scholarly journals Posterior Translation of the Fibula is a Critical Factor in the Stability of the Syndesmosis After Injury and Repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0012
Author(s):  
Neel Patel ◽  
Thomas Rudolf Pfeiffer ◽  
Jan-Hendrik Naendrup ◽  
Conor Murphy ◽  
Jason Zlotnicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Tracking System ◽  
Optical Tracking ◽  
Ankle Injuries ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Cortical Screw ◽  
Posterior Translation

Objectives: Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), and interosseous membrane (IOM) disruption is a predictive measure of residual symptoms after an ankle injury. Unstable syndesmotic injuries are typically treated surgically with cortical screw or suture button fixation. Previous studies have shown contradicting findings regarding the effects of partial syndesmotic injuries and different surgical fixation methods on tibiofibular kinematics. Thus, the objective of this study was to quantify tibiofibular joint motion with sequential disruption of the syndesmosis and with syndesmotic screw and suture button fixation compared to the intact ankle. Methods: Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age 60 yrs.; range 38-73 yrs.) were tested using a six degree-of-freedom robotic testing system. The subtalar joint was fused and the tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed to a robotic manipulator, while complete fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. A 5 Nm external rotation moment and 5 Nm inversion moment were independently applied to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. Fibular motion with respect to the tibia was tracked by a 3D optical tracking system. Outcome variables included fibular medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and external rotation (ER) in the following states: 1) intact ankle, 2) AITFL transected, 3) AITFL, PITFL, and IOM transected (complete injury), 4) 3.5 mm cannulated tricortical screw fixation, 5) suture button fixation. An ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis was performed for statistical analysis (*p < 0.05). Results: All significant differences in fibular motion between ankle states occurred during the inversion moment. An isolated AITFL injury caused significant increases in fibular posterior translation at 15° and 30° plantarflexion compared to the intact ankle. A complete syndesmotic injury caused significant increases in fibular posterior translation in all 4 ankle positions and in fibular ER at 0° flexion and 15° plantarflexion compared to the intact ankle. No significant differences were detected in fibular motion between an isolated AITFL injury and complete injury at any ankle positions. No significant differences existed between the tricortical screw fixation and the intact ankle. Significantly higher fibular posterior translation was observed with the suture button compared to the intact ankle at 0° flexion, 30° and 15° plantarflexion. (Figure 1) Conclusion: An isolated AITFL injury resulted in a significant increase in fibular posterior translation relative to the tibia, comparable to that a complete injury, especially in positions of plantarflexion. Current diagnostic protocols after injury focus on the evaluation of fibular ML translation. However, these findings show that it is important to also evaluate syndesmotic stability in the sagittal plane and at different ankle positions. Restoration of native tibiofibular kinematics is essential to prevent post-traumatic arthritis. Tricortical screw fixation was able to restore tibiofibular kinematics in all planes. However, suture button fixation was not able to restore tibiofibular AP translation, which suggests that physicians should critically evaluate fibular AP translation and individualize treatment of unstable ankle injuries when reconstructing the syndesmosis with suture button fixation. [Figure: see text]

scholarly journals Restoration of Tibiofibular Kinematics with a Tricortical Screw or Suture Button Fixation After Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0000
Author(s):  
Conor Murphy ◽  
Thomas Pfeiffer ◽  
Jason Zlotnicki ◽  
Volker Musahl ◽  
Richard Debski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Tracking System ◽  
Optical Tracking ◽  
Ankle Injuries ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Cortical Screw ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Posterior Translation

Category: Ankle, Sports, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), Posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) and Interosseous membrane (IOM) disruption is a predictive measure of residual symptoms after ankle injury. In unstable injuries, the syndesmosis is treated operatively with cortical screw fixation or a suture button apparatus. Biomechanical analyses of suture button versus cortical screw fixation methods show contradicting results regarding suture button integrity and maintenance of fixation. The objective of this study is to quantify tibiofibular joint motion in syndesmotic screw and suture button fixation models compared to the intact ankle. Methods: Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age 58 yrs.; range 38-73 yrs.) were tested using a 6-degree-of- freedom robotic testing system. The tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed to the robotic manipulator and the subtalar joint was fused. The full fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. Fibular motion with respect to the tibia was tracked by a 3D optical tracking system. A 5 Nm external rotation moment and 5 Nm inversion moment were applied to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. Outcome variables included fibular medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and external rotation (ER) in the following states: 1) intact ankle, 2) AITFL transected, 3) PITFL and IOM transected, 4) 3.5 mm cannulated tricortical screw fixation, 5) suture button fixation. An ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis was performed for statistical analysis (*p<0.05). Results: Significant differences in fibular motion were only during the inversion moment. Fibular posterior translation was significantly higher with complete syndesmosis injury compared to the intact ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and the tricortical screw at 15° and 30°. Significantly higher fibular posterior translation was observed with the suture button compared to the intact ankle at 15° and 30 plantarflexion and to the tricortical screw at 15°. ER was significantly increased with complete injury compared to the tricortical screw at 0° and 30° plantarflexion. The suture button demonstrated significantly greater ER at 0° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion compared to the intact ankle. The only significant difference in ML translation exists between the tricortical screw and complete injury at 30° plantarflexion. Conclusion: The suture button did not restore physiologic motion of the syndesmosis. It only restored fibular ML translation. Significant differences in AP translation and ER persisted compared to the intact ankle. The tricortical screw restored fibular motion in all planes. No significant differences were observed compared to the intact ankle. These findings are consistent with previous studies. This study utilized a novel setup to measure unconstrained motion in a full length, intact fibula. Physicians should evaluate AP translation and ER as critical fibular motions when reconstructing the syndesmosis with suture button fixation.

scholarly journals Hybrid Fixation Restores Tibiofibular Kinematics for Early Weightbearing After Syndesmotic Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596712094674
Author(s):  
Neel K. Patel ◽  
Calvin Chan ◽  
Conor I. Murphy ◽  
Richard E. Debski ◽  
Volker Musahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axial Compression ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Optical Tracking ◽  
Hybrid Fixation ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Lateral Translation ◽  
Posterior Translation

Background: Disruption of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), and interosseous membrane (IOM) is a predictive measure of residual symptoms after an ankle injury. Controversy remains regarding the ideal fixation technique for early return to sport, which requires restoration of tibiofibular kinematics with early weightbearing. Purpose: To quantify tibiofibular kinematics after syndesmotic fixation with different tricortical screw and suture button constructs during simulated weightbearing. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A 6 degrees of freedom robotic testing system was used to test 9 fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age, 65.1 ± 17.3 years). A 200-N compressive load was applied to the ankle, while a 5-N·m external rotation and a 5-N·m inversion moment were applied independently to the ankle at 0° of flexion, 15° and 30° of plantarflexion, and 10° of dorsiflexion. Fibular medial-lateral translation, anterior-posterior translation, and internal-external rotation relative to the tibia were tracked by use of an optical tracking system in the following states: (1) intact ankle; (2) AITFL, PITFL, and IOM transected ankle; (3) single-screw fixation; (4) double-screw fixation; (5) hybrid fixation; (6) single suture button fixation; and (7) divergent suture button fixation. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction was performed for statistical analysis. Results: In response to the external rotation moment and axial compression, single tricortical screw fixation resulted in significantly higher lateral translation of the fibula compared with that of the intact ankle at 10° of dorsiflexion ( P < .05). Suture button fixation resulted in significantly higher posterior translation of the fibula at 0° of flexion and 10° of dorsiflexion, whereas divergent suture button fixation resulted in higher posterior translation at only 0° of flexion ( P < .05). In response to the inversion moment and axial compression, single tricortical screw and hybrid fixation significantly decreased lateral translation in plantarflexion, whereas double tricortical screw fixation and hybrid fixation significantly decreased external rotation of the fibula compared with that of the intact ankle at 15° of plantarflexion ( P < .05). Conclusion: Based on the data in this study, hybrid fixation with 1 suture button and 1 tricortical screw may most appropriately restore tibiofibular kinematics for early weightbearing. However, overconstraint of motion during inversion may occur, which has unknown clinical significance. Clinical Relevance: Surgeons may consider this data when deciding on the best algorithm for syndesmosis repair and postoperative rehabilitation.

Kinematic Analysis of Combined Suture-Button and Suture Anchor Augment Constructs for Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-472
Author(s):  
Addison R. Wood ◽  
Seyed A. Arshad ◽  
Hannah Kim ◽  
Donald Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Simultaneous Recording ◽  
Ankle Injuries ◽  
Interosseous Ligament ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Cortical Screw ◽  
Custom Made

Background: Syndesmosis injuries are common, with up to 25% of all ankle injuries being reported to involve an associated syndesmosis injury. These injuries are typically treated with cortical screw fixation or suture-button implants when indicated, but the addition of a suture anchor augment implant has yet to be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of a suture anchor augment to add sagittal plane translational and transverse plane rotational constraint to suture-button constructs with syndesmosis injuries. We hypothesized that the suture anchor augment oriented in parallel with the fibers of an injured anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) in addition to a suture-button construct would achieve physiological motion and stability at the syndesmosis through increased rotational and translational constraint of the fibula. Methods: Eleven fresh-frozen cadaver ankles were stressed in external rotation using a custom-made ankle rig. Each ankle had simultaneous recording of ultrasound video, 6 degrees-of-freedom kinematics of the fibula and tibia, and torque as the ankle was stressed by an examiner. The ankles were tested in 6 different states: native uninjured; injured with interosseous ligament and AITFL sectioned; 1× suture button; 2× suture buttons, divergent; 1× suture anchor augment with 2× suture buttons, divergent; and 1× suture anchor augment with 1× suture buttons. Results: Only the suture anchor augment + 2× suture buttons and suture anchor augment + 1× suture-button constructs were found to be significantly different from the injured state ( P = .0003, P = .002) with mean external rotation of the fibula. Conclusion: Overall, the most important finding of this study was that the addition of a suture anchor augment to suture-button constructs provided a mechanism to increase external rotational constraint of the fibula. Clinical Relevance: This study provides a mechanistic understanding of how the combined suture-button and suture anchor augment construct provides an anatomically similar reconstruction of constraints found in the native ankle. However, none of the constructs examined in this study were able to fully restore physiologic motion.

scholarly journals Hybrid Fixation Restores Tibiofibular Kinematics for Early Weightbearing after Syndesmotic Injury

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0009
Author(s):  
Neel Patel ◽  
Calvin Chan ◽  
Conor Murphy ◽  
Richard Debski ◽  
Volker Musahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Syndesmotic Injury ◽  
Hybrid Fixation ◽  
Fixation Methods ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Lateral Translation ◽  
Posterior Translation ◽  
Single Suture

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Injury to the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), and interosseous membrane (IOM) of the syndesmosis is a predictive measure of residual symptoms after an ankle injury. Unstable syndesmotic injuries are typically treated surgically with constructs consisting of cortical screw and/or suture button fixation. Previous studies have shown contradicting findings regarding the effects of different surgical fixation methods on tibiofibular kinematics. Thus, the objective of this study was to quantify tibiofibular joint motion with different syndesmotic screw and suture button fixation constructs after disruption of the syndesmosis compared to the intact ankle during simulated weight bearing. Methods: Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens were tested using a six degree-of-freedom robotic testing system. After subtalar joint fusion, the tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed to a robotic manipulator, while complete fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. A constant 200 N compressive load was applied to the ankle while an additional 5 Nm external rotation and 5 Nm inversion moment applied independently to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. Fibular motion with respect to the tibia was tracked using an optical tracking system. Outcome variables included fibular medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and external rotation (ER) in the following states: intact ankle, complete injury (AITFL, PITFL, and IOM transected), single tricortical screw fixation double tricortical screw fixation, hybrid fixation (single tricortical screw and single suture button), suture button fixation, and divergent suture button fixation. Repeated measures ANOVA was performed for statistical analysis. Results: The external rotation moment produced significant differences in fibular motion between the injury and fixation states compared to the intact state. A complete syndesmotic injury caused significantly increased fibular lateral translation, posterior translation, and external rotation in all ankle positions except 30° plantarflexion compared to the intact ankle. Single suture button and single screw fixation resulted in significantly higher fibular lateral translation at 10° dorsiflexion compared the intact ankle, while single suture button fixation also resulted in significantly higher external rotation at 10° dorsiflexion compared the intact ankle. Fibular posterior translation was significantly higher with hybrid, suture button, and divergent suture button fixation at 0° flexion and with single tricortical screw and double screw fixation at 10° dorsiflexion compared to the intact ankle (Figure 1). Conclusion: Complete injury to the syndesmosis results in significantly higher fibular lateral translation, external rotation, and posterior translation compared to the intact ankle. Hybrid or divergent suture button fixation would be recommended to restore tibiofibular motion without over-constraint. However, none of the fixation methods were able to restore AP translation in all ankle positions. Thus, it is important to evaluate syndesmotic stability in the sagittal plane at different ankle positions. Findings of this study suggest that physicians should evaluate fibular AP translation in a neutral position when using suture button fixation constructs and in dorsiflexion when using tricortical screw fixation constructs.

scholarly journals Talar Motion is Constrained by Tricortical Screw Fixation of the Syndesmosis: A Cadaveric Robotic Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0015
Author(s):  
Neel K. Patel ◽  
Thomas Rudolf Pfeiffer ◽  
Jan-Hendrik Naendrup ◽  
Conor Murphy ◽  
Jason Zlotnicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Lateral Shift ◽  
Testing System ◽  
Ankle Sprains ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Cortical Screw ◽  
Robotic Testing ◽  
Robotic Testing System

Objectives: High ankle sprains are a common injury that occur in up to 11% of ankle sprains. Injury to the structures of the syndesmosis, the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), and interosseous membrane (IOM), has been shown to be predictive of residual symptoms after ankle injury. When the syndesmosis is unstable, it is typically treated surgically with cortical screw fixation or suture button fixation. Studies have shown that a 1 mm lateral shift of the talus relative to the tibia significantly decreases the tibiotalar contact area by 42%. Thus, restoring the tibiotalar kinematics to those of the intact ankle with appropriate fixation is important to avoid accelerated tibiotalar arthritis. The objective of this study was to quantify tibiotalar joint motion after syndesmotic screw and suture button fixation compared to the intact ankle. Methods: Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age 60 yrs.; range 38-73 yrs.) were tested using a six degree-of-freedom robotic testing system. The subtalar joint was fused and the tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed to a robotic manipulator, while fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. Talar motion with respect to the tibia was measured using the robotic testing system. A 5 Nm external rotation moment and 5 Nm inversion moment were applied independently to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. Outcome variables included talar medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and internal/external rotation relative to the tibia in the following syndesmosis states: 1) intact, 2) AITFL transected, 3) AITFL, PITFL, and IOM transected, 4) 3.5 mm cannulated tricortical screw fixation, and 5) suture button fixation. An ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis was performed for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: There were significant differences in ML translation of the talus relative to the tibia between the tricortical screw fixation and the intact ankle. These significant changes were only present during states with no loads applied. Tricotical screw fixation resulted in a significant decrease in medial translation of the talus compared to the intact ankle at 30° plantarflexion and increased lateral translation at 0° flexion (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). The talus moved 1.1 mm less medially at 30° plantarflexion and 0.4 mm more laterally at 0° flexion in the tricortical screw fixation state compared to the intact ankle. The total medial translation of the talus relative to the tibia during plantarflexion decreased from 1.1 mm to only 0.4 mm. No significant difference in AP translation or external rotation of the talus existed between the tricortical screw fixation and the intact ankle. No significant differences existed in translation or rotation of the talus between the suture button fixation and intact ankle at any ankle positions. Conclusion: Suture button fixation restored tibiotalar motion in all planes, with no significant differences compared to the intact ankle. Tricortical screw fixation significantly increased lateral shift of the talus in a neutral ankle position and constrained motion during plantarflexion compared to the intact ankle, which can lead to accelerated tibiotalar arthritis. Thus, physicians should consider hardware removal after tricortical screw fixation for syndesmotic repair to avoid post-traumatic arthritis. [Figure: see text]

scholarly journals Anterior-Posterior Translation and Axial Rotation of the Fibula are Significantly Increased with Sequential Disruption of the Syndesmosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0003
Author(s):  
Conor Murphy ◽  
Thomas Pfeiffer ◽  
Jason Zlotnicki ◽  
Volker Musahl ◽  
Richard Debski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Optical Tracking ◽  
Flexion Angle ◽  
Rotational Instability ◽  
Syndesmotic Injury ◽  
Combined Injury ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Posterior Translation ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Category: Ankle, Sports, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Injury to the Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), Posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) and Interosseus membrane (IOM) predicts residual symptoms in ankle sprains. Limited kinematic knowledge of the tibiofibular joint results in missed diagnosis and poor clinical outcomes. Lateral fibular displacement on radiologic assessment signifies syndesmotic disruption which dictates operative management. Previous studies demonstrated that fibular motion is multiplanar after injury. The objective of this study is to determine increases in fibular motion with sequential syndesmotic injury and the contribution of the AITFL. Methods: Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibial plateau-to-toe specimens with a mean age of 58 years (range 38-73 years) were tested using a 6-degree-of-freedom robotic testing system. The tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed. The subtalar joint was fused. The full fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. A 5 Nm external rotation and 5 Nm inversion moment were applied to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. The motion of the fibula was tracked by a 3D optical tracking system. Outcome variables included fibular medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and external rotation (ER) during each applied moment and flexion angle in the following conditions: 1) intact ankle, 2) AITFL transected, 3) PITFL and IOM transected. Statistical analysis included an ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis to compare the changes in fibular motion between the intact and injury models at each applied moment and flexion angle (*p<0.05). Results: The only significant differences in fibular motion were during the 5 Nm inversion moment. The posterior translation of the fibula was significantly greater with AITFL injury compared to the intact ankle at 15° and 30° plantarflexion. Significant increases in posterior translation between the intact ankle and AITFL, PITFL, and IOM injury existed at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion. No significant motion differences were observed between the AITFL injury and combined injury at any condition. When comparing the intact ankle and combined injury, significant increases in ER existed at 0° and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. The only significant difference in ER between the intact ankle and AITFL injury existed at 0° plantarflexion. Conclusion: This study showed that transecting the AITFL resulted in the largest increases in fibular motion with only minimal further increases after complete syndesmotic injury. Fibular displacement was primarily in the sagittal plane. This study utilized a novel setup with unconstrained motion in a full length, intact fibula. Measuring ML translation alone could underestimate sagittal and rotational instability of the syndesmosis in AITFL injuries. Evaluating fibular AP translation and ER are not part of current standard diagnostic protocols. Physicians may consider more aggressive treatment of isolated AITFL injuries.

scholarly journals Displacement of Sequential Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries Assessed by a 3D Weightbearing CT

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0012
Author(s):  
Arne Burssens ◽  
Nicola Krähenbühl ◽  
Hannes Vermue ◽  
Nathan Davidson ◽  
Maxwell Weinberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Ankle Injuries ◽  
Deltoid Ligament ◽  
3D Analysis ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Posterior Translation ◽  
2D Imaging ◽  
Weightbearing Ct

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Syndesmotic ankle injuries are challenging to diagnose, since current 2D imaging techniques try to quantify a 3D displacement. Therefore, our aim was two-fold: to determine displacement of sequential syndesmotic ankle injuries under various amounts of load using a 3D weightbearing CT (WBCT) and to assess the relation with current 2D imaging. Methods: Seven paired male cadaver specimens were included (tibia plateau to toe-tip) and mounted into a custom-built frame. WBCT scans were obtained after different patterns of load (0 kg or 85 kg) were combined with torque (0 Nm or 10 Nm external rotation). These conditions were repeated after each ligament condition: intact ligaments, sequential sectioning of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), deltoid ligament (DL), and interosseous membrane (IOM). CT images were segmented to obtain 3D models. These allowed quantification of displacement based on the position of computed anatomical landmarks in reference to the intact position of the fibula. A correlation analysis was performed between the 2D and 3D measurements. Results: The effect of torque caused significant displacements in all directions (P<0.05), except for shortening of the fibula (P>0.05). Weight caused a significant lateral (mean=-1.4 mm, SD=1.5) and posterior translation (mean=-0.6 mm, SD=1.8). The highest displacement consisted of external rotation (mean=-9.4°, SD=6.5) and posterior translation (mean=6.1 mm, SD=2.3) after IOL sectioning combined with torque (Fig. 1). Pearson correlation coefficients were moderate (range 0.31-0.51, P<0.05). Conclusion: Torque demonstrated superiority over weight in detecting syndesmotic ankle instability after 3D analysis. The clinical relevance of these findings can improve diagnosis by incorporating rotatory platforms during imaging and treatment strategies by providing appropriate stabilization against rotation.

Suture-Endobutton Fixation of Ankle Tibio-Fibular Diastasis: A Cadaver Study

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Thornes ◽  
Alan Walsh ◽  
Matt Hislop ◽  
Paraic Murray ◽  
Moira O'Brien
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Cadaver Study ◽  
Ankle Injuries ◽  
Syndesmosis Injury ◽  
Consistent Performance ◽  
Routine Removal ◽  
Syndesmosis Screw ◽  
Membrane Division ◽  
Rate Of Failure

Suture-Endobutton fixation is proposed as a minimally invasive, flexible fixation of ankle tibio-fibular diastasis, which would not require routine removal. This study tested the Suture-Endobutton construct in a cadaver syndesmosis injury model and compared this against A.O. syndesmosis screw fixation. Sixteen embalmed cadaver legs were used. Phase one consisted of placing the leg in a jig, generating an external rotation torque and measuring diastasis with increasing intraosseous membrane division. Phase two then compared the Suture-Endobutton construct vs. single four-cortex 4.5 mm A.O. screw fixation. Diastasis increased significantly with increasing intraosseous membrane division (p<0.001). No significant differences were seen in the mean rate of failure between the Suture-Endobutton and A.O. screw fixation. However, the Suture-Endobutton did give a significantly more consistent performance; the distribution of standard deviations for A.O. screw fixation was 0.64 mm higher than that for the Endobutton (95% C.I. 0.46 to 0.84). These results show that Suture-Endobutton fixation at least equals the performance of screw fixation and encourages clinical trials in ankle injuries with a syndesmosis diastasis.

scholarly journals Characterization of Ankle Kinematics and Constraint Following Ligament Rupture in a Cadaveric Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bardiya Akhbari ◽  
Matthew H. Dickinson ◽  
Ednah G. Louie ◽  
Sami Shalhoub ◽  
Lorin P. Maletsky
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Ankle Injuries ◽  
Ankle Sprains ◽  
Ligament Rupture ◽  
Ankle Kinematics ◽  
Posterior Translation ◽  
Ankle Mobility ◽  
And Inversion

Ankle sprains are a common injury that may need reconstruction and extensive physical therapy. The purpose of this study was to provide a description of the biomechanics of the ankle joint complex (AJC) after anterior talofibular (ATFL) and calcaneofibular (CFL) ligament rupture to better understand severe ankle injuries. The envelope of motion of ten cadaveric ankles was examined by manual manipulations that served as training data for a radial basis function used to interpolate ankle mobility at flexion angles under load and torque combinations. Moreover, ankle kinematics were examined, while tendons were loaded to identify how their performance is altered by ligament rupture. The increased force required to plantarflex the ankle following ligament rupture was measured by calculating the load through the Achilles. Following ATFL injury, the largest changes were internal rotation (5 deg) in deep plantarflexion and anterior translation (1.5 mm) in early plantarflexion. The combined ATFL and CFL rupture changed the internal/external rotation (3 deg), anterior/posterior translation (1 mm), and inversion (5 deg) throughout flexion relative to the isolated ATFL rupture. Moreover, the Achilles' load increased by 24% after the rupture of ligaments indicating a reduction in its efficiency. This study suggests that if patients demonstrate primarily an increased laxity in internal rotation, the damage has solely occurred to the ATFL; however, if the constraint is reduced across multiple motions, there is likely damage to both ligaments. Higher loads in the Achilles suggest that it is overloaded after the injury; hence, targeting the calf muscles in rehabilitation exercises may reduce patients' pain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document