scholarly journals Risk Factors for Immediate Postoperative Coronal Imbalance in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Patients Fused to Pelvis

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822091764
Author(s):  
Jiandang Zhang ◽  
Zheng Wang ◽  
Pengfei Chi
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Lower Amount ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Coronal Imbalance ◽  
Type C ◽  
Upper Instrumented Vertebra

Study Design: Retrospective case-control radiographic study. Objective: To identify risk factors for immediate postoperative coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients fused to pelvis. Methods: A total of 71 DLS patients treated with deformity correction surgery were reviewed. Measurements included coronal parameters such as global coronal malalignment (GCM), major Cobb angle, L4/L5 coronal tilt and sagittal parameters. Based on the orientation of L4 coronal tilt relative to C7 plumb line (PL) preoperatively, coronal patterns were subdivided into (1) consistency pattern, L4 coronally tilts toward C7 PL, and (2) opposition pattern, L4 coronally tilts opposite C7 PL; the proportion of these 2 patterns was analyzed. Also, the proportion of type C and surgical factors were recorded. According to postoperative GCM, patients were divided into imbalanced group and balanced group. Results: Compared with the balanced group, the imbalanced group had a larger proportion of preoperative consistency pattern (79.17% vs 40.43%, P = .002), larger proportion of type C (29.17% vs 8.51%, P = .023), and lower amount of GCM correction (−4.92 ± 24.25 vs 14.52 ± 19.49 mm, P < .001). There were no significant intergroup differences regarding preoperative and postoperative major Cobb angle, preoperative and postoperative L4 or L5 coronal tilt, major Cobb correction, the amounts of correction of coronal tilt of L4/L5, osteotomy levels, osteotomy grades, instrumented levels, levels of interbody fusion, and distribution of upper instrumented vertebra. Conclusions: In addition to known risk factors such as type C, preoperative coronal consistency pattern might be a new risk factor for postoperative coronal imbalance in DLS patients fused to pelvis.

scholarly journals Orientation of L4 coronal tilt relative to C7 plumb line as a predictor for postoperative coronal imbalance in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiandang Zhang ◽  
Zheng Wang ◽  
Pengfei Chi ◽  
Cheng Chi
Keyword(s):  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Plumb Line ◽  
Lower Amount ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Coronal Imbalance ◽  
Correction Surgery ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract The study design is case–control. To evaluate the impact of preoperative coronal patterns based on the relationship between orientation of L4 coronal tilt and C7 plumb line on immediate postoperative coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients. Although lumbosacral fractional curve has been long stressed in correction surgery of DLS, there is paucity of literature focusing on preoperative coronal pattern based on the relationship between orientation of L4 coronal tilt and C7 plumb line and its impact on immediate postoperative coronal imbalance in DLS patients. A consecutive series of DLS patients who underwent deformity correction surgery via posterior-only approach were reviewed. According to the relationship between orientation of L4 coronal tilt and C7 plumb line preoperatively, a total of 77 DLS patients who underwent posterior spinal corrective surgery were classified into: 1. Coronal consistency pattern, L4 coronally tilts toward C7 plumb line; 2. Coronal opposition pattern, L4 coronally tilts opposite C7 plumb line. Coronal imbalance was defined as global coronal malalignment (GCM) on either side more than or equal to 20 mm. Whole-spine standing radiographs of both pattern groups were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. There were 37 patients with coronal consistency pattern and 40 patients with coronal opposition pattern. Compared to patients with coronal opposition pattern, patients with coronal consistency pattern had significantly higher postoperative GCM (P = 0.028), lower amount of GCM correction (P = 0.013) and higher incidence of postoperative coronal imbalance (P = 0.001); further logistic regression analysis revealed coronal consistency pattern was associated with increased odds of postoperative coronal imbalance (odds ratio: 5.981; 95% confidence interval 2.029–17.633; P = 0.001). DLS patients with preoperative coronal consistency pattern carried greater risk for immediate postoperative coronal imbalance following posterior long correction surgery. Level of evidence 3

scholarly journals Incidence and Risk Factors for Neurological Deterioration in Posterior Corrective Surgeries for Severe Angular Kyphotic Deformities: A 10-Year Institutional Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822097912
Author(s):  
Kalyan Kumar Varma Kalidindi ◽  
Sulaiman Sath ◽  
Jeevan Kumar Sharma ◽  
Gayatri Vishwakarma ◽  
Harvinder Singh Chhabra
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Neurological Deficit ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Neurological Deterioration ◽  
Kyphotic Deformity ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Significant Difference

Study Design: Retrospective case-control study. Objective: Neurological deficit is one of the dreaded complications of kyphotic deformity correction procedures. There is inconsistency in the reports of neurological outcomes following such procedures and only a few studies have analyzed the risk factors for neurological deficits. We aimed to analyze the factors associated with neurological deterioration in severe kyphotic deformity correction surgeries. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 121 consecutive surgically treated severe kyphotic deformity cases (49 males, 56 females) at a single institute (May 1st 2008 to May 31st 2018) and analyzed the risk factors for neurological deterioration. The demographic, surgical and clinical details of the patients were obtained by reviewing the medical records. Results: 105 included patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A (without neurological deficit) with 92 patients (42 males, 50 females) and Group B (with neurological deficit) with 13 patients (7 males, 6 females) (12.4%). Statistically significant difference between the 2 groups was observed in the preoperative sagittal Cobbs angle (p < 0.0001), operative time (p = 0.003) and the presence of myelopathic signs on neurological examination (p = 0.048) and location of the apex of deformity (p = 0.010) but not in other factors. Conclusions: Preoperative Sagittal Cobbs angle, presence of signs of myelopathy, operative time and location of apex in the distal thoracic region were significantly higher in patients with neurological deterioration as compared to those without neurological deterioration during kyphotic deformity correction surgery. Distal thoracic curve was found to have 4 times more risk of neurological deterioration compared to others.

Comparison between oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a retrospective clinical study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
chaojun Xu ◽  
Yingjie HAO ◽  
Lei YU ◽  
Guangduo ZHU ◽  
Zhinan REN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Abstract Backgroud Few studies compared radiographic and clinical outcomes between oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed the case data of 40 patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis in our hospital from July 2016 to October 2018. Among which,19 cases underwent oblique lumbar Interbody fusion(OLIF group) and 21 cases underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF group). The duration of the operation, volume of intraoperative hemorrhage, incision length, bed rest time, length of hospital stay, and complications were recorded for all patients. The clinical effects of 40 patients were evaluated by VAS for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and The radiographic parameters were evaluated using the lumbar scoliosis Cobb angle, sagittal vertical axis(SVA), coronal vertical axis(CVA), lumbar lordosis(LL), pelvic tilt(PT), sacral slope(SS), and Disc height(DH). Results The duration of the operation, the volume of intraoperative hemorrhage, incision length, bed rest time, length of hospital stay of the OLIF group were shorter than the PLIF group( P ＜ 0.05 ). The VAS scores for back pain, the ODI of the two groups were significantly decreased, which compared with the preoperative( P ＜ 0.05 )，which in OLIF group was significantly more decreased than in PLIF( P ＜ 0.05 ) at 7 days and 3 months postoperatively, but at the last follow-up there were no significant difference between the two groups( P ＞ 0.05 ); The lumbar scoliosis Cobb angle, SVA, CVA, PT, LL, SS were significantly improved postoperatively( P ＜ 0.05 ). The OLIF group showed higher DH, smaller Cobb angle, and greater LL than the PLIF group at any time point( P ＜ 0.05 ). but there were no significant difference in SVA, CVA, PT and SS between the two groups at any follow-up points( P ＞ 0.05 ). The overall complication rate was slightly higher in the PLIF group（47.62%）than in the OLIF group（26.32%）without significant difference(x 2 =1.931, P =0.165). But the incidence of major complications in the PLIF group was significantly higher than that in the OLIF group (Fisher, P =0.026). Conclusion OLIF provides an alternative minimally invasive treatment for DLS, which compared with PLIF. It has the characteristics of a small incision, rapid recovery, fewer complications related to the surgical approach, and satisfactory orthopedics. Keywords : Minimally invasive, Oblique lumbar interbody fusion, Degenerative adult lumbar scoliosis , Posterior lumbar interbody fusion

scholarly journals The surgical outcome of decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Masuda ◽  
Takayuki Higashi ◽  
Katsutaka Yamada ◽  
Tatsuhiro Sekiya ◽  
Tomoyuki Saito
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Spinal Instability ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Surgical Decision ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Radiological Parameters ◽  
Surgical Decision Making

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of radiological parameters for surgical decision-making in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) by comparing the clinical and radiological results after decompression or decompression and fusion surgery.METHODSThe authors prospectively planned surgical treatment for 298 patients with degenerative lumbar disease between September 2005 and March 2013. The surgical method used at their institution to address intervertebral instability is precisely defined based on radiological parameters. Among 64 patients with a Cobb angle ranging from 10° to 25°, 57 patients who underwent follow-up for more than 2 years postoperatively were evaluated. These patients were divided into 2 groups: those in the decompression group underwent decompression alone (n = 25), and those in the fusion group underwent decompression and short segmental fusion (n = 32). Surgical outcomes were reviewed, including preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles, lumbar lordosis based on radiological parameters, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores.RESULTSThe JOA scores of the decompression group and fusion group improved from 5.9 ± 1.6 to 10.0 ± 2.8 and from 7.2 ± 2.0 to 11.3 ± 2.8, respectively, which was not significantly different between the groups. At the final follow-up, the postoperative Cobb angle in the decompression group changed from 14° ± 2.9° to 14.3° ± 6.4° and remained stable, while the Cobb angle in the fusion group decreased from 14.8° ± 4.0° to 10.0° ± 8.5° after surgery.CONCLUSIONSThe patients in both groups demonstrated improved JOA scores and preserved Cobb angles after surgery. The improvement in JOA scores and preservation of Cobb angles in both groups show that the evaluation of spinal instability using radiological parameters is appropriate for surgical decision-making.

scholarly journals Comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and short-segment fusion in the treatment of elderly degenerative lumbar scoliosis with spinal stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Li ◽  
Yuexin Tong ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
Zhezhe Zhang ◽  
Youxin Song
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Endoscopic Decompression ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Segmental Lordosis

Abstract Background Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) combined with spinal stenosis is increasingly being diagnosed in the elderly. However, the appropriate surgical approach remains somewhat controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the results of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) and short-segment fusion for the treatment of mild degenerative lumbar scoliosis combined with spinal stenosis in older adults over 60 years of age. Methods Of the 54 consecutive patients included, 30 were treated with PTED and 24 were treated with short-segment open fusion. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months (12–24 months). Patient demographics, and perioperative and clinical outcomes were recorded. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and modified Macnab criteria were used to assess clinical outcomes. At the same time, changes in disc height, segmental lordosis, coronal Cobb angle, and lumbar lordosis were compared. Results The mean age was 68.7 ± 6.5 years in the PTED group and 66.6 ± 5.1 years in the short-segment fusion group. At 1 year postoperatively, both groups showed significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores compared with preoperative scores (p < 0.05), with no statistically significant difference between groups. However, VAS-Back and ODI were lower in the PTED group at 1 week postoperatively (p < 0.05). According to the modified Macnab criteria, the excellent rates were 90.0 and 91.6% in the PTED and short-segment fusion groups, respectively. However, the PTED group had a significantly shorter operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative bed rest, and complication rate. There was no significant difference in radiological parameters between the two groups preoperatively. At the last follow-up, there were significant differences in disc height, segmental lordosis at the L4–5 and L5–S1 levels, and Cobb angle between the two groups. Conclusion Both PTED and short-segment fusion for mild degenerative lumbar scoliosis combined with spinal stenosis have shown good clinical results. PTED under local anesthesia may be an effective supplement to conventional fusion surgery in elderly patients with DLS combined with spinal stenosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document