scholarly journals Defining Sickle Cell Disease Acute Painful Episodes: The Pisces Project

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3510-3510
Author(s):  
Donna k McClish ◽  
Wally R. Smith ◽  
Joshua J. Field ◽  
Samir K. Ballas ◽  
Claudia M Campbell ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: For research purposes, painful crises in sickle cell disease (SCD) have either been self-defined by patients, or adjudicated by research experts, most often based on whether urgent care or hospital care was sought for pain related to SCD. The Pain in Sickle Cell Epidemiology Study (PiSCES) determined that three-fourths of self-defined crises days were not managed in urgent or hospital care. The Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (AAPT) published a taxonomy of chronic SCD pain, defined as pain on most days of 6 months duration, along with at least one clinical sign, and no better explanation for the pain. We served on a similar SCD consensus panel to propose a more expansive taxonomy of acute sickle cell pain or painful episodes, informed by the PiSCES dataset (manuscript under review). Here we present three PiSCES-derived definitions of acute painful episodes, and we analyze the impact of various definitions on pain outcome results potentially useful for research. Methods: PiSCES Patients (N=81) who completed at least 5 out of the expected 6 months of daily diaries and did not have gaps in their daily diary of 4 days or more were included. Patients self-reported their worst sickle cell pain intensity on a scale from 0 (none) to 9 (unbearable), and independently self-reported whether they were having a crisis that day, whether they went for an unscheduled physician visit, an Emergency Department visit, or whether they were hospitalized for sickle cell pain. Definitions of acute pain episodes compared here include self-reported crisis days, days with pain ≥ 5, and days with utilization of the ED or overnight hospitalization (other potential definitions not shown). To meet any definition, a crisis day (pain≥ 5, utilization) had to be reported for 2 or more consecutive days. Non-crisis intervals were 2 or more consecutive days without a self-reported crisis (pain ≥ 5, utilization). The average length of non-crisis intervals was considered to represent the time between crisis episodes. For <4 consecutive missing days, imputations were performed using non-missing data to calculate the probability that missing days were crisis days. We used PiSCES data to compare various pain outcomes (see Table) for patients with and without AAAPT-defined chronic pain, for the three definitions of an acute painful episode. We note that episode length, intensity, time between episodes and intensity of non-episodes were all estimated using only patients who had an acute painful episode. Results: (Table) For each definition of an acute painful episode, a larger percentage of patients with chronic pain had acute episodes than patients without chronic pain. Similarly, chronic pain patients had statistically significantly more episodes and higher mean pain intensity on non-episode days. For 2 of 3 definitions (but not ED or hospitalization use), chronic pain patients had longer episodes and shorter time between episodes. Only for the self-reported crisis definition, patients had higher mean pain intensity during episodes. Raising the pain intensity threshold from 5 to 6 to define an acute episode slightly decreased the absolute percentage with acute episodes, the number of episodes, and the length of episodes, but did not affect the relationships between outcomes for patients with and without chronic pain (results not shown in table). Conclusions: A comparison of various definitions of acute painful episodes using the PiSCES dataset yields slightly different pain outcome results. However, these differences are intuitive. For example, chronic pain patients still have more intense and more frequent acute painful episodes regardless of the definition used. The finding of more frequent acute pain in SCD adults with chronic pain has important implications for treatment and the design of SCD clinical trials. Table. Table. Disclosures Field: Ironwood: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prolong: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Dampier:Pfizer: Research Funding.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3525-3525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keesha Roach ◽  
Robert E Molokie ◽  
Zaijie Jim Wang ◽  
Mariam O Ezenwa ◽  
David Shuey ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) has been thought to be episodic, but more recent evidence has shown that individuals in this population also suffer from chronic pain likely resulting from central or peripheral neural damage (neuropathic pain). There is accumulating evidence from human and animal studies indicating potential neuropathic pain in SCD. A number of valid and reliable measures of neuropathic pain have been used to differentiate neuropathic from non-neuropathic types of pain. PAINReportIt, which takes about 10 to 18 minutes to complete, is a computer based self-report pain assessment tool based on the 1970 version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. From PAINReportIt, a new subscale has been proposed as a measure of neuropathic pain that sums the number of neuropathic pain quality words selected. The PAINReportIt number of neuropathic pain (PR-NNP) scale, however, lacks validation in patients with SCD. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the construct validity for the PR-NNP by examining the associations between the PR-NNP and other valid and reliable measures of neuropathic pain (self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [S-LANSS] and the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory [NPSI]) among adults with SCD. We hypothesized that the PR-NNP scores would be significantly correlated with S-LANSS and NPSI scores. Methods: This prospective instrument validation study was conducted in an ambulatory research setting with 79 adults diagnosed with SCD who had chronic pain within the prior 12 months (>3 on a 0-10 pain scale). The sample mean age was 36.0 ± 11.5 [ranged from 19-74 years], 63% were female, and 97% reported they were African American. The participants were asked to complete self-reported pain measures (PR-NNP, S-LANSS, NPSI, and PR-NNoc [number of nociceptive pain words]). Descriptive, correlational, and regression analyses were used. Results: Mean scores for average pain intensity, PR-NNP, NSPI, S-LANSS, and PR-NNoc appear in Table 1. Bivariate results indicated moderate correlation between the two validated measures of neuropathic pain (NPSI and S-LANSS; r= .57, p=.000). The NPSI was moderately correlated with PR-NNP (r= .43, p=.000), and weakly correlated with PR-NNoc (r=.35, p=.002). For S-LANSS, there was a moderate correlation with PR-NNP (r=0.41, p=.000) and a weak correlation with PR-NNoc (r=.30, p=.007). There was a weak correlation between average pain intensity and NPSI and S-LANSS, r=.37, p=.001 and r=.36, p=.001, respectively. Regression analysis including average pain intensity, PR-NNP, and PR-NNoc as predictors showed that controlling for PR-NNP and average pain, PR-NNoc was not significantly associated with either NPSI (p=.930) or S-LANSS (p=.731), while each point of increase in PR-NNP was associated with an increase of 1.9 (p=.004) in NPSI and of 0.8 (p=.003) in S-LANSS. The same analysis showed that a one point increase in the average pain intensity was associated with an increase of 2.7 (p=.001) in NPSI and of 1.0 (p=.001) in S-LANSS. Conclusions: Both average pain intensity and PR-NNP but not PR-NNoc have unique explanatory properties of both indicators of neuropathic pain (NPSI and S-LANSS). These findings support the construct validity of the PR-NNP as a potential screening tool for neuropathic pain in patients with SCD. Validation of PR-NNP is important for future neuropathic pain research in the sickle cell population, particularly in cases of multi-site trials, and in cases where the practitioner can detect the potential presence of neuropathic pain without use of expensive equipment. These findings are important because pain management in the sickle cell population often includes opioids, but easy and early detection of neuropathic pain could result in an opioid sparing pain management approach in this population. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Koch ◽  
K. Zacharowski ◽  
O. Boehm ◽  
M. Stevens ◽  
P. Lipfert ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 205510292091725
Author(s):  
Nadine Matthie ◽  
Coretta Jenerette ◽  
Ashley Gibson ◽  
Sudeshna Paul ◽  
Melinda Higgins ◽  
...  

Among 170 adults with sickle cell disease, we evaluated chronic pain impact and disability prevalence, assessed age and gender differences, and identified psychosocial predictors of chronic pain intensity and disability. Most participants had a high level of disability. Chronic pain intensity and disability were significantly associated with pain catastrophizing and chronic pain self-efficacy, and worsened with age. Further research is needed to confirm study findings and develop interventions, including palliative care approaches that address catastrophizing and disability, particularly for young women and middle-aged adults with sickle cell disease. Moreover, consistent clinical assessment of chronic pain and psychosocial health should be implemented.


2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald A. Wasserman ◽  
Chad M. Brummett ◽  
Jenna Goesling ◽  
Alex Tsodikov ◽  
Afton L. Hassett

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-50
Author(s):  
E.-B. Hysing ◽  
T. Gordh ◽  
R. Karlsten ◽  
L. Smith

AbstractAimsTreatment of the most complex chronic pain patients, often not accepted in regular pain management programs, remains a challenge.To beable todesign interventions for these patients we must know what characterize them. The aim of this study was to characterize a subgroup of pain patients, treated in our in-patient rehabilitation programme, organized at the University Hospital in Uppsala, the only tertiary treatment for pain patients in Sweden.MethodsThe study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Uppsala (Dnr 2010/182). Seventy-two patients, consecutive new referrals seen at the rehabilitation program in 2008–2010 were enrolled and examined with a 41-item questionnaire of symptoms other than pain. The 41 symptoms were listed on an ordinal scale from 0–10, with 0–no problems and 10–severe problem. The mean pain intensity within the preceding 24-h was assessed using an 11-point NRS, numeric rating scale from 0–no problems to 10–severe problems. Information about drug-consumption was obtained from the medical record. The opioid medication was translated to morphine-equivalents dos using EAPC (European Association for Palliative Care) conversion table.ResultsSeventy-two patients were enrolled and screened, 39% men and 61% woman. Median age 45 years (range 20–70). Seventy-four percent of patients were treated with opioids, 15 patients with more than one opioid. They all reported high pain intensity, the four patients with doses over 150 mg MEq reported pain 5–8. There was no correlation between the dose of opioids and pain intensity. The patients reported 22 symptoms (median) other than pain. The number of symptoms reported using this scaleina normal population is three–four. The most common symptoms reported were lethargy, tiredness, concentration difficulties and headache reported by over 80%. Sleeping disorders and tiredness were considered as the two most problematic symptom to deal with. We found no correlation between the degree of pain and presence and severity of symptoms reported. Number of symptoms reported diminished when the dose of opioids increased.ConclusionsThe pain patient considered too complex for regular pain-management programs are characterized by reporting many symptoms other than pain. High pain intensity or high opioid-dose does not correlate to presence or severity of other symptoms, and high dose of opioids does not have a connection to low pain intensity. Many of the symptoms commonly reported – lethargy, tiredness, concentration difficulties and headache are real obstacles for successful rehabilitation, and have to be dealt with to achieve successful results.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-368
Author(s):  
Akiko Okifuji ◽  
Reiko Mitsunaga ◽  
Yuri Kida ◽  
Gary W Donaldson

Aim: We conducted a preliminary evaluation of a newly developed, time-based visual time analog (VITA) scale for measuring pain in chronic pain patients. Materials & methods: 40 patients with chronic back pain rated their pain over four visits using numerical (pain) rating scale (NRS) and VITA assessing pain intensity by distributing the amount of time spent on ‘not aware of pain’ (blue), ‘aware of nothing but pain’ (red) and time in between (yellow). Results: The NRS scores were correlated with the VITA Red but not with VITA Blue. The psychometric analyses revealed that VITA achieved greater reliability and sensitivity than did NRS. Conclusion: The results provide preliminary support for VITA scale for assessing pain intensity in patients with chronic pain.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5577-5577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlton Haywood ◽  
Sophie Lanzkron ◽  
C. Patrick Carroll ◽  
John J. Strouse ◽  
Shawn M Bediako ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Perceived discrimination due to race or ethnicity has been associated with a greater burden of pain among minority groups.  Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), who in the U.S. are comprised primarily of individuals from racial and ethnic minority groups, are known to experience behaviors from others that may be construed as discriminatory.  Nevertheless, the association of these problematic interpersonal experiences with the burden of chronic pain in SCD is unknown. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data collected at baseline of the Improving Patient Outcomes with Respect and Trust Study (IMPORT), which is a federally funded prospective cohort study of SCD patient (age 15+) experiences of care (n = 291).  We sought to examine the association between patient perceptions of discrimination and their reports of chronic SCD pain.  Perceived discrimination from healthcare providers thought to be due to the patient's race/ethnicity (i.e., race-based), or status as having SCD (i.e, disease-based) was measured using subscales adapted from the Interpersonal Processes of Care Survey.  Using descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable analytic techniques, discrimination scores were examined for their association with self-reported chronic pain both unadjusted, and adjusted for the following potential confounders: patient age, sex, type of SCD, self-reported ED utilization for vaso-occlusive crisis, depression symptoms, the patient's perceived severity of their SCD, and the presence or absence of avascular necrosis. Results Patients in the cohort reported higher levels of race-based discrimination compared to other reports of African Americans using the same instrument.  The cohort reported an even higher level of perceived disease-based discrimination than race-based discrimination.  Race-based discrimination exhibited significant, positive associations with disease-based discrimination (r = 0.51, p<0.001), age, and depressive symptoms.  Disease-based discrimination exhibited significant, positive associations with depressive symptoms, ED utilization (see Figure 1), and perceived disease severity.  Fifty-four percent (54%) of the respondents reported having daily chronic SCD pain.  Perceived disease-based, but not race-based, discrimination from healthcare providers was independently associated with a greater likelihood of reporting daily chronic SCD pain (adjusted OR = 1.34, 95%CI [1.01, 1.78]) after adjustment for all potential confounders under study. Conclusions While perceptions of race and disease-based discrimination were correlated with each other, they exhibited different relationships with clinical factors like ED utilization and chronic pain.  Perceived disease-based, but not race-based, discrimination was found to be associated with a greater burden of chronic pain among patients with SCD independent of potential confounders like ED utilization. While the true causal directionality of this relationship is currently unclear, our findings do support greater use of a biopsychosocial approach to mitigating the burden of SCD pain.  Efforts to identify the various mechanisms through which perceived discrimination is associated with the burden of pain are essential in order to develop targeted interventions that could improve the pain experience of persons with SCD. * Test for trend significant at p <0.001 Disclosures: Haywood: NIH: Research Funding. Lanzkron:GlycoMimetics, Inc: Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding. Strouse:NIH: Research Funding; Doris Duke Charitable Foundation: Research Funding; Masimo Corporation: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bediako:NIH: Research Funding. Haythornthwaite:NIH: Research Funding. Beach:NIH: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document