scholarly journals Occult catheter rupture causing episodic symptoms in a patient treated with epoprostenol

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 204589321774805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara L. LeVarge ◽  
Anica C. Law ◽  
Blanche Murphy

Infection, thrombosis, and catheter dislodgment are well-recognized potential complications of chronic intravenous prostanoid therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. As long-term outcomes of pulmonary hypertension patients improve, novel adverse events are likely to arise. We describe the sudden development of unexplained hypotension and lightheadedness in a patient receiving intravenous epoprostenol for several years, ultimately determined to be due to an unusual catheter complication, not previously described in this population.

2021 ◽  
pp. 2102024
Author(s):  
Marius M. Hoeper ◽  
Christine Pausch ◽  
Ekkehard Grünig ◽  
Gerd Staehler ◽  
Doerte Huscher ◽  
...  

BackgroundSince 2015, the European pulmonary hypertension guidelines recommend the use of combination therapy in most patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, it is unclear to what extend this treatment strategy is adopted in clinical practice and if it is associated with improved long-term survival.MethodsWe analysed data from COMPERA, a large European pulmonary hypertension registry, to assess temporal trends in the use of combination therapy and survival of patients with newly diagnosed PAH between 2010 and 2019. For survival analyses, we look at annualized data and at cumulated data comparing the periods 2010–2014 and 2015–2019.ResultsA total of 2,531 patients were included. The use of early combination therapy (within 3 months after diagnosis) increased from 10.0% in patients diagnosed with PAH in 2010 to 25.0% in patients diagnosed with PAH in 2019. The proportion of patients receiving combination therapy 1 year after diagnosis increased from 27.7% to 46.3%. When comparing the 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 periods, 1-year survival estimates were similar (89.0% [95% CI, 87.2%, 90.9%] and 90.8% [95% CI, 89.3%, 92.4%]), respectively, whereas there was a slight but non-significant improvement in 3-year survival estimates (67.8% [95% CI, 65.0%, 70.8%] and 70.5% [95% CI, 67.8%, 73.4%]), respectively.ConclusionsThe use of combination therapy increased from 2010 to 2019, but most patients still received monotherapy. Survival rates at 1 year after diagnosis did not change over time. Future studies need to determine if the observed trend suggesting improved 3-year survival rates can be confirmed.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. e0193226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rogério Souza ◽  
Richard N. Channick ◽  
Marion Delcroix ◽  
Nazzareno Galiè ◽  
Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document