scholarly journals Hybrid Fixation Restores Tibiofibular Kinematics for Early Weightbearing after Syndesmotic Injury

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0009
Author(s):  
Neel Patel ◽  
Calvin Chan ◽  
Conor Murphy ◽  
Richard Debski ◽  
Volker Musahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Syndesmotic Injury ◽  
Hybrid Fixation ◽  
Fixation Methods ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Lateral Translation ◽  
Posterior Translation ◽  
Single Suture

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Injury to the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), and interosseous membrane (IOM) of the syndesmosis is a predictive measure of residual symptoms after an ankle injury. Unstable syndesmotic injuries are typically treated surgically with constructs consisting of cortical screw and/or suture button fixation. Previous studies have shown contradicting findings regarding the effects of different surgical fixation methods on tibiofibular kinematics. Thus, the objective of this study was to quantify tibiofibular joint motion with different syndesmotic screw and suture button fixation constructs after disruption of the syndesmosis compared to the intact ankle during simulated weight bearing. Methods: Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens were tested using a six degree-of-freedom robotic testing system. After subtalar joint fusion, the tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed to a robotic manipulator, while complete fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. A constant 200 N compressive load was applied to the ankle while an additional 5 Nm external rotation and 5 Nm inversion moment applied independently to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. Fibular motion with respect to the tibia was tracked using an optical tracking system. Outcome variables included fibular medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and external rotation (ER) in the following states: intact ankle, complete injury (AITFL, PITFL, and IOM transected), single tricortical screw fixation double tricortical screw fixation, hybrid fixation (single tricortical screw and single suture button), suture button fixation, and divergent suture button fixation. Repeated measures ANOVA was performed for statistical analysis. Results: The external rotation moment produced significant differences in fibular motion between the injury and fixation states compared to the intact state. A complete syndesmotic injury caused significantly increased fibular lateral translation, posterior translation, and external rotation in all ankle positions except 30° plantarflexion compared to the intact ankle. Single suture button and single screw fixation resulted in significantly higher fibular lateral translation at 10° dorsiflexion compared the intact ankle, while single suture button fixation also resulted in significantly higher external rotation at 10° dorsiflexion compared the intact ankle. Fibular posterior translation was significantly higher with hybrid, suture button, and divergent suture button fixation at 0° flexion and with single tricortical screw and double screw fixation at 10° dorsiflexion compared to the intact ankle (Figure 1). Conclusion: Complete injury to the syndesmosis results in significantly higher fibular lateral translation, external rotation, and posterior translation compared to the intact ankle. Hybrid or divergent suture button fixation would be recommended to restore tibiofibular motion without over-constraint. However, none of the fixation methods were able to restore AP translation in all ankle positions. Thus, it is important to evaluate syndesmotic stability in the sagittal plane at different ankle positions. Findings of this study suggest that physicians should evaluate fibular AP translation in a neutral position when using suture button fixation constructs and in dorsiflexion when using tricortical screw fixation constructs.

scholarly journals Hybrid Fixation Restores Tibiofibular Kinematics for Early Weightbearing After Syndesmotic Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596712094674
Author(s):  
Neel K. Patel ◽  
Calvin Chan ◽  
Conor I. Murphy ◽  
Richard E. Debski ◽  
Volker Musahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axial Compression ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Optical Tracking ◽  
Hybrid Fixation ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Lateral Translation ◽  
Posterior Translation

Background: Disruption of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), and interosseous membrane (IOM) is a predictive measure of residual symptoms after an ankle injury. Controversy remains regarding the ideal fixation technique for early return to sport, which requires restoration of tibiofibular kinematics with early weightbearing. Purpose: To quantify tibiofibular kinematics after syndesmotic fixation with different tricortical screw and suture button constructs during simulated weightbearing. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A 6 degrees of freedom robotic testing system was used to test 9 fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age, 65.1 ± 17.3 years). A 200-N compressive load was applied to the ankle, while a 5-N·m external rotation and a 5-N·m inversion moment were applied independently to the ankle at 0° of flexion, 15° and 30° of plantarflexion, and 10° of dorsiflexion. Fibular medial-lateral translation, anterior-posterior translation, and internal-external rotation relative to the tibia were tracked by use of an optical tracking system in the following states: (1) intact ankle; (2) AITFL, PITFL, and IOM transected ankle; (3) single-screw fixation; (4) double-screw fixation; (5) hybrid fixation; (6) single suture button fixation; and (7) divergent suture button fixation. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction was performed for statistical analysis. Results: In response to the external rotation moment and axial compression, single tricortical screw fixation resulted in significantly higher lateral translation of the fibula compared with that of the intact ankle at 10° of dorsiflexion ( P < .05). Suture button fixation resulted in significantly higher posterior translation of the fibula at 0° of flexion and 10° of dorsiflexion, whereas divergent suture button fixation resulted in higher posterior translation at only 0° of flexion ( P < .05). In response to the inversion moment and axial compression, single tricortical screw and hybrid fixation significantly decreased lateral translation in plantarflexion, whereas double tricortical screw fixation and hybrid fixation significantly decreased external rotation of the fibula compared with that of the intact ankle at 15° of plantarflexion ( P < .05). Conclusion: Based on the data in this study, hybrid fixation with 1 suture button and 1 tricortical screw may most appropriately restore tibiofibular kinematics for early weightbearing. However, overconstraint of motion during inversion may occur, which has unknown clinical significance. Clinical Relevance: Surgeons may consider this data when deciding on the best algorithm for syndesmosis repair and postoperative rehabilitation.

scholarly journals Restoration of Tibiofibular Kinematics with a Tricortical Screw or Suture Button Fixation After Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0000
Author(s):  
Conor Murphy ◽  
Thomas Pfeiffer ◽  
Jason Zlotnicki ◽  
Volker Musahl ◽  
Richard Debski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Tracking System ◽  
Optical Tracking ◽  
Ankle Injuries ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Cortical Screw ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Posterior Translation

Category: Ankle, Sports, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), Posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) and Interosseous membrane (IOM) disruption is a predictive measure of residual symptoms after ankle injury. In unstable injuries, the syndesmosis is treated operatively with cortical screw fixation or a suture button apparatus. Biomechanical analyses of suture button versus cortical screw fixation methods show contradicting results regarding suture button integrity and maintenance of fixation. The objective of this study is to quantify tibiofibular joint motion in syndesmotic screw and suture button fixation models compared to the intact ankle. Methods: Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age 58 yrs.; range 38-73 yrs.) were tested using a 6-degree-of- freedom robotic testing system. The tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed to the robotic manipulator and the subtalar joint was fused. The full fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. Fibular motion with respect to the tibia was tracked by a 3D optical tracking system. A 5 Nm external rotation moment and 5 Nm inversion moment were applied to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. Outcome variables included fibular medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and external rotation (ER) in the following states: 1) intact ankle, 2) AITFL transected, 3) PITFL and IOM transected, 4) 3.5 mm cannulated tricortical screw fixation, 5) suture button fixation. An ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis was performed for statistical analysis (*p<0.05). Results: Significant differences in fibular motion were only during the inversion moment. Fibular posterior translation was significantly higher with complete syndesmosis injury compared to the intact ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and the tricortical screw at 15° and 30°. Significantly higher fibular posterior translation was observed with the suture button compared to the intact ankle at 15° and 30 plantarflexion and to the tricortical screw at 15°. ER was significantly increased with complete injury compared to the tricortical screw at 0° and 30° plantarflexion. The suture button demonstrated significantly greater ER at 0° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion compared to the intact ankle. The only significant difference in ML translation exists between the tricortical screw and complete injury at 30° plantarflexion. Conclusion: The suture button did not restore physiologic motion of the syndesmosis. It only restored fibular ML translation. Significant differences in AP translation and ER persisted compared to the intact ankle. The tricortical screw restored fibular motion in all planes. No significant differences were observed compared to the intact ankle. These findings are consistent with previous studies. This study utilized a novel setup to measure unconstrained motion in a full length, intact fibula. Physicians should evaluate AP translation and ER as critical fibular motions when reconstructing the syndesmosis with suture button fixation.

scholarly journals Posterior Translation of the Fibula is a Critical Factor in the Stability of the Syndesmosis After Injury and Repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0012
Author(s):  
Neel Patel ◽  
Thomas Rudolf Pfeiffer ◽  
Jan-Hendrik Naendrup ◽  
Conor Murphy ◽  
Jason Zlotnicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Tracking System ◽  
Optical Tracking ◽  
Ankle Injuries ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Cortical Screw ◽  
Posterior Translation

Objectives: Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), and interosseous membrane (IOM) disruption is a predictive measure of residual symptoms after an ankle injury. Unstable syndesmotic injuries are typically treated surgically with cortical screw or suture button fixation. Previous studies have shown contradicting findings regarding the effects of partial syndesmotic injuries and different surgical fixation methods on tibiofibular kinematics. Thus, the objective of this study was to quantify tibiofibular joint motion with sequential disruption of the syndesmosis and with syndesmotic screw and suture button fixation compared to the intact ankle. Methods: Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age 60 yrs.; range 38-73 yrs.) were tested using a six degree-of-freedom robotic testing system. The subtalar joint was fused and the tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed to a robotic manipulator, while complete fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. A 5 Nm external rotation moment and 5 Nm inversion moment were independently applied to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. Fibular motion with respect to the tibia was tracked by a 3D optical tracking system. Outcome variables included fibular medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and external rotation (ER) in the following states: 1) intact ankle, 2) AITFL transected, 3) AITFL, PITFL, and IOM transected (complete injury), 4) 3.5 mm cannulated tricortical screw fixation, 5) suture button fixation. An ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis was performed for statistical analysis (*p < 0.05). Results: All significant differences in fibular motion between ankle states occurred during the inversion moment. An isolated AITFL injury caused significant increases in fibular posterior translation at 15° and 30° plantarflexion compared to the intact ankle. A complete syndesmotic injury caused significant increases in fibular posterior translation in all 4 ankle positions and in fibular ER at 0° flexion and 15° plantarflexion compared to the intact ankle. No significant differences were detected in fibular motion between an isolated AITFL injury and complete injury at any ankle positions. No significant differences existed between the tricortical screw fixation and the intact ankle. Significantly higher fibular posterior translation was observed with the suture button compared to the intact ankle at 0° flexion, 30° and 15° plantarflexion. (Figure 1) Conclusion: An isolated AITFL injury resulted in a significant increase in fibular posterior translation relative to the tibia, comparable to that a complete injury, especially in positions of plantarflexion. Current diagnostic protocols after injury focus on the evaluation of fibular ML translation. However, these findings show that it is important to also evaluate syndesmotic stability in the sagittal plane and at different ankle positions. Restoration of native tibiofibular kinematics is essential to prevent post-traumatic arthritis. Tricortical screw fixation was able to restore tibiofibular kinematics in all planes. However, suture button fixation was not able to restore tibiofibular AP translation, which suggests that physicians should critically evaluate fibular AP translation and individualize treatment of unstable ankle injuries when reconstructing the syndesmosis with suture button fixation. [Figure: see text]

scholarly journals Kinematics after Syndesmotic Injury: Assessing the Magnitude of Talus and Fibula Rotation and Displacement

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0011
Author(s):  
Jonathan Bartolomei ◽  
Mark W. Bowers ◽  
Kenneth J. Hunt
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Deltoid Ligament ◽  
Ankle Sprains ◽  
Syndesmotic Injury ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Clear Space ◽  
Lateral Translation ◽  
Radiographic Measurements

Category: Ankle; Sports; Other Introduction/Purpose: High ankle sprains, or injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis, are predictive of long-term ankle dysfunction. Our objectives were to evaluate ankle mortise stability, radiographically, and kinematically, using a cadaveric model with a simulated syndesmotic injury. We also measured the ability of a suture-button system to restore natural joint motion. Methods: Eight cadaveric specimens underwent serial sectioning of the anterior-inferior tibiofibular (AITFL), interosseous (IOL), posterior-inferior tibiofibular (PITFL), and deltoid ligaments. Specimens underwent external rotation and lateral translation testing after ligament release to obtain kinematic data (using a validated infrared LED motion capture system) and radiographic measurements. We then repeated external rotation and lateral translation testing after implementing a suture-button system. Repeated measures ANOVA with a Bonferroni/Dunn post-hoc test calculated the interspecimen comparisons. Results: Sectioning of each ligament, beginning with the AITFL, significantly increased talar external rotation. After releasing the AITFL and IOL, fibular external rotation increased significantly. Posterior displacement of the fibula began following the release of AITFL. Significant radiographic widening of the medial clear space and the syndesmosis occurred only after the release of the deltoid ligament. Syndesmotic and medial clear space widening was not significantly different from the intact state under lateral translation until after the release of the deltoid ligament. Placement of the suture-button system successfully reduced the medial clear space but was unable to restore the native stability of the ankle joint. Conclusion: This project addresses rotational and kinematic changes in the ankle after syndesmotic injury by quantifying the effect of ligamentous disruption on the tibiotalar articulation. The change in joint kinematics may explain why patients with moderate-to-severe syndesmosis injuries take longer to heal and develop long-term dysfunction. Significant talar rotation and posterior fibular displacement occur during external rotation, even with moderate syndesmosis injury, and before the disruption of the deltoid ligament. Stress radiography does not appear to be a reliable indicator of mild or moderate syndesmosis injuries.

scholarly journals Anterior-Posterior Translation and Axial Rotation of the Fibula are Significantly Increased with Sequential Disruption of the Syndesmosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0003
Author(s):  
Conor Murphy ◽  
Thomas Pfeiffer ◽  
Jason Zlotnicki ◽  
Volker Musahl ◽  
Richard Debski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Optical Tracking ◽  
Flexion Angle ◽  
Rotational Instability ◽  
Syndesmotic Injury ◽  
Combined Injury ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Posterior Translation ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Category: Ankle, Sports, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Injury to the Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), Posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) and Interosseus membrane (IOM) predicts residual symptoms in ankle sprains. Limited kinematic knowledge of the tibiofibular joint results in missed diagnosis and poor clinical outcomes. Lateral fibular displacement on radiologic assessment signifies syndesmotic disruption which dictates operative management. Previous studies demonstrated that fibular motion is multiplanar after injury. The objective of this study is to determine increases in fibular motion with sequential syndesmotic injury and the contribution of the AITFL. Methods: Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibial plateau-to-toe specimens with a mean age of 58 years (range 38-73 years) were tested using a 6-degree-of-freedom robotic testing system. The tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed. The subtalar joint was fused. The full fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. A 5 Nm external rotation and 5 Nm inversion moment were applied to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. The motion of the fibula was tracked by a 3D optical tracking system. Outcome variables included fibular medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and external rotation (ER) during each applied moment and flexion angle in the following conditions: 1) intact ankle, 2) AITFL transected, 3) PITFL and IOM transected. Statistical analysis included an ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis to compare the changes in fibular motion between the intact and injury models at each applied moment and flexion angle (*p<0.05). Results: The only significant differences in fibular motion were during the 5 Nm inversion moment. The posterior translation of the fibula was significantly greater with AITFL injury compared to the intact ankle at 15° and 30° plantarflexion. Significant increases in posterior translation between the intact ankle and AITFL, PITFL, and IOM injury existed at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion. No significant motion differences were observed between the AITFL injury and combined injury at any condition. When comparing the intact ankle and combined injury, significant increases in ER existed at 0° and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. The only significant difference in ER between the intact ankle and AITFL injury existed at 0° plantarflexion. Conclusion: This study showed that transecting the AITFL resulted in the largest increases in fibular motion with only minimal further increases after complete syndesmotic injury. Fibular displacement was primarily in the sagittal plane. This study utilized a novel setup with unconstrained motion in a full length, intact fibula. Measuring ML translation alone could underestimate sagittal and rotational instability of the syndesmosis in AITFL injuries. Evaluating fibular AP translation and ER are not part of current standard diagnostic protocols. Physicians may consider more aggressive treatment of isolated AITFL injuries.

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Fibular Motion After Fixation of Syndesmotic Injuries With a Screw or Suture-Button Construct

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 1350-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy M. LaMothe ◽  
Josh R. Baxter ◽  
Conor Murphy ◽  
Susannah Gilbert ◽  
Bridget DeSandis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Medial Malleolus ◽  
Syndesmotic Injury ◽  
Intact Specimen ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Single Suture ◽  
Rotation Stress

Background: Suture-button constructs are an alternative to screw fixation for syndesmotic injuries, and proponents advocate that suture-button constructs may allow physiological motion of the syndesmosis. Recent biomechanical data suggest that fibular instability with syndesmotic injuries is greatest in the sagittal plane, but the design of a suture-button construct, being a rope and 2 retention washers, is most effective along the axis of the rope (in the coronal plane). Some studies report that suture-button constructs are able to constrain fibular motion in the coronal plane, but the ability of a tightrope to constrain sagittal fibular motion is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess fibular motion in response to an external rotation stress test in a syndesmotic injury model after fixation with a screw or suture-button constructs. Methods: Eleven fresh-frozen cadaver whole legs with intact tibia-fibula articulations were secured to a custom fixture. Fibular motion (coronal, sagittal, and rotational planes) in response to a 6.5-Nm external rotation moment applied to the foot was recorded with fluoroscopy and a high-resolution motion capture system. Measures were taken for the following syndesmotic conditions: intact, complete lateral injury, complete lateral and deltoid injury, repair with a tetracortical 4.0-mm screw, and repair with a suture button construct (Tightrope; Arthrex, Naples, FL) aimed from the lateral fibula to the anterior medial malleolus. Results: The suture-button construct allowed significantly more sagittal plane motion than the syndesmotic screw. Measurements acquired with mortise imaging did not detect differences between the intact, lateral injury, and 2 repair conditions. External rotation of the fibula was significantly increased in both injury conditions and was not restored to intact levels with the screw or the suture-button construct. Conclusion: A single suture-button placed from the lateral fibula to the anterior medial malleolus was unable to replicate the motion observed in the intact specimen when subjected to an external rotation stress test and allowed significantly more posterior motion of the fibula than when fixed with a screw in simulated highly unstable injuries. Clinical Relevance: Fixation of a syndesmotic injury with a single suture-button construct did not restore physiological fibular motion, which may have implications for postoperative care and clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Talar Motion is Constrained by Tricortical Screw Fixation of the Syndesmosis: A Cadaveric Robotic Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0015
Author(s):  
Neel K. Patel ◽  
Thomas Rudolf Pfeiffer ◽  
Jan-Hendrik Naendrup ◽  
Conor Murphy ◽  
Jason Zlotnicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Lateral Shift ◽  
Testing System ◽  
Ankle Sprains ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Cortical Screw ◽  
Robotic Testing ◽  
Robotic Testing System

Objectives: High ankle sprains are a common injury that occur in up to 11% of ankle sprains. Injury to the structures of the syndesmosis, the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), and interosseous membrane (IOM), has been shown to be predictive of residual symptoms after ankle injury. When the syndesmosis is unstable, it is typically treated surgically with cortical screw fixation or suture button fixation. Studies have shown that a 1 mm lateral shift of the talus relative to the tibia significantly decreases the tibiotalar contact area by 42%. Thus, restoring the tibiotalar kinematics to those of the intact ankle with appropriate fixation is important to avoid accelerated tibiotalar arthritis. The objective of this study was to quantify tibiotalar joint motion after syndesmotic screw and suture button fixation compared to the intact ankle. Methods: Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age 60 yrs.; range 38-73 yrs.) were tested using a six degree-of-freedom robotic testing system. The subtalar joint was fused and the tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed to a robotic manipulator, while fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. Talar motion with respect to the tibia was measured using the robotic testing system. A 5 Nm external rotation moment and 5 Nm inversion moment were applied independently to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. Outcome variables included talar medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and internal/external rotation relative to the tibia in the following syndesmosis states: 1) intact, 2) AITFL transected, 3) AITFL, PITFL, and IOM transected, 4) 3.5 mm cannulated tricortical screw fixation, and 5) suture button fixation. An ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis was performed for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: There were significant differences in ML translation of the talus relative to the tibia between the tricortical screw fixation and the intact ankle. These significant changes were only present during states with no loads applied. Tricotical screw fixation resulted in a significant decrease in medial translation of the talus compared to the intact ankle at 30° plantarflexion and increased lateral translation at 0° flexion (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). The talus moved 1.1 mm less medially at 30° plantarflexion and 0.4 mm more laterally at 0° flexion in the tricortical screw fixation state compared to the intact ankle. The total medial translation of the talus relative to the tibia during plantarflexion decreased from 1.1 mm to only 0.4 mm. No significant difference in AP translation or external rotation of the talus existed between the tricortical screw fixation and the intact ankle. No significant differences existed in translation or rotation of the talus between the suture button fixation and intact ankle at any ankle positions. Conclusion: Suture button fixation restored tibiotalar motion in all planes, with no significant differences compared to the intact ankle. Tricortical screw fixation significantly increased lateral shift of the talus in a neutral ankle position and constrained motion during plantarflexion compared to the intact ankle, which can lead to accelerated tibiotalar arthritis. Thus, physicians should consider hardware removal after tricortical screw fixation for syndesmotic repair to avoid post-traumatic arthritis. [Figure: see text]

Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Current Ankle Syndesmosis Repair Techniques

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas O. Clanton ◽  
Scott R. Whitlow ◽  
Brady T. Williams ◽  
Daniel J. Liechti ◽  
Jonathon D. Backus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Compressive Load ◽  
Rotational Stability ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Biomechanical Comparison ◽  
Single Suture ◽  
Repair Techniques

Background: Significant debate exists regarding optimal repair for unstable syndesmosis injuries. Techniques range from screw fixation, suture-button fixation, or a combination of the two. In this study, 3 common repairs were compared using a simulated weightbearing protocol with internal and external rotation of the foot. Methods: Twenty-four lower leg specimens with mean age 54 years (range, 38-68 years) were used for testing. Following creation of a complete syndesmotic injury (AITFL, ITFL, PITFL, interosseous membrane), specimens were repaired using 1 of 3 randomly assigned techniques: (1) one 3.5-mm syndesmotic screw, (2) 1 suture-button construct, and (3) 2 divergent suture-button constructs. Repairs were cycled for 500 cycles between 7.5 Nm of internal/external rotation torque under a constant 750 N axial compressive load in a neutral dorsiflexion position. At 0, 10, 100, and 500 cycles, torsional cyclic loading was interrupted to assess torsional resistance to rotation within a physiologic range of motion (15 degrees external rotation to 10 degrees internal rotation). Torque (Nm), rotational position (degrees), and 3-dimensional data were collected throughout the testing to characterize relative spatial relationships of the tibiofibular articulation. Results: There were no significant differences between repair techniques in resistance to internal and external rotation with respect to the intact syndesmosis. Three-dimensional analysis revealed significant differences between repair techniques for sagittal fibular translation with external rotation of the foot. Screw fixation had the smallest magnitude of posterior sagittal translation (2.5 mm), and a single suture-button construct demonstrated the largest magnitude of posterior sagittal translation (4.6 mm). Screw fixation also allowed for significantly less anterior sagittal translation with internal rotation of the foot (0.1 mm) when compared to both 1 (2.7 mm) and 2 (2.9 mm) suture-button constructs. Conclusion: All repairs provided comparable rotational stability to the syndesmosis; however, no repair technique completely restored rotational stability and tibiofibular anatomic relationships of the preinjury state. Clinical Relevance: Constructs were comparable across most conditions; however, when repairing injuries with a suture-button construct, a single suture-button construct may not provide sufficient resistance to sagittal translation of the fibula.

Hybrid Fixation for Danis-Weber Type C Fractures With Syndesmosis Injury

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072096479
Author(s):  
Gi Beom Kim ◽  
Chul Hyun Park
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Syndesmotic Injury ◽  
Hybrid Fixation ◽  
Alternative Treatment Option ◽  
Syndesmosis Injury ◽  
Weber Type ◽  
Type C

Background: This study aimed to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of hybrid fixation for Danis-Weber type C ankle fractures with a syndesmotic injury. Methods: From January 2016 to April 2018, we retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent hybrid fixation for Danis-Weber type C ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. We excluded patients who achieved syndesmosis stability after fracture fixation. In all patients, we allowed partial weightbearing at 4 weeks postoperatively. We evaluated the visual analog scale for ankle pain, the Olerud-Molander ankle score, and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score. Malreduction of the syndesmosis was defined based on 2 previously reported methods. Fourteen patients (11 men and 3 women) were included in this study. There were 11 patients with pronation external rotation-type fractures and 3 patients with Maisonneuve fractures. The average age at operation was 37.2 years (range, 18-70 years). Results: Clinical scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up. Postoperative malreduction was observed only in 1 patient (7.1%). Conclusion: Hybrid fixation using a suture-button device combined with a syndesmotic screw in Danis-Weber type C fractures with syndesmosis injury showed a high accuracy of reduction, a low rate of diastasis, and favorable clinical outcomes. This combined method could be a good alternative treatment option for Danis-Weber type C ankle fractures with a syndesmosis injury. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document