scholarly journals Ankle Arthrodesis with Structural Grafts Can Work for the Salvage of Failed Total Ankle Replacement

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Adam Halverson ◽  
Gregory Berlet

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Surgical treatment options after failed total ankle replacement (TAR) are limited to revision total ankle replacements, revision bone block interposition arthrodesis, or amputation. In patients where revision TAR is not an option and limb salvage is desired, conversion to an ankle arthrodesis can provide a stable, plantigrade foot. Revision arthrodesis is challenged by significant bone loss with removal of the TAR implant. The purpose of this study was to report midterm outcomes and radiographic results in a single surgeon’s group of patients who have undergone revision ankle arthrodesis with intramedullary nail fixation and structural allograft augmentation following failed TAR. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. A retrospective chart and radiographic review was performed. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year who underwent failed TAR revision with structural femoral head allograft and intramedullary tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nail fixation were included. Patients with less than 1-year follow-up and alternative fixation or graft constructs were excluded from the study. Data were collected upon enrollment visit and again at midterm follow-up ranging from 3-7 years post-operatively. Foot Function Index (FFI), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) outcomes scores and radiographs were obtained at each visit. Primary outcomes of interest were the rate of limb salvage and patient reported outcome scores. Secondary outcomes include limb length correction and the fate of the structural allograft. Results: Five patients were available for enrollment. Average age at surgery was 63.2 (range 56-69) years. Enrollment visits averaged 1.68 years post-operative (range 0.95 - 3.78). Midterm follow-up was at an average of 5.2 years (range 4.7-5.6). Upon enrollment average FFI was 34.82 (range 8.82-75.88) and at midterm follow-up was 20.42 (range 0-35.38). AOFAS scores upon enrollment averaged 66.6 (range 61-77) and at midterm follow-up averaged 70.33 (range 54-88). Radiographic results show union in 4 of 5 patients at enrollment and in 2 of 3 patients upon midterm follow-up. Average limb length discrepancy at enrollment was 1.4 cm (range 0.5 - 2.0) and 1.6 cm (range 0.2 – 2.4) at midterm follow-up. Conclusion: Conversion of failed TAR to TTC fusion with femoral head allograft is a salvage technique that can lead to a functional arthrodesis and limb salvage in a situation where options are challenging. Our results show continued improvement in patient reported outcomes scores moving from short-term to midterm follow-up with preservation of limb length and no trend towards structural allograft resorption.

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002098092
Author(s):  
Devon W. Consul ◽  
Anson Chu ◽  
Travis M. Langan ◽  
Christopher F. Hyer ◽  
Gregory Berlet

Total ankle replacement has become a viable alternative to ankle arthrodesis in the surgical management of advanced ankle arthritis. Total ankle replacement has generally been reserved for patients who are older and for those who will have a lower demand on the replacement. The purpose of the current study is to review patient outcomes, complications, and implant survival in patients younger than 55 years who underwent total ankle replacement at a single institution. A single-center chart and radiographic review was performed of consecutive patients who underwent total ankle replacement for treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. All surgeries were performed by 1 of 5 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons at a single institution. A total of 51 patients met inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up of 31.2 months (SD = 16.2). Implant survival was 94%, There were 7 major complications (13%) requiring an unplanned return to the operating room and 8 minor complications (15%) that resolved with conservative care. The results of this study show that total ankle replacement is a viable treatment option for patients younger than 55 years. Levels of Evidence: A retrospective case series


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2258
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Mosca ◽  
Silvio Caravelli ◽  
Emanuele Vocale ◽  
Simone Massimi ◽  
Davide Censoni ◽  
...  

Recently, the progress in techniques and in projecting new prosthetic designs has allowed increasing indications for total ankle replacement (TAR) as treatment for ankle osteoarthritis. This retrospective work comprehended 39 subjects aged between 47 and 79 years old. The patients, observed for at least 12 months (mean follow up of 18.2 ± 4.1 months), have been evaluated according to clinical and radiological parameters, both pre- and post-operatively. The AOFAS and VAS score significantly improved, respectively, from 46.2 ± 4.8 to 93.9 ± 4.1 and from 7.1 ± 1.1 to 0.7 ± 0.5 (p value < 0.05). At the final evaluation, the mean plantarflexion passed from 12.2° ± 2.3° to 18.1° ± 2.4° (p value < 0.05) and dorsiflexion from a pre-operative mean value of 8.7° ± 4.1° to 21.7° ± 5.4° post-operatively (p value < 0.05). This study found that this new total ankle replacement design is a safe and effective procedure for patients effected by end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Improvements have been demonstrated in terms of range of motion, radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes. However, further studies are needed to assess the long-term performance of these prostheses.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexej Barg ◽  
Charles Saltzman

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: In the last two decades, total ankle replacement (TAR) has gained more acceptance as a treatment option in patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. However, there is a lack of literature on TAR using a lateral transfibular approach. Therefore, we sought to report early clinical and radiographic results of a patient cohort treated with TAR using a lateral transfibular approach by a single surgeon. Methods: Fifty-five primary total ankle arthroplasties using the Zimmer trabecular metal implant were performed in 54 patients (29 men and 25 women; mean age, 67.0 years) from October 2012 to December 2014. Clinical assessment including pain evaluation and measurement of ankle range of motion was done preoperatively and at the latest follow-up. Weight-bearing radiographs were used to determine the angular alignment of the tibial and talar components and to analyze the bone-implant interface. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, revision surgeries, and failures were evaluated. Results: Implant survival was 93% at 36 months follow-up. There were 3 revisions of a tibial component due to aseptic loosening. In 10 of 55 procedures, a secondary procedure was performed during follow-up. Mean follow-up duration was 26.6 ± 4.2 months. No delayed union or non-union was observed for fibula healing. The average VAS pain score decreased significantly from 7.9 ± 1.3 to 0.8 ± 1.2. The average total range of motion increased significantly from 22.9° ± 11.8° to 40.2° ± 11.8°. Conclusion: Early results of Zimmer trabecular metal total ankle replacement demonstrated improved patient-reported outcomes and increased ankle motion at a minimum follow-up of one year. In the first 55 consecutive cases, the fibular osteotomy required for access to the ankle healed without complications. Painful early loosening requiring revision due to lack of bony ingrowth was seen in 3 of 55 cases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1239-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Nunley ◽  
Samuel B. Adams ◽  
Mark E. Easley ◽  
James K. DeOrio

Background: Outcomes of total ankle replacement for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis continue to improve. Debate continues whether a mobile-bearing total ankle replacement (MB-TAR) or a fixed-bearing total ankle replacement (FB-TAR) is superior, with successful outcomes reported long term for MB-TAR and at intermediate- to long-term follow-up for newer generation FB-TAR. Although comparisons between the 2 total ankle designs have been reported, to our knowledge, no investigation has compared the 2 designs with a high level of evidence. This prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at a single institution compares patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, and radiographic results of the mobile-bearing STAR and the fixed-bearing Salto-Talaris in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. Methods: Between November 2011 and November 2014, adult patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis failing nonoperative treatment were introduced to the study. With informed consent, 100 patients (31 male and 69 female, average age 65 years, range 35-85 years) were enrolled; a demographic comparison between the 2 cohorts was similar. Exclusion criteria included inflammatory arthropathy, neuropathy, weight exceeding 250 pounds, radiographic coronal plane deformity greater than 15 degrees, or extensive talar dome wear pattern (“flat-top talus”). Prospective patient-reported outcomes, physical examination, and standardized weightbearing ankle radiographs were obtained preoperatively, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and then at yearly intervals. Data collection included visual analog pain score, Short Form 36, Foot and Ankle Disability Index, Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score. Surgeries were performed by a nondesign team of orthopedic foot and ankle specialists with total ankle replacement expertise. Statistical analysis was performed by a qualified statistician. At average follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 2-6 years) complete clinical data and radiographs were available for 84 patients; 7 had incomplete data, 1 had died, 4 were withdrawn after enrolling but prior to surgery, and 4 were lost to follow-up. Results: In all outcome measures, the entire cohort demonstrated statistically significant improvements from preoperative evaluation to most recent follow-up with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. Radiographically, tibial lucency/cyst formation was 26.8% and 20.9% for MB-TAR and FB-TAR, respectively. Tibial settling/subsidence occurred in 7.3% of MB-TAR. Talar lucency/cyst formation occurred in 24.3% and 2.0% of MB-TAR and FB-TAR, respectively. Talar subsidence was observed in 21.9% and 2.0% of MB-TAR and FH-TAR, respectively. Reoperations were performed in 8 MB-TARs and 3 FH-TARs, with the majority of procedures being to relieve impingement or treat cysts and not to revise or remove metal implants. Conclusion: With a high level of evidence, our study found that patient-reported and clinical outcomes were favorable for both designs and that there was no significant difference in clinical improvement between the 2 implants. The incidence of lucency/cyst formation was similar for MB-TAR and FH-TAR for the tibial component, but the MB-TAR had greater talar lucency/cyst formation and tibial and talar subsidence. As has been suggested in previous studies, clinical outcomes do not necessarily correlate with radiographic findings. Reoperations were more common for MB-TAR and, in most cases, were to relieve impingement or treat cysts rather than revise or remove metal implants. Level of Evidence: Level I, prospective randomized study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth Richman ◽  
Tyler Rutherford ◽  
Timothy Rearick ◽  
John T. Campbell ◽  
Rebecca Cerrato ◽  
...  

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis, Sports Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle replacement (TAR) and ankle arthrodesis (AA) are two common surgical treatment modalities for end stage tibiotalar arthritis. A key deciding point between the two is anticipated functional outcome postoperatively, especially in regards to sports related activities. However, there is a paucity of data available to help advise patients in their decision making. While TAR provides a theoretical benefit of improved functionality, the outcomes of several European studies have shown mixed results. These studies are limited by small sample size, obsolete TAR implants not used in the United States, and nonspecific outcome measures. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative sports activity levels following modern TAR and AA in a U.S. population, which may benefit surgical decision making and guide patient expectations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study that consisted of patients who underwent a TAR (N=62) or AA (N=51) between 2009-2015. The mean age of the arthrodesis group was 57.7 years ± 12.12 (28.84-85.26). There were 27 male participants and 24 female participants. The TAR group had 31 male and 31 female participants with a mean age of 64.9 years ± 8.57 (45-79.6). Exclusion criteria included paralysis, rheumatoid arthritis, revision surgery, incomplete pre- and post-operative scores, and follow up less than 2 years. General health and foot-ankle function were assessed using the SF-12 Health Survey and the revised Foot Function Index (FFI-R) preoperatively and at final follow-up. In addition, activity levels were assessed using a Return to Activities Following Surgery questionnaire that was administered at final follow up. This form included a Visual Analog Scale for Pain, satisfaction questions, and a list of 25 activities. Patients were asked to record their current level of activity, ability to participate pre- and post-surgery, and whether their desired level was met. All three measurements tools were compared between both treatment groups. Results: The SF-12 physical score both groups significantly increased postoperatively from 33.18 ± 10.37 to 43 ± 10.32 for AA’s and from 32.88 ± 9.44 to 45.81 ± 12.94 (p < 0.001) for TAR’s. The FFI scores showed a significant increase in both groups (p < 0.001). In the AA group, 88% of patients returned to work and would repeat the surgery, compared to 92% of patients in the TAR group. In terms of satisfaction and pain, the TAR group was more satisfied (1.78 vs. 1.44) and had less postoperative pain (1.32 vs. 2.56 p < 0.05). The AA group reported a significant increase in six activities including: golf (p < 0.05), weight lifting, and walking (p<0.001), while the TAR group reported significant increase in 15 activities, including hiking, tennis, and yoga (p<0.001). Conclusion: Our study revealed a significant increase in general physical function, foot function, and activity level in both groups. The TAR group was able to perform a wider range of activity and sports compared to the AA group. Overall, TAR patients were significantly more satisfied with their procedure compared to AA patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam L. Halverson ◽  
David A. Goss ◽  
Gregory C. Berlet

Background. Treatment options after failed total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) are limited. This study reports midterm outcomes and radiographic results in a single-surgeon group of patients who have undergone ankle arthrodesis with intramedullary nail fixation and structural allograft augmentation following failed TAA. Methods. A retrospective review on patients who underwent failed TAA revision with structural femoral head allograft and intramedullary tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nail fixation was completed. Foot Function Index (FFI), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) outcome scores, and radiographs were obtained at each visit with 5-year follow-up. Results. Five patients were followed to an average of 5.2 years (range 4.7-5.6). Enrollment FFI was 34.82 (range 8.82-75.88); at midterm follow-up it was 20.42 (range 0-35.38). Enrollment AOFAS scores averaged 66.6 (range 61-77); at midterm follow-up it was 70.33 (range 54-88). Radiographs showed union in 4 of 5 patients at enrollment and 2 of 3 patients at midterm. Conclusions. Utilization of TTC fusion with femoral head allograft is a salvage technique that can produce a functional limb salvage. Our results show continued improvement in patient-reported outcomes, with preservation of limb length and reasonable union rate. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level II: Prospective, comparative trial.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0005
Author(s):  
Francesco Granata ◽  
Camilla Maccario ◽  
Luigi Manzi ◽  
Eric Tan ◽  
Federico Giuseppe Usuelli

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Ankle arthritis is a highly limiting pathology that causes pain and functional limitation with subsequent deterioration of quality of life. With recent advances in surgical instrumentation and techniques, prosthetic replacement of the ankle has proved to be a valid alternative to arthrodesis with comparable outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological findings in a transfibular total ankle replacement with two years follow-up. Methods: This prospective study included 59 patients who underwent transfibular total ankle arthroplasty from May 2013 to December 2015. The mean age was 51.6 ± 13.4 years. All patients were followed for at least 24 months postoperative with an average follow-up of 42.0 ± 23.5 months. Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results: At 24 months, patients demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score from 33.6 to 88.1 (P<0.01), VAS scale from 79.3 to 14.0 (P<0.01) and SF-12 Physical and Mental Composite Scores from 29.9 and 44.6 to 74.4 and 95.3, respectively (P<0.01). Ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion improved from 5.5 and 8.8 degrees to 24.2 and 20.0 degrees, respectively (P<0.01). Radiographically, patients demonstrated neutral alignment of the ankle with a tibio-talar ratio of 34.9 ± 9.2 and hindfoot alignment view angle of 1.2 ± 7.0 degrees. No patient demonstrated any radiographic evidence of tibial or talar lucency at 24 months. Seven patients underwent reoperation for removal of symptomatic hardware; one patient developed a postoperative prosthetic infection requiring placement of an antibiotic spacer. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that transfibular total ankle replacement is a safe and effective option for the patients for ankle arthritis with improvements in patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, and radiological parameters. However, further studies are required to determine the mid- and long-term performance of these implants.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0032
Author(s):  
Andrea Pujol Nicolas ◽  
Jayasree Ramas Ramaskandhan ◽  
Triin Nurm ◽  
Malik Siddique

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle replacement as a valid treatment for end stage ankle arthritis, is gaining popularity and every year there is an increasing number of procedures. With revision rates as high as 21% at 5 years and 43% at 10 years there is a need for understanding and reporting the outcome of revision ankle replacement. Our aim was to study the patient reported outcomes following revision TAR with a minimum of 2 year follow up. Methods: All patients that underwent a revision total ankle replacement between 2012 and 2016 were included in the study. All patients received a post-operative questionnaire comprising of MOX-FQ score, EQ-5D (UK) and Foot and Ankle outcomes scores (FAOS) and patients satisfaction questionnaire with a minimum of 2 years follow up. Results: 32 patients had a revision total ankle replacement between 2012 and 2016. 2 patients were deceased therefore 30 patients were included in the study. 5 patients declined participation for completing questionnaires. We received 21 (66%) completed questionnaires. The mean MOX-FQ average domain score for pain was 58.8, walking/standing 65.8 and social function was 48.2. The mean FAOS scores were 50.7 for pain, 50.6 for symptoms, 54.9 for ADL and 28.2 for quality of life. The mean overall health score today for EQ-5D was 67.8/100. 45% of patients were satisfied with the pain relief and return to sports and recreation obtained following the operation, 48% were satisfied with the improved in daily activities. 52% were overall satisfied with the results from surgery. Conclusion: Revision total ankle replacement gives overall satisfactory results demonstrated from patients reported outcomes at a minimum of 2 years following surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0009
Author(s):  
Craig C. Akoh ◽  
Amanda N. Fletcher ◽  
Rishin J. Kadakia ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Young-uk Park ◽  
...  

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report on the radiographic outcomes, clinical outcomes, and implant survivorship following extramedullary-referenced (EMr) versus intramedullary-referenced (IMr) total ankle replacement (TAR). Methods: From May 2007 to February 2018, a consecutive series of patients with end-stage tibiotalar osteoarthritis undergoing TAR for primary arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, and inflammatory arthritis was enrolled in this study. Analyses were performed comparing IMr versus EMr components for patient-reported outcomes data, pre and postoperative radiographic ankle alignment, concomitant procedures, and complications. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses served to determine implant reoperation and revision surgery. Data was prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant for all statistical analyses. Results: A total of 340 TARs were included with 105 IMr TAR and 235 EMr TAR. The mean follow-up was 5.3 years ( +- 2.5, range 2-12). The absolute value for preoperative coronal alignment was significantly greater for IMr compared to EMr TAR (13.0 vs 6.4 degrees; p < 0.0001), but both groups achieved near neutral alignment postoperatively (1.4 vs 1.5 degrees; p=0.6655). The odds of having a concomitant procedure was 2.7 times higher in patients with an IMr TAR (OR 2.7, CI 1.7-4.4; p-value <0.0001). There were similar improvements in patient-reported outcome scores at one year and final follow up (all p > 0.05). The 5-year implant survivorship was 98.6.% for IMr versus 97.5% for EMr at final follow-up. Conclusion: Despite the IMr TAR group having more severe preoperative coronal and sagittal malalignment, both IMr and EMr TAR components had comparable postoperative alignment, patient-reported outcome scores, and complications. Among the patients with preoperative varus, valgus, or anterior distal tibial slope, the IMr patients achieved greater correction than the EMr patients. Although the 5-year implant survivorship was similar between the two cohorts with 98.6% survival for IMr TAR and 97.5% for EMr TAR, impending failures were greater for the mobile-bearing EMr TAR.


2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico G. Usuelli ◽  
Camilla Maccario ◽  
Francesco Granata ◽  
Cristian Indino ◽  
Venus Vakhshori ◽  
...  

Background: Ankle arthritis is a highly limiting pathology that causes pain and functional limitation with subsequent deterioration of quality of life. With recent advances in surgical instrumentation and techniques, prosthetic replacement of the ankle has proven to be a valid alternative to arthrodesis with comparable outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological findings in a transfibular total ankle replacement with follow-up of at least 2 years. Methods: This prospective study included 89 patients who underwent transfibular total ankle arthroplasty from May 2013 to February 2016. The mean age was 53.2 ± 13.5 years. All patients were followed for at least 24 months postoperatively with an average follow-up of 42.0 ± 23.5 months. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results: At 24 months postoperatively, patients demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle Hindfoot Score from 33.8 ± 14.3 to 88.5 ± 6.6 ( P < .001), visual analog scale (VAS) from 80.5 ± 17.0 to 14.1 ± 9.2 ( P < .001), and Short Form-12 Physical and Mental Composite Scores from 29.9 ± 6.7 and 43.3 ± 8.6 to 47.0 ± 7.6 and 53.3 ± 8.1, respectively ( P < .001). In addition, ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion improved from 6.2 ± 5.5 and 9.6 ± 5.8 degrees to 24.2 ± 7.9 and 18.1 ± 7.6 degrees, respectively ( P < .001). Radiographically, patients demonstrated maintained neutral alignment of the ankle at 24 months. No patient demonstrated any radiographic evidence of tibial or talar lucency at final follow-up. Seven patients underwent reoperation for removal of symptomatic hardware (6 fibular plates, 1 syndesmotic screw); 2 patients experienced delayed wound healing. The first one was treated with plate removal and flap coverage. The second one required fibular plate removal. One patient developed a postoperative prosthetic infection requiring operative debridement, removal of implants, and placement of an antibiotic spacer. Conclusion: This study found that transfibular total ankle replacement was a safe and effective option for patients with ankle arthritis resulting in improvements in patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, and radiographic parameters. However, further studies are required to determine the mid- and long-term performance of these implants. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document