scholarly journals BIVV001: The First Investigational Factor VIII Therapy to Break Through the VWF Ceiling in Hemophilia A, with Potential for Extended Protection for One Week or Longer

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 636-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara A Konkle ◽  
Amy Shapiro ◽  
Doris Quon ◽  
Janice Staber ◽  
Takashi Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dose Cohort

Abstract Introduction: The standard of care for patients with severe hemophilia A is prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII) replacement. Conventional recombinant FVIII products are efficacious but require frequent administration because of their short half-life, which reflects the dependence of FVIII on von Willebrand factor (VWF). Recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) provides an extended dosing interval, as well as joint protection and improved quality of life (Oldenburg et al, Haemophilia, 2018; Wang et al, Blood, 2016), with a well-characterized safety profile. While rFVIIIFc reduces the required administration frequency, longer prophylactic dosing intervals that also offer maximum overall protection are still an unmet need for patients with severe hemophilia A. Increasing the half-life of rFVIII is ultimately dependent upon decoupling FVIII and endogenous VWF. BIVV001 (rFVIII-VWF-XTEN) is a novel investigational rFVIII therapy with single-chain FVIII, the Fc domain of human immunoglobulin G1, 2 XTEN polypeptides, and the FVIII-binding D′D3 domain of VWF, designed to circulate in plasma independently of VWF, thereby breaking the VWF half-life ceiling. Here, we present the low-dose cohort results of EXTEN-A, a Phase 1/2a study assessing the safety and tolerability of a single dose of BIVV001, and the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of a single dose of BIVV001 compared with rFVIII. Methods: EXTEN-A (NCT03205163) is an open-label, dose-escalation, multicenter study. Previously treated adult males with severe hemophilia A (<1 IU/dL [<1%] endogenous FVIII activity) with ≥150 exposure days to FVIII products were included. Patients were assigned to either the low-dose cohort (25 IU/kg of rFVIII and 25 IU/kg of BIVV001; n≥6) or the high-dose cohort (65 IU/kg of rFVIII and 65 IU/kg of BIVV001; n≥8). Escalation from the low-dose cohort, and enrolment of patients to the high-dose cohort was undertaken after assessment of available data from the low-dose cohort. After a screening and washout period of up to 28 days, patients received a single dose (25 or 65 IU/kg) of rFVIII. After a 3- to 4-day washout period, patients received a single dose of BIVV001 at the same dose level as rFVIII. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected for 3 days after dosing of rFVIII and up to 14 days after dosing of BIVV001. Inhibitor testing was performed 14 and 28 days following BIVV001 administration. Adverse events, clinical abnormalities in laboratory tests (including inhibitor development), and PK parameters were assessed. An interim analysis is planned, including the first 2 patients of the high-dose cohort. Results: Out of 7 patients enrolled in the low-dose cohort (25 IU/kg), 6 patients were dosed with BIVV001. Patients in this group were primarily white, with 1 patient of Asian descent, and 1 of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Patient ages ranged from 19 to 60 years. Low-dose BIVV001 was well tolerated and no inhibitors were detected through 28 days after BIVV001 dosing. Low-dose BIVV001 demonstrated an extended half-life of 37.6 hours, compared with a 12.1-hour half-life for rFVIII. Average FVIII activity post-infusion of BIVV001 was 12.2% at 5 days and 5.3% at 7 days. At least 8 patients will be enrolled in the high-dose cohort (65 IU/kg); preliminary data for the first 2 patients will be reported. Conclusions: BIVV001 was well tolerated in 6 patients with severe hemophilia A who were treated with a single low dose (25 IU/kg). No patient developed an inhibitor to FVIII. Low-dose cohort data demonstrated a breakthrough in the half-life of rFVIII therapy, with BIVV001 providing sustained FVIII levels that could potentially allow for more optimal, extended protection for patients. Disclosures Konkle: Genentech: Consultancy; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy; Sangamo: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding. Shapiro:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BioMarin: Research Funding; Prometic Life Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioverativ, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sangamo Biosciences: Consultancy; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer Healthcare: Other: International Network of Pediatric Hemophilia; OPKO: Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; Kedrion Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bio Products Laboratory: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Quon:Bioverativ, a Sanofi Company: Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Consultancy; Genetech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau. Staber:uniQure: Honoraria; NovoNordisk: Consultancy; Bayer: Honoraria. Suzuki:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Poloskey:Bioverativ: Employment. Rice:Bioverativ: Employment. Katragadda:Bioverativ: Employment. Rudin:Bioverativ: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fruebis:Bioverativ: Employment, Other: Clinical Development.

Target Joint Bleeding in Pediatric Patients with Hemophilia Α Receiving Twice Weekly Prophylaxis with a Pegylated Full-Length Recombinant Factor VIII with Extended Half-Life

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3778-3778
Author(s):  
Amy L. Dunn ◽  
Alexis A. Thompson ◽  
Werner Engl ◽  
Marlies Sharkhawy ◽  
Brigitt E. Abbuehl
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Point Estimate ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Introduction: Patients with hemophilia A are at risk for acute bleeding which may affect muscles and other soft tissues but characteristically involves joints. Prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) is the optimal treatment to prevent bleeding into joints and, when begun at a young age, may prevent arthropathy. BAX 8551, a polyethylene glycol (peg)ylated, full-length, recombinant FVIII built on ADVATE2, demonstrated extended half-life, efficacy, and safety for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: A phase 3, prospective, uncontrolled, multicenter study was performed in pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A without history of inhibitors. To be eligible, patients aged <6 years had to have ≥50, those aged 6 to <12 years ≥150 previous exposure days (EDs) to FVIII. Patients received twice weekly infusions of 50 ±10 IU/kg of BAX 855 over a period of 6 months or ≥50 EDs. The prevalence of target joints, defined as a single joint with ≥3 spontaneous bleeding episodes in any consecutive 6-month period, was assessed at baseline. Annualized rates of target joint bleeds and the course of target joints were evaluated by age (<6 and 6 to <12 years). The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association. Results:Sixty-six patients were treated with a mean (SD) BAX 855 dose of 51.1 (5.5) IU/kg at a mean (SD) frequency of 1.8 (0.2) infusions/week. Fourteen of 66 patients (21.2%), 3/32 (9.4%) in the younger and 11/34 (32.4%) in the older cohort, had a total of 23 target joints at screening. The number of target joint bleeds decreased during a mean (SD) of 48.5 (7.7; median: 49.0) prophylactic EDs/patient. Five of 66 (7.6%) patients had at least 1 target joint bleed, 1/32 (3.1%) in the younger and 4/34 (11.8%) in the older cohort. The point estimate for the mean (95% CI) annualized rate of target joint bleeds was 0 (0 - infinity; median: 0) compared to an annualized rate of all joint bleeds of 1.1 (0.6 - 1.9; median: 0) and an annualized rate of all bleeds of 3.0 (2.2 - 4.2; median: 2.0) (Table 1). The point estimate for the mean (95% CI) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in 52 patients without target joints was 2.9 (2.0 - 4.2; median: 2.0) and was similar in 14 patients with target joints at screening at 3.5 (1.9 - 6.6; median: 2.1). In the younger cohort, the ABR was lower in patients with than those without target joints. However, the number of patients <6 years with target joints (N = 3) was too small to draw any conclusions (Table 1). During BAX 855 prophylaxis, no new target joints developed in any patient. Ten of 14 patients had at least 1 target joint revert to a non-target joint. In 8 of these 10 patients, 4 with 1 and 4 with 2 target joints, all target joints resolved. Conclusions:These results suggest that twice weekly infusion of BAX 855 is effective in the prevention of bleeding into target joints and may revert target to non-target joints in pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A. 1BAX 855 (Baxalta US Inc., now part of Shire) is licensed in the US and Japan under the trade name ADYNOVATE. 2ADVATE is a trade mark of Baxalta US Inc., now part of Shire. Disclosures Dunn: NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kedrion: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxalta (now part of Shire): Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding. Thompson:Eli Lily: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; ApoPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mast: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Baxalta (now part of Shire): Research Funding. Engl:Shire: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sharkhawy:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Employment. Abbuehl:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Employment.

Risk Factors for the Development of High-Titer Inhibitors in 260 Children with Severe Hemophilia a Born Between 1990 and 2009: The Remain Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3774-3774
Author(s):  
Maria Elisa Mancuso ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Helen Platokouki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
History Of

Abstract The development of anti-FVIII antibodies (i.e., inhibitors) is the major side effect of severe hemophilia A treatment. Inhibitors mainly develop in children during the first 50 exposure days and are classified in low-and high-titer (i.e., peak titer < or > 5 UB/ml). High-titer inhibitors have the major clinical impact. At diagnosis however, the real nature of the antibody is not clear in all patients, since some low-titer inhibitors may progress to high-titer. The determinants of the evolution from low- to high-titer inhibitors are still unclear and the aim of the present study was to investigate potential risk factors associated with the progression from low- to high-titer inhibitors. This study is a follow-up study of the PedNet Registry and includes 260 children with severe hemophilia A and clinically relevant inhibitors, born between 1990 and 2009 and consecutively recruited from 31 hemophilia centers in 16 countries. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the date of first positive inhibitor test and covered a minimum of 3-years follow-up. Factors potentially associated with progression from low- to high-titer inhibitor development were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. F8 mutation type was known in 247 patients (95%), including 202 (82%) null mutations (i.e., large deletions, nonsense mutations and inversions). Positive family history of inhibitors was present in 37 of 99 (37%) with positive family history of hemophilia. At diagnosis 49% (n=127) had low-titer inhibitors, however, upon FVIII re-exposure, 50% of low-titer inhibitors progressed to high-titer and only 25% of patients (n=69) had persistent low-titer inhibitors. Within the first 3 years of follow-up, immune tolerance induction (ITI) was equally implemented in around 80% of low-and high-titer patients but it was started later in children with high-titers (median time to ITI start 4.5 vs 0.3 months; p<0.001) in whom daily regimens and high-dose FVIII were more frequently adopted (89, 67% vs 41, 50% and 98, 74% vs 35, 43%; p=0.01 and <0.001, respectively). Overall high-titer inhibitor development was associated with null F8 mutations (OR 2.8, 95%CI 1.4-5.5) and family history of inhibitors (OR 3.9, 95%CI 1.2-12.6). The progression from low- to high-titer inhibitors during follow up, was associated with the use of high-dose ITI regimens (i.e., >100 IU/kg/day) with an OR of 3.9 (95%CI 1.5-10.0), independent from the effects of F8 mutation type (adjusted OR 3.6, 95%CI 1.4-9.8) and family history of inhibitors (adjusted OR 6.7, 95%CI 1.1-42.6). No difference was found by comparing the use of daily versus non-daily ITI. In conclusion, in a cohort of 260 children with severe hemophilia A and inhibitors, 49% presented with low-titers at diagnosis and 46% of them progressed to high-titers during follow-up. Progression to high-titer inhibitors was associated with the use of high-dose ITI. These results suggest that intensive ITI should be avoided as initial strategy in low-titer inhibitor patients. Disclosures Mancuso: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sobi/Biogen Idec: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kedrion: Consultancy. Fischer:Wyeth/Pfizer: Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Biotest Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Speakers Bureau; Baxter: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Freeline: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Santagostino:Octapharma: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Kedrion: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy; Biogen Idec: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Baxalta: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Escuriola:Baxalta, now part of Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator Clinical Studies, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Liesner:BPL: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cangene: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Baxalta Innovations GmbH, now a part of Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SOBI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria. Nolan:Sobi: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Lack of Inhibitor Development in the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN)-2 Factor Switching Study: Preliminary Report of Primary Outcome

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1114-1114
Author(s):  
Robert F. Sidonio ◽  
Dunlei Cheng ◽  
Christine Guelcher ◽  
Janna M. Journeycake ◽  
Susan U Lattimore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Inhibitor Development

Introduction: With many standard half-life (SHL) and extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII and factor IX products licensed in the US over the last 6 years, it is likely that previously treated patients (PTPs) will consider switching to a new EHL FVIII or FIX product. Although past product switching surveillance suggests no increased inhibitor development risk, there is the need for a real-world data on the incidence of inhibitor development following switching from SHL to EHL rFVIII or rFIX in PTPs with hemophilia A and B. Methods: A longitudinal, observational study of participants with Hemophilia A or B who switched to a rFVIII or rFIX concentrate licensed after Jan 1, 2013. The study included retrospective (switched within 50 exposure days (EDs) and prospective arms. Participants were recruited from ATHN-affiliated Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs). The primary outcome measure was the development of a new inhibitor (i.e. neutralizing antibodies to factor VIII or IX) a 1 year or during the 50 EDs following the product switch. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, 10 EDs and 50 EDs. Inclusion criteria include moderate or severe hemophilia A/B currently on a plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII or FIX concentrate with planned or recent switch to an EHL FVIII or FIX concentrate approved after Jan 1, 2013. Participants with an active inhibitor at time of enrollment or undergoing ITI or switched to a non-factor product were excluded. Results: 303 hemophilia participants from 27 treatment centers were enrolled from 2015 to June 2019. The median age at enrollment was 17 years (IQR 10-32 years). 300 of 303 participants were male, Caucasian (72.6%) and had private insurance (44.9%). 74.3% were FVIII deficient and 25.7% were FIX deficient. Most had severe hemophilia A or B, 82.3% (n=237) and 12.8% (n=37) had a prior history of inhibitor but were negative at the time of enrollment. Prior to the switching, 92.1% (n=197) and 7.9% (n=17) of hemophilia A participants took standard rFVIII or pdFVIII respectively, while 87.8% (n=65) and 12.2% (n=9) of hemophilia B participants took standard rFIX or pdFIX, respectively. The three most frequent switching reasons were extended half-life consideration (n=192; 66.7%), a desire for a longer acting version (n=55; 19.1%) and less than expected clinical response to the current product (n=15; 5.2%). Among 214 participants with hemophilia A, 182 (85.0%) switched to FVIII EHL products while 23 (10.7%) switched to new SHL FVIII. For nine patients (4.2%) switching product information was not available. 72 out of 74 (97.3%) participants with hemophilia B that switched products, switched to an EHL rFIX. Eleven hemophilia participants (six A and five B) entered a second cycle of switching after the completion of the first switching cycle. Following that, four switched to FVIII EHL products, two to new SHL rFVIII and five to rFIX EHL products. A total of 193 (63.7%; 148 FVIII, 45 FIX) participants completed the clinical trial while 36 (11.9%; 26 FVIII, 10 FIX) did not complete the trial and 74 (24.4%) are ongoing in the trial. None of 303 (0%) enrolled participants developed an inhibitor, the primary outcome for this study, through data updated 6/2019. Variability was noted in per-site enrollment. The median enrollment per Hemophilia Treatment Center (HTC) was 10, the IQR was 7-16 with a range of 1-31. The types of factors associated with patients switches are summarized in the figure. Conclusion: No new inhibitors were noted among 303 moderate/severe hemophilia A/B PTPs without active inhibitors at entry, who switched factor VIII or IX products over 50 exposure days or 12 months. This result provides real-world evidence of the rarity of inhibitor development after a product switch in PTPs. The study also achieved a key logistical objective: to demonstrate feasibility of a prospective observational study across ATHN sites. Figure Legend: Factor types to which ATHN-2 patients switched during the study. Disclosures Sidonio: Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Uniqure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Guelcher:Takeda: Other: Advisory Board; Genetech: Other: Advisory Board; NovoNordisk: Other: Advisory Board; Octapharma: Other: Advisory Board. Takemoto:genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; novartis: Other: DSMB membership. Tarantino:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Michael Tarantino, MD SC: Other: President, Owner- Private Practice ; Magellan Healthcare: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical Trial PI, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bleeding and Clotting Disorders Institute: Employment; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grant Reviewer , Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Neufeld:Octapharma, Agios, Acceleron, Grifols, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Shire Pharmaceuticals (Baxalta), Novo Nordisk, ApoPharma, Genentech, Novartis, Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; Octapharma, Shire Pharmaceuticals (Baxalta), Novo Nordisk, Celgene, NHLBI/NIH: Research Funding; Octapharma: Other: study investigator, NuProtect study (Octapharma-sponsored).

scholarly journals Adoption of Prophylaxis in the United States in the Era of Extended Half-Life Factor Concentrates

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2467-2467
Author(s):  
Lynn M. Malec ◽  
Gilbert C. White ◽  
Stacy E. Croteau ◽  
Dunlei Cheng ◽  
Margaret V. Ragni
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background: Use of prophylaxis is the evidence-based strategy to prevent joint bleeds and reduce arthropathy for patients with severe hemophilia however, prophylaxis has not been universally adopted in the United States. Amongst patients with severe hemophilia enrolled in the ATHNdataset, the largest database of patients with disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis in the United States, as of 2015, 37% of patients with hemophilia A, and 45% of patients with hemophilia B do not receive prophylaxis. With the approval of extended half-life (EHL) factor products, patients and providers have options for less treatment-intense and burdensome prophylaxis. With the changing landscape of available hemophilia products, we aimed to quantify the number of patients treated at U.S. HTCs on prophylaxis utilizing the ATHNdataset with the objective determining the impact of EHL products on the proportion of patients with severe hemophilia receiving prophylaxis and to characterize use of prophylaxis according to age, race and ethnicity, geographic region, and payer. Methods: The ATHNdataset, a HIPAA compliant limited dataset sponsored by the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN), was accessed as of June 30, 2018. The proportion of subjects with severe hemophilia on prophylaxis were compared to those on demand by age cohort. The proportion of subjects on prophylaxis was analyzed by race, ethnicity, insurance status, and hemophilia treatment center region. For each group receiving prophylaxis, the product (EHL versus standard half-life (SHL)), dose and frequency of treatment was analyzed. Results: ATHNdataset included 6,160 severe hemophilia patients using factor replacements, 5,234 individuals with hemophilia A and 926 individuals with hemophilia B. Overall, 76.0% (n=4,864) of patients with severe hemophilia are on prophylaxis whereas 24.0% (n=1426) are on demand; this included a total of 76.6% of patients with severe hemophilia A and 72.9% of patients with severe hemophilia B on prophylaxis. Treatment type (prophylaxis or not) had significant associations with age (p-value <0.001), ethnicity (p<0.001), race (p=0.005), hemophilia treatment center (HTC) region (p<0.001), and hemophilia type (p=0.015) (Table 1). Prophylaxis was not significantly correlated with payer (p=0.847) with a similar number of patients with Medicare/Medicaid or private insurance receiving prophylaxis. Among patients on prophylaxis, 30.8% (n=1,462) are prescribed EHL products including 27.4% of patients with hemophilia A and 50.4% with hemophilia B. In terms of dosing frequency (n=758), 73.8% of hemophilia A patients on prophylaxis receive EHL two times per week while 73.7% (n=1,906) receive SHL every other day (Table 2). Of hemophilia B patients using EHL products, 63.3% of patients receive prophylaxis once weekly, 12.7% every 10 days, and 15.0% every 2 weeks (Table 2). Discussion: The ATHNdataset highlights increased use of prophylaxis over the past 3 years in the U.S. with 76.6% of patients with severe hemophilia A and 72.9% of patients with severe hemophilia B currently receiving prophylactic therapy as compared to 63% and 55% of patients, respectively, in 2015. Further, the majority (83.7%) of patients are beginning prophylaxis according to the World Federation of Haemophilia recommendation to initiate prophylaxis by three years of age. There has been an uptake of the use of EHL factor products including a majority of patients (50.4%) with severe hemophilia B. Although not captured in the ATHNdataset, a plausible reason for the increased uptake of EHL in the hemophilia B population includes the data that 91% of patients are able to dose between weekly or less frequently. As the hemophilia treatment landscape continues to evolve, it is important to continue to understand the adoption of these new products into practice and to examine their real-world impact. Disclosures Malec: Shire: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Research Funding. White:Biomarin: Other: DSMB; Bioverativ: Other: DSMB; Bayer: Other: GRAC; Shire: Other: Physician Leadership Group; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Asklepios: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Invitrox: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Pfizer: Equity Ownership. Croteau:Biomarin: Consultancy; Bioveritiv: Consultancy; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy; CSL-Behring: Consultancy; Genetech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Spark Therapeutics: Research Funding; Tremeau Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Baxalta/Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ragni:Sangamo: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Research Funding; SPARK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; MOGAM: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals A Practical, One Clinic Visit, Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Protocol for Generation of PK Profiles in Subjects with Severe Hemophilia a

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2480-2480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor S. Blanchette ◽  
Laura Tiseo ◽  
David Lillicrap ◽  
Shannon Jackson ◽  
Massimo Morfini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Perfect Agreement ◽  
Post Infusion

Abstract Introduction Clearance of infused factor VIII (FVIII) varies approximately 2-fold between persons with severe hemophilia A. This results in significant interpatient differences in factor levels following an infusion of FVIII and contributes to potentially significant differences in protection against spontaneous musculoskeletal bleeding in patients on fixed dose prophylaxis regimens. Aim The aim of this study is to compare two PK protocols: 1) a 6-point PK protocol with a 72 hour washout; and 2) a 2-point, one clinic visit PK protocol with no washout using the following pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters: clearance (Cl) and time to FVIII:C of 1% above baseline (tt1%) in persons with severe hemophilia A. Methods Inhibitor negative males with severe hemophilia A (FVIII<2%) receiving a standard half-life recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) concentrate (ADVATE®) were consented into a research ethics board approved study. In the 6-point PK protocol, participants were infused with approximately 50 IU/kg rFVIII after a minimum washout of 72 hours and FVIII levels were measured pre-infusion and at 1, 3, 9, 24 and 48 hours post-infusion. The 2-point PK protocol consisted of a blood sample taken in clinic approximately 24 hours after the participant infused their prophylactic dose at home (15-50 IU/kg), followed by a 25 IU/kg dose given in clinic and a 3 hour post-infusion sample. Frozen plasma samples were sent to a central laboratory in Kingston, Ontario where one-stage and chromogenic FVIII assays were performed. PK parameters (Cl and tt1%) were estimated using the 2 compartmental models of PK programs Phoenix WinNonlin 7.0 (Certara USA Inc.) and myPKFiT version 3.0 (Baxalta US Inc). Intra-class correlations (ICCs) were used to compare the PK parameters derived from the two PK protocols using WinNonlin and myPKFiT. Results 28 males (median age: 12 years, range: 2-69 years) participated. The frequency distribution of clearance and the median half-life (t1/2) generated using myPKFiT is presented in Figure 1. There was a substantial to almost perfect agreement observed when comparing the PK parameters derived from the 6-point PK protocol with washout using the two PK programs (Table 1). There was a moderate to almost perfect agreement observed when comparing the PK parameters derived from the 6-point PK protocol with washout to the 2-point PK protocol with no washout using the myPKFiT program (Table 2). Conclusion The 2-point, one clinic visit, PK protocol (24 and 3 hrs) with no washout offers a convenient and practical approach to generating clinically relevant PK parameters in persons with severe hemophilia A. It can provide information relevant to selection of personalized prophylaxis regimens that aim to reduce to a minimum/eliminate spontaneous joint bleeding. Disclosures Blanchette: Shire: Other: Investigator-initiated research funding; Novo Nordisk: Other: Speaker's fees; Shire: Other: Speaker's fees; Bayer: Other: speaker's fees; Bioverativ: Other: Investigator-initiated research funding; Pfizer: Other: Speaker's fees. Jackson:Pfizer: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Other: Investigator initiated grant funding. Carcao:Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL-Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Khoo:Shire: Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Research Funding. Blatny:Shire, Pfizer, Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Immune Tolerance Induction Using Rfviiifc (Eloctate)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3531-3531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn M. Malec ◽  
Margaret V Ragni ◽  
Janna M. Journeycake ◽  
Michelle Alabek
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction

Abstract Introduction: Inhibitor formation affects approximately 30% of individuals with severe hemophilia A. The eradication of inhibitors using immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the mainstay of therapy, although typically requires daily high-dose factor VIII via a port for up to a year. Extended half-life recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc, Eloctate¨) has a half-life extension 1.5-fold longer than standard recombinant FVIII (rFVIII), reducing treatment frequency, and also induces regulatory T cell response to FVIII in animal models. We hypothesized that rFVIIIFc would provide more effective ITI, specifically shortening ITI, than rFVIII. We describe ITI with rFVIIIFc in three patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: Immune tolerance induction was initiated with rFVIIIFc (Eloctate) in three children with severe hemophilia A and an anti-FVIII inhibitor. Dosing was per MD discretion with family agreement, and performed by central venous access device or intravenous infusion via heplock. Follow-up was scheduled every 6-8 weeks, with planned determination of FVIII half-life once the anti-FVIII fell to <0.6 B.U. Tolerance was a priori defined as achieving anti-FVIII <0.6 B.U. and half-life, t½ >6 hours. FVIII half-life was determined by one-stage FVIII:C assay on citrate samples drawn pre- and 10 minutes, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-infusion of a single dose of rFVIIIFc. Once a t½ >6 hours was documented, incremental reduction to 50 IU/kg every other day or three times weekly, once there was evidence of maintenance of inhibitor neutralization and a >6 hour FVIII:C half-life. Results: Immune tolerance induction was initiated with rFVIIIFc at a dose of 100-200 IU/kg rFVIIIFc via central venous access device every other day or three times weekly per MD discretion in three children with severe hemophilia A and in anti-FVIII inhibitor > 5 B.U. (Table 1). Two patients had F8 genetic testing. In two patients, Pt 1 and Pt 3, this was the initial ITI course, and in the third child (Pt 2) this was salvage ITI after failing to achieve tolerance due to noncompliance with daily rFVIII ITI taper regimen. In two rFVIIIFc ITI was begun when anti-FVIII was < 10 B.U. Historic peak titers were 16-422 B.U. The time to anti-FVIII tolerance was 4-12 weeks Discussion: Immune tolerance induction was successful in three children with inhibitors using rFVIIIFc, including a child previously failing rFVIII ITI. The time to anti-FVIII=0 was 4-12 weeks, significantly shorter than with current rFVIII ITI. There were no adverse effects. These data indicate that rFVIIIFc safely and effectively induced immune tolerance to FVIII in children with inhibitors. Whether ITI may be accomplished more rapidly with rFVIIIFc, and the optimal dose for ITI will require prospective studies. A prospective observational study of rFVIIIFc ITI pre- and post-ITI T cell responses in children with hemophilia and inhibitors, the H emophilia I nhibitor R esponse to E loctate (HIRE) Study, is underway. Table 1. Immune Tolerance Induction with rFVIIIFc in Hemophilia A Inhibitor Patients Patient (Pt) Hemophilia Severity F8 Gene Mutation Age at Anti-FVIII Detection Peak Anti-FVIII Titer Initial ITI Dose Time toAnti-FVIII = 0 Current Anti-FVIII 1 <0.01 IU/ml Intron 22 inversion 13 months 32 B.U. 200 IU/kg QOD 12 weeks 0 B.U. 2 < 0.01 IU/ml Exon 18 nonsense variant 9 months 422 B.U. 200 IU/kg 3x/week 4 weeks 0 B.U. 3 <0.01 IU/ml Not available 10 years 16 B.U. 100 IU/kg QOD 11 weeks 0 B.U. Disclosures Malec: Baxter: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding. Ragni:Pfizer: Research Funding; Tacere Benitec: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Dimension: Research Funding; Vascular Medicine Institute: Research Funding; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; SPARK: Research Funding; Biomarin: Research Funding; Genentech Roche: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding. Journeycake:CSL, Baxalta, NovoNordisk: Consultancy; ATHN: Research Funding; Biogen: Speakers Bureau; ATHN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Efficacy of an Extended Half-Life GlycoPEGylated rFVIII (N8-GP): Pooled Analysis of ABR (Results from Two Clinical Trials)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1177-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratima Chowdary ◽  
Lone Hvitfeldt Poulsen ◽  
Miguel A Escobar ◽  
Susan Kearney ◽  
Meera B. Chitlur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Primary Investigator ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Introduction The short half-life of standard factor VIII (FVIII) products means that frequent injections (3 to 4 times/week) are needed for effective prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A. N8-GP (turoctocog alfa pegol), an extended half-life glycoPEGylated recombinant FVIII developed for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds in patients with hemophilia A, allows for less frequent dosing. Bleed frequency is an important outcome measure in hemophilia, particularly when choosing a dosing regimen that best suits a broad range of patients. Objectives To summarize annualized bleeding rate (ABR) data from 2 clinical trials of N8-GP in patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods Patients with severe hemophilia A (FVIII <1%) were enrolled into the pathfinder comprehensive clinical trial program:pathfinder 2 main phaseAdults/adolescents ≥12 years, N8-GP 50 IU/kg every 4 days (Q4D) or 20-75 IU/kg on demandpathfinder 2 extension phaseAdults/adolescents ≥12 years, randomized to receive N8-GP 50 IU/kg Q4D or 75 IU/kg once weekly (Q7D)Patients with ≤2 bleeds in the last 6 months were eligible for randomizationpathfinder 5 main phase Children <12 years, N8-GP 60 IU/kg (50-75 IU/kg) twice weekly. ABR was analyzed using a Poisson-regression model on the number of bleeds per patient, allowing for over-dispersion and using log-planned observation duration as an offset to allow for different treatment durations, with age cohort as a factor for pathfinder 5. Median and estimated Poisson mean ABR data from the 2 trials were summarized for overall, spontaneous, traumatic, joint, and muscle bleeds. Results For adults/adolescents receiving N8-GP 50 IU/kg Q4D (pathfinder 2 main phase) and those randomized to receive 50 IU/kg Q4D or 75 IU/kg Q7D (pathfinder 2 extension), median overall ABRs were 1.18, 0.00, and 0.00, respectively (Table). Corresponding median ABRs were:For spontaneous bleeds 0.00, 0.00, and 0.00For traumatic bleeds 0.00, 0.00, and 0.00For joint bleeds 0.85, 0.00, and 0.00For muscle bleeds 0.00, 0.00, and 0.00. For children (aged 0-11 years) receiving 60 IU/kg twice weekly (pathfinder 5), median overall, spontaneous, traumatic, joint, and muscle ABRs were 1.95, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, and 0.00, respectively. Poisson estimated mean ABR data for all bleed types are also shown in the Table. Conclusion N8-GP provides effective prophylactic protection in adult/adolescent and pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A, as demonstrated by low ABRs in phase 3 clinical trials. For patients of all ages, N8-GP enables simplicity in the choice of prophylaxis dose and dosing frequency with no need for pharmacokinetic-tailored dosing. Disclosures Chowdary: Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and SOBI (publ): Research Funding; Baxalta (Shire), Baxter, Biogen Idec, CSL Behring, Freeline, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Shire, and SOBI: Consultancy. Hvitfeldt Poulsen:Lecturer on Nordic meeting on EHL FVIII (SOBI): Other: Lecturer ; Primary investigator and national coordinator on clinical trials from Bayer Health Care: Other: Primary Investigator and national coordinator; Nordic advisory boards (Bayer Health Care, Roche): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chaired an educational haemophilia symposium for nurses: Other: Chair. Escobar:Bayer, CSL Behring, Genentech, Hemabiologics, Kedrion, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer and Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kearney:Bayer, Bioverativ, Daiichi Sankyo, Grifols and Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Bayer, Bioverativ and Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chitlur:Novo Nordisk Inc: Consultancy; Baxter, Bayer, Biogen Idec, and Pfizer: Honoraria. Klamroth:Baxalta (Shire), Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Shire, and SOBI: Research Funding; Baxalta (Shire), Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Shire, and SOBI: Consultancy. Negrier:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta/Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sobi/Bioverativ: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Clausen:Novo Nordisk: Employment. Driessler:Novo Nordisk: Employment. Landorph:Novo Nordisk: Employment. Santagostino:Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Potency-Adjusted Analyses of a Head-to-Head Pharmacokinetic Study of Damoctocog Alfa Pegol (BAY 94-9027) and Efmoroctocog Alfa (rFVIIIFc) in Patients with Severe Hemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
Alexander Solms ◽  
Anita Shah ◽  
Sara Wiegmann ◽  
Maurice Ahsman ◽  
Erik Berntorp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Crossover Study ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Principal Investigator ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Advisory Committees

Background Damoctocog alfa pegol (BAY 94-9027; Jivi®) is a B-domain-deleted recombinant factor VIII (FVIII), site-specifically PEGylated with a single, dual-branched 60 kDa polyethylene glycol molecule to extend its half-life. A previous head-to-head crossover study demonstrated that damoctocog alfa pegol has an improved pharmacokinetic (PK) profile compared with efmoroctocog alfa (rFVIIIFc; Elocta®/Eloctate®), an extended-half-life (EHL), recombinant FVIII fusion protein. A single infusion of damoctocog alfa pegol resulted in 25% higher area under the curve (AUClast) and 20% lower clearance (CL) compared with efmoroctocog alfa. Owing to differences in batch-specific FVIII activity, the actual dose of efmoroctocog alfa administered was subsequently found to be higher than for damoctocog alfa pegol. Thus, to provide a more accurate assessment of the differences in PK parameters between these two products, actual dosing should be considered. In the present study, dose-normalized analyses considering the dosing based on actual potency were performed for an accurate and valid comparison of PK parameters between damoctocog alfa pegol and efmoroctocog alfa. Methods The head-to-head comparison of the PK of EHL FVIII products was a single-center, randomized, open-label, crossover study of damoctocog alfa pegol and efmoroctocog alfa (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03364998). Eligible patients were male, aged 18-65 years with severe hemophilia A (FVIII &lt;1%). After a wash-out period of ≥3 or ≥5 days for prior treatment with standard-half-life or EHL FVIII products respectively, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a single 60 IU/kg dose of either damoctocog alfa pegol or efmoroctocog alfa. Patients received a single dose of the other product following a ≥7-day wash-out after the dose of the first product. In the study, doses were determined based on the nominal potency value as labeled on the vial. In the present study, PK parameters including normalized AUC (AUCnorm), CL, normalized maximum concentration (Cmax norm), volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) and incremental recovery, were assessed using doses adjusted for actual potencies, according to the certificates of analysis provided by the manufacturers for the actual batches used. Results As previously described elsewhere, one patient with pre-existing anti-PEG antibodies was considered an outlier for the PK analysis and was excluded from this analysis. In total, 17 patients were included in this analysis, and had a median age of 34 years (Table 1). For both drugs, vials with nominal potency of 1000 IU/vial were used, while actual potencies of efmoroctocog alfa and damoctocog alfa pegol used in this study were 1093 IU/vial and 990 IU/vial, respectively. Hence, the actual dose of efmoroctocog alfa administered was approximately 10.4% higher than the administered dose of damoctocog alfa pegol. After potency-adjustment, AUCnorm and CL were in favor of damoctocog alfa pegol (Table 2). AUCnorm was significantly increased by 39% (P &lt; 0.001) for damoctocog alfa pegol compared with efmoroctocog alfa; an increase with damoctocog alfa pegol compared with efmoroctocog alfa was observed in 16 (94.1%) out of 17 patients. Geometric mean CL was significantly reduced with damoctocog alfa pegol versus efmoroctocog alfa (0.0198 dL/h/kg vs 0.0273 dL/h/kg; P &lt; 0.001), with 16 (94.1%) patients exhibiting a difference in favor of damoctocog alfa pegol. No significant differences in Cmax norm between the two products were observed. Conclusion In the precedent analysis, published elsewhere, damoctocog alfa pegol demonstrated improvements in AUC, CL and t½ compared with efmoroctocog alfa. The improvements are confirmed in this potency-adjusted analysis, while, compared with the unadjusted analysis, a greater improvement for AUCnorm is observed for damoctocog alfa pegol versus efmoroctocog alfa. These data further support the superior PK profile of damoctocog alfa pegol compared with efmoroctocog alfa. Disclosures Solms: Bayer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Shah:Bayer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Wiegmann:Bayer: Current Employment. Ahsman:Bayer: Consultancy. Berntorp:Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Sobi/Bioverativ: Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tiede:Biotest: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria. Iorio:Bayer: Research Funding; BioMarin: Research Funding; CSL: Research Funding; Freeline: Research Funding; Grifols: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Spark: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Uniqure: Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Mancuso:Center for Thrombosis and Hemorrhagic Diseases, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy: Current Employment; Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Octapharma, Kedrion, Grifols, Catalyst, Kedrion, Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Octapharma, Grifols, Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Octapharma, Kedrion, Grifols, Sobi, PedNet Foundation: Consultancy. Zhivkov:Bayer: Other: Sub-Investigator of clinical trials, Research Funding; Apellis: Other: Sub-Investigator of clinical trials; Catalyst: Other: Sub-Investigator of clinical trials; Octapharma: Other: Sub-Investigator of clinical trials; Sanofi: Other: Sub-Investigator of clinical trials. Lissitchkov:Bayer: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials ; CSL Behring: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials ; Novo Nordisk: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials ; Octapharma: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials ; Sanofi: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials ; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lecturer; Shire: Other: lecturer; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lecturer; Catalyst Biosciences: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials .

Interim Results from a Dose Escalating Study of AMT-060 (AAV5-hFIX) Gene Transfer in Adult Patients with Severe Hemophilia B

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2314-2314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank W.G. Leebeek ◽  
Marco Tangelder ◽  
Karina Meijer ◽  
Giancarlo Castaman ◽  
Federica Cattaneo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dose Cohort ◽  
Advisory Boards

Abstract Introduction: The development of gene transfer for hemophilia is advancing rapidly and offers the potential to shift the disease severity from severe to mild with a single treatment. AMT-060 consists of an AAV5 vector with a gene cassette containing an LP1 liver specific promoter and codon-optimized wild type hFIX gene that has previously been shown to result in durable increases in FIX activity of at least 4 years1. This phase 1/2 study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of AMT-060 in adult patients with severe hemophilia B. Methods: This is a multi-national, multi-center, open-label, dose-escalating study in patients with FIX activity ≤ 2% of normal, and a severe bleeding phenotype. To be eligible, patients had to require either prophylactic exogenous FIX, or on-demand exogenous FIX with more than 4 bleeds per year or suffer from hemophilic arthropathy. Ten patients were treated in two subsequent, escalating dose cohorts, with AMT-060 5x 1012 gc/kg (n=5) or 2x 1013 gc/kg (n=5). Patients received AMT-060 via a single intravenous infusion over 30 minutes. Efficacy assessments include endogenous FIX activity, measured at least 10 days after the most recent administration of exogenous FIX; reduction of exogenous FIX use; and annualized spontaneous bleeding rates. Safety assessments include treatment related adverse events and immunological assessments, including T-cell response to capsid antigens. Results : There were no screen failures for pre-existing antibodies against AAV5. The age of enrolled patients ranged from 33 to 72 years. At enrollment, nine patients were on FIX prophylaxis, and one patient in the high dose cohort used on-demand FIX therapy. At the time of submission, all ten patients have received AMT-060. The mean of all endogenous FIX activity values after cessation of prophylaxis in the low-dose cohort was 5.4% (95% CI 5.0-5.8%, range 3.1-6.7%; n=4), and stable during the 39 weeks of follow-up. Four out of five patients in the low-dose cohort were able to stop FIX prophylaxis. These patients demonstrated a mean reduction in annualized total FIX usage of 82% after treatment with AMT-060. For all five patients in the low-dose cohort, the mean annualized total FIX usage declined 75% after treatment with AMT-060. Following AMT-060 administration, one patient in the lower dose cohort had a mild, asymptomatic, elevation of ALT at week 10 that resolved with a seven weeks course of tapering prednisolone. No change in FIX activity, and no T-cell response or other possibly associated immunogenicity or inflammatory abnormalities were seen during the ALT elevation. Efficacy and safety results will be updated up to 52 weeks of follow up for the low-dose cohort. Initial efficacy and safety results from the higher-dose cohort up to 26 weeks of follow up will also be presented. Conclusions: Follow up of patients with severe hemophilia B who received either the low or higher dose of AMT-060 is ongoing. A single infusion of AMT-060 was generally well-tolerated. FIX activity increased to levels sufficient to provide endogenous prophylaxis in four of five patients in the low-dose cohort, relieving them from the need for exogenous FIX prophylaxis and resulting in marked decrease of FIX usage. 1Nathwani et al. NEJM 2014; 371:1994-2004 Disclosures Leebeek: UniQure: Consultancy; Netherlands Hemophilia Foundation: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Baxter: Research Funding. Tangelder:uniQure: Employment. Meijer:Baxter: Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sanquin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Castaman:Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta-Shire: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cattaneo:Chiesi: Employment. Coppens:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanquin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Klamroth:SOBI: Other: honoraria for advisory boards and speaker fees; uniqure: Other: honoraria for advisory boards and speaker fees; pfizer: Other: honoraria for advisory boards and speaker fees; NovoNordisk: Other: honoraria for advisory boards and speaker fees; Octapharma: Other: honoraria for advisory boards and speaker fees; Baxalta: Other: honoraria for advisory boards and speaker fees ; Bayer: Other: honoraria for advisory boards and speaker fees; Biogen Idec: Other: honoraria for advisory boards and speaker fees; CSL Behring: Other: honoraria for advisory boards and speaker fees. Schutgens:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sanquin: Research Funding. Hendriks:uniQure: Employment. Corzo:uniQure: Employment. Miesbach:Grifols: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; uniQure: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Efficacy of rFVIIIFc for First-Time Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) Therapy: Final Results from the Global, Prospective VerITI-8 Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. LBA-5-LBA-5
Author(s):  
Lynn Malec ◽  
An Van Damme ◽  
Anthony Chan ◽  
Mariya Spasova ◽  
Nisha Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Half Life ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
First Time ◽  
Inhibitor Titer ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Introduction: Inhibitor development is a major complication of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy, affecting approximately 30% of people with severe hemophilia A (Peyvandi et al Lancet 2016). Inhibitor eradication is the standard of care to restore responsiveness to FVIII; however, ITI regimens often require frequent high-dose factor injections over a long period (DiMichele et al Haemophilia 2007; Carcao et al Haemophilia 2021). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time (months) to negative titer in the International ITI Study with high-dose FVIII was 4.6 (2.8-13.8) (n=31); negative titer to normal recovery was 6.9 (3.5-12.0) (n=23); and normal recovery to tolerance was 10.6 (6.3-20.5) (n=22) (Hay and DiMichele Blood 2012). Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) is an extended half-life (EHL) FVIII that showed potential benefits for ITI in retrospective clinical data and case reports (Malec et al Haemophilia 2016; Groomes et al Pediatr Blood Cancer 2016; Carcao et al Haemophilia 2021). VerITI-8 (NCT03093480) is the first prospective study of rFVIIIFc in first-time ITI and follows on from the reITIrate (NCT03103542) study of rFVIIIFc for rescue ITI (Königs et al Res Pract Thromb Haemost, ISTH 2021). Aim: Describe outcomes in the verITI-8 study of first-time ITI with rFVIIIFc over 48 weeks in subjects with severe hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitors. Methods: VerITI-8 is a prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study exploring efficacy of rFVIIIFc for first-time ITI in people with severe hemophilia A with high-titer inhibitors. Initial screening was followed by an ITI period in which all subjects received rFVIIIFc 200 IU/kg/day until tolerization or 48 weeks had elapsed (Figure). This was followed by tapered dose reduction to standard prophylaxis and follow-up. Key inclusion criteria included males with severe hemophilia A, high-titer inhibitors (historical peak ≥5 Bethesda units [BU]/mL), and prior treatment with any plasma-derived or recombinant standard half-life or EHL FVIII. Key exclusion criteria included coagulation disorder(s) other than hemophilia A and previous ITI. The primary endpoint was time to tolerization (successful ITI) with rFVIIIFc defined by inhibitor titer &lt;0.6 BU/mL, incremental recovery (IR) ≥66% of expected IR (IR ≥1.32 IU/dL per IU/kg) (both at 2 consecutive visits), and t ½ ≥7 hours (h) within 48 weeks. Secondary endpoints included number of subjects achieving ITI success, annualized bleed rates (ABR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Sixteen subjects were enrolled and received ≥1 rFVIIIFc dose. Median (range) age at baseline was 2.1 (0.8-16.0) years, and historical peak inhibitor titer was 22.4 (6.2-256.0) BU/mL (Table). Twelve (75%), 11 (69%), and 10 (63%) subjects, respectively, achieved a negative inhibitor titer, an IR &gt;66%, and a t½ ≥7 h (ie, tolerance) within 48 weeks. Median (IQR) times in weeks to achieve these markers of success were 7.4 (2.2-17.8), 6.8 (5.4-22.4), and 11.7 (9.8-26.2) (ie, 2.7 [2.3-6.0] months to tolerance), respectively. One subject achieved partial success (negative inhibitor titer and IR ≥66%), and 5 subjects failed ITI, of which 2 had high inhibitors throughout, 2 experienced an increase in inhibitor levels, and 1 recorded a negative inhibitor titer at 282 days. Most bleeds occurred in the ITI period when median (IQR) ABRs (n=13) were 3.8 (0-10.1) overall, 0 (0-2.6) for spontaneous, 1 (0-4) for traumatic, and 0 (0-3.1) for joint. During tapering, median (IQR) ABRs (n=10) were overall, 0 (0-2.4); spontaneous, 0 (0-0); traumatic, 0 (0-1.3); and joint, 0 (0-0). All 16 subjects experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent AE (TEAE), the most frequent of which was pyrexia in 7 subjects (44%). One subject reported ≥1 related TEAE (injection site pain). Nine subjects (56%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent serious AE (TESAE). TESAEs occurring in ≥2 subjects included vascular device infection, contusion, and hemarthrosis. No treatment-related TESAEs, discontinuations due to AEs, or deaths were reported. Conclusions: rFVIIIFc is the first EHL FVIII with prospective data for first-time ITI in patients with severe hemophilia A with historical high-titer inhibitors. Evaluated within a 48-week timeframe, rFVIIIFc offered rapid time to tolerization (median 11.7 weeks; 2.7 months) with durable responses in almost two-thirds of subjects and was well tolerated. Optimizing ITI to eradicate inhibitors remains a priority. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Malec: CSL Behring: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; HEMA Biologics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Van Damme: Pfizer: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Chan: Bioverativ: Consultancy. Jain: Sanofi: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Takeda: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Sensinger: Sanofi: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Dumont: Sanofi: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Lethagen: Sobi: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Carcao: Bayer, Bioverativ/Sanofi, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Roche, and Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Bayer, Bioverativ/Sanofi, CSL Behring, Grifols, LFB, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, and Shire/Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peyvandi: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ablynx, Grifols, Kedrion, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Shire, and Sobi: Other: Personal Fees. OffLabel Disclosure: adheres to routine clinical practice

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document