Cybord-Dara Is a Highly Effective Upfront Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Initial Efficacy Results of the 16-Bcni-001/Ctrial-IE (ICORG) 16-02 Study

Abstract Introduction : Daratumumab (DARA), a human IgG1k monoclonal antibody with single activity in multiple myeloma (MM) shows strong synergy in combination with other anti-MM agents, including immunomodulatory drug (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PI). This has led to the exploration of DARA in combination with front line regimens. Triplets including a PI and an IMiD are considered an ideal backbone with which to combine DARA prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT). However, based on the ability of Cyclophosphamide (Cy) to enhance DARA mediated antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis, we hypothesized that CyBorD may provide an alternative option (Naicker, ASH 2017). We are currently exploring the preliminary safety and efficacy of CyBorD and DARA as part of an ongoing phase 1b study in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) pts eligible for ASCT. Last year we reported on the safety of this combination with an absence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) with weekly subcutaneous (SQ) Bortezomib (Bor) 1.5mg/m2, Cy 300mg/m2 and DARA 16mg/kg (McEllistrim, ASH 2017). We now report on the efficacy of this regimen as pre-transplant induction, including the rate of CR post ASCT. Methods : Pts received 4 cycles of induction therapy with weekly CyBorD and DARA 16mg/kg weekly for cycles 1 and 2 and every 2 weeks for cycles 3 and 4. Following induction therapy, pts proceeded to stem cell mobilization and ASCT followed by 2 cycles of consolidation therapy with weekly CyBorD plus DARA 16mg/kg on days 1 and 15. Following completion of consolidation therapy, all pts receive DARA maintenance every 28-days for 2 yrs or until progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Pts with high-risk features receive Bor on days 1 and 15 during maintenance phase. The primary endpoints were the incidence of DLT within the first cycle of combination at each dose level and CR rate post ASCT. Secondary endpoints included: safety, CR rate at the end of induction, consolidation and maintenance, best overall response, minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate, progression-free survival, clinical benefit rate and overall survival. Responses were investigator-assessed as per IMWG criteria. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02955810. Results : Eighteen pts were enrolled between Nov 2016 and Dec 2017 and received at least 1 dose of treatment. Baseline characteristics were: median age = 56 y (range 32-66); M (61%), F (39%), ISS stage I, II, III in 78%, 17% and 6% of pts, respectively. 28% patients were identified with high risk genetic features [17p deletion and/or t(4;14) by FISH and/or SKY92 (SkylineDx)]. Three patients discontinued therapy early (primary refractory, persistent liver toxicity, death, respectively). Overall, treatment was well tolerated. The most common grade (gr) 3/4 hematologic treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) were lymphopenia (44%), neutropenia (11%) and anemia (11%). The most common gr 3/4 non-hematologic TEAE were diarrhea (11%) and infection (61%). One patient died from gr 5 diffuse alveolar damage 7 weeks post ASCT. A single patient developed gr 3 liver toxicity. DARA-associated infusion reactions were ≤ gr 2 (11%). On an intent to treat (ITT) basis 94% achieved ≥ very good partial response (VGPR) with ≥ complete response (CR) in 44% pts (Figure). Among the sixteen patients completing 4 cycles of induction ORR was 100%, ≥ VGPR (69%), ≥ CR (13%). Informative NGS data (Adaptive Biotech) are available on 11/16 patients post induction, of whom 100% are MRD negative post induction at a level of ≥ 10e4. Following the induction phase 15/16 patients readily mobilized sufficient CD34 positive progenitors and proceeded to ASCT, one patient failed repeated mobilization. One patient died prior to post ASCT response assessment and data on the last patient is pending. Thus 13/15 patients are currently evaluable for response post ASCT. Responses deepened post ASCT with 100% achieving ≥ VGPR and 62% achieving ≥ CR. Based on EBMT criteria the CR/nCR rate post ASCT was 92%. Post ASCT PET-CT scans were consistent with complete metabolic response in all 13 patients. Updated results, including MRD status post ASCT will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: CyBorD-DARA is a highly active, well tolerated induction therapy for NDMM patients undergoing ASCT. These data support the further development of this combination as a convenient, cost effective alternative to PI-IMiD-DARA based combinations. Disclosures Quinn: Janssen: Honoraria. O'Dwyer:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Onkimmune: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Melphalan/Prednisone/Lenalidomide (MPR) Versus High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Transplantation (MEL200) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients <65 Years: Results of a Randomized Phase III Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3069.3069 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3069-3069 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Antonio Palumbo ◽

Federica Cavallo ◽

Izhar Hardan ◽

Barbara Lupo ◽

Valter Redoglia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Patients ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Abstract 3069FN2 Background: High-dose chemotherapy with haemopoietic stem-cell improves outcome in multiple myeloma (MM). The introduction of novel agents questions the role of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in MM patients. Aims: In this prospective randomized study, we compared conventional melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) with tandem high-dose melphalan (MEL200) in newly diagnosed MM patients younger than 65 years. Methods: All patients (N=402) received four 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (25 mg, d1-21) and low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg, d1, 8, 15, 22) (Rd) as induction. As consolidation, patients were randomized to MPR (N=202) consisting of six 28-day cycles of melphalan (0.18 mg/kg d1-4), prednisone (2 mg/kg d1-4) and lenalidomide (10 mg d1-21); or tandem melphalan 200 mg/m2 MEL200 (N=200) with stem-cell support. All patients enrolled were stratified according to International Staging System (stages 1 and 2 vs. stage 3) and age (<60 vs. ≥60 years). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Data were analyzed in intention-to-treat. Results: Response rates were similar: at least very good partial response (≥VGPR) rate was 60% with MPR vs. 58% with MEL200 (p=.24); the complete response (CR) rate was 20% with MPR vs. 25% with MEL200 (p=.49). After a median follow-up of 26 months, the 2-year PFS was 54% in MPR and 73% in MEL200 (HR=0.51, p<.001). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was similar in the two groups: 87% with MPR and 90% with MEL200 (HR 0.68, p=.19). In a subgroup analysis, MEL200 significantly prolonged PFS in both standard-risk patients without t(4;14) or t(14;16) or del17p abnormalities (2-year PFS was 46% in the MPR group vs. 78% in the MEL200 group, HR=0.57, p=.007) and high-risk patients with t(4;14) or t(14;16) or del17p abnormalities (2-year PFS was 27% for MPR vs. 71% for MEL200, HR=0.32, p=.004). In patients who achieved CR, the 2-year PFS was 66% for MPR vs. 87% for MEL200 (HR 0.26; p<.001); in those who achieved a partial response (PR), the 2-year PFS was 56% for MPR vs. 77% for MEL200 (HR 0.45; p<.001). In the MPR and MEL200 groups, G3-4 neutropenia was 55% vs. 89% (p<.001); G3-4 infections were 0% vs. 17% (p<.001); G3-4 gastrointestinal toxicity was 0% vs. 21% (p<.001); the incidence of second tumors was 0.5% in MPR patients and 1.5% in MEL200 patients (p=.12). Deep vein thrombosis rate was 2.44% with MPR vs. 1.13% with MEL200 (p=.43). Conclusions: PFS was significantly prolonged in the MEL200 group compared to MPR. This benefit was maintained in the subgroup of patients with standard- or high-risk cytogenetic features. Toxicities were significantly higher in the MEL200 group. This is the first report showing a PFS advantage for ASCT in comparison with conventional therapies including novel agents. These data will be updated at the meeting. Disclosures: Palumbo: celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavallo:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Cavo:celgene: Honoraria. Ria:celgene: Consultancy. Caravita Di Toritto:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Di Raimondo:celgene: Honoraria. Boccadoro:celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone Compared with Thalidomide-Dexamethasone as Induction and Consolidation Therapy Before and After Double Autologous Transplantation In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results From a Randomized Phase 3 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.42.42 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 42-42 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Michele Cavo ◽

Giulia Perrone ◽

Silvia Buttignol ◽

Elisabetta Calabrese ◽

Monica Galli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Autologous Transplantation ◽

Consolidation Therapy ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 42 We prospectively compared thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) with bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) as induction therapy before, and consolidation after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Three 21-d cycles of either VTD (V, 1.3 mg/m2 twice-weekly; T, 200 mg/d through d 1 to 63; D, 320 mg/cycle) or TD were given as induction therapy. Consolidation therapy comprised two 35-d cycles of VTD (V, 1.3 mg/m2 once-weekly; T, 100 mg/d through d 1 to 70; D, 320 mg/cycle) or TD. 474 patients randomized to the VTD (n=236) or TD (n=238) arm were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis for response rate, PFS and OS. Centrally reassessed CR/nCR rate was significantly higher in the VTD compared with the TD arm after all treatment phases, including induction therapy (30% vs 10%, p<0.0001), double autotransplantation (54% vs 42%, p=0.008) and consolidation therapy (60% vs 44%, p=0.001). Best confirmed overall CR/nCR rate was 71% in the VTD arm compared with 52% in the TD arm (p<0.0001); the corresponding values for VGPR or better were 89% vs 72%, respectively (p<0.0001). To evaluate the role of consolidation therapy we performed a per-protocol analysis of 323 patients, 161 treated with VTD and 162 with TD. Overall, upgraded responses with VTD and TD as consolidation therapy were observed in 55% vs 37% of patients, respectively (p=0.01; OR:1.15-3.77). Furthermore, the probability to improve responses from less than CR before consolidation to CR after consolidation was 28% with VTD vs 15% with TD (p=0.02; OR:1.07-4.57) (p=0.003 using the Mc Nemar's test). Post-consolidation molecular detection of minimal residual disease was the objective of a substudy; detailed results are reported in a separate abstract. Briefly, both qualitative and quantitative analyses confirmed the statistically significant superiority of VTD over TD in effecting higher rates of molecular remissions and reducing the burden of residual myeloma cells after ASCT. Any grade 3–4 non-hematologic adverse events were 10% with VTD (peripheral neuropathy: 1.3%, skin rash: 0.6%) vs 12% with TD. With a median follow-up of 31 months, median PFS was 42 months in the TD arm and was not yet reached in the VTD arm (44-month projected rate: 61%) (HR: 0.62 [CI: 0.45–0.87], p=0.006). Superior PFS in the VTD vs TD arm was retained across patient subgroups with poor prognosis, including those with t(4;14) and/or del(17p). Randomization to VTD overcome the adverse influence of t(4;14) on PFS (40-month projected rates: 69% vs 67% according to the presence or absence of this abnormality, respectively; p=0.6). By the opposite, in the TD arm corresponding median PFS values were 24.5 vs 41.5 months, respectively (p=0.01). The small numbers of patients with del(17p) in both arms of the study precluded a statistical comparison with del(17p)-negative group. In a multivariate analysis, variables favorably influencing PFS were beta2-m lower than 3.5 mg/L (HR:0.47; p=0.000), absence of t(4;14) and/or del(17p) (HR:0.52; p=0.000), randomization to VTD arm (HR:0.57; p=0.002), attainment of at least VGPR (HR:0.50; p=0.009) and CR (HR:0.8; p=0.01). No statistically significant difference between the overall treatment protocols was seen in terms of OS, although curves seemed to initially diverge after 40 months (44-month projected rates: 84% vs 74% for VTD and TD arms, respectively). A multivariate analysis showed the independent role of absence of t(4;14) and/or del(17p) (HR:0.42; p=0.003), ISS stage1-2 (HR:0.49; p=0.02) and randomization to VTD (HR:0.53; p=0.04) in prolonging OS. When time-dependent CR entered the model, absence of t(4;14) and/or del(17p) and less advanced ISS stage retained their positive prognostic value; attainment of CR (strictly related to VTD randomization) was an additional favorable variable. In conclusion, in comparison with the TD arm of the study, 1) VTD induction emerges as a new standard of care for maximizing the degree and speedy of tumor reduction in preparation for ASCT; 2) VTD consolidation effected significantly higher rates of upgraded responses, including CR, and of molecular remissions; 3) double ASCT incorporating VTD as induction and consolidation therapy resulted in significantly longer PFS, a benefit confirmed in a multivariate regression analysis and maintained in the subgroup of patients with adverse cytogenetic abnormalities. Disclosures: Cavo: Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Use of bortezomib and thalidomide as induction therapy before, and consolidation after, autologous transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Baccarani:NOVARTIS: Honoraria; BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

EARLY Results of TOTAL Therapy 7 (TT7): High Response Rates of NEWLY Diagnosed High Risk Myeloma to Daratumumab

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131887 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4569-4569 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Frits van Rhee ◽

Sharmilan Thanendrarajan ◽

Carolina D. Schinke ◽

Jeffery R. Sawyer ◽

Adam Rosenthal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Early Results ◽

Research Grant

Background. The TT approach has significantly improved the outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) by combining new drugs with a regimen that comprises induction, tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), consolidation and maintenance. However, a group of 15% of patients with high risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) have derived little benefit despite similar response rates to induction chemotherapy and ASCT when compared to low risk MM. The poor outcome of HRMM is explained by early relapse post ASCT resulting in a short progression free survival (PFS) with only 15-20% of patients surviving long-term. Daratumumab (Dara) is a human IgG1k anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody that has shown favorable results in early single-arm studies and more recently in phase III studies for relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed MM. In TT7, we introduced Dara during all phases of therapy, including immune consolidation early post ASCT, to improve responses rate and PFS in HRMM. Methods. Patients had newly diagnosed HRMM as defined by high risk cytogenetic abnormalities, presence of extramedullary disease, >3 focal lesions on CT-PET, elevated LDH due to MM, or ISS II/III with cytogenetic abnormality. Dara (16mg/kgx1) was added to induction with KTD-PACE (carfilzomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone; and four-day continuous infusions of cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide). Conditioning for tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was with fractionated melphalan (50mg/m2x4) (fMEL) based on prior observations that patients with adverse cytogenetics fare better with fMEL rather than single high dose MEL200mg/m2.In the inter tandem ASCT period immunological consolidation with Dara (16mg/kg) alone for 2 doses was followed by Dara (16mg/kg) on day 1 combined with K (36mg/m2) and D (20mg) weekly for 2 cycles. DaraKD was administered to avoid treatment free periods allowing for myeloma regrowth. The 2nd ASCT was followed by further immunological consolidation with Dara (16mg/k) for 2 doses, and maintenance therapy for 3 yrs with 3-months block of alternating Dara-KD (dara 16mg/kg day 1; K 36mg/m2 and dex 20mg weekly) and Dara-lenalidomide (R)D (dara 16mg/kg day 1; R 15mg day 1-21 q28 and D 20mg weekly). Results. TT7 enrolled 43 patients thus far. The median follow-up was 11 months (range: 1-22). The median age was 61 yrs (range 44-73). Sixteen patients were ≥65 yrs (37.2%). A mean of 29.4x106 CD34+ cells/kg (range: 4.6-86.4) were collected. 36 patients completed ASCT #1 (83.7%) and 18 (41.9%) ASCT #2, whilst 14 patients have proceeded to the maintenance phase. R-ISS II/III or metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities were present in 85.1 and 58.1% of patients, respectively. Elevated LDH or >3FL on CT-PET were noted in 30 and 41.8%. The 1-yr cumulative incidence estimates for reaching VGPR and PR were 87 and 83%, respectively. A CR or sCR was achieved in 68 and 46%. The 1-yr estimates of PFS and OS were 91.6 and 87.2%. 40 subjects are alive, whilst 5 progressed on study therapy and 3 subsequently died. 38 patients are progression free at the time of reporting. Dara was well-tolerated and no subjects discontinued therapy due to dara-related side effects. The CR and sCR rates compared favorably to the predecessor HRMM TT5 protocol where CR and sCR rates were 59 and 27%. Conclusion. The early results of TT7 point to increased response rates of HRMM to a dara-based TT regimen with especially higher rates of CR and sCR. Longer follow-up is required to determine if these early results translate into superior PFS and OS. Figure Disclosures van Rhee: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Adicet Bio: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy; Castleman Disease Collaborative Network: Consultancy; EUSA: Consultancy. Walker:Celgene: Research Funding. Morgan:Amgen, Roche, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene, Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other: research grant, Research Funding. Davies:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Roche, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Consultant/Advisor; Janssen, Celgene: Other: Research Grant, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Final Results of a Frontline Phase 1/2 Study of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (CRd) in Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.631.631 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 631-631 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽

Dominik Dytfeld ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

David H. Vesole ◽

Tara B. Anderson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Growth Factors ◽

Partial Response ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 631 Introduction: In relapsed and/or refractory MM, the combination of carfilzomib (CFZ) with lenalidomide (Len), and low-dose dexamethasone (Dex) (CRd) has shown very promising efficacy (78% ≥partial response [PR], 40% ≥very good partial response [VGPR], and 24% CR/nCR) and good tolerability including a low rate of peripheral neuropathy (Wang et al, ASCO, 2011). In a Phase I/II study of newly diagnosed MM, the regimen was well tolerated in the Phase I portion of the study up to a maximum dose of CFZ 36 mg/m2, Len 25 mg, and Dex 40 mg, and very active with 96% ≥PR, 70% ≥VGPR, and 55% CR/nCR (Jakubowiak et al, ASH 2010). The lack of overlapping toxicities has allowed these agents to be used at full doses and for extended periods. Here we report the results for all patients (pts) enrolled in both phases of this first prospective trial of CFZ combination in new MM. Methods: In the initial eight 28-day cycles, pts were treated with CFZ at 20 mg/m2, 27 mg/m2 (Phase I), and 36 mg/m2 (Phase I and II), given IV on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16, Len at 25 mg PO (days 1–21), and Dex at 40/20 mg PO weekly (cycles 1–4/5–8). Pts achieving ≥PR could proceed to stem cell collection (SCC) using growth factors alone (protocol recommendation) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) after 4 cycles. Per protocol, ASCT candidates were offered the option to continue CRd treatment after SCC. After 8 cycles, pts received 28-day maintenance cycles of CFZ (days 1, 2, 15, 16), Len days 1–21, and Dex weekly at the doses tolerated at the end of 8 cycles. Responses were assessed by IMWG criteria with the addition of nCR. Results: Enrollment was completed (53 pts): 4 pts at CFZ 20 mg/m2, 13 at CFZ 27 mg/m2 and 36 at CFZ 36 mg/m2 (18 in Phase I and 18 in Phase II). Median age was 59 years (range 35–81; 23 pts ≥65), 60% had ISS stage II/III, and 33% (of 49 with available data) had unfavorable cytogenetics: del 13 or hypodiploidy by metaphase, or t(4;14), t (14;16), del 17p by FISH. As of June 30, 2011, toxicity data (cycles 1–8) were available for 51 pts. Hematologic toxicities were reversible and included Grade (G) 3/4: anemia (18%), neutropenia (12%), and thrombocytopenia (10%). The most common non-hematologic toxicities (all G) were hyperglycemia (76%), hypophosphatemia (61%), and infection (53%). G3/4 non-hematologic AEs included hyperglycemia (24%), DVT/PE while on ASA prophylaxis (10%), infection (6%), and mood alteration (2%). PN was limited to G1/2 sensory (24%). Forty-five pts continue treatment with 22 pts in the maintenance phase. Six pts discontinued treatment: 2 proceeded to ASCT, 1 due to toxicity, and 3 due to events unrelated to treatment or per pt wish. The majority of pts did not require dose modifications, either in the initial (31%) or in the maintenance (25%) phase. After a median of 8 cycles (range 1–20), the best responses per IMWG criteria for 49 response-evaluable pts (all pts who completed 1+ cycle) are shown in the Table. Responses were rapid with 46/49 pts achieving at least PR after 1 cycle, and improved with the duration of treatment reaching 100% ≥PR after 4 cycles and 100% ≥VGPR, 79% CR/nCR after 12 cycles. Responses were deep even at the 2 lower dose levels with the majority of pts at 36 mg/m2 still early in treatment. Responses in pts with unfavorable cytogenetics were similar to response rates in all remaining pts and included a 100% ≥PR in 6 pts with del 17p. Twenty-four pts proceeded to SCC after a median of 5 cycles of CRd (range 4–9); using growth factors only in 23 pts and cyclophosphamide and growth factors in 1 pt, with a median 6.55 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg collected (range 3.75–9.6); all resumed CRd treatment. After a median of 9.5 months of follow-up, only 1 pt has progressed, and all are alive Conclusions: CRd is highly active and well-tolerated allowing the use of full doses for an extended time in newly-diagnosed MM pts with limited need for dose modification. Responses are rapid and improve over time reaching 100% ≥VGPR and early time-to-event data are very encouraging. These results compare favorably to the best frontline regimens in MM. Disclosures: Jakubowiak: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Use of the investigational agent carfilzomib, proteasome inhibitor, in the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; OrthoBiotec.Imedex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medicom World Wide: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Optum Health Education: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PER Group: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vesole:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Hussein:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Leveque:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Vij:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase 2 Study of Carfilzomib, Thalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone As Induction/Consolidation in Newly Diagnosed, Transplant Eligible Patients with Multiple Myeloma, the Carthadex Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1141.1141 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1141-1141 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Ruth Wester ◽

Bronno van der Holt ◽

Emelie Asselbergs ◽

Mark van Duin ◽

Sonja Zweegman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fixed Dose ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Standard Risk

Abstract Introduction A phase 2 dose escalation trial of Carfilzomib in combination with Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (KTd) for induction and consolidation in newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We report the results of 4 dose levels. Methods In this multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial, transplant-eligible patients aged between 18 and 65 years with previously untreated symptomatic MM were included. Patients were treated with 4 cycles of escalating dose of Carfilzomib + fixed-dose thalidomide and dexamethasone (KTd) for induction therapy. The dose of Carfilzomib was 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2 followed by 27 mg/m2 on days 8, 9, 15, 16 of cycle 1 and on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 of cycles 2 to 4. Thalidomide dose was 200 mg orally on days 1 through 28 and Dexamethasone 40 mg orally on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. Carfilzomib was escalated to 20/36 mg/m2 in cohort 2, to 20/45 mg/m2 in cohort 3 and to 20/56 mg/m2 in cohort 4. Induction was followed by stem cell harvest after Cyclophosphamide priming (2 to 4 mg/m2) and G-CSF. Hereafter patients received high-dose Melphalan (HDM, 200mg/m2) and autologous stem cell transplantation followed by consolidation treatment with 4 cycles of KTd in the same schedule except a lower dose of Thalidomide (50mg). The primary endpoint was response after induction therapy and overall, specifically complete response (CR) and very good partial response (VGPR). Secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results All 111 patients with a median follow-up of 55, 42, 35 and 28 months, in cohorts 1 to 4, respectively were included in the analysis. Median age was 58 years. ISS stages I/II/III were 41%/34%/23%, respectively, R-ISS stages I/II/III/unknown were 23%/59%/9%/9%, respectively. Of 111 patients, 9 patients stopped treatment during/after induction, 8 patients after cyclophosphamide priming or HDM and 9 patients during consolidation because of toxicity (n=9), non-eligibility for further treatment (n=6), progression (n=5), refusal (n=2) or other reasons (n=4). Overall response rate for all cohorts was 95%. Response after induction was CR/sCR in 18% of patients, ≥ VGPR in 66% of patients, ≥ PR in 94% of patients. After HDM the CR/sCR rate increased to 31% and after consolidation to 64%. Responses between cohorts were in general comparable. See Table 1. Response based on risk status by ISS/FISH in either cohort and accumulated did not show a difference in CR/sCR rate after consolidation between standard-risk (67%) and high risk defined as t(4;14) and/or del17p and/or add1q and/or ISS3 (60%). OS at 30 months was comparable between standard risk and high risk, 91% versus 90%. PFS at 30 months for standard risk and high risk was 79% and 62%, logrank p=0.02 (HR=2.3, 95% CI=1.1-4.5). PFS at 30 months per cohort was 70% (95% CI, 55% to 81%), 70% (95% CI, 45% to 85%), 80% (95% CI, 56% to 92%) and 62% (95% CI, 32% to 82%) in cohorts 1,2, 3 and 4, respectively, and 71% (95% CI, 61% to 79%) in all patients. OS at 30 months per cohort was 90% (95% CI, 77% to 96%), 90% (95% CI, 66% to 97%), 95% (95% CI, 71% to 99%) and 88% (95% CI, 58% to 97%) respectively, and 91% (95% CI, 83% to 95%) in all patients. Gene expression profiling using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChips was performed on purified tumor cells for 49 patients. Using the prognostic classifier EMC92 a high-risk group of patients (16%) was identified versus standard risk (in terms of OS: logrank p=0.06 (HR=3.7, 95% CI=0.8-16.8), and in terms of PFS: logrank p=0.14 (HR=2.1, 95% CI=0.8-6.0)). Safety analysis for all 111 patients showed non-hematological grade 3 and 4 toxicity, mainly respiratory disorders (in 15%), GI disorders (13%) and skin lesions (10%). Toxicity between cohorts did not show a significant difference. Cardiac adverse events were limited and included heart failure (n=2 at 27 mg/m2), hypertension (n=2) and chest pain (n=1 at 45mg/m2). Conclusion Carfilzomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone (KTd) is an effective regimen, with increasing CR percentages following KTd consolidation. With escalated doses of Carfilzomib responses and toxicity were comparable to standard dose of 27 mg/m2. Disclosures Zweegman: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kersten:Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Minnema:Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Jansen Cilag: Consultancy. Palumbo:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Takeda: Employment, Honoraria. Lokhorst:Genmab: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Broijl:Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Sonneveld:Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Lenalidomide Maintenance for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3448.3448 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3448-3448 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Keren Osman ◽

Ajai Chari ◽

Samir Parekh ◽

Christine Pun ◽

Gillian Morgan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Consolidation Therapy ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Myeloma Cells

Abstract Introduction: Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against SLAMF7 that is approved for use in relapsed multiple myeloma patients in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. This agent appears to have several modes of action, including facilitation of antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) through binding to SLAMF7 on myeloma cells and activation of natural killer (NK) cells to kill tumor cells through ligation of the target. We initiated a single-center, open label, phase 1 trial based on the hypothesis that the addition of elotuzumab and autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) reconstitution to standard-of-care autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) and lenalidomide maintenance for consolidation therapy in myeloma patients after induction therapy will be safe and feasible. We hypothesize that early PBMC reconstitution post-auto-SCT will restore a viable NK cell population for activation by elotuzumab, which may target residual myeloma cells and promote tumor-specific humoral and cellular immune responses against myeloma cells. Subsequent maintenance therapy with elotuzumab and lenalidomide may amplify this response, resulting in long-term maintenance of the minimal residual disease state. Methods. This is a Phase 1b, open-label, trial investigating elotuzumab and autologous PBMC reconstitution with auto-SCT consolidation therapy and lenalidomide maintenance. The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of elotuzumab and autologous PBMC reconstitution in the setting of auto-SCT and lenalidomide maintenance in multiple myeloma patients. The secondary objectives are to assess myeloma disease status and progression-free survival (PFS) after one year of treatment. Subjects must achieve partial response or better by IMWG criteria with induction chemotherapy, be eligible for auto-SCT by institutional standards, and meet inclusion/exclusion criteria. Fifteen subjects are planned in this pilot study. The treatment plan is as follows: In addition to standard peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and harvest, subjects undergo steady-state leukopheresis for PBMC collection. Subjects receive standard melphalan conditioning (day -1) and autologous stem cell rescue (day 0). Autologous PBMC are reinfused on day +3 post-stem cell infusion and cycle 1 of elotuzumab 20 mg/kg IV is given on day +4. Subjects receive subsequent cycles of elotuzumab every 28 days up to cycle 12. Lenalidomide maintenance at 10 mg orally daily days 1-21 of every 28-day cycle begins with cycle 4 of elotuzumab, and may continue off study beyond cycle 12 at the investigator's discretion. Bone marrow aspirates and peripheral blood are collected for correlative studies at screening, cycle 2, cycle 4, and at the end of study after cycle 12. For the primary endpoint analysis, the safety population includes all subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment. The evaluable population constitutes all subjects who received at least four of the first five planned doses of elotuzumab. Results: Fourteen of the planned 15 subjects have been enrolled in the study. Demographic and staging data reflect the general transplant-eligible myeloma patient population at our institution. All 14 of these subjects are included in the safety population, having received at least 1 dose of elotuzumab. Nine of 14 subjects have completed at least 4 of the first 5 planned elotuzumab infusions and are evaluable. The majority of adverse events, including infusion reactions attributable to elotuzumab, have been grade 2 or lower. Grade 3 or higher hematologic AEs, including anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and non-hematologic AEs including nausea, vomiting, and dehydration, were attributable to the auto-SCT procedure. There were no delays in hematopoietic reconstitution observed. One episode of grade 3 hypertension was attributed to elotuzumab infusion and resolved with supportive care. No AEs were attributed to PBMC reconstitution. Conclusions: The combination of elotuzumab and PBMC reconstitution with standard auto-SCT and lenalidomide maintenance for consolidation therapy of multiple myeloma appears to be safe and feasible. One subject withdrew for personal reasons. The trial is ongoing and is expected to complete accrual and the clinical results will be updated for presentation. Disclosures Chari: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Geerlof:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Jagannath:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Cho:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agenus, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Bortezomib in Two Different Induction Therapies for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma – Subgroup Analysis from the GMMG-MM5 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3475.3475 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3475-3475 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Maximilian Merz ◽

Hans Salwender ◽

Mathias Hänel ◽

Uta Bertsch ◽

Christina Kunz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Group Iv ◽

Route Of Administration ◽

Prolonged Treatment ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background: In patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), Moreau and colleagues (Lancet Oncol, 2011) demonstrated that subcutaneous (SC) administration of bortezomib (BTZ) significantly reduced rates of adverse events (AE) compared to the intravenous (IV) formulation without loss of efficacy. Prospective data on SC BTZ in newly diagnosed MM are limited. We investigated the impact of SC versus IV BTZ in two different induction therapies for patients with newly diagnosed MM treated within the multicenter, prospective randomized MM5 trial of the German Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG). Methods: From 06/2010 until 11/2013, 604 patients were randomly assigned to receive 3 cycles of PAd (BTZ 1.3 mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8 and 11; Doxorubicin 9 mg/m2 IV, days 1-4; Dexamethasone 20 mg/d, orally, days 1-4, 9-12 and 17-20) or 3 cycles VCD (BTZ 1.3 mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8 and 11; Cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m2IV; day 1, Dexamethasone 40 mg/d, orally, days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9 and 11-12) for induction therapy. In the MM5 trial, induction therapy is followed by stem cell mobilization and harvest, high-dose therapy and Lenalidomide-based consolidation/maintenance therapy. Primary end points of the ongoing study are response to treatment after induction therapy and progression-free survival. Due to improved AE profile of SC compared to IV BTZ reported by Moreau, the administration of BTZ was changed from IV to SC in 02/2012. Therefore, we were able to perform an explorative analysis of 598 patients who received at least one dose of trial medication (PAd: n=150 IV / 140 SC; VCD: n=154 IV / 140 SC). 14 patients were excluded from the analysis because administration of BTZ was changed after start of induction therapy. We analyzed whether the route of administration influenced the applied cumulative BTZ dose, toxicity and efficacy of PAd and VCD. Results: The cumulative applied BTZ dose was significantly higher in patients treated with SC BTZ (PAd: 28.9 mg; VCD: 28.8 mg) compared to IV-treated patients (PAd: 27.6 mg; VCD: 27.9 mg; p = 0.007). Analysis of reported AEs associated to induction therapy revealed a significantly higher rate in patients treated with IV BTZ (65.1%) compared to SC-treated patients (55.7%, p = 0.02). AE > °II were reported more frequently in the IV group (IV: 52.0%; SC: 43.9%, p = 0.004). In detail, abnormal laboratory findings including leucopenia and thrombocytopenia (IV: 23.0%; SC: 16.4%, p = 0.05), metabolism and nutrition disorders (IV: 12.5%; SC: 5.4%, p = 0.004) and gastrointestinal disorders (IV: 9.9%; SC: 3.9%, p = 0.006) occurred more often in IV-treated patients. Analysis of peripheral neuropathy (PN) ≥ °II revealed no significant differences between IV and SC BTZ during the first two cycles of induction therapy (cycle 1: IV: 1.6%; SC: 2.5%; cycle 2: IV: 2.3%; SC: 3.6%) but PN occurred more often in IV-treated patients during the third cycle of induction therapy compared to the SC group (IV: 7.6%; SC: 1.8%, p = 0.001). Overall response rates (partial response or better) were not influenced by the route of administration in patients treated with PAd (IV: 72.7%; SC: 70.7%; p = 0.79) or VCD (IV: 77.9%; SC: 82.1%; p = 0.39). Analysis of the VCD arm showed that rates of VGPR or better were significantly higher in patients treated with IV BTZ compared to SC-treated patients (IV: 41.6%; SC: 28.6%, p = 0.02). Rates of VGPR or better were also higher for IV-treated patients in the PAd arm but did not reach statistical significance (IV: 36.7%; SC: 31.4%, p=0.39). Patient characteristics including baseline creatinine levels > 2 mg/dl, obesity or age at inclusion > 65 years did not influence efficacy of IV or SC BTZ in both arms. Conclusion: Last year we reported on the favorable toxicity profile and equal efficacy of VCD compared to PAd. With the current analysis we demonstrate that toxicity is further reduced with SC BTZ compared to IV. We therefore recommend VCD as induction therapy. However, we show for the first time a possible loss of efficacy in SC-treated patients. Therefore it remains unclear whether the reduced toxicity justifies the general application of SC BTZ in newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible patients or whether a prolonged treatment (4 x VCD SC) may reduce toxicity while achieving similar efficacy. Further studies are warranted since our results are partially in contrast with the previously presented data in relapsed MM and the ongoing MM5 trial was initially not designed to prospectively investigate the effect of SC or IV BTZ. Disclosures Salwender: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Binding site: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scheid:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Mai:Janssen: Travel support Other. Hose:Novartis: Research Funding. Schmidt-Wolf:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Weisel:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Noxxon: Consultancy. Duerig:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Polyphor: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Advanced Imaging and Targeted Myeloma Lesion Biopsies to Enhance Global Response Assessment and Evaluate Spatial Heterogeneity in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136478 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 20-22

Author(s):

Sabrina L. Browning ◽

Terri L. Parker ◽

Noffar Bar ◽

Tara Anderson ◽

Madhav V. Dhodapkar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advanced Imaging ◽

Advisory Committees

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous plasma cell neoplasm with significant genetic and biologic complexity. Limitations remain in our standard assessment of response to therapy, as random bone marrow biopsy may misrepresent the varied histologic and molecular features of this multifocal disease. Advanced imaging is crucial in evaluating bone and extramedullary (EM) lesions. We aim to refine global response assessment in MM, with incorporation of advanced imaging-guided lesion biopsies, to improve knowledge of residual tumor burden critical to patient outcomes. Methods: Patients ≥18 years of age with standard or high risk newly diagnosed clinical MM were eligible to participate in this study. Advanced imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) or whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) based on access, standard bone marrow biopsy and aspiration, and targeted lesion biopsy occurred at enrollment and after 4 cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRd). Carfilzomib was administered intravenously at a dose of 36 mg/m2 twice weekly, lenalidomide orally 25 mg daily days 1-21, and dexamethasone orally 40 mg weekly, with dose modifications as needed. Conventional clinical response, using IMWG Response Criteria (Kumar S et al, 2016), was assessed after each cycle of treatment. Results: An interim analysis was completed on 17 patients enrolled between June 2018 and March 2020, with 14 evaluable for global treatment response. Median age was 61 years (range, 43-76 years) and 82.4% of patients were male. 76.5% had Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage II or III disease and 58.8% had EM disease arising from bone (EM-B, 41.2%) or independently in soft tissue (EM-S, 17.6%). 70.6% of patients had at least one high risk feature at the time of diagnosis (Table 1). Of the 16 patients with conventional skeletal survey (CSS) at study entry, 68.8% had at least 1 myeloma-defining lesion on advanced imaging that was missed on CSS. Four patients had adequate sample from initial lesion biopsy for cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), 3 of whom demonstrated discordant FISH results when compared to standard bone marrow samples. Clinical response rates after 4 cycles of CRd were notable with 85.7% of patients achieving ≥ very good partial response (VGPR) and 3 patients with stringent complete response (sCR) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity by flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 10-5. However, of the 12 patients with ≥ VGPR by conventional response assessment, 9 had residual disease on advanced imaging with PET/CT (2 patients), WB-MRI (6 patients), or total spine MRI (1 patient) (Figure 1). Repeat myeloma lesion biopsy was limited to 6 patients with targetable lesions after induction therapy, with diagnostic yield impacted by the presence of sclerotic tissue and insufficient marrow elements in some of the lesions sampled (Table 2). 85.7% of patients continued CRd or proceeded to high dose therapy and autologous stem cell rescue, with no patients transitioning directly to maintenance treatment after 4 cycles of CRd. At a median follow-up of 8 months, 14.3% (2/14) of patients have had progression of disease. Both individuals had residual lesions on imaging at end of treatment, despite one with flow MRD-negative sCR and normal FISH by standard assessment. There were no grade 4 serious adverse events or deaths. Conclusions: In our cohort of high risk newly diagnosed MM, CRd induction was potent and well-tolerated. While deep clinical responses were observed by conventional clinical assessment, two thirds of patients had persistent abnormalities on advanced imaging with concern that these sites could give rise to progressive MM. Our patients demonstrated spatial heterogeneity, highlighting the limitations of standard bone marrow evaluation. Use of advanced imaging and targeted lesion biopsies in response assessment enhances our understanding of tumor growth pattern in MM and consideration could be given to integrating these into clinical care when available. Current limitations of this study include a small number of patients with lesions amendable to repeat biopsy and their incomplete diagnostic yield. Ongoing investigation includes whole exome sequencing of paired bone marrow and focal lesion biopsies and application of a WB-MRI lesion scoring system to further augment this novel response assessment method. Disclosures Anderson: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Dhodapkar:Roche/Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Lava Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board. Prebet:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Xu:Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Haims:Pfizer: Consultancy. Neparidze:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board; Eidos Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Diagnostic committee member ; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Carfilzomib has been shown to have significant anti-myeloma activity in relapsed myeloma. Phase I/II studies as well as one phase III study also showed favorable outcomes with carfilzomib-based regimens in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, including in patients with high risk disease. We utilized an induction regimen with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone given that patients enrolled in this study were required to have bone or soft tissue disease on advanced imaging, indicating a likely high risk feature with potentially aggressive disease biology. It has been shown that the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is a safe regimen for patients with multiple myeloma. This combination is approved in the relapsed/refractory setting and included in NCCN guidelines for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Download Full-text

Response To First-Line Treatment In Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) and Non-SCT Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Enrolled In The Connect MM Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3207.3207 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3207-3207

Author(s):

Rafat Abonour ◽

Jatin J. Shah ◽

Brian Durie ◽

Howard Terebelo ◽

Cristina J Gasparetto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Off Label ◽

Trial Setting

Abstract Introduction The advent of new therapies for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has resulted in improved clinical outcomes and patient (pt) survival. However, the best combination of agents from different drug classes and subsequent therapeutic strategies for pts with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM), while investigated, has not yet been established. The goal of the Connect(R) MM registry is to provide insight into the disease and explore the management and outcomes of pts with NDMM who are treated at community and academic sites in the United States. This analysis aims to describe the combinations used in NDMM outside the interventional clinical trial setting and the activity and outcome response to different regimens by class of therapeutic agents in clinical practice. Methods Connect MM is an ongoing prospective, longitudinal, observational registry of NDMM pts. This multicenter US pt registry was initiated in 2009. Pts who were newly diagnosed with symptomatic MM within 2 months of enrollment were eligible to participate. Data were collected at baseline and every 3 months. Pts who had response data 12 months after enrollment, met CRAB criteria, and received treatment were eligible for this analysis. Treated pts were stratified according to SCT status. Data on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, and initial therapies (proteasome inhibitors [PI], IMiD(R) immunomodulating agents, alkylating agents [AA], corticosteroids, and combinations) were collected. The overall response rate (ORR), as assessed by the site investigator, was defined as the best response during the course of initial therapy and is presented as cumulative ORR over 3, 6, and 12 months. Results As of the data cutoff (April 15, 2013), 1494 pts were enrolled in the registry; 1312 pts met CRAB criteria and received treatment. Of these, 439 received SCT or were anticipated to receive (had undergone a stem cell harvest) SCT and 873 would not receive SCT (non-SCT). Mean (SD) age for SCT and non-SCT pts was 58.9 years (8.7) and 69.8 years (10.7), respectively. Majority of pts in both groups were male (62.0% vs 56.5%) and Caucasian (85.4% vs 81.4%). Among SCT pts, ISS stages were: I/II (55.1%), III (25.3%), and unknown (19.6%) and ECOG performance status (PS) was 0/1 (63.1.%), 2/3 (7.1%), and unknown (29.8%). Among non-SCT pts, ISS stages were: I/II (42.0.%), III (32.2%), and unknown (25.8%) and ECOG PS was 0/1 (56.6%), 2/3/4 (14.7%), and unknown (28.8%). ORR to initial therapy and 1-year survival for the 5 most commonly used regimens are presented in the Table. A triplet regimen is 2 times more likely to be selected for SCT pts than for non-SCT pts, suggesting investigator bias in selecting more aggressive therapy for younger pts. For the 5 most commonly used regimens, 1-year survival was 97.9% for SCT pts and 83.3% for non-SCT pts. Conclusion Outside an interventional clinical trial setting, the most commonly used initial treatment regimens for NDMM were IMiD + PI + steroid for SCT pts and PI + steroid for non-SCT pts. Response rates were higher among SCT pts regardless of regimen. The investigator-assessed response rates were similar across the various combinations including 2 vs 3 drug combinations in SCT pts. Disclosures: Abonour: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: This abstract will report on an observational study. There is no pre-specified use of drugs; treating physicians determined what drugs to use and some could be off-label. Shah:Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Durie:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Terebelo:Amgen: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria. Gasparetto:Celgene ( 2012): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium (2012): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mehta:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Narang:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Toomey:Celgene: Consultancy. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment. Srinivasan:Celgene: Employment. Nagarwala:Celgene: Employment. Rifkin:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Phase I/II Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Lenalidomide/Bortezomib/Dexamethasone (RVD) and Panobinostat in Transplant-Eligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.187.187 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 187-187 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Jatin J. Shah ◽

Lei Feng ◽

Elisabet E. Manasanch ◽

Donna Weber ◽

Sheeba K Thomas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Depth Of Response ◽

High Risk Disease ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Induction therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) continues to improve with the use of multi-drug combination regimens. Panobinostat (pano), a deacetylase inhibitor, was recently approved in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed myeloma based on the phase III PANORMA I trial for RRMM. The addition of pano in PANORAMA demonstrated a near doubling in CR rate from 15 to 27%. We previously reported phase I trial data of RVD + pano in newly diagnosed myeloma (NDMM) and demonstrated the pano can be safely combined with RVD. Based on the encouraging preliminary data we pursued a phase II dose expansion to further explore the potential improvement in depth of response with RVD + pano in NDMM. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the safety/tolerability of pano and RVD in NDMM. Secondary objectives were to determine efficacy as measured by the CR/nCR rate after 4 cycles, ORR, tolerability/toxicity, and progression free survival. Patients had to have NDMM with indication for therapy and be eligible for ASCT with adequate organ function. Panobinostat 10 mg was administered on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12; bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 was administered subcutaneously on days 1, 4, 8, 11; lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-14; dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 on a 21 day cycle. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4 and responses were assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: 42 patients (pts) were enrolled; 12 in the dose escalation and 30 in the dose expansion. The median age was 60 (range 44-79); male (n=30); ISS stage I (n=28); ISS stage II (n=10); ISS stage III (n=4); 14/42 pts had high risk myeloma (1 pt with t(4:14) and del17p; 1 pt with del 17p and 1q21; and 12 pts with only 1q21 amplification). Among 42 pts, 2 completed only 1-2 cycles and 1 pt was inevaluable for response. Among the 39 pts who completed 4 cycles and were evaluable for efficacy the ORR (≥PR) after 4 cycles was 93% (36/39) including nCR/CR in 17/39 (44%), VGPR in 10/39 (26%), PR in 9/39 (23%), and SD in 3/39 (8%) pts. In 12 of 14 pts with high risk disease, who were evaluable for response, the ORR was 100% (12/12); the nCR/CR in 6/12 pts; VGPR in 4/12 pts; and 2/12 pts achieved a PR. 25/42 (59%) pts completed induction therapy and underwent consolidation with ASCT; 5 pts completed induction therapy, came off study and did not proceed to ASCT. 8 pts choose a delayed transplant approach, completed induction therapy and stem cell collection. 6 of those 8 pts remain on trial with maintenance therapy (len/dex/pano) per protocol. 2 pts, neither with high risk disease, progressed after cycles 10 and 11 with extramedullary disease and plasma cell leukemia/central nervous system involvement, respectively. 4 additional patients have completed 2, 3, and 5 cycles of therapy and are pending ASCT. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events included anemia (5); neutropenia (10); thrombocytopenia (16). Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicities included ALT elevation (1); AST elevation (1); constipation (2); diarrhea (4); dyspnea (2); fatigue/muscle weakness (5); syncope (2); MI (1); nausea (3); peripheral neuropathy (2); rash (1); DVT/VTE (3). Infectious complications included grade 2 (G2) urinary tract infection (2); G2 upper respiratory tract infection (5); pneumonia (5); osteomyelitis/musculoskeletal (3); infection (3). Treatment emergent serious adverse events related to therapy observed were: G3 pneumonia (9); G2 fever (5), G3-4 venous thromboembolic events (2); G3 diarrhea (2); atrial fibrillation (2). Other events included 1 pt each with G3 cellulitis, G3 myocardial infarction (MI), G3 febrile neutropenia, G2 diarrhea, G2 seizure, G3 hypotension and G3 sinusitis. 1 pt had a second primary malignancy - a newly diagnosed breast cancer during cycle 9 of therapy. Conclusions: Panobinostat 10 mg can be safely combined with full dose RVD in NDMM. The side effect profile with use of subcutaneous bortezomib demonstrated minimal gastrointestinal toxicity/diarrhea and was a well-tolerated combination. The combination of RVD+ pano lead to rapid disease control with high response rate after 4 cycles of therapy and ORR of 93% and significant depth of response with a 4 cycle nCR/CR rate of 44%. Enrollment in dose expansion is near completion and full data will be presented at ASH and supports the study of panobinostat in a randomized trial for NDMM. Disclosures Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Thomas:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Orlowski:Genentech: Consultancy; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioTheryX, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text