principal investigator
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

272
(FIVE YEARS 69)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
María‐José Foncubierta‐Rodríguez ◽  
Fernando Martín‐Alcázar ◽  
José‐Luis Perea‐Vicente

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Taffe

Concealing the identity of the principal investigator only partially closes the success gap between white and African American or Black researchers in NIH grant applications.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3971-3971
Author(s):  
Steven W Pipe ◽  
John P Sheehan ◽  
Michiel Coppens ◽  
Hermann Eichler ◽  
Camila Linardi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Gene therapy for hemophilia A has the potential to reduce the treatment burden for patients and their care providers by eliminating the need for regular factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis through long-term expression of endogenous FVIII at levels sufficient to provide bleed protection. Ongoing phase 3 gene therapy trials for hemophilia A show promise but can result in unpredictable FVIII expression of uncertain durability. Gene therapy must evolve to meet patient expectations of a durable, efficacious and safe treatment. BAY 2599023 (AAVhu37.hFVIIIco) is the first, clinical stage adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy vector, based on the AAVhu37 serotype. BAY 2599023 is a non-replicating AAV vector and contains a single-stranded DNA genome encoding a B-domain-deleted FVIII, under the control of a liver-specific promoter/enhancer combination, optimized for transgenic expression. The AAVhu37 capsid is a member of the hepatotropic clade E family and was selected based on preclinical studies demonstrating efficient, liver-directed FVIII gene transfer, favorable biodistribution and durable FVIII expression. Here, we report safety and FVIII activity levels achieved to date in this first-in-human, dose-finding study of BAY 2599023. Methods The ongoing BAY 2599023 phase 1/2, open-label, dose-finding study (NCT03588299) included male patients aged ≥18 years with severe hemophilia A, no history of FVIII inhibitors, no detectable neutralizing immunity against AAVhu37 (neutralizing antibody titer ≤5), and ≥150 exposure days to FVIII products. Patients received a single intravenous infusion of BAY 2599023 and were enrolled sequentially into three dose cohorts (0.5 × 10 13 GC/kg, 1.0 × 10 13 GC/kg and 2.0 × 10 13 GC/kg), each comprising at least two patients. Patients to be enrolled in a fourth cohort will receive a single infusion of 4 × 10 13 GC/kg (Figure 1). Primary endpoints were adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs) and AEs/SAEs of special interest (S/AESIs). The secondary endpoint was FVIII activity over time. Informed patient consent and ethics committee approval were obtained. Results Three cohorts of ≥2 patients each (N = 9) were enrolled sequentially (Figure 1). At the data cutoff (May 2021), FVIII activity data were available for the first eight patients. BAY 2599023 delivered sustained FVIII expression levels for up to >23 months, with evidence of bleed protection. Patients in Cohorts 2 and 3 have all been off prophylaxis with FVIII products since approximately 6-12 weeks after gene transfer. To date, it has been observed that no spontaneous bleeds requiring treatment have been reported once FVIII levels >11 IU/dL were achieved. Of the 9 patients treated, 5 patients developed an AESI: mild/moderate alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations observed in Cohort 2 (n =1) and Cohort 3 (n = 3) were managed with corticosteroid treatment; another ALT elevation was reported as study-drug-related SAE in Cohort 3 (n = 1) but returned to normal a few weeks after interruption of the H2 blocker famotidine. The latest follow-up data for up to 28 months will be presented. Conclusions BAY 2599023 was designed to enhance efficacy and durability of FVIII expression with a favorable safety profile. Sustained FVIII levels allowed suspension of FVIII prophylaxis in the majority of patients, with asymptomatic ALT elevations that responded to corticosteroids, making BAY 2599023 a key candidate in the evolution of gene therapy in hemophilia A. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pipe: Genventiv: Consultancy; Regeneron/ Intellia: Consultancy; uniQure: Consultancy, Other; Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Other; Sangamo Therapeutics: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Other; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Freeline: Consultancy, Other: Clinical trial investigator; HEMA Biologics: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy; Biomarin: Consultancy, Other: Clinical trial investigator; Bayer: Consultancy; ASC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Apcintex: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy. Sheehan: BioMarin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Coppens: Portola/Alexion: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Sanquin Blood Supply: Research Funding; uniQure: Research Funding; Medcon International: Consultancy; MEDtalks: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy. Eichler: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMarin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biotest: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Linardi: Bayer: Current Employment. Wiegmann: Bayer: Current Employment. Hay: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Inspiration: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMarin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lissitchkov: Bayer: Other: Principal Investigator of Clinical Trials; Catalist: Other: Principal Investigator of Clinical Trials; Grifols: Other: Principal Investigator of Clinical Trials.


Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurelia Vas ◽  
Prashanth D'sa ◽  
Sandeep Gokhale ◽  
Tanvi Agarwal ◽  
Gareth L Roberts ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A30.1-A30
Author(s):  
N Benhamouda ◽  
I Sam ◽  
N Epaillard ◽  
A Gey ◽  
A Saldmann ◽  
...  

BackgroundCD70, a costimulatory molecule on antigen presenting cells, is known to activate CD27-expressing T cells. CD27-CD70 interaction leads to the release of soluble CD27 (sCD27). However, persistent interaction of CD27 and CD70 such as in chronic infection may exhaust the T cell pool and promote apoptosis. Surprisingly, our analysis based on TCGA database show that clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) expresses the highest levels of CD70 among all solid tumors. Despite the important clinical efficacy of immunotherapy by anti-PD-1 in RCC patients, the overall response to anti-PD1 remains modest. The relationship between the CD27-CD70 interaction in the RCC and the response to immunotherapy is still unclear.Materials and MethodsTo study the CD27 and CD70 expression in the tumor microenvironment (TME), FFPE tumor tissues from 25 RCC patients were analysed using multiplex in situ immunofluorescence. 10 fresh RCC tumor samples were collected to analyse the phenotype of CD27+ T cells by flow cytometry and 4 samples were proceeded for single-cell RNA-seq analysis. A cohort of metastatic RCC patients (n = 35) treated by anti-PD-1 were enrolled for the measurement of plasma sCD27 by ELISA and the survival analysis is also realized.ResultsIn the TME, we demonstrated that CD27+ T cells interact with CD70-expressing tumor cells. In fresh tumors from RCC patients, CD27+ T cells express higher levels of cleaved caspase 3 (a classical marker of apoptosis) than CD27- T cells. We confirmed the apoptotic signature (BAX, FASLG, BCL2L11, CYCS, FBXO32, LGALS1, PIK3R1, TERF1, TXNIP, CDKN2A) of CD27+ T cells by single-cell RNAseq analysis. CD27+T cells also had a tissue resident memory T cell phenotype with enriched gene expression of ITGAE, PRDM1, RBPJ and ZNF683. Moreover, CD27+T cells display an exhaustion phenotype with the expression of multiple inhibitory receptors gene signature (PDCD1, CTLA4, HAVCR2, LAG3, etc). Besides, intratumoral CD27-CD70 interaction significantly correlates with plasma sCD27 concentration in RCC (p = 0.0017). In metastatic RCC patients treated with anti-PD-1, higher levels of sCD27 predict poor overall survival (p = 0.037), while it did not correlate with inflammatory markers or clinical prognostic criteria.ConclusionsIn conclusion, we demonstrated that sCD27, a surrogate of T cell dysfunction in tumors likely induced by persistent interactions of CD27+T cells and CD70-expressing tumor cells, is a predictive biomarker of resistance to immunotherapy in mRCC. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing that a peripheral blood biomarker may reflect certain aspects of the tumor-host interaction in the tumor microenvironment. Given the frequent expression of CD70 and CD27 in solid tumors, our findings may be further extended to other types of tumors. CD70-CD27 interaction could thus be considered as a mechanism of tumor escape, but also a novel therapeutic target in cancers.Disclosure InformationN. Benhamouda: None. I. Sam: None. N. Epaillard: None. A. Gey: None. A. Saldmann: None. J. Pineau: None. M. Hasan: None. V. Verkarre: None. V. Libri: None. S. Mella: None. C. Granier: None. C. Broudin: None. P. Ravel: None. B. Jabla: None. N. Chaput: None. L. Albiges: None. Y. Vano: None. O. Adotevi: None. S. Oudard: B. Research Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants already received); Modest; SIRIC CARPEM, FONCER. E. Tartour: B. Research Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants already received); Modest; Fondation ARC, INCA PLBio, Labex Immuno-Oncology, SIRIC CARPEM, FONCER, IDEX université de Paris, Inserm Transfert.


Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Jepson ◽  
Michelle Lazaroo ◽  
Samir Pathak ◽  
Natalie Blencowe ◽  
Jane Collingwood ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recruitment to surgical randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can be challenging. The Sunflower study is a large-scale multi-centre RCT that seeks to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of pre-operative imaging versus expectant management in patients with symptomatic gallstones undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at low or moderate risk of common bile duct stones. Trials such as Sunflower, with a large recruitment target, rely on teamworking. Recruitment can be optimised by embedding a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI). Additionally, engaging surgical trainees can contribute to successful recruitment, and the NIHR Associate Principal Investigator (API) scheme provides a framework to acknowledge their contributions. Methods This was a mixed-methods study that formed a component part of an embedded QRI for the Sunflower RCT. The aim of this study was to understand factors that supported and hindered the participation of surgical trainees in a large-scale RCT and their participation in the API scheme. It comprised semi-structured telephone interviews with consultant surgeons and surgical trainees involved in screening and recruitment of patients, and descriptive analysis of screening and recruitment data. Interviews were analysed thematically to explore the perspectives of—and roles undertaken by—surgical trainees. Results Interviews were undertaken with 34 clinicians (17 consultant surgeons, 17 surgical trainees) from 22 UK hospital trusts. Surgical trainees contributed to patient screening, approaches and randomisation, with a major contribution to the randomisation of patients from acute admissions. They were often encouraged to participate in the study by their centre principal investigator, and career development was a typical motivating factor for their participation in the study. The study was registered with the API scheme, and a majority of the trainees interviewed (n = 14) were participating in the scheme. Conclusion Surgical trainees can contribute substantial activity to a large-scale multi-centre RCT. Benefits of trainee engagement were identified for trainees themselves, for local sites and for the study as a whole. The API scheme provided a formal framework to acknowledge engagement. Ensuring that training and support for trainees are provided by the trial team is key to optimise success for all stakeholders.


Author(s):  
Thana Khawcharoenporn ◽  
Wilaiwan Chimkhong ◽  
Varanya Roestpricha

A pre–post study was conducted to evaluate the utility of template documents specifically created to assist research protocol submissions to a Thai research ethics committee (REC). A total of 172 protocols during the 2014–2016 preintervention period were matched to 172 protocols during the 2017–2019 postintervention period by type of principal investigator and REC review category. The intervention was associated with a significant reduction in initial REC requirement deficiencies in the information sheet and informed consent form, resubmission turn-around time by the principal investigator, and time form protocol submission to REC approval. The most significant postintervention improvements were for information about the consent process and listed risks of study participation. In this study, utilization of a structured protocol template with guidance instructions was associated with measurable improvement in the quality of research protocol submissions and REC review process.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 825-825
Author(s):  
Prajwala Vasudev ◽  
Sareet Laxmi Nandeibam ◽  
Ravi Dhati Mandyam ◽  
Shabeena Akbar ◽  
Jose Thomas

Abstract Objectives To assess the effect of maternal exposure to a specific food substance in the diet during her antenatal or postnatal period and comparing the acceptance of the same food in infant during feeding. Methods Mothers were recruited in JSS hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka when they came for antenatal visits after they have met inclusion criteria.Informed consent was signed by the mother after the study details and outcomes were explained by the principal investigator. Mothers were randomised into 3 groups: group A, group B and group C. Group A mothers were instructed to consume a diet containing 200 gm of spinach per meal 3–4 times in a week in their third trimester of pregnancy, group B mothers were instructed to consume 200 gm of spinach per meal 3–4 times in a week during the first three months immediate postnatal period and group C mothers served as controls as no dietary intervention were made. Mothers were advised regarding complementary feeding pattern to babies after 6 completed months as per IYCF guidelines .In addition, we modified the diet by introducing 30 gms of cooked spinach. The facial expression of the babies during each exposure was videotaped by the mothers which was then assessed by Neonatologist and Clinical psychologist. The principal investigator coded each video with a different assessment code and the results were analysed using Feeding infants behaviour and facial expression coding system (FIBFECS) scale.If a baby accepts the food without facial expression of distaste it is considered as ‘acceptance' in any exposure. If the baby does not accept the food, a maximum of 6 exposures on 6 different days is given .If the baby has facial expression of distaste even after 6th exposure, is accounted for as ‘unacceptance’ Results In comparision between the mothers, antenatally(gp-A) and postnatally (gp-B) with the control (gp_C), infants whose mother consumed spinach antenatally showed a higher rate of acceptance during complementary feeding with a significant p value of 0.025.Statistical analysis was done by ANOVA. Conclusions Exposure of flavours to babies antenatally or postnatally did show benefit in uptake of the food during complementary feeding. This indicates that the influence of the maternal feeding habits on the child's psychology does exists, and the idea that when the child is exposed repeatedly, the dislike to certain foods may decrease. Funding Sources None.


Author(s):  
Sadye L. M. Logan

Helen Zarsky Reinherz (1923–2017), Professor at Simmons College, was a social work pioneer known for her independence, work ethic, and intellect. She was considered a pioneer in the field of social work during her 43-year career as a beloved professor and faculty member at Simmons College. But it is her work as the principal investigator on the groundbreaking Simmons Longitudinal Study focusing on preschool children and adolescents that was considered her most impactful contribution to the field of social work.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1527-1527
Author(s):  
Waqas Haque ◽  
Ann M. Geiger ◽  
Celette Sugg Skinner ◽  
Rasmi Nair ◽  
Simon Craddock Lee ◽  
...  

1527 Background: Patient accrual for cancer clinical trials is suboptimal. The complexity of applying eligibility criteria and enrolling patients may deter oncologists from recommending patients for a trial. As such, there is a need to understand how experience, training, and clinical decision support impact physician practices and intentions related to trial accrual. Methods: From May to September 2017, we conducted a survey on clinical trial accrual in a national sample of medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists. The 20-minute survey assessed barriers and facilitators to clinical trial accrual, including experience (e.g., “In the past 5 years, have you been a study or site PI of a trial?”), training (e.g., “Did you receive training about trial design and recruitment as part of medical school, residency, or fellowship? After fellowship?”), and clinical decision support (e.g., “What kind of clinical decision support has your practice implemented?). We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with frequency of discussing trials (with ≥25% of patients) and likelihood of recommending a trial to a patient (likely or very likely) in the future. Results: Survey respondents (n = 1,030) were mostly medical oncologists (59%), age 35-54 years (67%), male (74%), and not in academic practice (58%). About 18% of respondents (n = 183) reported discussing trials with ≥25% of their patients, and 80% reported being likely or very likely to recommend a trial to a patient in the future. Prior experience as principal investigator of a trial was associated with both frequency of discussing trials (OR 3.27, 95% CI 2.25, 4.75) and likelihood of recommending a trial in the future (OR 5.22, 95% CI 3.71, 7.34), as was receiving additional training in clinical trials after fellowship (discussion with patients: OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.80, 3.42; recommend in future: OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.37, 2.69). Implementing clinical decision support was not associated with discussing trials with ≥25% of patients (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.76, 1.67), but was associated with being likely to recommend a trial in the future (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.11, 2.71). Conclusions: In a national survey of oncologists, we observed differences in physician practices and intention related to clinical trial accrual. Whereas the vast majority (80%) reported being likely or very likely to recommend trials in the future, far fewer (20%) reported discussing trials with their patients within the past 5 years. Implementation of clinical decision support – electronic tools intended to optimize patient care and identification of patient eligibility – was not associated with frequency of past discussion of clinical trials but was associated with recommending a trial in the future. Given the stronger association between experience as a site Principal Investigator and recommending a trial, future research should explore how improving opportunities to lead a clinical trial impact trial accrual.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document