scholarly journals A comparative study of innovative percutaneous repair and open repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture: Innovative usage of intraoperative ultrasonography

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902091027
Author(s):  
Jeong-Kil Lee ◽  
Chan Kang ◽  
Deuk-Soo Hwang ◽  
Dong-Hun Kang ◽  
Gi-Soo Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Athletic Ability ◽  
Percutaneous Repair

Purpose: There is no definitive consensus on the optimal treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. We comparatively analyzed the clinical outcomes of two types of repair surgeries in treating Achilles tendon rupture. Methods: This retrospective study included 12 patients of Achilles tendon rupture (group A) treated with ultrasound-guided percutaneous repair and 18 patients (group B) treated with open repair. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Arner–Lindholm scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle–hindfoot score, Achilles Tendon Total Rupture score (ATRS), visual analog scale, time to single heel raise, bilateral calf circumferences, recovery of athletic ability, and other complications. Results: While the Arner–Lindholm scale, AOFAS ankle–hindfoot score, ATRS, time point when single heel raise was possible, differences in bilateral calf circumference, and recovery of athletic ability compared to pre-rupture level were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.999, 0.235, 0.357, 0.645, 0.497, and 0.881, respectively), overall and aesthetic satisfaction levels were higher in the group treated with percutaneous repair under ultrasonography guidance (p = 0.035 and 0.001, respectively). Overall, there were no cases involving sural nerve injury in either group. Conclusion: Innovative percutaneous repair provides not only similar clinical outcomes but also greater overall and aesthetic satisfaction levels of operative outcomes and minimal complications (i.e. sural nerve injury) compared to open repair surgeries. Therefore, percutaneous repair may be a useful technique in the treatment of Achilles tendon rupture.

scholarly journals Intraoperative Ultrasonography assistance for minimally invasive repair of the acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongliang Yang ◽  
Honglei Jia ◽  
Wupeng Zhang ◽  
Shihong Xu ◽  
Fu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Intraoperative Ultrasonography ◽  
Medial Side ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Minimally invasive repair is a better option for Achilles tendon rupture with low re-rupture and wound-related complications than conservative treatment or traditional open repair. The major problem is sural nerve injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect and advantage of the intraoperative ultrasonography assistance for minimally invasive repair of the acute Achilles tendon rupture.Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 36 cases of acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with minimally invasive repair assisted with intraoperative ultrasonography from January 2015 to December 2017. The relationship of the sural nerve and small saphenous vein was confirmed on the preoperative MRI. The course of the small saphenous vein and sural nerve were identified and marked by intraoperative ultrasonography. The ruptured Achilles tendon was repaired with minimally invasive Bunnell suture on the medial side of the SSV.Results: All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. No sural nerve injury or other complications was found intraoperatively and postoperatively. All the patients returned to work and light sporting activities at a mean of 12.78±1.40 weeks and 17.28±2.34 weeks, respectively. The Mean AOFAS scores improved from 59.17±5.31 preoperatively to 98.92±1.63 at the time of 12 months follow-up. There was statistically significant difference (P<0.001). No patient complained a negative effect on their life.Conclusions: The minimally invasive repair assisted with intraoperative ultrasonography can yield good clinical outcomes, less surgical time and less complications, especially sural nerve injury. It is an efficient, reliable and safe method for acute AT rupture.

scholarly journals Intraoperative Ultrasonography assistance for minimally invasive repair of the acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongliang Yang ◽  
Honglei Jia ◽  
Wupeng Zhang ◽  
Shihong Xu ◽  
Fu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Intraoperative Ultrasonography ◽  
Medial Side ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Minimally invasive repair is a better option for Achilles tendon rupture with low re-rupture and wound-related complications than conservative treatment or traditional open repair. The major problem is sural nerve injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect and advantage of the intraoperative ultrasonography assistance for minimally invasive repair of the acute Achilles tendon rupture. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 36 cases of acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with minimally invasive repair assisted with intraoperative ultrasonography from January 2015 to December 2017. The relationship of the sural nerve and small saphenous vein was confirmed on the preoperative MRI. The course of the small saphenous vein and sural nerve were identified and marked by intraoperative ultrasonography. The ruptured Achilles tendon was repaired with minimally invasive Bunnell suture on the medial side of the small saphenous vein (SSV).Results: All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. No sural nerve injury or other complications was found intraoperatively and postoperatively. All the patients returned to work and light sporting activities at a mean of 12.78±1.40 weeks and 17.28±2.34 weeks, respectively. The Mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores improved from 59.17±5.31 preoperatively to 98.92±1.63 at the time of 12 months follow-up. There was statistically significant difference (P<0.001). No patient complained a negative effect on their life.Conclusions: The minimally invasive repair assisted with intraoperative ultrasonography can yield good clinical outcomes, less surgical time and less complications, especially sural nerve injury. It is an efficient, reliable and safe method for acute Achilles Tendon (AT) rupture.

scholarly journals Comparison of mini-open repair system and percutaneous repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Li ◽  
Qiang Jiang ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Hongkui Xin ◽  
Qing He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Percutaneous Repair ◽  
Repair Group ◽  
Mini Open

Abstract Background To reduce incision complications, minimally invasive operative approaches for treatment with acute Achilles tendon rupture have been developed, such as Mini-open repair and percutaneous repair. Which technique is the better surgical option? In the present study, we compared the two surgical procedures— modified Mini-open repair versus percutaneous repair—in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Methods From January 2016 to November 2018, 68 matched patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were divided into treatment group (Mini-open with modified Ma-Griffith technique) and control group (the Ma–Griffith technique). The patients were then treated with different surgical techniques and followed up for no less than 24 months, and the functional outcome scores and complications were retrospectively evaluated. Results The mean follow-up time in Mini-open repair group was 29.0±2.9 months, and that in control group was 27.9±2.9 months (P=0.147). The Mini-open repair group showed reliably higher American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score and Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) than the control group in functional assessment (95.0±3.8 vs. 92.3±5.3, P=0.000; 93.8±3.8 vs. 90.9±4.5,P=0.000). There was no cases of sural nerve injury in Mini-open repair group, whereas the percutaneous repair group had 5 cases of the same (P=0.027). No significant differences were found in the calf circumference (32.3±3.9 vs. 31.8±3.6) (P=0.564), range of motion of the ankle (51.3±4.8 vs. 50.5±4.2, P=0.362), or wound complications (34/0 vs. 34/0) (P=1.000) between the two groups at the end of the follow-up time. However, the percutaneous repair group had a shorter average operating time (23.1±5.2 min) than that of the Mini-open repair group (27.7±4.3 min) (P=0.000). Conclusions Acute Achilles tendon ruptures may be treated successfully with a new Mini-open repair system or percutaneous repair technique. However, the Mini-open repair system may represent a superior surgical option, since it offers advantages in terms of direct visual control of the repair, AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score, Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score and risk of sural nerve palsy. Study design Case-control studies, Level of evidence, 3.

scholarly journals Management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 561-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Yang ◽  
H. Meng ◽  
Q. Quan ◽  
J. Peng ◽  
S. Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Functional Rehabilitation ◽  
Percutaneous Repair ◽  
Tendon Ruptures ◽  
Mini Open

ObjectivesThe incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture appears to be increasing. The aim of this study was to summarize various therapies for acute Achilles tendon rupture and discuss their relative merits.MethodsA PubMed search about the management of acute Achilles tendon rupture was performed. The search was open for original manuscripts and review papers limited to publication from January 2006 to July 2017. A total of 489 papers were identified initially and finally 323 articles were suitable for this review.ResultsThe treatments of acute Achilles tendon rupture include operative and nonoperative treatments. Operative treatments mainly consist of open repair, percutaneous repair, mini-open repair, and augmentative repair. Traditional open repair has lower re-rupture rates with higher risks of complications. Percutaneous repair and mini-open repair show similar re-rupture rates but lower overall complication rates when compared with open repair. Percutaneous repair requires vigilance against nerve damage. Functional rehabilitation combining protected weight-bearing and early controlled motion can effectively reduce re-rupture rates with satisfactory outcomes. Biological adjuncts help accelerating tendon healing by adhering rupture ends or releasing highly complex pools of signalling factors.ConclusionThe optimum treatment for complete rupture remains controversial. Both mini-open repair and functional protocols are attractive alternatives, while biotherapy is a potential future development. Cite this article: X. Yang, H. Meng, Q. Quan, J. Peng, S. Lu, A. Wang. Management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A review. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:561–569. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.710.BJR-2018-0004.R2.

scholarly journals Mini-Invasive, Ultrasound Guided Repair of the Achilles Tendon Rupture—A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2370
Author(s):  
Łukasz Paczesny ◽  
Jan Zabrzyński ◽  
Marcin Domżalski ◽  
Maciej Gagat ◽  
Miron Termanowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Sonographic Guidance

Percutaneous acute Achilles tendon rupture suturing has become a leading treatment option in recent years. A common complication after this mini-invasive procedure is sural nerve injury, which can reduce the patients’ satisfaction and final outcomes. High-resolution ultrasound is a reliable method for localizing the sural nerve, and it can be performed intra-operatively; however, the long-term results are yet unknown. The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the long-term results of percutaneous Achilles tendon repair supported with real-time ultrasound imaging. We conducted 57 percutaneous sutures of acute Achilles tendon rupture between 2005 and 2015; 30 were sutured under sonographic guidance, while 27 were performed without sonographic assistance. The inclusion criteria were acute (less than 7 days) full tendon rupture, treatment with the percutaneous technique, age between 18 and 65 years, and a body mass index (BMI) below 35. The operative procedure was carried out by two surgeons, according to the surgical technique reported by Maffulli et al. In total, 35 patients were available for this retrospective assessment; 20 (16 men and 4 women) were treated with sonographic guidance, while 15 (12 men and 3 women) underwent the procedure without it. The mean follow-up was 8 years (range, 3–13 years). The sural nerve was localized 10 mm to 20 mm (mean, 15.8; SD, 3.02) laterally from the scar of the Achilles tendon tear. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to the FAOQ score (P < 0.05). High-resolution ultrasounds performed intra-operatively can minimize the risk of sural nerve injury during percutaneous Achilles tendon repair.

A New Modification of Bosworth’s Technique to Repair Infectious Achilles Tendon Rupture

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qipeng Wu ◽  
Yuan Xiong ◽  
Zhenhua Fang ◽  
Junwen Wang ◽  
Guohui Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Skin Necrosis ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to assess radiographic and clinical outcomes of a new modified approach on the basis of Bosworth’s technique in the treatment of infectious Achilles tendon rupture (IATR). Materials and methods 15 patients (9 males and 6 females; 15 feet; average age of 38.3 years) were included in the study. After infection, the wounds were transferred to our department for treatment (Figure 1).Radiographic and clinical outcome in terms of the American Orthopaedic Foot&Ankle Society score (AOFAS), the Victorian institute of sports assessment Achilles (VISA-A), and the Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) were investigated at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively. Results Preoperative AOFAS, VISA-A, and ATRS showed statistically significant improvement (p≤0.05) from35.03±6.81 (25-45), 21.04±8.17 (5-45), and 20.08±8.93 (6-55) to 90.04±5.32 (82-97), 95.11±3.09 (79-99), and 96.34±3.61 (89-97) at the last follow-up, respectively. All patients could lift heel on one foot and return to work at 12 to 16 weeks after operation (average 14.2 weeks). Overall, No complications such as infection, skin necrosis, sural nerve injury, deep vein thrombosis, and re-rupture of Achilles tendon occurred at last follow-up. Conclusion The new modified approach of Bosworth’s technique provided powerful curative efficacy of infectious Achilles tendon rupture, without severe complications in terms of infection, skin necrosis, sural nerve injury, deep vein thrombosis, and re-rupture of Achilles tendon. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

scholarly journals Modified Bunnell suture versus bundle-to-bundle suture for acute Achilles tendon rupture: A prospective comparative study of patients aged <45 years

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
xiaomeng wang ◽  
Huixin Liu ◽  
dengke li ◽  
zixuan luo ◽  
Yansen Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Suture Technique ◽  
Percutaneous Repair ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: This study was performed to compare the operative outcome between percutaneous repair (modified Bunnell suture) and open repair (bundle-to-bundle suture) for treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture.Methods: Seventy-two consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture were evaluated. Thirty-six patients were treated by the bundle-to-bundle suture technique (Group A), and 36 patients were treated by the modified Bunnell suture technique (Group B). Functional examination included measurement of the calf muscle circumference and performance of the single-leg heel-rise test. The length and diameter of the Achilles tendon were compared between the injured and uninjured sides using magnetic resonance imaging. The number of single-leg heel rises (height of >5 cm) performed within 15 s was compared between the injured and uninjured sides. The ankle joint range of motion was also recorded. The Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale score, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were used to evaluate the clinical outcome after a minimum 12-month postoperative follow-up period.Results: In total, 61 patients were followed up. The mean follow-up time was not significantly different between Group A (23.73 ± 2.81 months) and Group B (22.61 ± 3.96 months). However, there were significant differences in the heel-rise test (Group A, 1.74 ± 0.96; Group B, 2.37 ± 1.42) and length of the Achilles tendon (Group A, 11.98 ± 1.64 cm; Group B, 11.11 ± 1.74 cm). The calf circumference of the injured side was significantly larger in Group A than B (p = 0.043). The cross-sectional diameter of the Achilles tendon after open repair was significantly different from that after percutaneous repair. There were no significant differences in the ATRS, AOFAS score, or VAS score at the final follow-up between the two groups. One patient in Group A had delayed wound healing, which resolved in about 40 days.Conclusions: Both suture methods described in this report can provide good clinical results. The bundle-to-bundle suture technique is more effective for restoration of the Achilles tendon length and muscle function. This method is safe, effective, and worthy of promotion.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes and Ultrasonic Evaluation of Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben-Mao Liu ◽  
Hung-Chou Chen ◽  
Chen-Kun Liaw ◽  
Chia-Hsien Chen ◽  
Chih-Hwa Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Ultrasonic Evaluation ◽  
Achilles Tendon Repair ◽  
The Mean

Abstract BackgroundAchilles tendon rupture remains one of the most common tendon injuries in adult population. At present, randomized studies have failed to demonstrate the optimal management of Achilles tendon rupture. Wound complications have been significantly minimized since the emergence of percutaneous repairs when compared to traditional open methods. However, some studies suggested a higher incidence of rerupture rates and iatrogenic sural nerve injuries. The goal of this study was to present the clinical outcomes and ultrasonic evaluation of percutaneous Achilles tendon repair.MethodsBetween August 2015 and May 2018, 36 patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture, treated in percutaneous repair, were studied retrospectively. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain questionnaires were sent to assess the clinical and functional outcomes. Ultrasonic evaluation was recorded using Möller grading system as an objective measurement.ResultsThe 25 male and 11 female (mean age 47.03 years) were clinically followed-up for a minimum of 12 months (average 28.97 months). No wound complications or reruptures occurred. Four(11.1%) patients reported sural nerve hypoesthesia and one of them required additional treatment. The mean AOFAS and VAS score was 92.6 and 1.8 respectively at the 12th postoperative month. Ultrasonic evaluation was performed at the average follow-up of 18.3 months and the mean points were 1.8. All treated tendons were healthily recovered and all patients were able to return to previous work or activities.ConclusionPercutaneous Achilles tendon repair offers good clinical outcome and no apparent increased risk of reruptures. The risk of iatrogenic sural nerve injury, however, remains the most occurred complication. Ultrasound can be used to visualize and examine the repaired tendon, which demonstrated satisfying healing process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document