scholarly journals Obesity and sudden cardiac death in the young: Clinical and pathological insights from a large national registry

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gherardo Finocchiaro ◽  
Michael Papadakis ◽  
Harshil Dhutia ◽  
Della Cole ◽  
Elijah R Behr ◽  
...  

Aims Obesity is an increasing public health problem and a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. The aim of the study was to determine the main features and aetiologies in a large cohort of sudden cardiac deaths that occurred in obese subjects. Methods Between 1994 and 2014, 3684 consecutive cases of unexpected sudden cardiac death were referred to our cardiac pathology centre. This study was confined to young individuals (age ≤ 35 years) for whom information about body mass index was available and consisted of 1033 cases. Results Two-hundred and twelve individuals (20%) were obese. In obese sudden cardiac death victims the main post-mortem findings were: normal heart (sudden arrhythmic death syndrome) ( n = 108; 50%), unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy ( n = 25; 12%) and critical coronary artery disease ( n = 25; 12%). Less common were hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ( n = 4; 2%) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy ( n = 4;2%). When compared with non-obese sudden cardiac death victims, sudden arrhythmic death syndrome was less common (50% vs. 60%, P < 0.01), whereas left ventricular hypertrophy and critical coronary artery disease were more frequent (12% vs. 2%, P < 0.001 and 12% vs. 3%, P < 0.001, respectively). The prevalence of critical and non-critical coronary artery disease was significantly higher in obese individuals (23% vs. 10% in non-obese individuals, P < 0.001). Conclusions Various conditions underlie sudden cardiac death in obesity, with a prevalence of sudden arrhythmic death syndrome, left ventricular hypertrophy and coronary artery disease. The degree of left ventricular hypertrophy measured by heart weight is excessive even after correction for body size. Almost one in four young obese sudden death patients show some degree of coronary artery disease, underscoring the need for primary prevention in this particular subgroup.

Author(s):  
Francis J. Ha ◽  
Hui-Chen Han ◽  
Prashanthan Sanders ◽  
Kim Fendel ◽  
Andrew W. Teh ◽  
...  

Background: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the young is devastating. Contemporary incidence remains unclear with few recent nationwide studies and limited data addressing risk factors for causes. We aimed to determine incidence, trends, causes, and risk factors for SCD in the young. Methods and Results: The National Coronial Information System registry was reviewed for SCD in people aged 1 to 35 years from 2000 to 2016 in Australia. Subjects were identified by the International Classification of Diseases , Tenth Revision code relating to circulatory system diseases (I00–I99) from coronial reports. Baseline demographics, circumstances, and cause of SCD were obtained from coronial and police reports, alongside autopsy and toxicology analyses where available. During the study period, 2006 cases were identified (median age, 28±7 years; men, 75%; mean body mass index, 29±8 kg/m 2 ). Annual incidence ranged from 0.91 to 1.48 per 100 000 age-specific person-years, which was the lowest in 2013 to 2015 compared with previous 3-year intervals on Poisson regression model ( P =0.001). SCD incidence was higher in nonmetropolitan versus metropolitan areas (0.99 versus 0.53 per 100 000 person-years; P <0.001). The most common cause of SCD was coronary artery disease (40%), followed by sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (14%). Incidence of coronary artery disease–related SCD decreased from 2001–2003 to 2013–2015 ( P <0.001). Proportion of SCD related to sudden arrhythmic death syndrome increased during the study period ( P =0.02) although overall incidence was stable ( P =0.22). Residential remoteness was associated with coronary artery disease–related SCD (odds ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.24–1.67]; P <0.001). For every 1-unit increase, body mass index was associated with increased likelihood of SCD from cardiomegaly (odds ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.05–1.11]; P <0.001) and dilated cardiomyopathy (odds ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01–1.06]; P =0.005). Conclusions: Incidence of SCD in the young and specifically coronary artery disease–related SCD has declined in recent years. Proportion of SCD related to sudden arrhythmic death syndrome increased over the study period. Geographic remoteness and obesity are risk factors for specific causes of SCD in the young.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (41) ◽  
pp. 3409-3417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohapradeep Mohan ◽  
Shaween Al-Talabany ◽  
Angela McKinnie ◽  
Ify R Mordi ◽  
Jagdeep S S Singh ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim We tested the hypothesis that metformin may regress left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in patients who have coronary artery disease (CAD), with insulin resistance (IR) and/or pre-diabetes. Methods and results We randomly assigned 68 patients (mean age 65 ± 8 years) without diabetes who have CAD with IR and/or pre-diabetes to receive either metformin XL (2000 mg daily dose) or placebo for 12 months. Primary endpoint was change in left ventricular mass indexed to height1.7 (LVMI), assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis (n = 63), metformin treatment significantly reduced LVMI compared with placebo group (absolute mean difference −1.37 (95% confidence interval: −2.63 to −0.12, P = 0.033). Metformin also significantly reduced other secondary study endpoints such as: LVM (P = 0.032), body weight (P = 0.001), subcutaneous adipose tissue (P = 0.024), office systolic blood pressure (BP, P = 0.022) and concentration of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, a biomarker for oxidative stress (P = 0.04). The glycated haemoglobin A1C concentration and fasting IR index did not differ between study groups at the end of the study. Conclusion Metformin treatment significantly reduced LVMI, LVM, office systolic BP, body weight, and oxidative stress. Although LVH is a good surrogate marker of cardiovascular (CV) outcome, conclusive evidence for the cardio-protective role of metformin is required from large CV outcomes trials.


Vascular ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-198
Author(s):  
Haojian Dong ◽  
Yanqiu Ou ◽  
Zhiqiang Nie ◽  
Wenhui Huang ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
...  

Objective Data about renal artery stenosis association with left ventricular remodeling in patients coexisting with coronary artery disease are scanty. Methods Patients with suspected both coronary artery disease and renal artery stenosis undergoing coronary and renal arteriography between October 2013 and December 2015 were prospectively enrolled. Left ventricular remodeling patterns were compared among different severity of renal artery stenosis group. Logistic regression was done to investigate the determinants of the left ventricular morphology. Results The overall prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy was 40.5%, the highest in bilateral renal artery stenosis group compared to unilateral or normal ones (65.4% versus 41.8% versus 34.8%, p = 0.012). Significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher cystatin C level were found in bilateral renal artery stenosis group than that in other two groups. Multivariate regression analysis showed that bilateral renal artery stenosis was associated with increased left ventricular hypertrophy and concentric hypertrophy with statistical significance (adjusted odds ratio = 2.909 (95%CI: 1.063–7.961), and 3.021 (95%CI: 1.136–8.033)). In addition, estimated glomerular filtration rate level was also related to left ventricular hypertrophy, while there was no significant interaction between renal artery stenosis and coronary artery disease on left ventricular hypertrophy/concentric hypertrophy occurrence. Conclusions Bilateral renal artery stenosis is significantly associated with increased left ventricular hypertrophy/concentric hypertrophy in patients with suspected concomitant coronary and renal artery disease, while no synergic effect could be found in coronary artery disease.


1973 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.Lance Gould ◽  
Kirk Lipscomb ◽  
Glen W. Hamilton ◽  
J.Ward Kennedy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document