scholarly journals Where are we with improving outcome guidance? An update on pelvic urological services in the NHS

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 29-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer Jallad ◽  
Luke Hounsome ◽  
Julia Verne ◽  
Erik Mayer
Keyword(s):  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Pelvic Surgery ◽  
Steady Increase ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Outcome Relationship ◽  
Catchment Areas ◽  
Volume Outcome

Background: The volume–outcome relationship in surgery has been a focus of interest for over a decade. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published their improving outcome guidance in 2002, which encouraged a regionalised multidisciplinary approach in managing urological cancer cases and recommended centralisation of urological pelvic surgery. The current study offers an updated view on the urological pelvic services in England with regard to radical cystectomy (RC) and radical prostatectomy (RP) and adherence to improving outcome guidance guidelines and patterns of services provision since its introduction in 2002. Methods: The data for inpatient elective RC and RP were taken from hospital episodes statistics for 2003–2013. The RC and RP cases were calculated separately per year for every trust to calculate the annual rates and then combined for every trust. The catchment areas for RC and RP were calculated using the proportionate-flow method. Results: The number of trusts performing RC and RP reduced significantly over the 10 years, while in the same period, the numbers of RC and RP performed increased significantly ( P<0.05). There has been a steady increase in the cases referred to another trust for their RC or RP surgery ( P<0.05). Overall, there has been a significant increase in the number of trusts achieving the improving outcome guidance recommended minimal case volume of 50 or more (RC + RP combined) over the 10-year analysis ( P=0.0006). Conclusion: There has been a shift in urological pelvic surgery provision in England since the publication of improving outcome guidance by NICE in 2002, with over 95% of cases being performed in improving outcome guidance compliant centres achieving 50 cases or more per year. Simultaneously, a significant reduction in postoperative mortality and the hospital length of stay has been seen over this period.

scholarly journals 108 A Multidisciplinary Team Initiative to End PJ Paralysis Was Successful in Achieving Cultural Change on An Acute Geriatric Ward

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
J Butler ◽  
T Welford
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Change ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Service Development ◽  
Steady Increase ◽  
Geriatric Ward ◽  
Additional Equipment ◽  
Acute Geriatric Ward

Abstract Introduction Prolonged bedrest amongst the elderly causes deconditioning leading to; increased hospital length of stay, additional social costs and decreased quality of life. An audit on an acute geriatric ward in November 2018, found that over a third of patients medically fit (PMF) to sit out remained in bed all day. Therefore, a service development initiative was undertaken, addressing the misconception that keeping elderly patients in bed is safe, when in fact, unintentional harm results. Method In a root cause analysis, four main reasons for bedrest were identified: risk aversion, unknown function, widespread “bed is safe” culture and lack of equipment. The project tasked getting PMF out of bed each day and was audited daily from November 2018 to present, involving all members of the multi-disciplinary team (MDT) and using a “plan, do, study, act” approach. Results Initially, the project showed an increase in percentage of PMF sitting out each day, but this subsequently decreased with winter pressures. However, for a whole year (February 2019–February 2020) a sustained and significant improvement was achieved (64.3%–89.7%). The pre-COVID19 period (February–March 2020) saw fluctuations in PMF sitting out. Data collection halted during the COVID19 peak, although observationally most patients remained in bed. Auditing resumed from June 2020 (COVID19 recovery phase) which showed a steady increase in PMF out of bed, with recent figures surpassing pre-COVID19 levels (97.8%). Conclusion Cultural change takes time to embed and needs persistent reviewing by a dedicated and engaged MDT. Improvements were made through more accessible doctor’s advice, better MDT education and communication, daily feedback of data and sourcing additional equipment. Disruption to working patterns over the COVID19 period made this unachievable and the project lost impetus. In the COVID19 recovery phase, the specialized MDT reformed and worked successfully to restore the cultural change as evidenced by audited data.

Laparoscopic versus Open Colon Resections in California: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (10) ◽  
pp. 1063-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriya S. Patel ◽  
Madhukar S. Patel ◽  
Sanjit Mahanti ◽  
Adrian Ortega ◽  
Glenn T. Ault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Colectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity ◽  
Laparoscopic Techniques ◽  
Sectional Analysis

Laparoscopic surgery is associated with decreased hospital length of stay, improved perioperative morbidity, and faster return to work compared with open procedures. Despite these benefits, laparoscopy has not been universally adopted with recent implementation estimates ranging from 10 to 30 per cent. The purpose of this study was to analyze the adoption of laparoscopic techniques for colon resections in California in 2009 based on institutional colectomy volume status. A total of 14,736 patients from 320 hospitals was analyzed. The laparoscopic to open case ratios for the low (zero to 17 cases/year), medium (18 to 50 cases/year), and high (greater than 50 cases/year) volume centers were: 0.32, 0.50, and 0.92, respectively. Although the data confirmed that a laparoscopic approach reduced length of stay (LOS) regardless of volume, lower adopters of laparoscopic colectomy had a longer overall total LOS, likely related to preponderance of open cases. Therefore, the data show that higher-volume institutions appear to have implemented laparoscopic colectomy for more of their case volume, and this adoption may account for the better institutional outcomes observed in these centers.

Does Endovascular Repair for Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injuries Provide Better Outcomes Compared to Its Open Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shekhar Gogna ◽  
◽  
Mahir Gachabayov ◽  
Priya Goyal ◽  
Rifat Latifi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Aortic Injuries ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Introduction: Traumatic aortic injuries are devastating events in terms of high mortality and morbidity in most survivors. We aimed to compare the outcomes of endovascular repair (ER) vs. open repair (OR) in the treatment of traumatic aortic injuries. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Postoperative mortality was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay, operating time, paraplegia, stroke, acute renal failure, and reoperation rate. The Mantel-Haenszel method (random-effects model) with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (OR (95% CI)), and the inverse variance method with the mean difference (MD (95% CI)), were used to measure the effects of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results: A total of 49 studies involving 12,857 patients were included. Postoperative mortality was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.459). Among secondary outcomes, the paraplegia rate was significantly lower after ER (p=0.032). Other secondary endpoints such as ICU length of stay (p=0.329), hospital length of stay (p=0.192), operating time (p=0.973), stroke rate (p=0.121), ARF rate (p=0.928), and reoperation rate (p=0.643) did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that ER was associated with a reduced paraplegia rate compared to OR for the management of traumatic aortic injury.

Factors associated with referral for perioperative geriatric comanagement (GERI-CO) program in 12,398 older adults with cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12034-12034
Author(s):  
Armin Shahrokni ◽  
Koshy Alexander ◽  
Soo Jung Kim ◽  
Sincere McMillan ◽  
Robert J. Downey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Cardiac Disease ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
History Of

12034 Background: At ASCO 2019, we showed that the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Geriatric Co-management (GERI-CO) program was associated with improvement in 90-day postoperative mortality rate. Now, we present factors associated with the use of such program. Methods: At MSK, patients aged 75+ can be referred for perioperative GERI-CO. We retrospectively reviewed the available data of patients aged 75+ who underwent surgery within two months of their initial visit with the surgeon (2011 to 2019). Patients that were referred for GERI-CO were compared with those who were not: sociodemographic, frailty, comorbid conditions, and surgery characteristics. Frailty level was determined using the MSK Frailty Index (score ranges from 0-11, higher scores suggest more frailty). Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with the use of the GERI-CO Program. Results: In total 12,398 patients (4422, 35.7% GERI-CO) were included. Average time from surgical consult to geriatric visit was 9 days. Patients in the GERI-CO program were older (80.7 vs. 79.6), less likely to be non-Hispanic White (87% vs. 91%), have English as primary language (84% vs. 89%), and be fit (12% vs. 17% with MSK-FI 0). They were more likely to have stroke history (5% vs. 4%), have diabetes (DM) (25% vs.20%), hypertension (78% vs. 71%), and peripheral vascular disease (14% vs. 12%), but less likely to have cardiac disease (22% vs. 26%), myocardial infarction (MI) (7% vs. 10%), pulmonary disease (13% vs. 16%). Patients referred for GERI-CO were more likely to undergo 3+ hours surgeries (25% vs. 8%), with 100+ cc intraoperative blood loss (41% vs. 22%), and hospital length of stay (LOS) of 3+ days (42% vs. 19%). In multivariable analysis, being frail (OR = 1.3 and 1.6 for MSK-FI 1-2 and 3+), longer surgery (OR = 2.6 and 3.6 for operation time 1.5-3 and 3+ hours), longer LOS (OR = 1.3 and 1.5 for LOS 1-2 and 3+ days), older age (OR = 1.06), having DM (OR = 1.15) were associated with higher likelihood of GERI-CO while having history of cardiac disease (OR = 0.55), MI (OR = 0.84), pulmonary disease (OR = 0.69) were associated with less likelihood of referral for GERI-CO. Conclusions: Our result shows the unique characteristics of patients managed in the GERI-CO program. This has implications for both implementation of GERI-CO program in other institutions and assessing outcomes of these patients.

Abstract W P351: A Stroke Above the Rest: A Reengineering of the Interdisciplinary Plan of Care

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noella J West
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Participation ◽  
Stroke Survivor ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Steady Increase ◽  
Quality Enhancement ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Stroke Team

Background and Purpose: Patients who are newly diagnosed with a stroke are often overwhelmed due to the devastating nature of their condition. The post-acute phase frequently involves a significant amount of education regarding new medications, treatments, recovery and follow up. Ineffective education may be associated with poor outcomes; therefore information from healthcare professionals should be easily understood by patients and their families. The purpose of this evidence based nursing practice and quality enhancement initiative was to improve the patient outcomes and provide tools to assist patients for reentry into the community. Methods: The reengineered plan of care was implemented by the interdisciplinary Stroke Team. Individual education packets were developed based on diagnosis and specific comorbidities, and took into consideration the concept of health literacy. Communication with the primary care provider as well as providing patients with a thirty-day filled prescription prior to discharge assisted with continuity of care. Follow up phone calls reinforced education. Creation of a listserv provided notification of monthly stroke support group meetings and our yearly stroke retreat. Both programs are tailored to the stroke survivor and caregiver, and have been beneficial to the community. Results: This interdisciplinary initiative contributed to a steady increase in patient’s ratings of communication with doctors, and with a decrease in hospital length of stay for patients who were treated by the Interdisciplinary Stroke Team. In addition, patient participation in the annual Stroke Retreat and patient participation in community stroke programs have increased.Conclusions : Reengineering of the interdisciplinary plan of care improved not only the patient experience, but also better prepared patients and their caregivers for discharge. This quality enhancement initiative was vital in decreasing length of stay and quality of care in the stroke population.

Carotid endarterectomy following thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke

VASA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naz Ahmed ◽  
Damian Kelleher ◽  
Manmohan Madan ◽  
Sarita Sochart ◽  
George A. Antoniou
Keyword(s):  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Acute Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Cardiac Complications ◽  
High Dependency ◽  
Low Incidence

Abstract. Background: Insufficient evidence exists to support the safety of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) following intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischaemic stroke. Our study aimed to report a single-centre experience of patients treated over a five-year period. Patients and methods: Departmental computerised databases were interrogated to identify patients who suffered an ischaemic stroke and subsequently underwent thrombolysis followed by CEA. Mortality and stroke within 30 days of surgery were defined as the primary outcome end points. Results: Over a five-year period, 177 out of a total of 679 carotid endarterectomies (26 %) were performed in patients presenting with acute ischaemic stroke. Twenty-five patients (14 %) received IVT prior to CEA in the form of alteplase. Sixty percent of patients were male with a mean age of 68 years. Sixteen patients (64 %) underwent CEA within 14 days of IVT and the median interval between thrombolysis and CEA was 7.5 days (range, 3–50 days). One female patient died of a further intraoperative stroke within 30 days of surgery, yielding a mortality rate of 4 %. Two patients (8 %) suffered from cardiac complications postoperatively resulting in a short high dependency unit stay. Another two patients (8 %) developed local wound complications, which were managed conservatively without the need for re-operation. The median hospital length of stay was 4.5 days (range, 1–33 days). Conclusions: Our experience indicates that CEA post-thrombolysis has a low incidence of mortality. Further high quality evidence is required before CEA can be routinely recommended following IVT for acute ischaemic stroke.

scholarly journals Treatment of Anaemia in Patients with Acute Burn Injury: A Study of Blood Transfusion Practices

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 476
Author(s):  
Ioana Tichil ◽  
Samara Rosenblum ◽  
Eldho Paul ◽  
Heather Cleland
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Transfusion Requirements ◽  
Total Body

Objective: To determine blood transfusion practices, risk factors, and outcomes associated with the use of blood products in the setting of the acute management of burn patients at the Victorian Adult Burn Service. Background: Patients with burn injuries have variable transfusion requirements, based on a multitude of factors. We reviewed all acute admissions to the Victorian Adult Burns Service (VABS) between 2011 and 2017: 1636 patients in total, of whom 948 had surgery and were the focus of our analysis. Method and results: Patient demographics, surgical management, transfusion details, and outcome parameters were collected and analyzed. A total of 175 patients out of the 948 who had surgery also had a blood transfusion, while 52% of transfusions occurred in the perioperative period. The median trigger haemoglobin in perioperative was 80mg/dL (IQR = 76–84.9 mg/dL), and in the non-perioperative setting was 77 mg/dL (IQR = 71.61–80.84 mg/dL). Age, gender, % total body surface area (TBSA) burn, number of surgeries, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were associated with transfusion. Conclusions: The use of blood transfusions is an essential component of the surgical management of major burns. As observed in our study, half of these transfusions are related to surgical procedures and may be influenced by the employment of blood conserving strategies. Furthermore, transfusion trigger levels in stable patients may be amenable to review and reduction. Risk adjusted analysis can support the implementation of blood transfusion as a useful quality indicator in burn care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document