scholarly journals CALGB 50604: risk-adapted treatment of nonbulky early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma based on interim PET

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (10) ◽  
pp. 1013-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Straus ◽  
Sin-Ho Jung ◽  
Brandelyn Pitcher ◽  
Lale Kostakoglu ◽  
John C. Grecula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Interim Pet ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Involved Field

Key Points Interim PET− nonbulky stage I/II patients had 3-year PFS of 91% with 4 ABVD cycles and no RT. Too few patients were interim PET+ to draw firm conclusions about efficacy of escalated BEACOPP plus involved-field RT.

scholarly journals Balancing risk and benefit in early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (15) ◽  
pp. 1666-1678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Bröckelmann ◽  
Stephanie Sasse ◽  
Andreas Engert
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Limited Stage ◽  
Interim Pet ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract With defined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) and risk-adapted treatment, early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has become curable in a majority of patients. Hence, a major current goal is to reduce treatment-related toxicity while maintaining long-term disease control. Patients with early-stage favorable disease (ie, limited stage without risk factors [RFs]) are frequently treated with 2 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (2×ABVD) followed by 20-Gy involved-field or involved-site RT (IF/ISRT). In patients with early-stage unfavorable disease (ie, limited stage with RFs), 4 cycles of chemotherapy are usually consolidated with 30-Gy IF/ISRT. Compared with 4×ABVD, 2 cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (2×BEACOPPescalated) followed by 2×ABVD improved 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), with similar 5-year overall survival. Recently, treatment strategies based on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) response were evaluated. In early-stage unfavorable HL, a majority of patients achieved a negative interim PET after 2×ABVD and an excellent outcome after 4×ABVD, whereas in those with a positive interim PET, 2×BEACOPPescalated improved 5-year PFS. Furthermore, a PET-guided RT approach was evaluated to decrease long-term toxicity. Although both the RAPID and H10 trials reported poorer disease control without RT, PET-guided omission of RT can constitute a valid therapeutic option in patients with an increased risk of RT-associated toxicity (eg, because of sex, age, or disease localization). Implementation of drugs such as the anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin or the anti–programmed death 1 antibodies nivolumab or pembrolizumab might allow further reduction of overall mortality and improve quality of life in affected patients.

Efficacy of Abbreviated Stanford V Chemotherapy and Involved Field Radiotherapy in Early Stage Hodgkin's Disease: Mature Results of the G4 Trial.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1670-1670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjana H Advani ◽  
Richard T Hoppe ◽  
David M. Baer ◽  
Joseph Mason ◽  
Saul A Rosenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Hodgkin's Disease ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Hodgkin’S Disease ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Metastatic Colon Cancer ◽  
Eortc Criteria ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Involved Field ◽  
Involved Field Radiotherapy

Abstract Abstract 1670 Poster Board I-696 The standard management for early stage Hodgkin's disease (HD) is combined modality therapy. In the G4 protocol, patients (pts) with non-bulky, supra-diaphragmatic stage I-IIA disease received 8 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy + 30 Gy involved field radiotherapy (IFRT). 87 pts were enrolled and treated between 4/1996 and 4/2001. Median age was 30 years (16-59) and stages were IA (n=23), IIA (n=64). Unfavorable risk factors were present in 47 patients (54%) according to German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) criteria (> 2 AA sites, ESR > 50 or EN involvement) and 38 (44%) according to EORTC criteria (> 3 AA sites, ESR > 50). Therapy was well tolerated with grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxic events in 7 % of pts. These included constipation (n=3), peripheral neuropathy (n=1), generalized weakness (n=2), chest pain (n=1), mylagias (n=1), abdominal pain (n=1) and an allergic reaction to etoposide (n=1). 42 patients received cytokine support for grade 3-4 neutropenia however only 2 pts developed fever with neutropenia. No cases of clinical bleomycin toxicity or radiation pneumonitis were observed. At a median follow-up of 9 (2-12) years, freedom from progression (FFP) and survival (OS) are 94% and 96% respectively. FFP was 100% for favorable and 89% for unfavorable patients by GHSG criteria (p=0.04) with no differences in OS (96.9% versus 95.7%). All relapses (n=5) occurred in the RT field: limited in 2 patients and combined with distant disease in 3 pts. All relapses were in “unfavorable” risk patients: 5 per GHSG and 4 per EORTC criteria. Secondary therapy included chemotherapy followed by high dose therapy and stem cell support (n=3) and ABVD (n=2). Three pts died, 2 due to disease progression after second-line therapy and one due to metastatic colon cancer. 5 patients developed a second cancer (2 breast, 2 melanomas at unirradiated sites and 1 colon cancer). The cases of breast cancer were considered unrelated to RT as both occurred within 5-years of therapy in women who were > 30 yrs at time of treatment. No secondary AML and no late cardiac or pulmonary toxicities have been observed. In conclusion, for pts with non-bulky stage I/II A HD, abbreviated Stanford V with 8 weeks of chemotherapy and 30 Gy IFRT is a safe and highly effective regimen. It is still too early to assess potential RT-related complications. Our outcomes in “unfavorable” stage I-IIA patients without bulky or symptomatic disease compare favorably with more intensive or prolonged regimens employed by the GHSG and EORTC. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing ABVD + Radiotherapy and the Stanford V Regimen In Patients with Stage I/II Bulky Mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Subset Analysis of the US Intergroup Trial E2496

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 416-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Fangxin Hong ◽  
Richard I Fisher ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Sue Robinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Mediastinal Disease ◽  
The Us ◽  
Involved Field

Abstract Abstract 416 Background: Standard therapy for locally extensive Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) defined as stage I/II with bulky mediastinal disease [mediastinal mass ratio (MMR) > than 1/3 of the chest diameter on standing postero-anterior chest x-ray or 10 cm on computerized tomography] is combined modality therapy (CMT). E2496 was a North American intergroup, randomized phase III study comparing ABVD versus the Stanford V regimen for patients with locally extensive and advanced stage HL. In this subgroup analysis we compare two CMT approaches, ABVD + radiotherapy (RT) and the Stanford V regimen, in patients with stage I/II bulky mediastinal HL. Methods: Patients with stage I/II HL bulky mediastinal disease were randomized to receive chemotherapy (CT) on either Arm A (ABVD × 6–8 cycles administered q 28 days) or Arm B (12 weeks of Stanford V, administered weekly). Two-3 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, modified involved field RT was delivered at 36 Gy to the mediastinum to patients on ABVD as well as Stanford V. Patients on Stanford V also received involved field RT to any other sites >5 cm at diagnosis. The primary endpoint was failure free survival (FFS) defined as the time to either progression/relapse or death. The log-rank test was used to compare FFS and OS (overall survival) for all eligible patients. Results: Of the 812 eligible patients with advanced HL enrolled on the study 267 had locally advanced bulky mediastinal disease: 136 on ABVD and 131 on Stanford V. Patient characteristics between the two randomized groups were well matched with a median age of 30 years and 86% had stage II disease. On ABVD 61% of patients received 6 cycles, 29% 8 cycles of CT and 77% required some dose modification. In Stanford V 97% completed the assigned 12 weeks of CT and 76% required some dose modification. 82% received RT per protocol in ABVD versus 88% in Stanford V. The overall response (CR+PR) was 82% in ABVD and 86% in Stanford V. At a median follow-up of 5.47 years, there are 19 failures and 6 deaths in the ABVD group and 25 failures with 9 deaths in the Stanford V group. We failed to detect statistically significant differences between ABVD +RT and Stanford V for FFS (5y 85% versus 77% p=0.13, HR=1.56 95% CI (0.87, 2.88) and OS (5y 95% versus 92% p=0.31, HR=1.69 95% CI (0.60, 4.75). No difference in hematologic toxicity was observed between the two arms. Evaluation of pulmonary function and patterns of failure are pending. Conclusions: For stage I/II patients with bulky mediastinal disease, CMT with either ABVD +RT or the Stanford V regimen results in high cure rates and is highly effective. ABVD for 6–8 cycles plus 36 Gy RT remains the US standard of care. Longer follow up is required to assess RT related late effects. Future research efforts should focus on risk stratification to identify; a) the 15–20% of patients destined to relapse after standard therapy and evaluate treatment intensification strategies and b) the 80–85% of patients who are cured with standard therapy and determine whether a subset can achieve the same excellent outcomes with a reduction or elimination of radiation. Planned US cooperative group trials will address these questions, using ABVD as the chemotherapy backbone in conjunction with interim PET imaging for risk stratification. Disclosures: Blum: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Horning:Genentech: Employment.

Interim FDG PET Imaging in CALGB 50203 Trial of Stage I/II Non-Bulky Hodgkin Lymphoma: Would Using Combined PET and CT Criteria Better Predict Response Than Each Test Alone?,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3644-3644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lale Kostakoglu ◽  
Heiko Schoder ◽  
Nathan Hall ◽  
David J. Straus ◽  
Jeffrey L Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Interim Pet ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Pet Ct

Abstract Abstract 3644 Use of interim PET in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) for risk-adapted treatment has been confounded by a lack of standardized criteria for interpretation. The International Harmonisation Project (IHP) criteria (JCO 2007;25:571) have been validated and are widely used for restaging following therapy. Our objective was to validate the IHP criteria for response evaluation based on PET after two cycles and correlate with the “London”criteria and diagnostic CT-based (dCT) lesion size changes. Methods: Pts were accrued prospectively to CALGB 50203, a trial of doxorubicin, vinblastine and gemcitabine (AVG) for initial treatment of stage I-II non-bulky Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). All had FDG PET or PET/CT and a separate high-resolution dCT scan at baseline, after two cycles of AVG (PET-2 and dCT-2) and at the end of therapy. No treatment change was made based on the PET-2 results. Of 99 assessable pts, 88 had both PET-2 and dCT-2. The primary PET-2 interpretation was based on IHP criteria (uptake > mediastinal blood pool/background is positive), a secondary interpretation was performed using the 5 point London criteria (uptake > liver is positive). The percent decrease in the sum of the products of the diameter (%SPPD) was determined between baseline dCT and dCT-2. A receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the best cut-off for %SPPD to define a positive and negative CT result. The PET-2 and dCT-2 (%SPPD change) data were correlated with progression free survival (PFS). Results: Sixty-four pts (73%) achieved a complete remission (CR)/CR unconfirmed (CRu), 23.9% a partial response (PR), and 3% had stable disease. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years (1.8–5.0 years), 23.9% of patients relapsed/progressed with an estimated 3-year PFS of 0.77 [CI 68,84]. Eleven of 24 (45.8%) PET-2 positive patients relapsed vs. 10 of 64 (15.6%) PET-2 negative patients (p=0.0004). The best cut-off determined from ROC analysis for %SPPD change was 65%. The comparative results for individual evaluation criteria are displayed in the Table. In the PET-2 positive group, a negative dCT-2 increased PFS by 27–35%, suggesting an influence from dCT-2 results. However, in the combinatorial analysis, some of the confidence intervals are large due to small number of patients in each individual group, particularly, when both PET-2 and dCT-2 were positive as well as when PET-2 was positive and dCT-2 was negative. Conclusions: Interim PET/CT after two cycles of chemotherapy using either IHP or London criteria has a high NPV in early stage non-bulky HL. However, the PPV of interim PET needs to be improved to guide clinical management. Combining PET-2 with %SPPD decrease after 2 cycles improves prediction of PFS compared to each test alone. These data provide a proof of concept for risk-adapted clinical trials and further studies are underway to confirm these findings in a larger population. Disclosures: Bartlett: seattle genetics: Research Funding. Cheson:Celphalon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celegen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.

Changes In The Use Of Radiation Therapy Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Early Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Implications For Survival and Risk Of Secondary Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 722-722
Author(s):  
Ana Xavier ◽  
Luciano J Costa
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Secondary Malignancies ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Abstract Background Early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease with the combined use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT). There has been a recent trend to abandon RT, driven mostly by concerns of development of secondary malignancies (SMN). However, it is unknown whether the omission of RT in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with early stage HL affects survival and the risk of developing SMN. Methods We used data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program (SEER-13) to determine the overall survival (OS) and the risk of SMN among AYA with early stage HL treated or not with radiation therapy. Inclusion criterion was the diagnosis of stage I or II HL in the period of 1995-2010 as first malignant neoplasm among patients age 13 to 40 years. Patients with less than 6 months of follow up and patients with unknown use of RT were excluded. Follow up was updated to the end of 2012 (November 2012 submission). Cases were divided in two “eras”, 1995-2002 and 2003-2010, with the latter being expected to reflect changes in the use of RT. The impact of the era, RT, age, race, gender, and stage on survival were accessed utilizing multivariate analysis. Cumulative incidence of SMN among early stage HL survivors was calculated using a competing risk model, treating death from any cause in absence of SMN as the competing risk. Results A total of 5,336 early stage HL cases were included in the analysis with median follow up of 89 months (range 7-191). Median age of patients was 27 years, 2,459 (46%) were male, 1,327 (24.8%) had stage I, 512 (9.7%) had classical HL non otherwise specified, 4,231 (79.2%) had nodular sclerosing HL, 442 (8.3%), had mixed-cellularity HL, 130 (2.4%) had lymphocyte-rich HL, and 21 (0.4%) had lymphocyte depleted HL. Most patients were white (4,438; 83.2%), 513 (9.6%) black, 337 (6.4%) other ethnicity, and 44 (0.8%) unknown. There where 2,793 patients in the 1995-2002 era and 2,542 patients in the 2003-2010 era. Radiation was included in the initial treatment of 1,659 (59.4%) patients in the former and 1,351 (53%) patients in the latter era (P<0.001). Factors associated with use of RT were earlier era, white race and stage II HL. Within the 1995-2002 era, there was a trend towards better survival among patients treated with RT (5-year survival 95.0% vs. 93.6%, P=0.058). In the 2003-2010 cohort survival was superior among patients treated with RT (5-year survival 97.3% vs. 95.9%, P=0.008). In multivariate analysis, diagnosis of HL in the 1995-2002 era (HR=1.73, 95% C.I. 1.31-2.28, P < 0.001), black race (HR= 2.18, 95% C.I. 1.63-2.91, P <0.001), male sex (HR=1.55, 97% C.I. 1.24-1.93, P < 0.001), and omission of RT (HR=1.31, 95% C.I. 1.05-1.64, P=0.017) were associated with higher mortality. The cumulative incidence of SMN was not significantly different between patients treated or not with radiation, while the risk of death was higher among patients not treated with RT (Figure). Conclusion There has been a reduction in utilization of RT among AYA with early stage HL in the US. Omission of RT was associated with increased overall mortality but no reduction in incidence of SMN and should not be adopted outside clinical trials. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document