Open Label Non-Randomized Phase II Study Exploring «Chemo-Free » Treatment Association with Idelalisib + Obinutuzumab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (MW), a Filo Trial: Results of the Intermediary Analysis of the Induction Phase

Background The treatment algorithm is still limited in WM as very few drugs were approved based on studies dedicated to WM patients. In 2015, the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib became the first drug approved to treat WM (Treon et al, 2015). However, a subset of patients (pts) relapses due to acquired resistance. Therefore there is a great medical need to develop chemo-free approaches based on a better understanding of the biology of the disease to increase all survival endpoints. MYD88L265P also promotes activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway Gopal et al. reported 80% ORR in 10 patients with WM, refractory to anti-CD20 and alkylating agents, treated with idelalisib (a PI3K inhibitor) (NEJM, 2014). A previous study was stopped because of high incidence of hepatotoxicity (Castillo, Leuk lymphoma, 2017). So we design our trial with a Bayesian analysis of adverse events. Aims We initiated a prospective, single-arm phase II study to evaluate efficacy and safety of idelalisib in combination with obinutuzumab in pts with R/R WM in need of treatment. (NCT02962401). Methods During the induction phase, idelalisib was given continuously 150 mg BID PO in association with IV obinutuzumab 100mg day 1, 900mg day 2 then 1000mg fixed dose day 8, 15 of cycle 1 and every day 1 of cycles 2 to 6 (28-days cycle). Then during the maintenance phase, idelalisib was given alone for a maximum of 2 years. Pts were closely monitored for infusion related reactions (IRR). Adverse events were graded per CTCAE v.4.0. Response was assessed based on IWWM6 criteria. The analyses of PFS, primary endpoint of this study, were based on the intent-to-treat population. The safety analysis was designed according to Bayesian estimation of the probability of grade 3 or more adverse events. Roche and Gilead provide drugs and funding. Results Fifty pts were enrolled between February 2017 and July 2018 but 49 pts were analyzed (1 screen failure). We present the results of early efficacy and safety, assessed after the induction phase. At time of analysis, median follow-up was 18.3 months (range 14.9-23 months). Median age was 71 years (range 50-83 years) and 36 pts (73%) were men. MYD88 mutation was present in 47 pts (96%). Indications to treat were anemia (31%), anemia + thombocytopenia (11%), constitutional symptoms (11%), rapid evolution of monoclonal component (11%), hyperviscosity syndrome (9%), thrombocytopenia (6%), extramedullary disease (8%) and neuropathy (6%) (data not available for 2 pts). Median number of previous lines of therapy was 1 (range 1-3), and only 1 patient was previously exposed to BTK inhibitors. At baseline, median serum IgM was 2.193 mg/dl (range 0.19-9.2), median bone marrow involvement was 55% (range 10-90, n=25) and median hemoglobin was 10 g/dl (range 6.5-13.8). Thirty-four pts responded, 13 after 3 cycles and 21 after 6 cycles. The overall response rate (ORR) was 90% and the major response rate (MRR) was 76% (no CR, VGPR: 8%, PR: 68%, MR: 14%, SD: 8%, and progression: 3%). The correlation between responses and genomic status using ultra deep next generation sequencing will be communicated later. Median PFS was 25.2 months. The1-year and 2-year PFS were 90% [IC95%: 80; 100] and 70% [IC95%: 53; 93] respectively. The1-year and 2-year OS were 98% [IC95%: 94; 100] and 85% [IC95%: 69; 100] respectively. Three pts died (1 before starting treatment, 1 from macrophage activation syndrome, 1 after stopping treatment). Median duration of response was 21.8 months. No flare, no IRR grade ≥ 2, no tumor lysis syndrome were observed. Thirty-five pts experienced at least one grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AE) or serious adverse events (SAE), with an estimated probability of 72.5% (95% credibility interval, 59.5-83.9) and a probability of 1 that more than 30% of pts experience at least 1 grade 3 AE. Events that occurred most frequently included hepatotoxicity (23 AE, 5 SAE, 20%), diarrhea (4 AE, 10 SAE; 10%), skin (3 AE, 3 SAE, 4%), infections (0 AE, 5 SAE, 4%), neutropenia (41 AE, 29%), anemia (7 AE, 5%), thrombopenia (6 AE, 4%). This trial is ongoing with 29 pts who started idelalisib maintenance. Conclusion This is the first study evaluating combination with idelalisib + obinutuzumab and the first chemo-free fixed-duration association in R/R WM pts. The combination has clinical activity with 90% ORR and 76% MRR. Median PFS was 25 months. Most of grade ≥ 3 AE or SAE are hepatotoxicity, diarrhea and neutropenia as expected with idelalisib. Figure Disclosures Tomowiak: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Perrot:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria; jannsen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leblond:Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (BVD) in Patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Updated Results of a Multicenter Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4734.4734 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4734-4734

Author(s):

Massimo Offidani ◽

Laura Maracci ◽

Laura Corvatta ◽

Liberati Anna Marina ◽

Stelvio Ballanti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Response Rate ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Prior Treatment ◽

New Drugs ◽

Induction Phase ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Therapy Reduction

Abstract Introduction: Bendamustine, a bifunctional alkylating agent, exerts a mechanism of action different from that of other conventional alkylators despite it remains mostly unknown. In patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed-refractory MM bendamustine has proven to be active either as monotherapy or in combination with new drugs, particularly bortezomib and immunomodulatory agents. Methods: The preliminary results of this prospective, phase II study conducted in 22 Italian centres are recently published (Blood Cancer J. 2013, 3: e162). Here we present the conclusive results of the combination Bendamustine (70 mg/m2 days 1, 8), Bortezomib (1.3 mg/ m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) and Dexamethasone (20 mg days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12) (BVD) administered every 4 weeks in patients with relapsed-refractory MM of any age, with adequate cardiac, liver and hematological function, not refractory to bortezomib and treated with no more than four previous lines of therapy. The primary endpoint of this study was achievement of a response at least PR, as to IMWG criteria, after four cycles of BVD. Patients achieving a response less than a PR were taken off-study. Patients obtaining at least a PR received two additional treatment cycles followed by a 12-months consolidation phase with cycles repeated every 2 months. Therefore, patients with a PR after the induction phase could receive up to 18 months of treatment and up to 12 cycles of BVD. Results: 75 patients were included in the study. Median age was 68 years (range 41-85 years), 26.5% had ISS stage 3, 19% IgA myeloma and 9% renal failure. Eight of 36 evaluable patients (22%) had high-risk cytogenetics. Patients had received a median of one prior line of therapy (range 1-4). All patients had received prior treatment with new drugs, such as thalidomide (57%), lenalidomide (54.5%), bortezomib (46.5%) or both (20%). Twenty-four patients (32%) were refractory to IMIDs. Best response rate was 75%, including 14 CRs (20%), 22 VGPRs (24%) and 27 PRs (31%). Five patients (6.5%) died early. Only prior treatment with bortezomib significantly reduced the response rate ≥ PR (48.5% vs 80%; P = 0.004). At a median follow-up of 27 months (range 18-38), 45 patients had progressed and 43 had died. Median TTP and PFS were 17 and 12.5 months, respectively while median OS was 24 months (40% at 3 years). After longer follow-up, prior therapy with bortezomib plus lenalidomide was confirmed as the only factor that significantly reduced TTP (9 vs 19 months; HR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.3-5.8; P = 0.009), PFS (9 vs 15 months; HR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.2-3.8; P = 0.020) and OS (17 vs 32 months; HR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.2-3.9; P = 0.043). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 55% of patients leading to therapy reduction in 24% and to protocol discontinuation in 11% of patients. The most frequent severe adverse events were thrombocytopenia (28%), neutropenia (20%), infections (12%), peripheral neuropathy (9%), gastrointestinal (5%) and cardiovascular events (4%). Compared with younger, patients aged > 70 years had a significantly higher incidence of grade 3-4 side effects particularly thrombocytopenia and infections with, consequently, a higher rate of therapy reduction and discontinuation. Moreover, 4/5 early deaths occurred in patients aged more than 70 years. Conclusions: BVD combination is an effective and well tolerated regimen in relapsed-refractory MM. Data suggest that the optimal target of BVD maybe patients younger than 70 years who has not previously received both bortezomib and lenalidomide. Disclosures Offidani: Mundipharma, Janssen: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Bendamustine. Corvatta:Janssen: Honoraria. Ballanti:Janssen: Honoraria. Brunori:Janssen: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Phase II Study of the Combination of Ixazomib with Lenalidomide As Maintenance Therapy Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3155.3155 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3155-3155 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Jatin J. Shah ◽

Lei Feng ◽

Donna Weber ◽

Sheeba K Thomas ◽

Michael Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Respiratory Failure ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: The role of maintenance lenalidomide (Len) in the post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) setting has been based on a significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) in the CALBG 100104 and IFM 2005-02 trials, and overall survival (OS) benefit in the CALBG100104 trial. To date, the use of a proteasome inhibitor (PI) as maintenance therapy has been limited by the inconvenience of its IV/subcutaneous administration. Ixazomib, an oral PI, may provide an alternative maintenance therapy. Here we report the results of a single arm phase II study combining ixazomib and lenalidomide as post ASCT maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Methods: This is a single arm phase II study of the combination of lenalidomide/ixazomib (LI) maintenance therapy for NDMM paients post ASCT. The primary objective was to establish safety and efficacy of Len as maintenance therapy. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the incidence of secondary primary malignancies (SPMs), overall response rate (sCR/nCR/VGPR/PR), TTP, time to next therapy, and toxicity profile. Eligible patients had undergone ASCT, with melphalan as a preparative regimen, within 12 months of initiation of induction therapy. Patients were required to start maintenance therapy 60-180 days post ASCT. Treatment consisted of 28 day cycles of ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and lenalidomide 10 mg daily on days 1-28. Len was increased to 15 mg after 3 months if well tolerated. Based on clinical experience from ongoing phase III studies, the protocol was later amended to reduce the starting dose of ixazomib to 3 mg. Adverse events were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4. Response was assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: 65 patients (pts) were enrolled with a median age of 60 (range 39-74); 65% (42/65) were male. 39 pts had ISS stage I disease, 13 had Stage II; and 13 had stage III. Of the 65 pts, 47 remain on therapy and as of June 2015, pts have received a median of 10 cycles (range 1-30). The median PFS has not been reached however, the estimated 2-year PFS was 83%. 18 pts are off study: 7 due to progressive disease (PD), 3 at PI discretion, and 8 due to consent withdrawal. 6/7 pts with PD had high risk disease and received 2, 5, 7, 7, 9, 11, and 24 cycles of study therapy. Among the 7 pts with PD, the median PFS post ASCT was 13 months (6-34 months); 3 pts have died with an OS of 15, 27 and 31 months. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) included: grade 3 (G3) anemia (2), G3 neutropenia (13), G4 neutropenia (2); and G3/4 thrombocytopenia (7). Grade 3/4 drug-related non-hematologic AEs included: G3 elevated aspartate aminotransferase (3); G3 back pain (2); G3 constipation (4); G3 creatinine increase (2); G3 nausea and diarrhea (2); G3 fatigue (4). 10 pts had G1/2 rash and 8 pts had G3 rash. 42 patients had G1/2 peripheral neuropathy (PN); 1 pt had G3 PN; and 2 pts had G3/4 respiratory failure. There were no second primary malignancies. Infectious complications included G3 urinary tract infections (2); G3/4 upper respiratory tract infections (4); G3 sinusitis (1); G3 pneumonia (7); G3 influenza (2); G4 infection (1). Other AEs included G4 renal failure due to progressive disease (1); G3 non cardiac chest pain (1); G3 emesis (1); G4 respiratory failure and G4 sepsis/respiratory failure (2). 10 patients required a dose reduction of ixazomib for PN (5); neutropenia (3); thrombocytopenia (1), and hearing loss (1). 1 pt discontinued ixazomib and remained on Len due to persistent PN. 11 pts had a dose reduction in Len to 10 mg for 21 of a 28 day cycle due to cytopenias (neutropenia or thrombocytopenia); 5 pts had a dose reduction to 5 mg due to rash/pruritus in 4 pts and 1 pt due to neutropenia. Conclusions: Long term administration of combination of lenalidomide/ixazomib as maintenance therapy post ASCT is feasible with pts ongoing at 30+ cycles. The incidence of adverse events was similar to historical experience with lenalidomide alone; hematologic adverse events were manageable with dose reductions. The incidence of PN was limited to grade 1/2 events and 1 grade 3 event with no other unexpected toxicity. The combination is safe, feasible, well tolerated and experience to date supports further exploration in phase III studies. Disclosures Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Thomas:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Wang:Celgene: Research Funding. Orlowski:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; BioTheryX, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Open Label Phase II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM 018/ Asian Myeloma Network (AMN) 002 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139174 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 39-40

Author(s):

Hang Quach ◽

Simon J Harrison ◽

Je-Jung Lee ◽

Nichloas Murphy ◽

Jae Hoon Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Open Label Phase ◽

Grade 3

Background: The combination of carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) has been studied in upfront MM treatment but has not been studied in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). The ALLG MM018/ AMN002 is an open-label phase II study of KTd in patients with RRMM. This study was conducted across 16 sites across Australia, New-Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Method: Patients with RRMM with 1-3 prior lines of treatment were given carfilzomib [K: 20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 days 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from cycle 1 day 8 onwards], thalidomide (T: 100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [dex: 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, T was omitted, and K was given on days 1,2,15,16 and dex days 1,15 every 28-day cycles for a further six cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). The study had an 80% power to detect a ≥70% PFS at 6.5 months compared to historical ≤50% PFS at 6.5 months expected with Td (Kropff, M. et al. Haematologica 2012), at a significance level of 0.05. Results: This study has completed accrual. Eighty-three patients [median age of 66 years (42-85)] were enrolled with a median follow up of 15.9 (0.9-26) months. ORR rates were 86.4% (≥VGPR 70.2%). Median PFS was 20m (95% CI 15.9-26m). PFS at 6.5 months was 76.2% (95% CI 73.6-84.9%). Median OS has not been reached, and was 75% at 20 months. The most common grade ≥3/4 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (16%), upper respiratory tract infections (12%), dyspnoea (14%), and hypertension (10%). Grade ≥3/4 cardiac AEs occurred in 6%. The median carfilzomib dose that was delivered was 70.7% (32.8-92.6%) of the target dose. Thus far, 41% of patients have completed the intended 18 cycles of treatment. 21% of patients ceased therapy early. The most common reason for early treatment cessation was disease progression (30%) and adverse events (15%). Fifteen patients (18%) have died, 11 were due to MM, two from infection, one from an ischaemic cardiac event, and one from a traffic accident. QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument, remained stable throughout treatment. Conclusion: The ALLG MM018/AMN 002 study has met its primary endpoint. The KTd schedule as outlined in this study is efficacious in patients with RRMM, resulting in a prolonged PFS and a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. KTd is an active option in jurisdictions where the cost of other IMiDs prohibits regulatory funding. Comparisons of efficacy and adverse events between the Caucasian and Asian populations will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Quach: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Kline Smith: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Haemalogix: Consultancy. Augustson:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Soo:Hanmi: Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Phase I-II Study of Clofarabine-Melphalan-Alemtuzumab (CMA) Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) in Patients with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies: Determination of MTD and Outcomes.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.197.197 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 197-197 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Koen van Besien ◽

Justin Kline ◽

Lucy A Godley ◽

Richard A. Larson ◽

Vu H. Nguyen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Renal Toxicity ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

One Year

Abstract Abstract 197 Supported by an unrestricted grant from Genzyme Corporation. Fludarabine (Flu) melphalan-alemtuzumab is a well tolerated, reduced intensity conditioning regimen for HCT. Clofarabine (Clo), a second generation nucleoside analog with excellent activity in acute leukemia, might enhance disease control over Flu. We report outcomes of a completed phase I and ongoing phase II study of CMA conditioning for allogeneic peripheral blood HCT. Tacrolimus was administered as GVHD prophylaxis. For the phase I cohort, one pt was enrolled per dose level, until the first DLT or until 2 had grade 3 toxicity. Dose level 1 consisted of: clo 10 mg/m2/day on d −7 to −3 and melphalan 100 mg/m2 on day −2. Clo was increased by 10 mg/m2/day per cohort until 40 mg/m2/day. Then, melphalan was increased by 20 mg/m2 until 140 mg/m2. Alemtuzumab was given at a fixed dose of 20 mg/day on d −7 to −3. Twelve pts were accrued in the phase I portion of whom three remain in remission at 26, 22 and 21 months. Forty pts, median age 53 (24–69), have been accrued in the phase II study of whom 16 had related and 24 unrelated donors. 20 had AML/MDS (6 refractory, 4 CR2, 9 CR1, 1 untreated MDS), 16 NHL (6 refractory, 9 chemosensitive relapse, 1 CR1) 2 CLL, 2 MPD. ASBMT risk score was high in 14, intermediate in 14, and low in 12. Performance score was 0 in 19, 1 in 17, 2 in 2, and not documented in 2 patients. The phase II dose was initiated at Clo 40 mg/m2/day x 5 days and melphalan 140 mg/m2. Twenty-four pts received this dose. Grade 3 renal toxicity occurred between day −7 and day +7 in 4 of 24 (17%) pts receiving this dose. The phase II dose was then reduced to Clo 30 mg/m2/day x 5 days and melphalan 140 mg/m2, and used to treat 16 pts. One pt with preexisting cardiomyopathy and refractory AML died during conditioning from cardiovascular failure. No grade 3 renal toxicity has been observed in this cohort and 3 pts had reversible grade 2 renal failure. Other toxicities included: gr 2–3 reversible ALT elevation between day −2 and day +5 in 8 pts; gr 2 reversible bilirubin elevation in 1 pt. No grade 3–4 hand foot syndrome or VOD occurred in this cohort. All evaluable pts engrafted. Twenty of 24 pts had full donor CD3 chimerism on day 30 and 2 had mixed donor chimerism. 11 pts had gr II aGVHD, and 3 had gr IIII/IV aGVHD. 7 have cGVHD.With a median follow-up of 313 days (19–607), 24 of 40 pts (60%) in the phase II portion of the study remain in remission. Eight have relapsed, 4 of whom have died. Eight others have died of treatment-related causes (7 after Clo 40 and 1 after Clo 30). Estimated one year survival is 72% (95%CI, 56–88) and PFS is 63% (45–81%). Neither dose of Clo (40 vs 30), donor type (MUD vs related), age (< 50 vs >50) affected outcomes. One year PFS was 56% (28–84) for NHL and 68% (46–90) for AML/MDS (P=NS). One year PFS was 43% (15–71%) for ASBMT high risk pts vs 70% (50–90%) for ASBMT low/intermediate risk pts (P=0.01; Figure 1). Conclusions: Clofarabine - melphalan - alemtuzumab conditioning induces durable remissions in a substantial fraction of patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Clo 30/Mel 140 has an excellent safety profile. Disclosures: Off Label Use: clofarabine for transplant conditioning. Kline:Genzyme corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Odenike:Genzyme corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stock:Genzyme: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Pomalidomide, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone Is Superior to Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.303.303 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 303-303 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Rachid Baz ◽

Thomas G. Martin ◽

Melissa Alsina ◽

Kenneth H. Shain ◽

Hearn J. Cho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Overall Response ◽

Best Response ◽

Randomized Phase Ii ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Pomalidomide-dexamethasone results in an overall response rate of 33% and median PFS of 4.2 months in patients with prior lenalidomide and bortezomib (Richardson et al. Blood 2014). In this randomized phase II trial, we compared pomalidomide-dexamethasone (arm B) versus the addition of oral weekly cyclophosphamide to pomalidomide-dexamethasone (arm C) in patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (MM). We have previously reported that the recommended phase II dose of cyclophosphamide with standard-dose pomalidomide + dexamethasone was 400 mg PO D1, 8, 15. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had relapsed and refractory MM after at least 2 prior therapies and were lenalidomide refractory. Patients had a platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm3 and ANC ≥ 1,000/mm3 (patients with ≥50% bone marrow plasmacytosis were allowed if platelet count was ≥ 30,000/mm3and ANC could be supported with GCSF during screening and therapy). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pomalidomide 4 mg PO D1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg PO D1, 8, 15, 22 (20 mg if older than 75 years) (arm B) with or without oral cyclophosphamide 400 mg PO D1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle (arm C). Patients randomized to arm B were allowed to cross over to arm C in the event of disease progression. Thromboprophylaxis was mandated with aspirin, warfarin, or LMWH. The primary endpoint was overall response rate using IMWG criteria. Secondary endpoints included an evaluation of PFS, OS and safety of the two arms. Results: Between 7/2012 and 3/2014, 36 patients were randomized to arm B and 34 to arm C. Patients characteristics were not different between the 2 arms (table below). The median number of prior therapies was 4 (2-12). All patients were lenalidomide refractory and none received prior pomalidomide. After a median follow up of 15 months, the overall response rate (partial response or better) was 39% and 65% (p=0.03) for arm B and C, respectively. The clinical benefit rate (minimal response or better) was 64% and 79% (p=0.2) for arm B and C, respectively. The median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 2.3-5.9) for arm B and 9.2 months (95% CI 4.6-16) for arm C (log rank p=0.04). As of July 2014, 28 patients had died (16 arm B, 12 arm C) with median overall survival of 10.5 versus 16.4 months (p=0.08) for arm B and C, respectively. Hematologic grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent in arm C, although this was not statistically significant (see table). Thirteen patients crossed over and oral weekly cyclophosphamide was added to their tolerated dose of pomalidomide dexamethasone. For those patients, the best response was as follows: 2 PR, 2 MR, and 6 SD, 3 PD. Conclusions: Pomalidomide-dexamethasone in combination with oral weekly cyclophosphamide resulted in a superior response rate and PFS compared to pomalidomide-dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. The increased hematologic toxicities, as a result of the addition of oral cyclophosphamide, were manageable. Table Arm B (N=36) Arm C (N=34) P value Age, years, median (range) 63 (50-78) 64 (47-80) 0.7 Male, n (%) 23 (64) 18 (53) 0.3 Number of prior therapies, median (range) 4 (2-12) 4 (2-9) 0.5 Bortezomib refractory, n (%) 28 (78) 24 (71) 0.3 Carfilzomib refractory, n (%) 16 (44) 13 (38) 0.5 Prior high-dose therapy, n (%) 27 (75) 28 (82) 0.6 Prior alkylating agent, n (%) 32 (89) 32 (94) 1 B2-microglobulin, median (range) 3.2 (1.6-10) 3.6 (1.5-13.9) 0.5 Serum creatinine, median (range) 1 (0.5-2.3) 0.9 (0.6-2.1) 0.6 High-risk cytogenetics, n (%) 5 (24) 6 (28) 0.8 Deletion 17p, n (%) 3 (14) 4 (20) 0.8 t(4;14), n (%) 3 (14) 3 (14) 0.9 Trisomy or tetrasomy 1q, n (%) 11 (55) 6 (33) 0.4 Best response (partial response or better), n (%) 14 (39) 22 (65) 0.03 Clinical benefit rate (MR or better), n (%) 23 (64) 27 (79) 0.2 Grade 3/4 neutropenia, n (%) 12 (33) 17 (50) 0.2 Grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia, n (%) 4 (11) 6 (18) 0.5 Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, n (%) 2 (5) 5 (15) 0.2 Grade 3/4 anemia, n (%) 3 (8) 7 (20) 0.2 Grade 3/4 pneumonia, n (%) 4 (11) 3 (9) 1 Grade 3/4 fatigue, n (%) 2 (5) 4 (12) 0.4 Number of serious adverse events 17 20 Disclosures Baz: Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Karypharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide cyclophosphamide dexamethasone in relapsed refractory myeloma. Martin:Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Alsina:Triphase: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Shain:Onyx / Amgen: Research Funding; Treshold: Research Funding. Chari:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jagannath:Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Multi-institutional phase II study of carboplatin-gemcitabine combination chemotherapy in elderly patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.18179 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 18179-18179

Author(s):

J. Sasaki ◽

H. Uramoto ◽

K. Kashiwabara ◽

H. Kishi ◽

E. Moriyam ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase Ii ◽

Combination Chemotherapy ◽

Advanced Nsclc ◽

Response Rate ◽

Group Performance ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Single Agent ◽

Objective Response ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Grade 3

18179 Background: Because elderly pts may tolerate platinum-based combination chemotherapy poorly, single-agent chemotherapy is selected for the treatment regimen. However, retrospective subgroup analyses have consistently indicated that elderly pts indeed benefit from platinum-based combination chemotherapy as well as their younger counterparts. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of carboplatin-gemcitabine combination chemotherapy in elderly pts with advanced NSCLC. Methods: Fifty-four pts aged more than 70 years old (median, 77; range, 70–88) with previously untreated advanced NSCLC were enrolled on this trial. Additional criteria included the presence of measurable lesions, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Pts received carboplatin at an area under the curve of 4 mg/ml/min on the first day and gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 on the first and eighth day of consecutive 3 week periods. The primary endpoint was to determine the objective response rate of this platinum-doublet regimen. The RECIST criteria were used to measure response. Results: Enrolled pts included 15/39 with stage IIIB/IV diseases. Fifty-one out of enrolled pts were eligible for efficacy and safety analyses. The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range, 1–7). Fifteen partial responses (response rate: 29%) were obtained. The median TTP was 118 days. Hematological toxicities of grade 3/4 included leukopenia (46%), neutropenia (72%) and thrombocytopenia (50%). Non-hematological toxicities of grade 3/4 included nausea (6%), appetite loss (7%), fatigue (7%) and infection (9%). Conclusions: The combination carboplatin-gemcitabine at these doses has shown activity with a favorable toxicity profile for fit elderly pts with advanced NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

A Randomized Phase II Study of Azacitidine Combined with Lenalidomide or with Vorinostat Vs. Azacitidine Monotherapy in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML): North American Intergroup Study SWOG S1117

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.lba-5.lba-5 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. LBA-5-LBA-5 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Megan Othus ◽

Alan F. List ◽

Olatoyosi Odenike ◽

Richard M. Stone ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

International Prognostic Scoring System ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

N Rates

Abstract Background: Higher-risk MDS and CMML comprise a spectrum of disorders associated with cytopenias, high risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and truncated survival. Initial treatment with a hypomethylating agent such as azacitidine (AZA) is considered standard of care. Whether addition of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (VOR), which acts synergistically with AZA to reactivate epigenetically silenced genes, or addition of lenalidomide (LEN), which impacts the bone marrow microenvironment, improves response rates compared to AZA monotherapy is unknown. Methods: This Phase II study (ClinTrials.gov # NCT01522976) randomized higher-risk MDS (International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Int-2 or High and/or bone marrow blasts >5%) and CMML patients (pts) with <20% blasts to receive AZA (75 mg/m2/d on d1-7 of a 28d cycle), AZA + LEN (10 mg/d on d1-21), or AZA + VOR (300 mg BID on d3-9). Eligibility criteria included: >18 years (yrs), no previous allogeneic transplant, no prior treatment with any of the study drugs, and adequate organ function; therapy-related (t)MDS was allowed. Pts continued treatment until disease progression, relapse, unacceptable toxicity, or lack of response. Dose reductions occurred for unresolved grade >3 adverse events (per NCI CTCAE) or delayed count recovery. The primary endpoint was improvement in overall response rate (ORR), by intention to treat and reviewed centrally, of one of the combination arms vs. AZA monotherapy per 2006 International Working Group MDS response criteria (complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + hematologic improvement (HI)). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was from time of response. The study had 81% power to detect a 20% improvement in ORR from 35% to 55%. Results: Of 282 pts enrolled from 3/12–6/14, 276 are included in analyses (6 ineligible pts excluded): 92 on the AZA arm, 93 on AZA+LEN, and 91 on AZA+VOR. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced across arms (Table). Pts received a median of 23 weeks of therapy: 25 of AZA; 24 of AZA+LEN; and 20 of AZA+VOR and were followed for a median of 9 months (range: 0-26). Numbers of pts with notable adverse events >grade 3 for AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR included febrile neutropenia (10:13:13); gastrointestinal disorders (4:11:23); infections (2:3:3); and rash (2:12:1). Responses were assessable in 260 pts (94%). ORR for the entire cohort was 33%: 19% CR, 1% PR, and 13% HI, with a median RFS of 7 months. ORR was similar across study arms: 36% for AZA, 37% for AZA+LEN (p=1.0 vs. AZA), and 22% for AZA+VOR (p=.07 vs. AZA). CR/PR/HI rates across arms were also similar: 23%/0%/13% for AZA; 18%/1%/17% for AZA+LEN (CR p=.47 vs. AZA); and 14%/1%/7% for AZA+VOR (CR p=.18 vs. AZA); rates of bone marrow exams to assess response were 76%, 67%, and 73%, respectively. HI-P/HI-E/HI-N rates were 21%/15%/5% for AZA, 26%/14%/15% for AZA+LEN, and 12%/8%/4% for AZA+VOR. HI-N rates were higher in AZA+LEN vs. AZA (p=.05) but otherwise were similar across arms. Median time to best response across arms was 15 weeks in AZA, 16 weeks in AZA+LEN, and 16 weeks in AZA+VOR. ORR did not vary significantly across arms in subgroup analyses for tMDS, baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependence, and by IPSS risk group. ORR for CMML pts for AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR was 33%:53%(p=.15 vs. AZA):12%(p=.41 vs. AZA). Allogeneic transplantation rates were: 7 pts on AZA, 6 on AZA+LEN, and 9 on AZA+VOR. For AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR, median RFS was: 6:8:11 months (log-rank p=.3 for combination arms vs. AZA, Figure); and for pts on therapy >6 months, it was 7:7.5:13 months (log-rank p=.11 for AZA+VOR, .74 for AZA+LEN vs. AZA). Conclusions: In higher-risk MDS pts, ORR was similar for AZA monotherapy compared to AZA-containing combination arms, though some subgroups may have benefitted from combination therapy. Differences in types of response may have resulted from differential rates of follow-up bone marrow assessments. While a non-significant signal of a DFS advantage for combination therapy was observed, longer-term outcome data are being assessed. Table Table. Figure Figure. Disclosures Sekeres: Boehringer-Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: lenalidomide, vorinostat for higher-risk MDS. List:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Attar:Celgene: Consultancy. Erba:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase I/II Trial Of Everolimus, Bortezomib and Rituximab In Relapsed Or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4402.4402 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4402-4402 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Irene M. Ghobrial ◽

Erica N Boswell ◽

Stacey Chuma ◽

Ranjit Banwait ◽

Courtney Hanlon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Complete Response ◽

Recommended Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction The phase I aimed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of the combination of everolimus and rituximab, or everolimus, bortezomib, and rituximab and the phase II study aimed to examine response and safety of the combination of all 3 agents in relapsed and/or relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia. This trial was based on our preclinical studies that demonstrated synergistic activity of everolimus and bortezomib with rituximab in WM. Methods Eligibility criteria include: 1) patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory WM with any number of prior lines of therapy, including everolimus and bortezomib 2) not completely refractory to rituximab 3) measurable disease by monoclonal IgM protein in the serum and lymphoplasmacytic cells in the bone marrow, 4) Not receiving chemotherapy > 3 weeks, or biological/novel therapy for WM > 2 weeks. A cycle is 28 days and a total of 6 cycles are given, followed by everolimus maintenance until Progression. The phase I trial included two stages with a total of four dose levels. In stage A, patients received everolimus at the recommended dose orally daily for 28 days and rituximab at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days at cycle 1 and 4 only. In stage B, patients received everolimus at the recommended dose orally daily for 28 days, bortezomib at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days, and rituximab at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days at cycle 1 and 4 only. For the phase II study, patients received everolimus 10 mg daily, bortezomib IV 1.6mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days, and rituximab 375mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days at cycle 1 and 4 only. Patients were assessed for response after every cycle. Subjects who had a response continued on therapy for a total of 6 cycles, and then continued on to maintenance therapy with everolimus alone until progression Results Forty-Six patients were enrolled in this phase I/II clinical trial from April 2009 to July 2013. The median age is 65 (range, 47–84) yrs and the median lines of prior therapy is 5 (range, 1–9) with 45 (98%) patients receiving prior rituximab and 23 (50%) receiving prior bortezomib. The median number of cycles on therapy was 19.5 (range, 0–39). Overall, this combination therapy is very well tolerated. Grade 4 toxicities included: neutropenia (4.3%), leukopenia (2.2%), thrombocytopenia (13%), lymphopenia (2.2%) and hypertriglyceridemia (2.2%). Grade 3 toxicities included: neutropenia (13%), leukopenia (13%), anemia (10.9%), lymphopenia (8.7%), pneumonitis (4.3%), SGPT (4.3%), neuropathy (4.3%), Herpes zoster reactivation (4.3%), (2.2%) bacterial endocarditis, (2.2%) congestive heart failure, (2.2%) hearing loss, hyperglycemia (4.3%) hypernatremia (4.3%) and 1(2.2%) subject had an incarcerated inguinal hernia with small bowel obstruction. Two patients discontinued therapy due to grade 3 anemia. For the phase II study, sixteen patients are currently evaluable for response, including 2 (13%) complete response (CR), 11 (68%) partial response and 1 (6%) minimal response (MR), for an overall response rate including MR of 14/16 (88%) in this relapsed/refractory population. Furthermore, overall response including MR in phase I was 1/23 (4%) complete response, 7/23 (30%) partial response and 10/23 (43%) minimal response. In phase II 1/23 (4%) complete response, 14/23 (61%) partial response and 2/23 (9%) minimal response. Additionally, 8 (17%) patients achieved stable disease. Conclusions The combination of everolimus, bortezomib, and rituximab is generally well tolerated, and importantly no grade 3/4 neuropathy was seen. The responses observed to date indicate that this combination is highly effective in this relapsed/refractory population. This study was supported from the FDA Office of Orphan Products Development and by Millennium/Takeda and Novartis Inc. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Treon:Millennium: Consultancy. Matous:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Final Results of the Phase I/II Study of Chemosensitization Using the CXCR4 Inhibitor Plerixafor in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4256.4256 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4256-4256 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Irene M. Ghobrial ◽

Kenneth H. Shain ◽

Jacob Laubach ◽

Patrick Henrick ◽

James Vredenburg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Response Rate ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Median Number ◽

Recommended Dose ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine activity and safety of the CXCR4 inhibitor plerixafor in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM). This was based on our preclinical studies showing that plerixafor (Mozobil, Sanofi Corporation) induces de-adhesion of MM cells and sensitization to bortezomib in preclinical animal models. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Theprimary endpoint of the phase I study was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and for the phase II study, the safety and response rate of the combination. Eligibility criteria included patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM with 1-5 prior lines of therapy including bortezomib (unless patients were refractory to bortezomib). The phase I included 8 cohorts with different doses and two treatment schedules. In cohorts 1-5, patients received plerixafor at the recommended dose sq on days 1-6 of each cycle and bortezomib at the recommended dose twice a week on days 3, 6, 10, and 13 every 21 days. In cohort 5b-6, plerixafor was given at the recommended dose sq on days 1, 3, 6, 10, and 13 and bortezomib was given at the recommended dose twice a week on days 3, 6, 10, and 13 every 21 days. For the phase II portion patients received plerixafor at the MTD established in phase I of trial, 320 mcg/kg sq on days 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, and 13. Bortezomib was given 1.3 mg/m2 IV or sq twice a week on days 3, 6, 10, 13, every 21 days. Dexamethasone was given at 40mg on days of Bortezomib. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were enrolled on this study from June 2009 to March 2015, with 25 on the phase I and 33 on the phase II study. In the phase I study, the median age was 60 years (range, 43-85), the median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-4), with all but 3 patients receiving prior bortezomib. The median number of cycles on therapy was 4 (1-12). Dose limiting toxicities including insomnia, restlessness, and psychosis were observed in two patients at dose level 6 (plerixafor 0.40 mg/kg and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2). Therefore, 3 additional patients were enrolled at dose level 5b (plerixafor 0.32 mg/kg and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2). There were no grade 4 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicities included lymphopenia (40%), hypophosphatemia (20%), anemia (10%), hyponatremia (10%), hypercalcemia (10%), and bone fracture due to myeloma bone disease (10%). Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response, including 1 (4%) complete response (CR), 1 (4%) very good partial response (VGPR), 1 partial remission (PR) and 2 (9%) MR, and 15 (65%) having stable disease with only 3 (13%) progressive disease (PD). In the phase II study, the median age was 63 (46-83). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (1-5), with 22 (66%) who have received prior bortezomib. The median number of cycles on therapy is 5 (1-24). The response rate included 5 VGPR (16%), 11 PR (35%) with an overall response rate of 51% and another 11 (35%) stable disease. Grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (68%), lymphopenia (6%), hypophosphatemia (2%), anemia (4%), infections (4%), hyponatremia (2%), hypercalcemia (2%) and neurological toxicity (2%). We also examined in vivo mobilization of plasma cells, CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells and other accessory bone marrow cells. Analysis of these samples showed rapid mobilization of plasma cells at 2 hours post-plerixafor with a rapid return to normal levels at 4 and 24 hours post plerixafor. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of plerixafor and bortezomib is generally well tolerated with minimal neuropathy or other toxicities seen to date. The responses observed are strongly encouraging with 51% ORR in this relapsed and refractory population. This study was supported by R01CA133799-01, and by Sanofi and Takeda Corporations. Disclosures Off Label Use: Plerixafor in myeloma. Azab:Verastem: Research Funding; Selexys: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Cell Works: Research Funding; Targeted Therapeutics LLC: Other: Founder and owner . Schlossman:Millennium: Consultancy. Richardson:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib in Combination with Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin and Thalidomide (VDT), An Effective Steroid Independent Regimen for Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients: Final Result of a Phase II Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.618.618 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 618-618

Author(s):

Taimur Sher ◽

Kena C Miller ◽

Sikander Ailawadhi ◽

Debbie Manfredi ◽

Margaret Wood ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Toxicity ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 618 Introduction: Steroids have been an important component of multiple myeloma (MM) therapeutics. High doses steroids as used in MM are associated with significant toxicity and morbidity. Development of steroid independent or steroid-lite regimens remains an important area of investigation in MM. Orlowski et al combined Doxil (D) with bortezomib (V) and showed enhanced anti-myeloma activity. In a phase II study in relapsed refractory MM patients, we observed further improvement in clinical efficacy with addition of thalidomide (T) to VD combination (VDT regimen). Encouraged by high response rates of this steroid sparing novel combination we investigated VDT regimen in treatment naïve MM patients. Final results of this phase II trial are reported here. Methods: Patients with previously untreated MM were eligible for this phase II trial. VDT regimen (V 1.3mg/m2 on days 1, 4,15,18; D 20mg/m2 on days 1,15 and T 200 mg daily continuously) given on a 4-week cycle for a maximum of 8 cycles. Acyclovir (400 mg BID) and weight adjusted low-dose warfarin (1 or 2mg for absolute body weight <70kg or ≥70kg, respectively) was given for prophylaxis of herpes zoster and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), respectively. Response was assessed using the modified Blade criteria. Results: Forty patients (26 males, 14 females; median age 60.5, range 40-80 yrs) were enrolled on this study. Among these 58%(n=23) had stage III (Durie-Salmon) disease with a median b2 microglobulin of 3.7 (range 1.6-16.5 mg/L) and median LDH of 443 (range 152-129 IU/L). Thirty-nine patients are eligible for response evaluation (1 too early for assessment). Overall response rate (CR/nCR+PR) was 79.4% (n=31) with 38% (n=15) patients achieving CR/nCR. The median progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) has not been reached. At 1 year the PFS and OS is 81% and 97%, respectively (1 patient died from disease progression to leukemic phase). Toxicity: Neutropenia was the most significant hematological toxicity with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia observed in 22.5% and 2.5% of the patients, respectively. Only 1 (2.2%) patient had febrile neutropenia. Clinically significant neuropathy (grade ≥2) was seen in 20% while grade ≥2 palmer planter erythrodysesthesia was seen in 15% (n=6) of the patients. Other grade 3 non-hematological toxicities included pneumonia (20%), pleural effusion (10%), pulmonary embolism (2%), DVT (2%), congestive heart failure (5%) and interstitial pneumonitis (2%). Conclusion Although effective, steroid based treatment regimen can be associated with significant toxicity especially among patients with concurrent co morbid conditions such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, recent investigations demonstrate that decreasing steroid doses may actually improve PFS and OS despite a comparatively low initial ORR. In this clinical trial we hypothesized that rational combination of novel myeloma agents may actually preclude the need to rely on high-dose steroids without significantly compromising ORR. Consistent with our expectations, the VDT regimen has ORR comparable to some of the steroid-inclusive triple drug combinations. The toxicity profile of this combination was acceptable and the regimen was well tolerated. Thus we note that VDT is an effective and well tolerated steroid-independent induction regimen for MM patients. Disclosures: Off Label Use: A Phase II study of a novel combination in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Miller:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Czuczman:Centocor Ortho Biotech: Research Funding. Sood:Celgene: Stock. Chanan-Khan:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text