scholarly journals Effect of diuretic infusion clinic in preventing hospitalization for patients with decompensating heart failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 205031212094009
Author(s):  
Kamal Waheeb Alghalayini

Introduction: It is proposed that access to administering intravenous furosemide outside the hospital can contribute to lowering hospital admissions for heart failure. This study aims to evaluate the effect of outpatient furosemide infusion protocol in preventing hospitalization for patients with decompensating heart failure. This constitutes designing a viable clinical pathway in hospitals using a multidisciplinary heart failure program. Methods: A prospective interventional study testing the effect of diuretic infusion clinic in preventing hospitalization for patients with decompensating heart failure was conducted on 150 decompensating heart failure patients requiring hospital admission. Only 105 patients met the criteria and subsequently enrolled in the study. Each patient was administered intravenous furosemide infusion one or more times according to the protocol and depending on their symptoms of decompensation. Patients were referred for admission at any point once there is no improvement of their medical condition, or referred to heart failure clinic when clinical picture improved as observed by the treating team. Results: In total, 14 of 105 patients who received intravenous furosemide infusion did not respond to diuretic infusion protocol and required hospital admission while 91 patients responded to same protocol and did not require admission, P value was statistically significant in three laboratory test measures of potassium (<0.001), urea (0.004), and creatinine (0.008). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was observed in 70 (76.9%) responders with a mean ejection fraction of 23% and in 9 (64.3%) non-responders with mean ejection fraction of 19.9%. Conclusion: Outpatient intravenous furosemide infusion protocol is effective in preventing hospitalization for decompensating heart failure and a viable clinical pathway for heart failure programs.

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M V Polito ◽  
A Rispoli ◽  
V Vitulano ◽  
F D"auria ◽  
A Silverio ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements none Aims. To evaluate the effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan (S/V) on clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters and outcomes in a real-world population with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results. Prospective study enrolling consecutive patients with HFrEF treated with S/V.The primary outcome was HF rehospitalization;secondary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiac death and the composite of cardiac death and HF rehospitalization at 12 months follow up.The clinical outcome was compared with a retrospective cohort of 90 HFrEF patients treated with standard medical therapy by using propensity score weighting. At 6 months follow-up, changes in symptoms, echocardiographic parameters, eGFR and furosemide dose were also evaluated. The study population consisted of 90 patients (66.1 ± 11.7 years). At 6 months FU, a significant improvement in NYHA class, LVEF (from 31.0% to 34.0%; p = 0.001), LVESV (from 115.0 to 101.0 mL; p = 0.033) and sPAP (from 31.0 to 25.0 mmHg; p = 0.024) was observed. Moreover, S/V did not affect negatively eGFR and was associated with a significantly lower dose of furosemide prescribed. The propensity score weighting adjusted regression analysis showed a significantly lower risk for HF rehospitalization (HR, 0.131; 95% CI, 0.034-0.503; p = 0.003) and the composite outcome (HR, 0.162; 95% CI, 0.053-0.492; p = 0.001) among patients treated with S/V as compared to the standard therapy group. Conclusions In this real-world HFrEF population, S/V reduced HF rehospitalization and cardiac death at 1 year. Moreover, S/V improved significantly NYHA class, LVEF, LVESV and sPAP at 6 months, preserving renal function and reducing the need of furosemide. Table Study outcomes Unadjusted model HR 95% CI p-value HF rehospitalization 0.273 0.101-0.740 0.011 Cardiac death 0.443 0.137-1.440 0.176 Composite outcome 0.331 0.155-0.710 0.005 All-cause death 0.666 0.272-1.628 0.372 Adjusted model HR 95% CI p-value HF rehospitalization 0.131 0.034-0.503 0.003 Cardiac death 0.259 0.047-1.415 0.119 Composite outcome 0.162 0.053-0.492 0.001 All-cause death 0.713 0.201-2.529 0.601 Adjusted and unadjusted HR for the study outcomes. Abstract 412 Figure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerolos Wagdy ◽  
Sherif Nagy

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex disease which accounts for more than half of all HF hospital admissions with high prevalence and lack of effective evidence-based management. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor is a new antidiabetic drug that recently gained a new role in the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction but its role in HFpEF had yet to be studied.Study and results: EMPEROR-Preserved trial set out to evaluate the effects of SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin on major heart failure outcomes in patients with HFpEF. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion into two groups; to receive either empagliflozin 10 mg per day (n = 2,997) or placebo (n = 2,991) in addition to usual therapy. Empagliflozin led to a 21% risk reduction of the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, which was mainly related to a 29% lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure rather than effect on cardiovascular death empagliflozin. The effects SGLT2 inhibitors were consistent in all patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 967-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Rusinaru ◽  
David Houpe ◽  
Catherine Szymanski ◽  
Franck Lévy ◽  
Sylvestre Maréchaux ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Galli ◽  
Y Bouali ◽  
A Gallard ◽  
A Hubert ◽  
C Leclercq ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background the non-invasive assessment of myocardial work (MW) by pressure-strain loops analysis (PSL) is a relative new tool for the evaluation of myocardial performance. Sacubitril/Valsartan is a treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) which has a spectacular effect on the reduction of cardiovascular events (MACEs). Purposes of this study were to evaluate 1) the short and medium term effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan treatment on MW parameters; 2) the prognostic value of MW in this specific group of patients. Methods 79 patients with HFrEF (mean age: 66 ± 12 years; LV ejection fraction: 28 ± 9%) were prospectively included in the study and treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan. Echocardiographic examination was performed at baseline, and after 6- and 12-month of therapy with Sacubitril/Valsartan. Results Sacubitril/Valsartan significantly increased myocardial constructive work (CW) (1023 ± 449 vs 1424 ± 484 mmHg%, p &lt; 0.0001) and myocardial work efficiency (WE) [87 (78-90) vs 90 (86-95), p &lt; 0.0001]. During FU (2.6 ± 0.9 years), MACEs occurred in 13 (16%) patients. After correction for LV size, LVEF and WE, global myocardial constructive work (CW) was the only predictor of MACEs [HR 0.99 (0.99-1.00), p = 0.05]. (Table 1). A CW &lt; 910 mmHg (AUC = 0.81, p &lt; 0.0001, Figure 1, left panel) identified patients at particularly increase risk of MACEs [HR 11.09 (1.45-98.94), p = 0.002, log-rank test p &lt; 0.0001] (Figure 2, Right panel). Conclusions in patients with HFrEF who receive a comprehensive background beta-blocker and mineral-corticoid receptor antagonist therapy, Sacubitril/Valsartan induces a significant improvement of myocardial CW and WE. In this population, the estimation of CW before the initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan therapy allows the prediction of MACEs. Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value Age, per year 0.99 (0.95-1.04) 0.81 Ischemic cardiomyopathy 1.07 (0.36-3.21) 0.89 LVEDVi*, per ml/m2 1.01 (1.00-1.03) 0.03 LVESVi, per ml/m2 1.01 (1.00-1.03) 0.009 1.01 (0.99-1.02) 0.35 LVEF, per % 0.91 (0.85-0.98) 0.01 1.02 (0.93-1.12) 0.71 CW, per mmHg% 0.99 (0.99-1.00) 0.002 0.99 (0.99-1.00) 0.04 WE, per mmHg% 0.91 (0.86-0.96) 0.001 0.95 (0.88-1.02) 0.16 Predictors of MACEs at univariable and multivariable analysis Abstract Figure 1 A and B


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaidon Al-Falahi ◽  
Giuseppe Femia ◽  
Linda Gardiner ◽  
Jodie Ekholm ◽  
Kishore Kadappu ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundHeart failure (HF) has become a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite significant improvements in the management of HF, the overall outcomes remain poor. In addition to pharmacotherapy and device therapy, non-pharmacological interventions are needed to mitigate the effects of this illness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the heart failure outreach program on the rate of mortality, HF hospitalisations and guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF in South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD).MethodsIn this observational, registry based study, adult patients diagnosed with Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) within the South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD) and invited to participate in the heart failure outreach service between March 2011 and January 2016 were included in the study. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. In addition, we examined the rate of optimal medical therapy, HF hospitalisations and the total lengths of stay.ResultsA total of 818 patients were included in the study; 470 (57.5%) patients were enrolled and 348 (42.5 %) not enrolled into the program. At the end of the follow up period (median 978 days, interquartile range (IQR) 720-1237), the primary outcome of mortality was observed significantly less in the enrolled group (122 (26%) vs. 133 (38.2%), p<0.001) independently of other variables. In addition, significantly fewer enrolled patients had >3 hospital admissions for HF (16.2% vs. 35.6%, p<0.001) and reduced median admission days (14.5 days [IQR 8-25] vs 22 [IQR 12-37], p <0.001). Patients enrolled into the program were much more likely to be on GDMT (76.6% vs 56.6%, p<0.001).ConclusionsEnrolment in the heart failure outreach program was associated with a significant reduction in mortality as well as a reduction in the frequency and length of hospital admissions. In addition, the rate of GDMT was significantly higher in the enrolled group. With the high prevalence of heart failure, these programs should be considered in the routine management of patients with HFrEF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Wisniowska-Smialek ◽  
A Karabinowska ◽  
K Holcman ◽  
E Dziewiecka ◽  
A Lesniak-Sobelga ◽  
...  

Abstract Background According to the latest approach new class ARNI with sacubitryl-valsartan may be ordered in clinically stable heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction ( HFrEF) or short time after acute heart failure exacerbation. Methods: Since July 2016 till February 2019 we started ARNI in 50 HFrEF patients; 33 (66%) were clinically stabile during at least 3 months and 17 (34%) were short time after HF exacerbation. Results: There were no differences in age (63 vs 58) and BMI between groups. Clinically stabile patients presented significantly lower NYHA class (2 ± 0,5 vs 3 ± 0,7) and lower NT-proBNP level (1948 pg/ml vs 5570 pg/ml) in comparison to those after HF decompensation. There were no differences in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), volume (LVEDV) and ejection fraction (EF) between both groups. Patients after HF decompensation had greater left and right atrium area(LAA, RAA respectively), higher estimated pulmonary artery pressure (PASP) and reduced right ventricular systolic function expressed with TAPSE (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion) in comparison to stabile patients. Patients from both groups presented similar physical activity tolerance estimated with 6-minute walking test ( 6- MWT): 369 m vs 402 m (tbl). Conclusions: Clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory differences were observed between groups of HFrEF patients with different clinical status when ARNI was administrated. Parameter Stabile n = 33 After HF decompensation n= 17 p- value BMI [kg/m2] 25(23-36) 25(21-26) 0,72 Age [years] 63 (39-68) 58 (42-67) 0,81 NYHA 2 ± 0,5 3 ± 0,7 0,001 NT-proBNP [pg/ml] 1948(601-2933) 5570(4147-8021) P&lt; 0,001 6 MWT dystans [m] 369(327-432) 402(240-480) 0,32 FW [%] 23 (18-28) 19(15-26) 0,17 LVEDD [mm] 69(59-76) 64(63-71) 0,32 LVEDvol [ml] 242(153-324) 225(178-235) 0,29 TAPSE [mm] 19(14-21) 14(13-16) 0,02 LAA [cm2] 28(24-34) 36(27-39) 0,032 RAA [cm2] 19(16-30) 26(23-32) 0,046 PASP [mmHg] 31(23-43) 43(38-55) 0,046


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
YOUHOK Lim

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The most common etiologies of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Cambodia included heart failure (HF) (52.9%), angina pectoris (11.6%), and acute myocardial infarction (4.11%). Purpose The goal of this study is to describe characteristics, clinical features, evaluation and treatment of patients with HF admitted to one public hospital in Cambodia. Methods This retrospective study included all patients age ≥18 years who were admitted with the diagnosis of HF to the Intensive Care Unit of one public hospital from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2018. Out of 140 cases, 20 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Characteristics, evaluation, and treatment of the 120 remaining patients were analyzed. Results HF with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) was present in 15%, with mid-range EF (HFmrEF) in 13.3%, and preserved EF (HFpEF) in 71.7% of patients. Hypertension was more prevalent in HFpEF (89.5%, P &lt;0.001) (table 1). Diabetes was more common in HFpEF and HFmrEF (52.3% and 43.7%, P = 0.316) (table 1). Coronary artery disease was more prevalent in HFrEF (72.2%, P = 0.015) (table 1). Global wall hypokinesia was more common in HFrEF group (72.2%, P &lt;0.001) (figure 1). Patients with HFrEF who were given ACEi/ARB (44.4%, P = 0.324) was lower than those with HFpEF (55.8%, P = 0.324). Oral beta-blockers were commonly used in HFrEF (44.4%, P &lt;0.175). Spironolactone was prescribed more in HFmrEF (56.2%, P &lt;0.001) patients than in those with HFrEF (44.4%, P &lt;0.001). Conclusions HFpEF was the most common types of HF in this population, and was associated with hypertension and diabetes. HFrEF was least common and was associated with CAD. Prevention and treatment of hypertension and diabetes is essential to reduce the incidence of HFpEF while greater use of guideline recommended drugs is needed in HFrEF. TABLE 1: Characteristics of HF Patients Clinical characteristics Total (n = 120) HFrEF (n = 18) HFmrEF (n = 16) HFpEF (n = 86) p value Age (years) 58.8 ± 15.2 57.2 ± 16.3 57.3 ± 16.3 61.8 ± 12.9 0.274 Women, n (%) 57 (47.5) 10 (55.5) 4 (25.0) 43 (50.0) 0.14 Men, n (%) 63 (52.5) 8 (44.4) 12 (75.0) 43 (50.0) 0.14 Hypertension, n (%) 95 (79.2) 7 (38.9) 11 (68.7) 77 (89.5) &lt;0.001 Diabetes, n (%) 58 (48.3) 6 (33.3) 7 (43.7) 45 (52.3) 0.316 CAD, n (%) 55 (45.8) 13 (72.2) 9 (56.2) 32 (37.2) 0.015 Values are shown as n (%) or mean ± SD. HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HFmrEF, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; CAD, coronary artery disease. Abstract FIGURE 1: Proportion of HF and LVWM


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document