scholarly journals Varicella Zoster Virus Reactivation Can be Prevented Very Well By Valacyclovir in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Bortezomib

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5655-5655
Author(s):  
Qi Wei ◽  
Yongqiang Wei ◽  
Ru Feng ◽  
Xiaolei Wei

Abstract BACKGROUND: Bortezomib is associated with a significant risk of Varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). There are some reports that acyclovir or valacycclovir reduces the risk of VZV reactivation. We assessed whether VZV reactivation could be prevented by valacyclovir at a dose of 300 mg bid. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 108 patients with MM who received bortezomib and valacyclovir prophylaxis at the Nanfang Hospital from 2015 to 2017. Patients received valacyclovir prophylaxis orally at a dose of 300 mg bid, without cessation until finishing the whole course of bortezomib treatment. RESULTS: The median age was 56 years (range=37-84 years). 57 patients were male and 51 were female. The median bortezomib dose was 31.2 mg/m2(range=5.2-83.2 mg/m2). All patients also received corticosteroids. The median duration of valacyclovir prophylaxis was 333 days (range=38-724 days) and the median valacyclovir dose was 199.8 g (range=22.8-434.4 g). VZV reactivation did not develop in any patient during valacyclovir prophylaxis. Adverse events over grade 3 associated with valacyclovir were not observed. CONCLUSION: Valacyclovir at a dose of 300 mg bid appears to be effective at preventing VZV reactivation and was well-tolerated by patients with MM treated with bortezomib. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5179-5179
Author(s):  
Zhi-Xiang Shen ◽  
Hua Yan ◽  
Linna Wang

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma-cell malignancy and overall survival for patients who have relapsed after initial therapy is approximately 2 years. Bortezomib (VELCADE TM) is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor that has demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity in MM patients. Here we report the results of an observational study of the efficacy and safety of bortezomib-based regimens in Chinese relapsed/refractory MM patients. Methods: This was a multi-center, open-label, phase IV observational study designed to enroll 550 patients with relapsed or refractory MM. From Mar 2006 to May 2008, 500 patients with relapsed or refractory MM were enrolled from 43 medical centers in China and 395 of them were evaluated. Bortezomib (0.7 to 1.6 mg/m2 i.v.) was given on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in in a 21-day cycle, up to a maximum of 8 cycles, combined with other agents, mainly with the addition of dexamethasone (60.1%). Major endpoint included response rate, safety and time to response. Responses of 62% patients were determined by European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (EBMT). Bortezomib withheld if patients developed neutropenia fever, grade 4 haematologic adverse events (AEs), or grade 3 non-haematologic AEs, and re-administered at 75% of the initial dosage after recovery. Results: In 395 evaluable cases, the median age was 59 years (range 35–82) and the male/female ratio was 1.5:1. 90% of patients were in late stage(stage II/III) and 50% of them were IgG subtype. Patients had received various prior therapies before bortezomib treatment, including VAD (31.3%), VBMCP (M2, 15.1%) and thalidomide-based regimens(14.9%), with best response rate of 10.4% complete response (CR) and 42.3% partial response (PR) from prior therapies. 311 (82%) cases of patients received 1.0–1.4mg/m2 bortezomib-based regimens treatment and 38.5% of them received at least 4 cycles of treatment. 364 patients were evaluable for response, the overall response rate was 287/364 (78.8%), 89 patients (24.5%) achieved a CR, 30(8.24%) had a nearly complete response (nCR), 168 (46.2%) had a PR, 39 (10.7%) had minimal response (MR), 24 (6.6%) had stable disease (SD), and the other 14 (3.9%) had progressive disease (PD). Median time to response was 1 cycle of treatment (range 1–6). Patients who received 4 or more cycles of bortezomib treatment achieved a higher response rate (CR+PR: 81.5%) compared to those who received fewer cycles (partly due to adverse events). And prognosis-related analysis showed that the dosage of bortezomib at 1.0 mg/m2 or more had a significant influence on the time to response and response rate, but no obvious effect on response duration, time to progress or the survival time. Drug related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 50.4% of patients during treatment, including hematologic AEs (mainly thrombocytopenia, 22.5%), gastrointestinal AEs (24.8%), and peripheral neuropathy (22.5%). The rates of grade 3–4 AEs of them were 46.1%, 11.2% and 15.7%, respectively. Serious AEs occurred in 33 (8.4%) cases and 23 (70%) patients recovered finally. Most AEs were predictable and manageable. Conclusion: Bortezomib-based regimen is effective treatment with higher response rate and is well tolerated in most Chinese patients with relapsed and refractory MM patients. Long-term follow-up is continuing.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3477-3477
Author(s):  
Yucai Wang ◽  
Fang Yang ◽  
Wenwen Zhang ◽  
Xiaoxiang Guan ◽  
Neil Kothari ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in maintenance therapy of multiple myeloma through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patients and methods: PubMed, Web of Science, ASCO, ESMO and ASH databases were searched for RCTs that investigated the treatment outcomes (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS] and/or event-free survival [EFS] and/or time to progression [TTP]) of maintenance therapy with IMiDs in patients with multiple myeloma. Study endpoints included OS, PFS/EFS/TTP, and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for survival outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Comprehensive MetaAnalysis (v2). The random-effect model was utilized in view of clinical heterogeneity in the study population. Results: Eighteen RCTs comprising a total of 6562 patients were included in this meta-analysis. IMiDs used in the RCTs included thalidomide (14 trials) and lenalidomide (4 trials). Overall, IMiD-based maintenance therapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 - 0.99, P = 0.027) and PFS (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.60 - 0.68, P < 0.001). Notably, IMiDs maintenance therapy increased OS in the setting of ASCT but showed no OS prolongation without ASCT. On further stratification, thalidomide-based maintenance therapy demonstrated OS benefit only in the setting of ASCT, while lenalidomide-based maintenance therapy did not show OS benefit regardless of transplantation status. For PFS however, both thalidomide- and lenalidomide-based maintenance therapies demonstrated significant survival benefits, regardless of transplantation status (Table 1). IMiD-based maintenance therapy increased the risk of developing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (RR = 3.04, 95% CI = 2.49 - 3.70, P < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (RR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.90 - 3.79, P < 0.001), anemia (RR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.23 - 3.15, P = 0.005), infection (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.22 - 1.92, P < 0.001), fatigue (HR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.24 - 2.36, P = 0.001), constipation (RR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.15 - 3.62, P = 0.015), and peripheral neuropathy (RR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.20 - 3.39, P = 0.008). Conclusions: IMiD-based maintenance therapy results in significant improvement in OS and PFS in multiple myeloma patients but increased the risk of developing some grade 3 or 4 adverse events. While thalidomide-containing maintenance therapy regimens showed OS benefits in the setting of ASCT, lenalidomide-containing maintenance therapy did not prolong OS regardless of transplantation status. Both thalidomide- and lenalidomide-based maintenance therapies increased PFS in multiple myeloma patients independent of transplantation status. When more data on lenalidomide and the newer agent pomalidomide become available, further analysis will be warranted to analyze the efficacy and safety of IMiDs in multiple myeloma maintenance therapy. Table 1. Effects of IMiD-based maintenance therapy on OS and PFS in multiple myeloma patients IMiD ASCT status Survival Number of trials HR 95% CI P value Thalidomide/Lenalidomide combined OS 18 0.91 0.84 - 0.99 0.027 with ASCT OS 10 0.88 0.78 - 0.99 0.036 without ASCT OS 9 0.94 0.83 - 1.06 0.299 Thalidomide combined OS 14 0.92 0.84 - 1.01 0.090 with ASCT OS 8 0.87 0.77 - 1.00 0.049 without ASCT OS 7 0.97 0.85 - 1.10 0.640 Lenalidomide combined OS 4 0.84 0.67 - 1.04 0.102 with ASCT OS 2 0.89 0.66 - 1.20 0.457 without ASCT OS 2 0.78 0.57 - 1.06 0.114 Thalidomide/Lenalidomide combined PFS 17 0.63 0.60 -0.68 < 0.001 with ASCT PFS 9 0.62 0.57 - 0.67 < 0.001 without ASCT PFS 9 0.66 0.60 - 0.73 < 0.001 Thalidomide combined PFS 13 0.67 0.63 - 0.72 < 0.001 with ASCT PFS 7 0.66 0.60 - 0.72 < 0.001 without ASCT PFS 7 0.69 0.62 -0.77 < 0.001 Lenalidomide combined PFS 4 0.50 0.43 - 0.58 < 0.001 with ASCT PFS 2 0.49 0.41 - 0.58 < 0.001 without ASCT PFS 2 0.52 0.40 - 0.67 < 0.001 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


In Vivo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 3289-3296
Author(s):  
YASUKATA OHASHI ◽  
MEGUMI YATABE ◽  
DAISUKE NIIJIMA ◽  
ARINA IMAMURA ◽  
YOSHIYUKI NAGAYAMA ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1868-1868
Author(s):  
Jae-Sook Ahn ◽  
Deok-Hwan Yang ◽  
Joon Ho Moon ◽  
Sang Kyun Sohn ◽  
Sung-Hoon Jung ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1868 Backgrounds & Aims: Salvage therapy such as bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (Vel-CTD) showed an effective regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, toxicities of this regimen due to combination bortezomib and thalidomide interrupt the consecutive treatments in a few patients. Therefore, we compared the clinical responses and toxicities between bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Vel-CD) and Vel-CTD in patients with relapsed or refractory MM patients, retrospectively. Methods: Eighty-six patients received at least 2 cycles of treatment with Vel-CTD (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 i.v. on D1, 4, 8 and 11; cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2 orally on D1-4; thalidomide 50 mg/day orally every day; and dexamethasone 20 mg/m2 i.v. on D1, 4, 8 and 11 for every 3 weeks) and 67 patients with Vel-CD, which is the same regimen except thalidomide. Vel-CD group was only received low-dose acyclovir for prevention of herpes zoster. Results: 17/67 (25%) and 10/86 (12%) of light chain disease was enrolled in Vel-CD and Vel-CTD group respectively (p=0.027) and there was no statistical difference at baseline demographic and disease characteristics between two groups in the others. The median time from diagnosis to treatment in Vel-CD and Vel-CTD was 15.6 months (range, 2–250 months) and 15.7 months (range, 1–230 months), respectively (p=0.54). The median number of treatment cycles was 6 cycles (range, 2–18) in Vel-CD and 8 cycles (range, 2–24) in Vel CTD group, and the number of cycles delivered was 430 and 678, respectively. The overall response rates (≥PR) of Vel-CD and Vel-CTD group were 88% and 90% ( 49% and 48% of complete response, 9% and 14% of very good partial response, 30% and 28% of partial response), respectively (each, p>0.05). There was no difference in progression free survival (p=0.69) and overall survival (p=0.49). Grade 3 or more hematologic adverse events occurred in the same proportion of patients in the both group. In non hematologic toxicities profiles, Vel-CTD group (14%) showed the higher proportion of grade 3 or more sensory neuropathy compared with Vel-CD group (3%) (p=0.02). Dose adjustment of bortezomib in Vel-CD and Vel-CTD were 40% (27/67) and 41%(35/86), respectively (p=0.96). Two patients (3%) in Vel-CD group received acyclovir prophylaxis developed herpes zoster compared with 17 patients (20%) in Vel-CTD group they were not received acyclovir prophylaxis (p=0.002). Three patients showed thrombotic events (2: pulmonary thromboembolism, 1: acute myocardial infarction) in only Vel-CTD group despite aspirin prophylaxis (p=0.16). Conclusion: Vel-CD combination therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory MM is an effective and more tolerable salvage regimen compared with Vel-CTD in the aspect of comparable response rate, less non-hematologic toxicities especially thalidomide associated adverse events. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5768-5768
Author(s):  
Bingzong Li ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
Xueping Ge ◽  
Xiaohui Zhang ◽  
Jinxiang Fu

Abstract Background: Proteasome inhibition with bortezomib has revolutionized the treatment of multiple myeloma, but the vast majority of patients eventually develop clinical bortezomib resistance through poorly understood mechanisms. Long-lived plasma cells, which are supported by niche environments, are postulated to be an important mediator of resistance to chemotherapy and disease relapse. CXCR4/CXCL12 (SDF-1) axis plays an important role in the interaction of long-lived plasma cells and the microenvironment. Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) is reported to possess the potential to inhibit the expression of SDF-1, thus to suppress the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis and mobilize long-lived plasma cells from the niche environments. Bortezomib is reported to be able to eliminate both short- and long-lived plasma cells. In this trial we hypothesized that inhibition of the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis by G-CSF would disrupt the interaction of plasma cells with the environment and increase the sensitivity of myeloma cells to bortezomib. Methods: GBCD-001 (G-CSF, Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone), a registered phase II study clinical trial (NCT02027220), engaged to both bortezomib-naïve and bortezomib-exposed myeloma patients. All the patients received G-BCD regimen at least one cycle. Dosing schedule consisted 28-day cycles of G-CSF 150µg, intracutaneously injection (IC) on days 0, 1, 7, 8, 14, 15, 21 and 22; Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2, intravenously injection (IV) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22; Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2, IV on days 1, 8, 15 and 22; and Dexamethasone 20mg/d, IV on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23. Response was assessed by the IMWG criteria and toxicity was graded using the CTCAE v4.0. Results: From July 2013 to July 2014, 22 patients (10 females and 12 males; median age 63, range 44-80) meeting eligibility criteria have beed enrolled onto this study and are evaluated for response and toxicity, with 21 patients presenting with Durie-Salmon stage ¢ò/¢ó, 15 presenting with ISS stage ¢ò/¢ó disease. The median plasma cells is 32%, ranging from 5%-90%. Of the 22 pts, 19 are primary ones who had received no therapy and 3 are refractory ones who had received regimens including bortezomib. The response was listed in table 1. Of 19 primary pts, the ORR (¨RPR) was17/19 (89.5%) after one cycle and 10 pts received four cycles, among which, 7 (70%) achieved nCR/CR, 2 (20%) VGPR and 1 (10%) PR. Of 3 pts who received six cycles, all (100%) achieved CR. Of 3 refractory pts, the ORR was 2/3 (67%) after one cycle, 2 CR and 1 PR after 3 cycles. The most common adverse events observed included thrombocytopenia (40.9%, with 1 grade 4, 3 grade 3, 3 grade 2 and 2 grade 1), fatigue (40.9%, with 9 grade 1), neutropenia (22.7%, with 1 grade 4, 2 grade 2 and 2 grade 1), constipation (22.7%, with 2 grade 2 and 3 grade 1) and diarrhea (18.2%, with 1 grade 3, 1 grade 2 and 2 grade 1). Peripheral neuropathy possibly related to the drug was seen in 5 patients with grade 1 and 1 patient with grade 2, respectively. There were no deaths on study. Conclusions: In this study, among patients completing four cycles of G-BCD therapy, both primary and refractory ones, 100% have achieved PR or better. CR rate was 70% and 66.7% in primary pts and refractory ones, respectively. The adverse events were well tolerated and without special intervention. The study is currently recruiting more participants and updated results will be presented at the meeting. Large clinical studies and control studies are needed to replicate this promising results.Table 1 Response 1 cycle n/N (%) 4 cyclesn/N (%)6 cyclesn/N (%)PrimaryRefractoryPrimaryRefractoryPrimaryORR (¨RPR)17/19 (89.5)2/3(66.7)10/10 (100)3/3(100)3/3(100)nCR/CR1/19(5.3)07/10(70)2/3(66.7)3/3(100)VGPR1/19(5.3)02/10(20)00PR15/19(78.9)2/3(66.7)1/10(10)1/3(33.3)0 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3690-3690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽  
Igor W. Blau ◽  
Paolo Corradini ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Johannes Drach ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Bortezomib has been shown to be effective in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). However, the data on response to re-treatment with bortezomib is very limited, mostly coming from small retrospective studies. Response to re-treatment is particularly relevant in patients with relapsing incurable conditions such as MM. The primary objective of this first international prospective phase II trial was to determine the best response to bortezomib re-treatment in patients with MM. Secondary objectives included safety profile, duration of response, time to progression, best M protein response and the evaluation of the best investigator-assessed response compared to the best response reported to the previous bortezomib treatment. Methods: Patients with secretory MM were eligible if they had responded (CR or PR) to a bortezomib-based most recent treatment and had a treatment-free interval of at least 6 months since the last bortezomib dose. They needed to meet the PD criteria as defined by European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Patients received bortezomib starting at the last tolerated dose in the previous bortezomib regimen (1.3 or 1.0 mg/m2). Bortezomib was administered alone or in combination with dexamethasone at investigator discretion. Bortezomib was administered as an intravenous injection on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle up to a maximum of 8 cycles. Response was evaluated every 6 weeks according to EBMT criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent until at least 30 days after treatment and were graded by the NCI-CTCAE. This clinical trial closed to recruitment on 30th June 2008 after reaching the planned sample size of 128 patients, with 57 patients still receiving treatment. The results presented include the efficacy and safety data available for 100 patients who had completed at least 2 treatment cycles at the time of data cut-off (16 July 2008) or who had withdrawn from therapy for any reason. Results: The 100 patients (M: 59, F: 41; median age 66 years) who received at least 1 dose of bortezomib are included in the current safety analysis. The median time from diagnosis of MM was 4.5 years (range 0–14 years) and 59% had received 3 or more lines of prior therapy (including the previous bortezomib therapy). Karnofsky performance status was £ 70% in 16% of patients. Twenty-six percent of patients had achieved a complete response (CR) with the last bortezomib regimen. The median treatment free interval since the previous bortezomib treatment was 14.3 months. Eighty-seven percent of the patients received at least 3 cycles and the median number of completed cycles was 5 cycles. Dexamethasone was added to the bortezomib treatment in 69% of patients. In the 97 patients eligible for the current efficacy analysis, the overall response rate (ORR) by EBMT criteria [CR+PR] was 26.8% (CI=18.3– 36.8), with 3.1% complete responses, whilst ORR + minimal response (MR) was 46.4%. The ORR did not differ in patients treated with bortezomib plus dexamethasone (27.9%, CI=17.7– 40.1) versus those treated with bortezomib alone (24.1%, CI=10.3–43.5). The median time to at least PR was 43 days, with a median time to best response of 64 days. The most commonly reported related grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (24%), neutropenia (5%) and diarrhea (5%). Peripheral neuropathy (PN) was observed in 20% of patients, with grade 3 PN reported in 6% of patients only. Serious TEAE’s were reported in 23% of patients and 10% of patients discontinued bortezomib due to related TEAE’s including 6 cases of PN. TEAE’s leading to death were reported in three patients. Conclusions: Response after re-treatment with bortezomib alone or in combination with dexamethasone in heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma patients was still high, and the adverse event profile was consistent with the already known safety profile. Updated results will be presented at time of the meeting.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. A699
Author(s):  
Dmitriy Generalov ◽  
Elise Hsu ◽  
Winnie Chu ◽  
Garry Lachhar ◽  
Christina Le ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document