404) in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (22) ◽  
pp. 2965-2971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Primo N. Lara ◽  
Jean-Yves Douillard ◽  
Kazuhiko Nakagawa ◽  
Joachim von Pawel ◽  
Mark J. McKeage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Vascular Disrupting Agent ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Vascular Disrupting

Purpose This phase III trial was conducted to test whether the novel vascular disrupting agent ASA404 (vadimezan), when combined with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, improves survival in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) versus chemotherapy alone. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, stratified by sex and tumor histology, were randomly assigned 1:1 to paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve, 6.0) with or without ASA404 (1,800 mg m2), given intravenously once every 3 weeks for six cycles followed by maintenance ASA404 or placebo. Primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results One thousand two hundred ninety-nine patients were randomly assigned. The trial was stopped for futility at interim analysis. At final analysis, there was no difference in OS seen between ASA404 (n = 649) and placebo (n = 650) arms: median OS was 13.4 and 12.7 months respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.19; P = .535). Similarly, no OS difference was seen in the histologic (squamous or nonsquamous) and sex (male or female) strata. Median PFS was 5.5 months in both arms (HR, 1.04; P = .727), while ORR was 25% in both arms (P = 1.0). Overall rate of adverse events (AEs) was comparable between the ASA404 and placebo arms. Grade 4 neutropenia (27% v 19%) and infusion site pain (10% v 0.5%) were reported more frequently in the ASA404 arm. Conclusion The addition of ASA404 to carboplatin and paclitaxel, although generally well tolerated, failed to improve frontline efficacy in advanced NSCLC.

Randomized, Phase III Study of Weekly Paclitaxel in Combination With Carboplatin Versus Standard Every-3-Weeks Administration of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 468-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandra P. Belani ◽  
Suresh Ramalingam ◽  
Michael C. Perry ◽  
Renato V. LaRocca ◽  
David Rinaldi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Alternative Treatment Option

Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin administered every 4 weeks to the standard regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin administered every 3 weeks for the treatment of patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Four hundred forty-four patients with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to either arm 1 (n = 223), paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) = 6 mg/mL · min on day 1 of each 4 week cycle, or arm 2 (n = 221), paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 6 on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. After four cycles of therapy, patients in both treatment arms were eligible to continue weekly paclitaxel (70 mg/m2, 3 of 4 weeks) as maintenance therapy until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Results The objective response rate was 27.6% for arm 1 and 19.2% for arm 2. Median time to progression (TTP) was 18.4 and median survival (MS) was 38.6 weeks for arm 1. For arm 2, the median TTP and MS were 16.7 weeks and 42.9 weeks respectively. Grade 3/4 anemia was more common with arm 1, although grade 2/3 neuropathy and arthralgia were less common. The remainder of the toxicities were similar between the two arms. Conclusion All efficacy parameters were similar between the two treatment arms. The favorable nonhematologic toxicity profile of arm 1 makes this an alternative treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase II Study of Pemetrexed and Carboplatin Plus Bevacizumab With Maintenance Pemetrexed and Bevacizumab As First-Line Therapy for Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (20) ◽  
pp. 3284-3289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyoti D. Patel ◽  
Thomas A. Hensing ◽  
Alfred Rademaker ◽  
Eric M. Hart ◽  
Matthew G. Blum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeThis study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab in patients with chemotherapy-naive stage IIIB (effusion) or stage IV nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsPatients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for six cycles. For patients with response or stable disease, pemetrexed and bevacizumab were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.ResultsFifty patients were enrolled and received treatment. The median follow-up was 13.0 months, and the median number of treatment cycles was seven (range, one to 51). Thirty patients (60%) completed ≥ six treatment cycles, and nine (18%) completed ≥ 18 treatment cycles. Among the 49 patients assessable for response, the objective response rate was 55% (95% CI, 41% to 69%). Median progression-free and overall survival rates were 7.8 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 11.5 months) and 14.1 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 19.6 months), respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was modest—anemia (6%; 0), neutropenia (4%; 0), and thrombocytopenia (0; 8%). Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were proteinuria (2%; 0), venous thrombosis (4%; 2%), arterial thrombosis (2%; 0), fatigue (8%; 0), infection (8%; 2%), nephrotoxicity (2%; 0), and diverticulitis (6%; 2%). There were no grade 3 or greater hemorrhagic events or hypertension cases.ConclusionThis regimen, involving a maintenance component, was associated with acceptable toxicity and relatively long survival in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. These results justify a phase III comparison against the standard-of-care in this patient population.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2354-2362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank V. Fossella ◽  
Russell DeVore ◽  
Ronald N. Kerr ◽  
Jeffrey Crawford ◽  
Ronald R. Natale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

PURPOSE: To confirm the promising phase II results of docetaxel monotherapy, this phase III trial was conducted of chemotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had previously failed platinum-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 373 patients were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (D100) or 75 mg/m2 (D75) versus a control regimen of vinorelbine or ifosfamide (V/I). The three treatment groups were well-balanced for key patient characteristics. RESULTS: Overall response rates were 10.8% with D100 and 6.7% with D75, each significantly higher than the 0.8% response with V/I (P = .001 and P = .036, respectively). Patients who received docetaxel had a longer time to progression (P = .046, by log-rank test) and a greater progression-free survival at 26 weeks (P = .005, by χ2 test). Although overall survival was not significantly different between the three groups, the 1-year survival was significantly greater with D75 than with the control treatment (32% v 19%; P = .025, by χ2 test). Prior exposure to paclitaxel did not decrease the likelihood of response to docetaxel, nor did it impact survival. There was a trend toward greater efficacy in patients whose disease was platinum-resistant rather than platinum-refractory and in patients with performance status of 0 or 1 versus 2. Toxicity was greatest with D100, but the D75 arm was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: This first randomized trial in this setting demonstrates that D75 every 3 weeks can offer clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced NSCLC whose disease has relapsed or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Phase III randomized trial comparing cisplatin and carboplatin with or without ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1388-1396 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Sculier ◽  
M Paesmans ◽  
J Thiriaux ◽  
J Lecomte ◽  
G Bureau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Moderate Dose

PURPOSE A phase III randomized trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was performed to determine if the addition of ifosfamide to moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin improved response rate (primary end point) and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 529 patients were randomized to receive a combination of moderate-dose carboplatin (200 mg/m2 intravenously [i.v.] on day 1) and cisplatin (30 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2 and 3) with (CCI arm) or without (CC arm) ifosfamide (1.5 g/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 3). There were 248 eligible patients on the CC arm and 257 on the CCI arm, with 220 and 238 patients assessable for response, respectively. All but 23 had stage IV disease with pleural effusion. RESULTS There was a 16% objective response (OR) rate to CC and a 31% OR rate to CCI. That observed difference was highly statistically significant (P < 0.001). Duration of response and survival were not statistically different between arms. The CCI regimen was associated with significantly more acute toxicities: emesis, alopecia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. The frequency of chronic renal, auditive, and peripheral neurologic toxicity was low in both arms (4.6% and 6.6%, respectively, after six courses of chemotherapy). The relative dose-intensity (RDI) of the CCI arm was significantly lower than that of the CC arm. CONCLUSION The addition of ifosfamide to moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin significantly improves the antitumoral response rate, but has no apparent effect an survival in advanced NSCLC.

Customizing Cisplatin Based on Quantitative Excision Repair Cross-Complementing 1 mRNA Expression: A Phase III Trial in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2747-2754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Dolores Isla ◽  
Bartomeu Massuti ◽  
Ana Montes ◽  
Jose Miguel Sanchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Purpose Although current treatment options for metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) rely on cisplatin-based chemotherapy, individualized approaches to therapy may improve response or reduce unnecessary toxicity. Excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) has been associated with cisplatin resistance. We hypothesized that assigning cisplatin based on pretreatment ERCC1 mRNA levels would improve response. Patients and Methods From August 2001 to October 2005, 444 stage IV NSCLC patients were enrolled. RNA was isolated from pretreatment biopsies, and quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assays were performed to determine ERCC1 mRNA expression. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to either the control or genotypic arm before ERCC1 assessment. Patients in the control arm received docetaxel plus cisplatin. In the genotypic arm, patients with low ERCC1 levels received docetaxel plus cisplatin, and those with high levels received docetaxel plus gemcitabine. The primary end point was the overall objective response rate. Results Of 444 patients enrolled, 78 (17.6%) went off study before receiving one cycle of chemotherapy, mainly due to insufficient tumor tissue for ERCC1 mRNA assessment. Of the remaining 346 patients assessable for response, objective response was attained by 53 patients (39.3%) in the control arm and 107 patients (50.7%) in the genotypic arm (P = .02). Conclusion Assessment of ERCC1 mRNA expression in patient tumor tissue is feasible in the clinical setting and predicts response to docetaxel and cisplatin. Additional studies are warranted to optimize methodologies for ERCC1 analysis in small tumor samples and to refine a multibiomarker profile predictive of patient outcome.

scholarly journals Randomized, Phase III Trial of First-Line Figitumumab in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Alone in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (19) ◽  
pp. 2059-2066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey J. Langer ◽  
Silvia Novello ◽  
Keunchil Park ◽  
Maciej Krzakowski ◽  
Daniel D. Karp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

Purpose Figitumumab (CP-751,871), a fully human immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody, inhibits the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R). Our multicenter, randomized, phase III study compared figitumumab plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC disease with nonadenocarcinoma histology received open-label figitumumab (20 mg/kg) plus paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 6 mg · min/mL) or paclitaxel and carboplatin alone once every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Of 681 randomly assigned patients, 671 received treatment. The study was closed early by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee because of futility and an increased incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) and treatment-related deaths with figitumumab. Median OS was 8.6 months for figitumumab plus chemotherapy and 9.8 months for chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.40; P = .06); median progression-free survival was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.4) and 4.6 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.4), respectively (HR, 1.10; P = .27); the objective response rates were 33% and 35%, respectively. The respective rates of all-causality SAEs were 66% and 51%; P < .01). Treatment-related grade 5 adverse events were also more common with figitumumab (5% v 1%; P < .01). Conclusion Adding figitumumab to standard chemotherapy failed to increase OS in patients with advanced nonadenocarcinoma NSCLC. Further clinical development of figitumumab is not being pursued.

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine as first line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17076-17076 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. McNeill ◽  
S. Kalmadi ◽  
M. Davis ◽  
D. Peereboom ◽  
D. J. Adelstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Doublet

17076 Background: A platinum doublet has been the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and good performance status. This treatment results in almost a doubling of 1-year survival, along with an improvement in quality of life despite treatment related toxicities. However, platinum based treatment is associated with significant toxicity. Methods: In this trial, we prospectively evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel and gemcitabine for advanced NSCLC from December 2001 to January 2005. The endpoints of this study included objective response rate, survival and toxicity. Forty-two patients with previously untreated, advanced NSCLC with PS 0–1 were included. Patients received docetaxel (36 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (600 mg/m2) on days 1,8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Responses were assessed every two cycles. Results: The median age was 63 years; with 22 males and 20 females; 67% were >60 years old; and 38 patients had stage IV disease. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of response, 16 patients had a partial response (38%) and 15 patients had stable disease (36%). The 1-year survival was 48%; median survival for all patients was 11.3 months and the median progression-free survival was 5.1 months. Toxicities (> grade 3) included neutropenia (29%), asthenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (14%), diarrhea (14%), pneumonitis (7%), peripheral neuropathy (5%), peripheral edema (5%), nail changes (2%), and myositis (2%). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that this non-platinum doublet (docetaxel + gemcitabine) given on a weekly schedule for advanced NSCLC was well tolerated with efficacy comparable to platinum based chemotherapy regimens. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of docetaxel and S-1 combination therapy in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18122-18122
Author(s):  
S. Atagi ◽  
M. Kawahara ◽  
A. Kubo ◽  
T. Kawaguchi ◽  
K. Yumine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Previously Treated

18122 Background: Docetaxel is active against chemotherapy-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). S-1 is a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, composed of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenase inhibitor), and potassium oxonate (orotate phosphoribosyl transferase inhibitor). It has been commercially available and used for NSCLC in Japan. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel combined with S-1 in NSCLC patients (pts) who were previously treated with one or more regimens. Methods: Eligible pts were required to have histologically or cytologically confirmed measurable or evaluable stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, age= 20 years, one or more previous chemotherapy, a performance status (PS) 0–1, and adequate organ function and bone marrow reserve. In this study, pts received S-1 (80 mg/m2 orally on days 1–14) and docetaxel (40mg/m2 IV on days 1). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Results: Between January 2005 and May 2006, 30 pts were enrolled on this study. 29 pts were eligible and evaluable. Median age was 67 (48–79), male/female (23/6), PS 0/1 (9/20), stage IIIB/IV (7/22), and prior chemotherapy regimen 1/2/3 (23/4/2). 28 pts received a platinum-based chemotherapy. Response: PR=7(24%), SD=13, PD=7, NE=2. Median survival time was 10.2 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities (% of pts) were as follows: leukocytes 6/0 (20.6%), neutrophils 7/3 (34.4%), platelets 0/0, infection 0/1 (3.4%), fever 2/0 (6.9%), diarrhea 1/0 (3.4%), neurology 0/1 (3.4%), and mucositis 1/0 (3.4%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel and S-1 was effective with acceptable toxicity in pts with previously treated NSCLC. These results warrant further investigations of this regimen a randomized controlled trial as a second-line treatment for NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document