scholarly journals Initial treatment for patients with CML

Hematology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 (1) ◽  
pp. 453-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Goldman
Keyword(s):  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Advanced Phase

AbstractFor adult patients who present with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase it is now generally agreed that initial treatment should start with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib at 400 mg daily. Five years after starting imatinib about 60% of these patients will be in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), still taking imatinib; an appreciable proportion of these will have achieved a major molecular response, defined as a 3-log reduction in the level of BCR-ABL1 transcripts in their blood. The patients in CCyR seem to have a very low risk of relapse to chronic phase or of progression to advanced phase. Other patients may be resistant to imatinib or may experience significant side effects that require change of therapy. The best method of monitoring responding patients is to enumerate Philadelphia chromosome–positive marrow metaphases at 3-month intervals until CCyR and to perform RQ-PCR for BCR-ABL1 transcripts at 3-month intervals after starting imatinib. The recommendations for defining “failure” and “sub-optimal response” proposed by the European LeukemiaNet in 2006 have proved to be a major contribution to assessing responses in individual patients and are now being updated. Patients who fail imatinib may respond to second-generation TKIs, but allogeneic stem cell transplantation still plays an important role for eligible patients who fare badly with TKIs. Patients who present in advanced phases of CML should be treated initially with TKI alone or with TKI in conjunction with cytotoxic drugs, but their overall prognosis is likely to be much inferior to that of those presenting in early chronic phase.

Patients with Chronic Phase CML in the IRIS Study Who Receive Imatinib Mesylate (IM) 2nd Line after Prior IFN/Ara-C Have Sustained Complete Cytogenetic and Major Molecular Response Rates Similar to 1st Line IM Patients.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2139-2139
Author(s):  
Jaspal Kaeda ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Jerald Radich ◽  
Susan Branford ◽  
Charlene So ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Progression Rate ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Real Time Quantitative Pcr ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Advanced Phase

Abstract The IRIS study compared IM and interferon+cytarabine (IFN/Ara-C) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP (n=553 per arm). IFN/Ara-C pts. could cross over to IM if they satisfied predetermined criteria for disease, either resistance/refractoriness (=resistance), or intolerance of or reluctance to continue the combination (=lack of resistance). Pts who received IM 1st line or 2nd line who achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) had BCR-ABL transcript levels measured serially by real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). Results were expressed as log reduction in BCR-ABL/BCR from a standardized baseline value for untreated pts. Yearly rates of 3 log reduction (Major Molecular Response, MMR) from IM treatment starting date were estimated by multiplying the CCyR rate by the MMR rate in CCyR pts at each time point. Overall, of 553 pts who received 1st line IM 82% achieved CCyR, an estimated 69% during the 1st year (yr) of treatment. Of 359 pts who received 2nd line IM, 80% achieved CCyR, 62% during the 1st yr; rates were lower in pts with resistance than in those without resistance to prior IFN/Ara-C (75% vs 85% overall, p=0.025, 56% vs 68% within first yr, p<0.01). Best observed and estimated molecular responses for CCyR pts. are summarized in the table. The median follow-up for BCR-ABL evaluation on 1st line vs 2nd line IM was 45 and 35 months, respectively. Molecular response on 1st- and 2nd-line IM in the IRIS study 1st-line IM 2nd-line IM after IFN/Ara-C All pts N = 553 All pts N = 359 Resistance N =174 Lack of resistance N =185 CcyR 454 (82%) 288 (80%) 131 (75%) 157 (85%) Pts with CCyR during treatment and PCR sample(s) N = 401 N = 211 N = 98 N = 113 –≥3 log reduction (MMR) 323 (81%) 154 (73%) 63 (64%) 91 (81%) –≥ 4 log reduction 216 (54%) 92 (44%) 35 (36%) 57 (50%) Estimated % of all pts who achieve CCyR and MMR by – 1 yr 36 24 19 28 – 2 yr 59 38 29 45 – 4 yr 67 67 58 72 – 5 yr 85 82 78 84 Overall response rates were similar between 1st and 2nd line IM pts, although responses in 2nd line IM pts may have occurred more slowly. However, the number of RQ-PCR samples between 1 and 2 yrs of 2nd line IM was limited as samples were not obtained routinely between Jan 2003 and Aug 2004. In pts who achieved CCyR, the estimated 5-yr progression rate to advanced CML phase was 3% for 1st line IM and 4% for 2nd line IM; using the broader definition of progression (including events such as CML-unrelated deaths and loss of MCyR/CHR) the progression rates were 9% and 8% respectively. In both 1st and 2nd line IM pts with CCyR who also achieved MMR, only an estimated 1% progressed to advanced phase within 5 yrs; the estimated broadly defined event rates were 5% and 4% respectively. In summary, for 1st line IM patients with a RQ-PCR follow-up of up to 5 yrs, an estimated 85% achieved MMR at 5 yrs compared with 59% at 2 yrs. Cytogenetic and molecular response rates were similar for 1st line and 2nd line IM pts, primarily due to responses in pts who crossed over for reasons other than resistance or refractoriness. For IM pts the rate of progression to advanced CML phase at 5 yrs was low in those with CCyR and even lower in pts who also achieved MMR.

scholarly journals Treatment with nilotinib after cytogenetic relapse at 12 months in a patient in chronic phase with sub-optimal response to imatinib

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5S) ◽  
pp. 9-13
Author(s):  
Massimo Breccia
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Optimal Response ◽  
Late Responder

We report a case of patient with chronic myeloid leukemia who started imatinib at standard dose and obtained a sub-optimal response at 6 months. Considering the patient as a possible “late responder”, we decided not to change the imatinib dose, but, at 12 months, we did not achieve a complete cytogenetic response. At that time, we decided to switch to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), nilotinib 800 mg/day, obtaining soon a major molecular response. Recently, the retrospective application of European LeukemiaNet guidelines in large cohorts of patients suggested that patients whose response to imatinib is sub-optimal at 6 months showed significantly worse survival. Therefore we can hypothesise that this kind of patients could be eligible for an early switch to second-generation TKI.

Does pre-imatinib (IM) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) predict myelosuppression and outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)?

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7071-7071
Author(s):  
L. Lima ◽  
S. E. Assouline ◽  
D. Saxe ◽  
K. Mann ◽  
M. McLemore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Selective Inhibition ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Resistant Disease ◽  
Advanced Phase

7071 Background: IM-associated myelosuppression occurs in 4–40% of CML patients (pts) vs. 1–16% in GIST. Selective inhibition of predominantly Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) driven hematopoiesis may explain development of myelosuppression. In the absence of clinically applicable methods to quantitate Ph+/Ph- progenitor ratio, we hypothesized that the pre-IM percentage of BCR-ABL+ cells measured by FISH predicts myelosuppression. Methods: FISH pre-IM was available in 58 CML pts with chronic phase (CP, n=52), or advanced phase (AP, accelerated =3, blast =3) at 2 institutions. Grade >3 myelosuppression occurred < 60 days from starting IM in 9 pts (400 mg/d=6, > 600 mg/d=3), leading to dose reduction (4), discontinuation (1) or continuation same dose IM despite myelosuppression (4). Cryopreserved marrow CD34+/CD38- cells from 14 pts with (7) or without (7) post-IM myelosuppression were sorted using flow cytometry and subjected to FISH analyses. Results: Median FISH was higher for myelosuppression (90%) vs. no myelosuppression (80%) pts (p= 0.03), and in AP vs. CP (97 % vs. 80%, p=0.003). Results of FISH on CD34+/CD38- cells will be reported. Table summarizes outcomes of CP pts. Median follow-up was 14 and 45 months for myelosuppression and no myelosuppression AP pts, respectively. Myelosuppression AP pts expired (CML=2, GVHD=1); 1 after complete hematologic (CHR) and minor cytogenetic response (CTGR), 1 after partial HR, and 1 resistant disease. All 3 pts without myelosuppression achieved CHR with major CTGR, and 2 had partial molecular response. 1 died from GVHD. Conclusions: Higher FISH pre-IM identifies a group of CML pts who develop myelosuppression and are less likely to respond to IM. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of bosutinib (SKI-606) in chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients with resistance or intolerance to imatinib

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (17) ◽  
pp. 4567-4576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Tim H. Brümmendorf ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Anna G. Turkina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Complete Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Bosutinib, a dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor, has shown potent activity against chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In this phase 1/2 study we evaluated bosutinib in patients with chronic phase imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant CML. Part 1 was a dose-escalation study to determine the recommended starting dose for part 2; part 2 evaluated the efficacy and safety of bosutinib 500 mg once-daily dosing. The study enrolled 288 patients with imatinib-resistant (n = 200) or imatinibintolerant (n = 88) CML and no other previous kinase inhibitor exposure. At 24 weeks, 31% of patients achieved major cytogenetic response (primary end point). After a median follow-up of 24.2 months, 86% of patients achieved complete hematologic remission, 53% had a major cytogenetic response (41% had a complete cytogenetic response), and 64% of those achieving complete cytogenetic response had a major molecular response. At 2 years, progression-free survival was 79%; overall survival at 2 years was 92%. Responses were seen across Bcr-Abl mutants, except T315I. Bosutinib exhibited an acceptable safety profile; the most common treatment-emergent adverse event was mild/moderate, typically self-limiting diarrhea. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic adverse events (> 2% of patients) included diarrhea (9%), rash (9%), and vomiting (3%). These data suggest bosutinib is effective and tolerable in patients with chronic phase imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant CML. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00261846.

Mutation Analysis of ABL1 Gene and its Relation to the Achievement of Major Molecular Response in Indonesian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
Reni Widyastuti ◽  
Melva Louisa ◽  
Ikhwan Rinaldi ◽  
Riki Nova ◽  
Instiaty Instiaty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Imatinib Mesylate ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Imatinib Resistance

Background: Imatinib mesylate is the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy. Imatinib is an effective drug. However, previous studies have shown that about 20-30% of patients eventually would develop resistance to imatinib. Approximately 40% of imatinib resistance is associated with BCRABL kinase domain mutation. One of the most common and serious variations account for imatinib response is T315I of ABL1 gene. Objective: The study aimed to examine the association of T315I mutation with the ABL1 gene and its relation to major molecular response (MMR) achievement in CML patients. This study also examined other mutations adjacent to T315I, i.e., F311I, F317L, and different possible variations in the ABL1 gene. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study on Indonesian CML patients in chronic phase. We analyzed 120 blood samples from patients in chronic phase who have received imatinib mesylate (IM) for ≥12 months. Results: There were no T315I, F311I, and F317L mutations found in this study. However, we found another variation, which was 36 substitutions from A to G at position 163816 of ABL1 gene (according to NG_012034.1). Conclusions: We found no T315I, F311I, and F317L mutations in this study. Our findings suggest that there might be other factors that influenced the MMR achievement in our study patients. However, there were 36 substitutions from A to G at position 163.816 (according to NG_012034.1) that needed further examination to explore the significance of this mutation in clinical practice.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Of Dasatinib For Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase In Japan

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1493-1493
Author(s):  
Kohei Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazunori Murai ◽  
Shigeki Ito ◽  
Tomoaki Akagi ◽  
Kazuei Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Once Daily

Abstract Background Dasatinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitor that has a 325-fold higher potency than imatinib and a 16-fold higher potency than nilotinib in vitro. The previous report from the global DASISION trial showed dasatinib resulted in significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) compared with imatinib. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in Japan. Methods Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were include in this study. Patients received dasatinib 100mg once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. MMR defined as a BCR-ABL transcript level of 0.1% or lower on the International scale by means of a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in peripheral blood. Secondary end points were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 12 months, the rate of MR4.5 (either (i) detectable disease with <0.0032% BCR-ABL1 IS or (ii) undetectable disease in cDNA with >32,000 ABL1 transcripts in the same volume of cDNA used to test for BCR-ABL1) by 12 months and adverse events of dasatinib (UMIN #000006358). Results Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were included in this study. All except one patient administered dasatinib 100 mg once daily. One patient was withdrawal before administration of dasatinib. So far, there were 71 patients with 6 months follow-up and 51 patients with 12 months follow-up. The estimated MMR rates were 69.5 % (95%CI, 58.7-80.3 %) by 6 months and 82.7% (95%CI, 73.0-92.4 %) by 12 months. The estimated MR4.5 rates were 27.1 % (95%CI, 16.7-37.5 %) by 6 months and 48.9% (95%CI, 36.0-61.7 %) by 12 months. Only 6 patients were withdrawal because of adverse event (5 patients) and ineffectiveness (1 patient). Conclusion Dasatinib treatment results in higher rates of molecular responses in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients in Japan. Dasatinib as the first-line agent might be acceptable for CML-CP patients because of better clinical efficacy and less toxicity. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

How I treat chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (8) ◽  
pp. 2828-2837 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Goldman
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Allogeneic Transplant ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Log Reduction

AbstractAlthough it is now generally accepted that imatinib is the best initial treatment for patients newly diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, a number of questions remain unanswered. For example, (1) Is imatinib the best initial treatment for every chronic-phase patient? (2) At what dose should imatinib be started? (3) How should response to treatment be monitored? (4) For how long should the drug be continued in patients who have achieved and maintain a complete molecular response? (5) How does one handle a patient who achieves a 2-log but not a 3-log reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts? (6) How should response or failure be defined? (7) For the patient deemed to have failed imatinib, should one offer dasatinib or nilotinib? (8) For the patient who has failed imatinib but has a possible allogeneic transplant donor, should one offer dasatinib or nilotinib before recommending a transplantation? (9) Should the transplantation be myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning? (10) How should one treat the patient who relapses after allografting? This paper will address these issues, many of which cannot yet be answered definitively.

Better Molecular Response (MR) to Imatinib (IM) in Early Chronic Phase (CP) Versus Late CP Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients (pts) in Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCR): A Comparison at 24 Months of 2 Clinical Trials of the GIMEMA Working Party on CML on Behalf of the GIMEMA Working Party on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (GIMEMA-CML).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1096-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Poerio ◽  
Marilina Amabile ◽  
Ilaria Iacobucci ◽  
Simona Soverini ◽  
Sabrina Colarossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Nested Pcr ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Interferon Α ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Log Reduction

Abstract We sought to determine the differences in molecular response between early and late CP pts with CML who achieved a CCR after treatment with IM at the standard dose of 400mg/d. We studied 2 different cohorts of patients in CCR: 67/191 (35%) pts after α-Interferon (α-IFN) failure enrolled on the CML/002/STI571 protocol 53/76 (70%) pts treated front line with a combination of IM and pegilated IFN-α (PEG-IFN) enrolled on the CML/011/STI571 protocol Cytogenetic response was monitored on bone marrow (BM) metaphases and molecular response was assessed by real time RT-PCR (TaqMan) BM and peripheral blood (PB) samples, collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months during the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. Molecular response was expressed as the ratio between BCR/ABL and β2-microglobulin (β2-M) x100. The lowest level of detectability of the method was 10−5. Negative results (i.e. undetectable transcript) were confirmed by nested PCR performed 4 times (sensitivity 10−6). For the purpose of this analysis, a major molecular response (MMR) was defined as a BCR-ABL/β2M value &lt;0.0001%, which turned out to be roughly equivalent to a 3-log reduction and a complete molecular response (CMR) was defined as negative (undetectable) BCR/ABL levels confirmed by nested PCR. We observed a progressive decrease of the amount of BCR/ABL transcript in pts who achieved a CCR. At 24 months the median reduction in BCR/ABL transcript level was: a 3-log reduction in late CP pts a 4-log reduction in early CP pts In the latter group of pts MR was assessed also at 36 months. So we observed that 36 months after the first dose of IM and PEG-IFN pts who were still in CCR had the median value of BCR/ABL transcript of 0.00001% both in BM and PB. Therefore all these pts achieved a MMR. However only 8/53 (4%) pts were in CMR (undetectable BCR/ABL at least once as assessed by nested PCR). We conclude that front-line treatment with IM results in a better quality MR (4-log reduction in BCR/ABL transcript levels in early CP pts, as against a 3-log reduction in late CP pts). Figure Figure

Significant Reduction of BCR-ABL Transcripts after Switching to Imatinib Therapy in Patients with CML and Complete or Near-Complete Cytogenetic Responses to Interferon-Alpha (IFN).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2142-2142
Author(s):  
Susan Branford ◽  
Timothy Hughes ◽  
Steven Stylian ◽  
Anthony P. Schwarer ◽  
Chris Arthur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Advanced Phase ◽  
Molecular Assessment

Abstract IFN confers a survival advantage for the minority of patients with CML who achieve a complete cytogenetic response. The 10-year survival rate was reported as 72%. In the IRIS trial only 3% of patients remained on IFN after randomization and 65% crossed-over to imatinib. Imatinib offered superior compliance and toxicity profiles and clear quality of life advantages. Furthermore, patients on first line imatinib with a major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months had a 100% progression free survival to advanced phase. An important clinical question of whether IFN-responsive patients can experience further improvements with imatinib has not been answered. We studied 23 chronic phase patients treated with IFN for a median of 4.5 years (r1.6–14.3) who had achieved a complete (n=15) or near-complete (n=8) cytogenetic response. IFN was ceased and 400mg imatinib commenced in a clinical trial with the primary objective of determining if switching to imatinib in IFN-responsive patients improves response when assessed at the molecular level. Molecular assessment was undertaken for the first 12 months of imatinib therapy by measurement of peripheral blood BCR-ABL levels by quantitative PCR at 3 month intervals. A subset of 10 patients had follow-up molecular assessment for 3.8 to 4.5 years after commencing imatinib. Prior to IFN cessation all patients had detectable BCR-ABL and 16 of 23 had not achieved a MMR, which is a 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL from a standardized baseline value for untreated patients. At a median of 3 months of imatinib (r3–12) these 16 patients achieved MMR. A significant reduction of BCR-ABL over the 12 month assessment was considered >50% and this occurred in 15 of these 16 patients (median 98.4% reduction, r94.4–99.8). In the sole patient without a significant reduction, BCR-ABL returned to the pre imatinib level after repeated dose interruptions of 93 days and decrease to 200mg imatinib due to thrombocytopenia. Of the 7 patients with a MMR prior to IFN cessation, all 7 maintained this level of response after switching to imatinib. Therefore, over the 12 month assessment all patients either achieved MMR (n=16) or maintained MMR (n=7). One patient withdrew consent after 83 days. The 10 patients with longer molecular follow-up of up to 4.5 years of imatinib all maintained MMR. The typical molecular response is illustrated in the figure, which plots the log reduction of BCR-ABL from the standardized baseline for 3 patients assessed at regular time-points before and after switching to imatinib. In conclusion, the data suggest that switching to imatinib leads to rapid and significant improvement in IFN-responsive patients in terms of achieving MMR, a response with established prognostic value with imatinib therapy. The study should help patients and their physicians make evidence-based decisions about the potential benefits and risks of switching to imatinib with prior response to IFN. Figure Figure

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document