Immune Response Evaluation Through Determination of Type 1, Type 2, and Type 17 Patterns in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 828-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Batista Cândido ◽  
Luciana Maria Silva ◽  
Andréa Teixeira Carvalho ◽  
Rívia Mara Lamaita ◽  
Roberto Mundim Porto Filho ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1592-1600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Dahl Steffensen ◽  
Marianne Waldstrøm ◽  
Anni Grove ◽  
Bente Lund ◽  
Niels Pallisgård ◽  
...  

ObjectiveAn increasing body of evidence has suggested that epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients can broadly be divided into 2 groups on the basis of histopathologic parameters and molecular profiles. Type 1 tumors are slow-growing tumors with inherent mutations such as KRAS or BRAF mutations, whereas type 2 tumors are more rapidly growing tumors of which many contain TP53 mutations. In the present study, we performed a comprehensive study in a large Danish material to evaluate the clinical importance.Materials and MethodsA total of 512 tissue samples were included (430 EOCs, 34 borderline, 28 benign tumors, and 20 normal ovaries). KRAS mutations (codon 12/13) and BRAF codon 600 mutations were analyzed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue by ARMS qPCR. p53 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry.ResultsOf the EOC patients, 25% had histopathologically classified type 1 tumors, and of these, 44% were either KRAS or BRAF mutated. Of patients with histopathologic type 2 tumors, 66% showed p53 protein overexpression, whereas 4 (1.5%) patients contained a KRAS mutation. In a univariate survival analysis, a large difference in survival was seen between patients with type 1 and type 2 tumors. Patients with type histologic 2 tumors had significantly worse survival compared with patients with type 1 tumors (P< 10−5). International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, tumor grade, residual tumor, and KRAS/BRAF mutation were independent predictors of overall survival in the multivariate analysis. Patients with KRAS/BRAF mutated carcinomas showed independent decreased overall survival with a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.13–3.57;P= 0.018).ConclusionsKRAS/BRAF mutations are with very few exceptions constrained to patients with histopathologic type 1 tumors, whereas p53 overexpression is very frequent in type 2 tumors. KRAS/BRAF mutations had independent prognostic importance. The classification presented here should have a major therapeutic implication and serve as a hallmark of future clinical trials.


2015 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
pp. 591
Author(s):  
Anze Urh ◽  
Nicole Romano ◽  
KyuKwang Kim ◽  
Jennifer Ribeiro ◽  
Christina Raker ◽  
...  

1949 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-288
Author(s):  
B. E. Quinn

Abstract Two types of problems are dealt with in the paper which are involved in the design of mechanisms required to have specified dynamic characteristics: (1) Determination of applied forces required to produce specified dynamic characteristics. (2) Determination of the dynamic characteristics which will result from the application of known forces. While graphical methods may be used in the solution of type (1) problems involving more or less complex mechanical systems, they do not afford a direct approach to type (2) problems. The energy method which will be outlined can be applied in either case, although this paper will be primarily concerned with the determination of the dynamic characteristics which result when a known force is applied to a given mechanism.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2923-2928
Author(s):  
Gaurav Kr Thakur ◽  
Tusha Sharma ◽  
T Krishna Latha ◽  
B D Banerjee ◽  
Harendra Kr Shah ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Matthew J. Simmonds ◽  
Stephen C. L. Gough

Dysfunction within the endocrine system can lead to a variety of diseases with autoimmune attack against individual components being some of the most common. Endocrine autoimmunity encompasses a spectrum of disorders including, e.g., common disorders such as type 1 diabetes, Graves’ disease, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, and rarer disorders including Addison’s disease and the autoimmune polyendocrine syndromes type 1 (APS 1) and type 2 (APS 2) (see Table 1.6.1). Autoimmune attack within each of these diseases although aimed at different endocrine organs is caused by a breakdown in the immune system’s ability to distinguish between self and nonself antigens, leading to an immune response targeted at self tissues. Investigating the mechanisms behind this breakdown is vital to understand what has gone wrong and to determine the pathways against which therapeutics can be targeted. Before discussing how self-tolerance fails, we first have to understand how the immune system achieves self-tolerance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document