scholarly journals Intraoperative Ultrasonography assistance for minimally invasive repair of the acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongliang Yang ◽  
Honglei Jia ◽  
Wupeng Zhang ◽  
Shihong Xu ◽  
Fu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Intraoperative Ultrasonography ◽  
Medial Side ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Minimally invasive repair is a better option for Achilles tendon rupture with low re-rupture and wound-related complications than conservative treatment or traditional open repair. The major problem is sural nerve injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect and advantage of the intraoperative ultrasonography assistance for minimally invasive repair of the acute Achilles tendon rupture.Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 36 cases of acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with minimally invasive repair assisted with intraoperative ultrasonography from January 2015 to December 2017. The relationship of the sural nerve and small saphenous vein was confirmed on the preoperative MRI. The course of the small saphenous vein and sural nerve were identified and marked by intraoperative ultrasonography. The ruptured Achilles tendon was repaired with minimally invasive Bunnell suture on the medial side of the SSV.Results: All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. No sural nerve injury or other complications was found intraoperatively and postoperatively. All the patients returned to work and light sporting activities at a mean of 12.78±1.40 weeks and 17.28±2.34 weeks, respectively. The Mean AOFAS scores improved from 59.17±5.31 preoperatively to 98.92±1.63 at the time of 12 months follow-up. There was statistically significant difference (P<0.001). No patient complained a negative effect on their life.Conclusions: The minimally invasive repair assisted with intraoperative ultrasonography can yield good clinical outcomes, less surgical time and less complications, especially sural nerve injury. It is an efficient, reliable and safe method for acute AT rupture.

scholarly journals Intraoperative Ultrasonography assistance for minimally invasive repair of the acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongliang Yang ◽  
Honglei Jia ◽  
Wupeng Zhang ◽  
Shihong Xu ◽  
Fu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Intraoperative Ultrasonography ◽  
Medial Side ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Minimally invasive repair is a better option for Achilles tendon rupture with low re-rupture and wound-related complications than conservative treatment or traditional open repair. The major problem is sural nerve injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect and advantage of the intraoperative ultrasonography assistance for minimally invasive repair of the acute Achilles tendon rupture. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 36 cases of acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with minimally invasive repair assisted with intraoperative ultrasonography from January 2015 to December 2017. The relationship of the sural nerve and small saphenous vein was confirmed on the preoperative MRI. The course of the small saphenous vein and sural nerve were identified and marked by intraoperative ultrasonography. The ruptured Achilles tendon was repaired with minimally invasive Bunnell suture on the medial side of the small saphenous vein (SSV).Results: All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. No sural nerve injury or other complications was found intraoperatively and postoperatively. All the patients returned to work and light sporting activities at a mean of 12.78±1.40 weeks and 17.28±2.34 weeks, respectively. The Mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores improved from 59.17±5.31 preoperatively to 98.92±1.63 at the time of 12 months follow-up. There was statistically significant difference (P<0.001). No patient complained a negative effect on their life.Conclusions: The minimally invasive repair assisted with intraoperative ultrasonography can yield good clinical outcomes, less surgical time and less complications, especially sural nerve injury. It is an efficient, reliable and safe method for acute Achilles Tendon (AT) rupture.

scholarly journals A comparative study of innovative percutaneous repair and open repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture: Innovative usage of intraoperative ultrasonography

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902091027
Author(s):  
Jeong-Kil Lee ◽  
Chan Kang ◽  
Deuk-Soo Hwang ◽  
Dong-Hun Kang ◽  
Gi-Soo Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Athletic Ability ◽  
Percutaneous Repair

Purpose: There is no definitive consensus on the optimal treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. We comparatively analyzed the clinical outcomes of two types of repair surgeries in treating Achilles tendon rupture. Methods: This retrospective study included 12 patients of Achilles tendon rupture (group A) treated with ultrasound-guided percutaneous repair and 18 patients (group B) treated with open repair. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Arner–Lindholm scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle–hindfoot score, Achilles Tendon Total Rupture score (ATRS), visual analog scale, time to single heel raise, bilateral calf circumferences, recovery of athletic ability, and other complications. Results: While the Arner–Lindholm scale, AOFAS ankle–hindfoot score, ATRS, time point when single heel raise was possible, differences in bilateral calf circumference, and recovery of athletic ability compared to pre-rupture level were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.999, 0.235, 0.357, 0.645, 0.497, and 0.881, respectively), overall and aesthetic satisfaction levels were higher in the group treated with percutaneous repair under ultrasonography guidance (p = 0.035 and 0.001, respectively). Overall, there were no cases involving sural nerve injury in either group. Conclusion: Innovative percutaneous repair provides not only similar clinical outcomes but also greater overall and aesthetic satisfaction levels of operative outcomes and minimal complications (i.e. sural nerve injury) compared to open repair surgeries. Therefore, percutaneous repair may be a useful technique in the treatment of Achilles tendon rupture.

scholarly journals Mini-Invasive, Ultrasound Guided Repair of the Achilles Tendon Rupture—A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2370
Author(s):  
Łukasz Paczesny ◽  
Jan Zabrzyński ◽  
Marcin Domżalski ◽  
Maciej Gagat ◽  
Miron Termanowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Sonographic Guidance

Percutaneous acute Achilles tendon rupture suturing has become a leading treatment option in recent years. A common complication after this mini-invasive procedure is sural nerve injury, which can reduce the patients’ satisfaction and final outcomes. High-resolution ultrasound is a reliable method for localizing the sural nerve, and it can be performed intra-operatively; however, the long-term results are yet unknown. The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the long-term results of percutaneous Achilles tendon repair supported with real-time ultrasound imaging. We conducted 57 percutaneous sutures of acute Achilles tendon rupture between 2005 and 2015; 30 were sutured under sonographic guidance, while 27 were performed without sonographic assistance. The inclusion criteria were acute (less than 7 days) full tendon rupture, treatment with the percutaneous technique, age between 18 and 65 years, and a body mass index (BMI) below 35. The operative procedure was carried out by two surgeons, according to the surgical technique reported by Maffulli et al. In total, 35 patients were available for this retrospective assessment; 20 (16 men and 4 women) were treated with sonographic guidance, while 15 (12 men and 3 women) underwent the procedure without it. The mean follow-up was 8 years (range, 3–13 years). The sural nerve was localized 10 mm to 20 mm (mean, 15.8; SD, 3.02) laterally from the scar of the Achilles tendon tear. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to the FAOQ score (P < 0.05). High-resolution ultrasounds performed intra-operatively can minimize the risk of sural nerve injury during percutaneous Achilles tendon repair.

A New Modification of Bosworth’s Technique to Repair Infectious Achilles Tendon Rupture

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qipeng Wu ◽  
Yuan Xiong ◽  
Zhenhua Fang ◽  
Junwen Wang ◽  
Guohui Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Skin Necrosis ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to assess radiographic and clinical outcomes of a new modified approach on the basis of Bosworth’s technique in the treatment of infectious Achilles tendon rupture (IATR). Materials and methods 15 patients (9 males and 6 females; 15 feet; average age of 38.3 years) were included in the study. After infection, the wounds were transferred to our department for treatment (Figure 1).Radiographic and clinical outcome in terms of the American Orthopaedic Foot&Ankle Society score (AOFAS), the Victorian institute of sports assessment Achilles (VISA-A), and the Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) were investigated at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively. Results Preoperative AOFAS, VISA-A, and ATRS showed statistically significant improvement (p≤0.05) from35.03±6.81 (25-45), 21.04±8.17 (5-45), and 20.08±8.93 (6-55) to 90.04±5.32 (82-97), 95.11±3.09 (79-99), and 96.34±3.61 (89-97) at the last follow-up, respectively. All patients could lift heel on one foot and return to work at 12 to 16 weeks after operation (average 14.2 weeks). Overall, No complications such as infection, skin necrosis, sural nerve injury, deep vein thrombosis, and re-rupture of Achilles tendon occurred at last follow-up. Conclusion The new modified approach of Bosworth’s technique provided powerful curative efficacy of infectious Achilles tendon rupture, without severe complications in terms of infection, skin necrosis, sural nerve injury, deep vein thrombosis, and re-rupture of Achilles tendon. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

scholarly journals Achillon versus modified minimally invasive repair treatment in acute Achilles tendon rupture

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902090835
Author(s):  
Jun-Yi Liu ◽  
Wei-Feng Duan ◽  
Sheng Shen ◽  
Ye Ye ◽  
Yong-Qiang Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Accelerated Rehabilitation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Specialized Equipment

Purpose: To date, the best treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) is still inconclusive. Achillon seems to be a promising approach with satisfactory function and low complication rate. We hypothesize a modified minimally invasive repair (MMIR), which provides direct visualization of proximal tendon stump without specialized equipment that could provide comparable results. This trial is aimed to evaluate the functional and surgical outcomes of MMIR comparing with Achillon. Methods: From February 2013 to February 2017, 114 patients with AATR were enrolled in this trial, underwent an alternative operation (Achillon or MMIR), and accelerated rehabilitation protocol. Forty-four patients took the Achillon and the other 70 patients took the MMIR at their subjective choice. One hundred eleven full follow-up data were obtained including Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS), time back to work, rerupture rate, overall complication rate, and operation time. Results: There was no significant difference between groups in demographic characters. There was no statistical difference between both groups regarding to time return to work and ATRS at 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month, respectively. Five reruptures and two Achilles tendons tethering to skins were found in the Achillon group, and two reruptures and one sural nerve injury in the MMIR group. No wound infection and dehiscence occurred. Overall complication rate in the Achillon group is higher (16.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.044). The operation time of Achillon is less than MMIR (34.84 vs. 39.71, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Both techniques combining with accelerated rehabilitation showed to be reliable and effective. MMIR is safer and more economical, and Achillon is faster.

The Percutaneous Surgical Approach for Repairing Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shay Tenenbaum ◽  
Niv Dreiangel ◽  
Ayal Segal ◽  
Amir Herman ◽  
Amnon Israeli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Main Concern ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Percutaneous Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: Treatment modalities for acute Achilles tendon rupture can be divided into operative and nonoperative. The main concern with nonoperative treatment is the high incidence of repeated ruptures; operative treatment is associated with risk of infection, sural nerve injury, and wound-healing sequelae. We assessed our experience with a percutaneous operative approach for treating acute Achilles tendon rupture. Methods: The outcomes of percutaneous surgery in 29 patients (25 men; age range, 24–58 years) who underwent percutaneous surgery for Achilles tendon rupture between 1997 and 2004 were retrospectively evaluated. Their demographic data, subjective and objective evaluation findings, and isokinetic evaluation results were retrieved, and they were assessed with the modified Boyden score and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale. Results: All 29 patients demonstrated good functional outcome, with no- to mild-limitations in recreational activities and high patient satisfaction. Mean follow-up was 31.8 months. Changes in ankle range of motion in the operated leg were minimal. Strength and power testing revealed a significant difference at 90°/sec for plantarflexion power between the injured and healthy legs but no difference at 30° and 240°/sec or in dorsiflexion. The mean modified Boyden score was 74.3, and the mean Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score was 94.5. Conclusions: Percutaneous surgery for Achilles tendon rupture is easily executed and has excellent functional results and low complication rates. It is an appealing alternative to either nonoperative or open surgery treatments. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 100(4): 270–275, 2010)

scholarly journals Percutaneous Repair Method and Achilles Tendon Rupture Rehabilitation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Ficek ◽  
Paweł Gwiazdoń ◽  
Jolanta Rajca ◽  
Grzegorz Hajduk
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Professional Activity ◽  
Rehabilitation Protocol

Abstract Background: Subcutaneous, spontaneous, complete ruptures of the Achilles tendon are usually caused indirectly by trauma associated with rapid movement. When minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair is performed, an active rehabilitation protocol can be implemented that allows for fast, measurable progress, reduced tissue atrophy, and an improved range of motion, thereby reducing pain and increasing patients’ overall physical well-being. However, overestimating the effectiveness of rehabilitative interventions can lead to arbitrary advancements in rehabilitation that significantly exceed the permitted levels of daily or professional activity. This issue can lead to various side effects and slow rehabilitation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of adverse effects on objective outcomes after minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair.Methods: The study included 36 individuals with complete Achilles tendon rupture who underwent the percutaneous Ma-Griffith technique. The same rehabilitation protocol was used.Results: Five side effects were identified during rehabilitation: deformation of the repair construct (DRC), irritation of the sural nerve (SNI), morning ankle stiffness (MAS), edema of the soft tissue around the tendon (OST) and suture knots. DRC and MAS were associated with a longer time being required to achieve full ankle range of motion. SNI and OST were associated with a longer time being required to meet the criteria for dynamic training. None of the side effects were related to the isokinetic strength of the ankle plantar and dorsiflexors.Conclusions: The incidence of the assessed side effects in the postoperative period is not related to the type of activity, whether it is professional or amateur. Among the identified side effects, deformation of the regenerated shape of the heel tendon and MAS cause a delay in the recovery of full ankle range of motion. Calf nerve irritation and soft tissue swelling increase the time it takes to meet the criteria for starting dynamic training.Trial registration:The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Academy of Physical Education in Katowice (no. 13/2007)

scholarly journals A New Minimally Invasive Technique for Repairing Achilles Tendon Rupture:A Biomechanical Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng zhao ◽  
Dawei Sun ◽  
Yaru Xiong ◽  
Ribo Zhuo
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Research Group ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
New Technique ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Cyclical Loading

AbstractIntroductionThe incidence of Achilles tendon rupture shows a gradually increasing trend, which is mainly managed by minimally invasive treatment due to its advantages, such as low wound infection rate. At present, the firmness of the commonly applied minimally invasive suture method for Achilles tendon remains controversial. Our research group has developed a novel suture method for Achilles tendon, which has achieved favorable clinical outcomes. Therefore, this experiment aimed to explore the optimal approach to repair Achilles tendon rupture through comparing the biomechanical strength of the commonly used Achilles tendon suture methods currently.Materials and methods6 fresh frozen human cadaveric Achilles tendon specimens were sutured by three kinds of technique, and were tested through the cyclical loading after repair.ResultsResults of cyclical loading showed that, the repair using the new technique was stronger after 10 cycles, 1000 cycles, and rupture. Moreover, the new technique had displayed superior anti-deformation strength to that of the Ma-Griffith technique.ConclusionsOur experimental results demonstrate that, the new technique proposed by our research group can attain comparable biomechanical properties to those of the Krachow technique. However, the sample size in this study is small, and further clinical trials are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document