scholarly journals Hexabody-CD38, a Novel CD38 Antibody with a Hexamerization Enhancing Mutation, Demonstrates Enhanced Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity and Shows Potent Anti-Tumor Activity in Preclinical Models of Hematological Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3106-3106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart ECG De Goeij ◽  
Maarten L Janmaat ◽  
Grietje Andringa ◽  
Laurens Kil ◽  
Berris Van Kessel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

HexaBody-CD38 (GEN3014) is a novel, hexamerization-enhanced human IgG1 targeting CD38 with superior complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) activity, in addition to other effector mechanisms. HexaBody-CD38 carries the E430G mutation and binds a different epitope than the clinically validated CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab, which is currently being established as backbone therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Introduction of the E430G mutationfacilitates the natural process of antibody hexamer formation through increased intermolecular Fc-Fc interactions after antigen binding at the cell surface (Diebolder et al., Science 2014; de Jong et al., PLoS Biol 2016). Improved IgG hexamer formation can increase binding of the hexavalent complement component C1q, thereby potentiating or unlocking antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Preclinical data demonstrate highly potent CDC-mediated tumor cell kill in vitro in a panel of cell lines derived from hematological malignancies, including multiple myeloma (MM), B cell lymphoma and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In these cell lines, at the highest dose tested (10 µg/mL), HexaBody-CD38 induced approximately 2-fold more CDC-mediated lysis compared to daratumumab. Of note, in those cell lines that were responsive to daratumumab in CDC assays (>50% tumor cell lysis), CDC activity of HexaBody-CD38 was superior to daratumumab, with IC50 values for HexaBody-CD38 2.4- to 13-fold lower than for daratumumab. Moreover, HexaBody-CD38 unlocked CDC activity in 17 out of 28 tumor cell lines that were not sensitive to daratumumab in CDC assays (<50% tumor cell lysis), including cell lines with lower expression of CD38 or higher expression of the complement inhibitory protein CD59. Importantly, in pilot experiments that are part of an ongoing larger study, HexaBody-CD38 was able to effectively kill MM cells from patients in CDC assays ex vivo, including in one patient that had relapsed from daratumumab (Figure 1). In addition to superior CDC, HexaBody-CD38 was shown to induce comparable antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cell mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) as daratumumab. HexaBody-CD38 demonstrated more efficient inhibition of CD38 cyclase activity, which has been postulated to contribute to immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. Importantly, in the presence of monocytes, HexaBody-CD38 treatment resulted in the removal of CD38 from the cell membrane of CD38 expressing cells, including T regulatory cells. This suggests downmodulation of CD38 as another potential mechanism to reduce CD38-generated metabolites and associated immune suppression. Finally, HexaBody-CD38 induced promising anti-tumor activity in vivo in PDX models of diffuse large B cell lymphoma in nude mice. Anti-tumor activity was associated with CD38 expression levels. In conclusion, HexaBody-CD38 is a novel CD38 antibody that shows superior capacity to induce CDC-mediated tumor cell kill compared to daratumumab, including in tumor samples from MM patients. Furthermore, HexaBody-CD38 induces FcγR-mediated effector functions and effectively inhibits CD38 enzymatic activity, either directly or indirectly by removal of CD38 from the cell membrane, thereby potentially contributing to immune activation. Targeting CD38 with HexaBody-CD38 could have therapeutic potential in daratumumab-naïve and -refractory MM patients, as well as in CD38-positive tumors in which daratumumab does not have single agent efficacy, such as DLBCL and AML. The promise of HexaBody-CD38 warrants further clinical investigation in CD38-positive hematological malignancies, including MM, B cell lymphoma and AML. Disclosures De Goeij: Genmab BV: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Janmaat:Genmab BV: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Andringa:Genmab BV: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Kil:Genmab: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Van Kessel:Genmab: Other: stock and/or warrants. Lingnau:Genmab: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Freidig:Genmab BV: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Mutis:Onkimmune: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Aduro: Research Funding. Sasser:Genmab: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Breij:Genmab: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Van De Donk:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ahmadi:Genmab Inc: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Satijn:Genmab BV: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants.

Analysis of Adct-602 Pre-Clinical Activity in B-Cell Lymphoma Models and Identification of Potential Biomarkers for Its Activity

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 10-11
Author(s):  
Eugenio Gaudio ◽  
Chiara Tarantelli ◽  
Luciano Cascione ◽  
Filippo Spriano ◽  
Gaetanina Golino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphoma Cell ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Travel Grant

Introduction. CD22 is a cell surface marker expressed by the vast majority of normal and neoplastic B-cells. ADCT-602 is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) composed of Emab-C220, an engineered version of the anti-CD22 humanized IgG1 antibody epratuzumab, site-specifically conjugated to SG3249, which includes the DNA minor groove crosslinking pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer SG3199 linked to the antibody via a protease-cleavable linker (Zammarchi et al, ASH 2016). ADCT-602 is currently being tested in a phase I/II clinical trial (NCT03698552) in recurrent or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients. Here, we assessed its in vitro anti-lymphoma activity, also exploring for potential biomarkers and mechanisms of resistance. Methods. Fifty-seven human lymphoma cell lines were exposed to ADCT-602, an isotype-control ADC and the PBD dimer SG3199 as single agents for 96h, followed by MTT proliferation assay and IC50 calculation. Quantum Simply Cellular (QSC) microspheres were used for the quantitative determination of cellular CD22 antigen expression (Bangs Laboratories. Inc). Differences in IC50 values among lymphoma subtypes were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Statistical significance was defined by P values of 0.05 or less. Sensitivity analysis to ADCT-602 was performed by integrating different omics data, such as Illumina HT-12 microarray data (GSE94669), HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel data (GSE103934) and DNA copy number variations. Results. The median IC50 for ADCT-602 was 200 pM (95%C.I, 90-400 pM) in 48 B-cell lymphoma lines (including three Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines), and 1850 pM in nine T-cell lymphoma lines (95%C.I, 700-15000 pM). ADCT-602 was more active in B- than in T-cell lymphomas, as expected based on the pattern of CD22 expression (P &lt; 0.005). Focusing on B-cell lymphomas, ADCT-602 in vitro activity was not correlated with its target expression measured both at the cell surface protein level (absolute quantitation, n=48, r=0.06 P=ns) and at the RNA level (Illumina HT-12 arrays, n=42, r=0.28, P=ns; HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel, n=36, r=0.24, P=ns). In vitro activity was stronger in marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) cell lines than other B-cell lymphoma models (median IC50s 62.5 vs 312.5 pM; P = 0.03) as well as in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines with BCL2 and MYC translocations (DHT DLBCL) versus DLBCL with none or a single translocation (median IC50s 25 vs 400 pM, P = 0.03). No associations were seen with TP53 status or other histology (mantle cell lymphoma, DLBCL, DLBCL cell of origin). We then exploited the gene expression profiling data using the Illumina HT-12 microarray gene expression technology. Within all the B-cell lymphoma cell lines (sensitive, n= 25; resistant, n= 23) we identified 1.207 genes down-regulated (FC-) and 1,104 genes up-regulated (FC+) in resistant cell lines. To delineate the pathways associated with the different degrees of sensitivity to ADCT-602, we performed a gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA; GSEA hallmarks and c2.common pathways) on the pre-ranked limma data. Transcripts up-regulated in resistant cell lines were enriched of genes coding for proteins involved in respiratory electron transport, oxidative phosphorylation and proteasome. Conversely, transcripts up-regulated in the sensitive cell lines were enriched of genes coding for proteins involved in inflammation, chemokine signaling, p53 response, IL2/STAT5 signaling, hypoxia, TGF-beta and interferon response. Similar gene signatures were picked up using the HTG platform, which can be applied to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded clinical specimens, despite the smaller number of investigated genes. Conclusion. ADCT-602 showed in vitro anti-tumor activity across a large panel of B-cell lymphoma models of various histology. Expression signatures and other features (MZL or DHT DLBCL histology), but not the expression levels of its target, were associated with different sensitivity to the ADC. Our data supports the clinical evaluation of ADCT-602 in patients with B-cell lymphoma in addition to B-ALL. Disclosures Zucca: Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Celltrion Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stathis:PharmaMar: Other: Travel Grant; Member of the steering committee of the trial of this abstract: Other; Loxo: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Cellestia: Research Funding; Roche: Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Other, Research Funding; Bayer: Other, Research Funding; Merck: Other, Research Funding; Pfizer: Other, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Other, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutcis: Other, Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Travel Grant. Van Berkel:ADC-Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zammarchi:ADC-Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bertoni:ADC-Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bayer AG: Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Menarini Ricerche: Consultancy, Research Funding; NEOMED Therapeutics 1: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector ASA: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Other: travel grant; Amgen: Other: travel grant.

scholarly journals Results of a First in Human, Dose Ascending, Phase I Study Examining the Safety and Tolerability of KA2237, an Oral PI3K p110β/δ Inhibitor in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4099-4099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Sattva S Neelapu ◽  
Eric Davis ◽  
Felipe Samaniego ◽  
Nathan H Fowler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

Introduction: Despite therapeutic advances, there remains a considerable need for novel therapies for B-cell lymphomas. Although a high proportion of patients (pts) show response to initial therapy, many fail to achieve durable remissions and experience recurrent disease. Agents that target molecular pathways associated with the development and progression of lymphoma are likely to be highly effective and are desirable. The p110δ isoform of the PI3K enzyme is mainly expressed in lymphocytes and has been an attractive therapeutic target, with several PI3Kδ inhibitors demonstrating meaningful efficacy in B-cell lymphomas. Targeting the p110β isoform may further overcome tumor growth and escape mechanisms by mitigating the upregulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway, particularly in PTEN-deficient lymphomas. KA2237 is an oral, potent and selective inhibitor of the PI3K β and δ isoforms. The aim of this first in human, phase I, open-label, single arm study (NCT02679196) was to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic properties and pharmacodynamic effects of KA2237, in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose based on dose limiting toxicity and assess preliminary anti-tumor activity in pts with R/R B-cell lymphoma. Methods: Pts ≥ 18 years (yrs) of age, ECOG ≤ 2, with B-cell lymphoma R/R or intolerant of established therapies (including rituximab) were enrolled using a 3+3 dose escalation (50-400mg) design. KA2237 was given orally on a once daily continuous schedule until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Anti-tumor activity was evaluated by computed tomography and, when available, integrating 18F-FDG positron emission tomography response assessment, at 8, 16 and 24 weeks. Response was assessed according to Lugano 2014 criteria. Pts received PJP prophylaxis. Results: 21 pts with B-cell lymphoma were enrolled (8 DLBCL [diffuse large B-cell], 5 FL [follicular], 3 MCL [mantle cell], 3 CLL/SLL [chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma], 1 MZL [marginal zone], 1 WM [Waldenstrom]). Pts received KA2237 at 4 dose levels: 50mg (n=6), 100mg (n=3), 200mg (n=7) and 400mg (n=5) daily; 21 pts were evaluable for safety assessment. Pharmacokinetic profiles were favorable with mean plasma half-life of 17-33 hours, compatible with once daily oral dosing. Median age was 69 yrs (range 48-84) with 76% males; median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1-6). Median follow up duration was 8.5 months (range 6.9-24.6). Median duration of drug exposure was 82 days (range 10-714 days). 86% of pts experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). 43% of pts experienced a grade ≥ 3 TRAE, with rash (n=3), transaminitis (n=2) and pneumonitis (n=2) occurring in more than 1 pt. 29% discontinued treatment due to a TRAE with pneumonitis (n=2) occurring in more than 1 pt. One grade 5 TEAE (multifocal pneumonia) was observed. 19/21 pts were evaluable for response, ORR was 37% (4 CR, 3 PR). Responses were observed across lymphoma subtypes including DLBCL, FL, CLL and MCL. Responses were often durable (see Figure) and in 2 pts with DLBCL who achieved CR permitted consolidation by autologous stem cell transplantation. Conclusions: KA2237 is an oral, once a day, selective dual inhibitor of PI3K β/δ with a manageable toxicity profile and promising single-agent clinical activity in heavily pretreated R/R B-cell lymphoma. The recommended phase II dose is 200mg daily. The findings of this study support the further evaluation of KA2237. Figure. Disclosures Nastoupil: Novartis: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Neelapu:Acerta: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy. Fowler:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Westin:Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; Unum: Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; 47 Inc: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board. Wang:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; BioInvent: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aviara: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding; Pulse Biosciences: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Beer:Karus therapeutics Ltd.: Employment. Cecil:Karus Therapeutics: Employment. Dow:Karus Therapeutics: Employment. McHale:Karus Therapeutics: Employment. Silva:Karus Therapeutics: Employment. Ward:Karus Therapeutics: Employment. Yavari:Karus Therapeutics: Employment. Shuttleworth:Karus Therapeutics: Employment.

scholarly journals Impact of Interim FDG-PET (iPET) in the Outcomes of Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Receiving DA-EPOCH-R

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2898-2898
Author(s):  
Vania Phuoc ◽  
Leidy Isenalumhe ◽  
Hayder Saeed ◽  
Celeste Bello ◽  
Bijal Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
End Of Treatment

Introduction: 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) remains the standard of care for baseline and end of treatment scans for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, the role of interim FDG-PET remains not as well defined across aggressive NHLs, especially in the era of high-intensity chemoimmunotherapy. Interim FDG-PET (iPET) can serve as an early prognostic tool, and prior studies evaluating the utility of iPET-guided treatment strategies primarily focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Classification criteria systems assessing response also differ between studies with no clear consensus between use of Deauville criteria (DC), International Harmonization Project (IHP), and the ΔSUVmax method. Methods: This study evaluates our institutional experience with iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with or without Rituximab) in aggressive NHLs. We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who started on DA-EPOCH ± R between 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018 for aggressive NHLs. Response on interim and end-of-treatment (EOT) scans were graded per DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods, and progression free survival (PFS) probability estimates were calculated with chi-square testing and Kaplan Meier method. PFS outcomes were compared between interim negative and positive scans based on each scoring method. Outcomes were also compared between groups based on interim versus EOT positive or negative scans. Results: We identified 70 patients with aggressive NHLs who received DA-EPOCH ± R at our institute. The most common diagnoses were DLBCL (61%) followed by Burkitt's lymphoma (10%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (9%), plasmablastic lymphoma (7%), gray zone lymphoma (6%), primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma (1%), primary effusion lymphoma (1%), and other high-grade NHL not otherwise specified (3%). Of the 43 patients with DLBCL, 21/43 (49%) had double hit lymphoma (DHL) while 7/43 (16%) had triple hit lymphoma (THL), and 3/43 (7%) had MYC-rearranged DLBCL while 2/43 (5%) had double expressor DLBCL. Thirty nine out of 70 (56%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 58.39 years (range 22.99 - 86.86 years). Most patients had stage IV disease (49/70, 70%), and 43/70 (61%) had more than one extranodal site while 45/70 (64%) had IPI score ≥ 3. Forty-six out of 70 (66%) received central nervous system prophylaxis, most with intrathecal chemotherapy (44/70, 63%). Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) had iPET available while 6/70 (9%) had interim computerized tomography (CT) scans. Fifty-six out of 70 (80%) had EOT PET, and 4/70 (6%) had EOT CT scans. Sustained complete remission occurred in 46/70 (66%) after frontline DA-EPOCH ± R (CR1), and 12/70 (17%) were primary refractory while 5/70 (7%) had relapse after CR1. Four of 70 (6%) died before cycle 3, and 3/70 (4%) did not have long-term follow-up due to transition of care elsewhere. Median follow-up was 15.29 months (range 0.85 - 60.09 months). There was significantly better PFS observed if iPET showed DC 1-3 compared to DC 4-5 (Χ2=5.707, p=0.0169), and PFS was better if iPET was negative by IHP criteria (Χ2=4.254, p=0.0392) or ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=6.411, p=0.0113). Comparing iPET to EOT PET, there was significantly better PFS if iPET was negative with EOT PET negative (iPET-/EOT-) compared to iPET positive with EOT negative (iPET+/EOT-), and iPET+/EOT+ and iPET-/EOT+ had worse PFS after iPET-/EOT- and iPET+/EOT- respectively. This pattern in iPET/EOT PFS probability remained consistent when comparing DC (Χ2=30.041, p<0.0001), IHP (Χ2=49.078, p<0.0001), and ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=9.126, p=0.0104). These findings fit clinical expectations with positive EOT scans indicating primary refractory disease. There was no significant difference in PFS when comparing DLBCL versus non-DLBCL (Χ2=3.461, p=0.0628) or DHL/THL versus non-DHL/THL diagnoses (Χ2=2.850, p=0.0914). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a prognostic role of iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R for aggressive NHLs. Significant differences in PFS were seen when graded by DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods used in prior studies and when comparing interim versus EOT response. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures Bello: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Chavez:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Phase II Study Of Anti-CD19 Antibody Drug Conjugate (SAR3419) In Combination With Rituximab: Clinical Activity and Safety In Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (NCT01470456)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4395-4395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Sophie de Guibert ◽  
Jehan Dupuis ◽  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background SAR3419 is a humanized anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to maytansin DM4, a potent cytotoxic agent. SAR3419 targets CD19, an antigen expressed in the majority of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The recommended dose for single agent SAR3419 was previously determined to be 55 mg/m2 administered IV every week for 4 weeks, then bi-weekly. In phase I, clinical activity was shown mainly in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). (Trial funded by Sanofi). Methods Patients (pts) with a CD20+ and CD19+ DLBCL relapsing or refractory (R/R) after at least 1 standard treatment including rituximab and not candidate for or who already underwent transplantation, were eligible. Refractory disease was defined as unresponsive to or progressing within 6 months of regimen completion. Fresh (or recent formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) biopsy was required before SAR3419 start. Pts received 375 mg/m2 of rituximab (R) IV and 55 mg/m² of SAR3419 on day 1, 8, 15, 22 (35-day cycle 1), followed by bi-weekly R and SAR3419 at the same doses for 2 additional 28-day cycles, provided there was no disease progression or other study discontinuation criteria met. The primary objective was the overall response rate (ORR) following Cheson 2007 criteria, with the first tumor assessment being done 42 days after the last study treatment administration. Secondary objectives were: safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and correlation of the antitumor and biological activity of the combination with tumor biomarker status. Results Fifty-three pts were enrolled, 52 treated. Median age was 66.5 years (range 38-85), 50% were male; 23%, 33% and 40% of patients had received 1, 2 or ≥3 prior chemo/immunotherapy regimens for DLBCL, respectively. Of the enrolled patients, 3.8% had received no prior regimen for DLBCL and therefore were excluded from primary analysis for efficacy. Seventy-three percent had stage III/IV disease, 59% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and 63% had bulky disease. Sixty percent were refractory to first regimen (primary refractory), 16% were refractory to last regimen and 24% were relapsed pts. The ORR in the per-protocol population (n=45) was 31.1% (80% confidence interval (CI): 22.0% to 41.6%). Among the 14 responders, 5 had progressed at the time of analysis, with duration of response beyond 6 months for 3 of them. The ORR was 58.3% (80% CI: 36.2% to 78.1%) for patients with relapsed DLBCL (n=12), 42.9% (80% CI: 17.0% to 72.1%) for pts refractory to last regimen (n=7) and 15.4% (80% CI: 6.9% to 28.4%) for primary refractory pts (n=26). Overall survival and PFS data are not yet mature. Biomarkers and PK data will be presented at the meeting. The most common (≥10%) all grades non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were asthenia (25.0%), nausea (21.2%), cough (19.2%), diarrhea (17.3%), weight decrease (17.3%), vomiting (15.4%), dyspnea (15.4%), abdominal pain (13.5%), back pain (13.5%), pyrexia (13.5%) and constipation (11.5%). Related grade 3-4 TEAEs were: 1 syncope, 1 bronchospasm, 2 neutropenia and 1 anemia. No TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation, no grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy or grade 3-4 ocular events were observed. Two pts experienced grade 2 keratitis, both rapidly recovered with local treatment. Hematological toxicity was moderate, with grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 15.7% and 9.8% pts, respectively. No complications related to neutropenia were reported. Grade 3 transaminase increase was observed in 1 patient. Conclusions The combination of SAR3419 plus R showed moderate ORR in R/R DLBCL; however the study population was of poor prognosis (60% refractory to first line therapy). In the relapsed DLBCL patients a higher ORR was observed. SAR3419 plus R presented with a favorable safety profile. Further investigations on biomarker expression are ongoing to identify a sub-group of pts who could have better benefited from this combination. Disclosures: Coiffier: Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Phase II of SAR3419. Ribrag:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cartron:LFB: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Casasnovas:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hatteville:Sanofi: Employment. Zilocchi:Sanofi: Employment. Oprea:Sanofi: Employment. Tilly:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Poor Outcomes Among Patients Failing Dose-Adjusted EPOCH in Aggressive Lymphoma: A Collaborative, Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1518-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie Vandermeer ◽  
Allison M Winter ◽  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Ryan D. Cassaday ◽  
Brian T. Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Among patients with aggressive B-NHL who fail RCHOP, about half respond to standard salvage regimens and may proceed to curative-intent, transplant-based therapy. However, whether pts failing more intensive regimens such as dose-adjusted, infusional EPOCH benefit from standard salvage regimens is unclear. We hypothesized that such patients comprise a higher-risk cohort, facing inferior response rates and outcomes using standard salvage regimens. We undertook a collaborative study to assess response rates and survival among pts failing EPOCH for aggressive B-NHL, to inform patient management and design of clinical trials in this setting. Methods Pharmacy records and institutional databases were queried, identifying pts receiving EPOCH over the last 10 years at the University of Washington/SCCA and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for combined analysis. Under IRB approval, patient characteristics, histology, outcome with EPOCH, time to EPOCH failure, response to salvage, and overall survival were analyzed. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, B-cell-lymphoma unclassifiable, HIV-associated B cell lymphoma, and transformed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included. Pts receiving <2 cycles EPOCH, or who had inadequate follow-up (<3 months), were excluded. Failure of EPOCH was defined as failure to respond or progression during therapy, need for initiation of salvage therapy, or death during therapy of any cause. Adverse events or treatment change due to toxicity were not included in the definition of failure. JMP 11 was used to generate kaplan-meier survival estimates. Results 124 pts with aggressive B-NHL receiving EPOCH were identified. 54 had not relapsed, and among 70 remaining da-EPOCH failures, 37 met the above inclusion criteria. Median age was 55. 27% were female, and 23 received EPOCH as first-line therapy. All but 3 received rituximab with EPOCH. Histologies were primarily DLBCL in 22/37 (60%) and BCL-U in 12/37 (32%) carrying a MYC translocation; most of these harbored additional translocations in BCL2 and/or BCL6 (10/12). However, data regarding MYC rearrangement was not available for all pts. 2 had HIV-associated B-NHL and 3 had PMBCL. With 18 months follow up, the median time to EPOCH failure was 5 months. Only 3 EPOCH failures occurred late (>12 months). Median OS from the date of EPOCH failure was 10 months (Figure 1). Those receiving EPOCH as first-line therapy (23) had a median OS of 14 months from EPOCH failure, as opposed to 4 months for those receiving EPOCH as salvage therapy (log-rank p=.01). Salvage chemotherapy regimens after EPOCH were diverse, and generally ineffective; 6/28 (21%) regimens produced a response (Table 1). Among patients failing EPOCH within a year, platinum-containing salvage (RICE/RDHAP) was effective in only 2/13 patients (15%). 9 patients did not receive any salvage, most of whom died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice care. Conclusions A relatively low overall response rate (21%) was observed in this retrospective analysis of patients failing EPOCH. Analogous to early RCHOP failure in the CORAL study, those failing EPOCH within a year may face inferior outcomes with platinum-based salvage therapy. While combined from two institutions, our data represent a modest sample size and require confirmation. If verified, examination of mechanisms of resistance to EPOCH, and selecting EPOCH failures for clinical trials of novel targeted therapies and transplant-based approaches, may prove critical. Table 1. Salvage Therapy for REPOCH failures Regimen: response/total number treated Notes Response to any salvage: 6/28 (21%) Some patients received more than 1 chemo salvage; responses were tabulated per regimen. RICE: 4/12 2/3 alive post transplant(1 auto 1 allo; 1 declined transplant and survived; 1 died) RDHAP: 1/6 Gemcitabine-based: 0/5 HyperCVAD (Part A and/or B): 1/5 Survivor had CNS only relapse, received regimen B and transplant 9- received no systemic treatmen; most died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent/Abbott: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMarin: Research Funding; Piramal: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Hill:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Till:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

An International Collaborative Study of Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Secondary CNS Involvement By Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1874-1874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly ◽  
Chan Yoon Cheah ◽  
Mette Dahl Bendtsen ◽  
Gita Thanarasjasingam ◽  
Roopesh Kansara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma

Abstract Background: Secondary CNS involvement (SCNS) is a detrimental complication seen in ~5% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with modern immunochemotherapy. Data from older series report short survival following SCNS, typically <6 months. However, data in patients that develop SCNS following primary therapy that contains a rituximab-based-regimen as well as the impact of more intensified treatment for SCNS are limited. Aims: The aims of this study were to i) describe the natural history of SCNS in a large cohort of patients treated with immunochemotherapy, and ii) determine prognostic factors after SCNS. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with SCNS during or after frontline immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP or equivalently effective regimens). SCNS was defined as new involvement of the CNS (parenchymal, leptomeningeal, and/or eye) in patients without known CNS involvement at the time of first pathologic diagnosis of DLBCL. Patients were identified from local databases and/or regional/national registries in Denmark, Canada (British Columbia), Australia, Israel, US (University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic SPORE), and England (Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London). Clinico-pathologic and treatment characteristics at the time of SCNS were collected from medical records. Results: In total, 281 patients with SCNS diagnosed between 2001 and 2016 were included. Median age at SCNS was 64 (range 20-93) years and male:female ratio was 1.3. SCNS occurred as part of first relapse in 244 (87%) patients and 112 (40%) had documented concurrent systemic disease at the time of SCNS. The median time from initial DLBCL diagnosis to SCNS was 9 months, which was similar for patients treated with (N=76, 27%) or without upfront CNS prophylaxis (N=205, 73%) (10 vs 9 Mo; P=0.3). The median post-SCNS OS was 4 months (interquartile range 2-13) and the 2yr survival rate was 20% (95% CI 15-25) for the entire cohort. Associations between clinicopathologic features, management strategy, and post-SCNS survival are shown in Table 1, which excludes patients who did not receive any treatment against SCNS, patients treated with steroids alone, and a patient with unavailable treatment information (n=43, 15%). In multivariable analysis, performance status >1, concurrent leptomeningeal and parenchymal involvement, SCNS developing before completion of 1st line treatment, and combined systemic and CNS involvement by DLBCL were associated with inferior outcomes. Upfront CNS prophylaxis did not influence post-SCNS OS. High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and/or platinum based treatment regimens (i.e. ICE, DHAP, or GDP [+/- IT treatment and/or radiotherapy], N=163) for SCNS were associated with reduced risk of death (HR 0.45 [0.32-0.62, P<0.01]). The 2yr post-SCNS survival for patients treated with HDMTX and/or platinum-based regimens (N=163) was 29% (95% CI 22-37). For patients with isolated parenchymal SCNS, single modality treatment with radiotherapy resulted in 2-yr OS of 19% (95% CI 8-35). For the subgroup of 49 patients treated with HDMTX- and/or platinum-based regimens for isolated SCNS after 1st line DLBCL treatment and with performance status 0 or 1, the 2yr post-SCNS survival was 46% (95% CI 31-59). Overall, 9% of the patients received HDT with ASCT as part of salvage therapy at the time of SCNS. Amongst 36 SCNS patients without systemic involvement and in CR following intensive treatment (HDMTX and/or platinum-based treatments), 11 patients consolidated with HDT had similar outcomes to 25 patients treated without consolidating HDT (P=0.9, Fig 1) Conclusions: Outcomes for patients with SCNS remain poor in this large international cohort of patients from the immunochemotherapy era. Combined parenchymal and leptomeningeal disease, presence of systemic disease concurrent with SCNS, performance status >1, and SCNS developing during first line treatment were independently associated with inferior OS. However, a significant fraction of patients with isolated SCNS after first line DLBCL treatment and with good performance status may achieve long-term remissions after intensive regimens for SCNS. Disclosures El-Galaly: Roche: Consultancy, Other: travel funding. Cheah:Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker's Bureau. Kansara:Celgene: Honoraria. Connors:Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding; NanoString Technologies: Research Funding; F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Sehn:roche/genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; seattle genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Opat:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Provision of subsidised drugs, Research Funding. Seymour:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Villa:Celgene: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals TNFR2 As a Target to Improve CD19-Directed CART Cell Fitness and Antitumor Activity in Large B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 901-901
Author(s):  
Claudia Manriquez Roman ◽  
Michelle J. Cox ◽  
Reona Sakemura ◽  
Kun Yun ◽  
Mohamad M. Adada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Death Receptors ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Introduction: It has become increasingly apparent that chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell activation and differentiation level is an important determinant of CART cell fate and response to therapy. In this study, we aimed to 1) measure levels of activation-induced surface death receptors and ligands on CART cells; 2) investigate how CART cell activation could impact their fitness and clinical responses, and 3) identify cell-based targets to modulate CART cell activation, apoptosis, and cytotoxicity to improve anti-tumor activity. Methods: We performed flow cytometric studies on ex-vivo stimulated, clinically annotated CART products of patients with large B cell lymphoma from the pivotal ZUMA-1 clinical trial that led to FDA-approved Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-Cel). We investigated possible correlations of a number of surface death receptors and ligands with T cell differentiation status and post-infusion CART cell expansion, utilizing samples from ZUMA-1 patients who achieved a complete response as a best outcome ('responders') vs patients who achieved stable or progressive disease('non-responders'). CART cell effector functions in vitro were measured, and CART apoptosis was assessed using Annexin V. For in vitro and in vivo functional studies, we used CART19 generated from healthy donors (HD CART19) as indicated in the specific experiment. CRISPR/Cas9 was employed during CART cell production to disrupt specific genes. A xenograft model of lymphoma was used to investigate the in vivo antitumor activity of CART19. Results: Following an ex vivo stimulation of Axi-Cel products with CD19 + target cells, we observed upregulation of death receptors and ligands in CART19 from non-responders, compared to responders. We also observed a possible association between such upregulated surface markers with CART cell differentiation as measured by CCR7 expression. In an extended in vitro co-culture assay, where HD CART19 cells were repeatedly stimulated through the CAR, we found that tumor necrosis factor α receptor 2 (TNFR2), unlike other death receptors and ligands, was persistently elevated, suggesting a possible role for TNFR2 in long-term antigen-dependent CART19 dysfunction (Figure 1A). We further found that HD CART19 upregulate TNFR2, but not TNFR1, upon CAR stimulation (Figure 1B). While non-specific TCR activation (CD3 stimulation) of HD CART19 cells protected them from activation-induced apoptosis, antigen-specific activation through the CAR resulted in significant initiation of apoptosis within 2 hours of stimulation (Figure 1C). Having identified a possible association between TNFR2 and CART19 dysfunction, we aimed to study the impact of TNFR2 knockout on HD CART19 functions. Using CRISPR/Cas9 during CART cell manufacturing, we generated TNFR2 k/o HD CART19 cells with a knockout efficiency of around 50%, where the expression levels of TNFR2 in activated CART19 cells were reduced, compared to control CART19 cells (with non-targeting gRNA CRISPR/Cas9, Figure 1D). TNFR2 k/o CART19 cells demonstrated reduced early activation surface markers compared to control CART19, as measured by CD25 and CD69 surface expression (Figure 1E), reduced apoptosis initiation as measured by the Annexin V assay (Figure 1F), and enhanced antigen-specific proliferation and cytotoxicity (Figure 1G). Finally, in an in vivo xenograft model of CD19 + lymphoma, TNFR2 k/o CART19 resulted in enhanced CART cell expansion and anti-tumor activity (Figure 1H). Conclusions: Our results indicate that TNFR2 plays a role in early activation and apoptosis initiation of CART19 following CAR stimulation with CD19 + target cells and present TNFR2 knockout as a strategy to enhance CART19 anti-tumor activity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cox: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Ding: Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Parikh: Pharmacyclics, MorphoSys, Janssen, AstraZeneca, TG Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, and Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Verastem Oncology, and AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kay: Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Targeted Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CytomX Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scholler: Kite: Current Employment. Bot: Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Travel support. Mattie: Kite: Current Employment. Kim: Gilead Sciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment. Filosto: Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Tusk Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: or other intellecular property; Gilead Sciences: Other: stock or other ownership . Kenderian: Humanigen, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Integrative Genomic Analysis Uncovers Unique Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Immune Environments and Identifies Associations with Specific Oncogenic Alterations

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 449-449
Author(s):  
Sravya Tumuluru ◽  
James Godfrey ◽  
Jovian Yu ◽  
Alan Cooper ◽  
Xiufen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Tumor Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphoma Cell ◽  
Oncogenic Signaling ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Gene Sets

Abstract Introduction: Most patients diagnosed with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are cured with combination chemoimmunotherapy, but 40% will develop relapsed or refractory (r/r) disease, which is often associated with a poor clinical outcome. PD-1 blockade therapy has been investigated in r/r DLBCL; however, response rates in unselected DLBCL patients are disappointing, highlighting the need for deeper understanding of DLBCL immune landscapes, as well as mechanisms that regulate the immune response to checkpoint blockade therapy (CBT) in this disease. In solid cancers, tumor-cell intrinsic oncogenic signaling strongly influences the immune environment and impacts clinical response to CBT. Despite the recent publication of large-scale genomic datasets in DLBCL, the impact of oncogenic signaling on the immune environment remains to be fully elucidated. In this study, we aimed to characterize immune landscapes associated with DLBCL, as well as the role of lymphoma-intrinsic alterations on shaping the immune environment in this disease. Methods: Using gene set variation analysis (GSVA) in a large cohort of primary DLBCLs (n = ~900), a sample-wise enrichment score was generated for gene sets associated with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Gene sets were manually curated to include signatures relating to IFNγ response, T helper cell subsets, CD8 + T cell exhaustion, macrophages, and dendritic cells. A DLBCL cell-of-origin (COO) signature was also included in the GSVA to control for the transcriptional and genomic effects of COO. Samples were hierarchically clustered into related groups. Multispectral immunofluorescence (mIF) for canonical T cell markers was used to confirm GSVA clustering. To mechanistically validate our findings, CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing was used to modulate candidate oncogenes and tumor suppressors genes (TSGs) in the syngeneic A20 murine lymphoma model. Results: GSVA performed on transcriptomes from a large genomic DLBCL dataset revealed four distinct DLBCL immune clusters, termed "ABC hot", "ABC cold", "GCB hot" and "GCB cold", defined by differential expression scores of immune related gene sets (Fig 1A). Concordant with our previous work, DLBCLs with PD-L1 gene amplifications, which are associated with a "T-cell inflamed" tumor microenvironment, were enriched in the "ABC hot" cluster (Fig 1B). Conversely, double hit signature DLBCLs, known to be associated with decreased immune cell infiltration and a GCB COO, were enriched in "GCB cold" DLBCLs (Fig 1C). In an internal cohort of diagnostic DLBCL samples (n = 90) for whom RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and FFPE tissue were available, mIF analysis showed that both "ABC hot" and "GCB hot" DLBCLs had significantly higher ratios of CD8 + T cells to lymphoma cells compared to cold DLBCLs. "ABC hot" DLBCLs also had a significantly higher CD4 + T cell to lymphoma cell ratio (Fig 1D). Importantly, several mutations that correlated with particular DLBCL immune clusters were identified. The "ABC cold" cluster was significantly enriched for loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in TMEM30A and MYD88, whereas LOF mutations in ATM and FOXO1 were commonly observed in "GCB cold" DLBCLs. Finally, LOF mutations in SOCS1 and B2M were significantly enriched in "GCB hot" DLBCLs (Fig 1E, 1F). As LOF SOCS1 mutations were strongly associated with "GCB hot" DLBCLs and are also prevalent in other CBT-sensitive lymphomas, we hypothesized that SOCS1 LOF mutations would enhance lymphoma cell vulnerability to CBT due to increased IFNγ sensitivity resulting from unopposed JAK/STAT activation. To test this hypothesis, we generated Socs1 deficient A20 lymphoma cells. Compared to A20 WT, A20 Socs1-/- cells were characterized by increased pStat1 levels upon IFNγ stimulation (Fig 1G). Interestingly, A20 Socs1-/- tumors showed increased sensitivity to α-PD1 therapy compared to A20 WT in syngeneic hosts. Together, these data suggest that tumor-cell intrinsic JAK/STAT activation via SOCS1 -/- increases lymphoma cell sensitivity to IFNγ and α-PD1 therapy (Fig 1H). Conclusion: We have developed a novel immunogenomic platform to define the role of tumor-cell intrinsic alterations on the immune landscape of DLBCL. Confirmatory studies using in vitro and in vivo models validated the effect of key oncogenes and TSGs on the tumor microenvironment, and suggest these candidate genes may impact response to CBT in DLBCL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Smith: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Other: Study investigator; Celgene, Genetech, AbbVie: Consultancy. Steidl: Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding; Curis Inc.: Consultancy; Epizyme: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Kline: Seagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite/Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; SecuraBio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Tolinapant (ASTX660), a Non-Peptidomimetic Antagonist of cIAP1/2 and XIAP, and the HDAC Inhibitor Romidepsin Are Synergistic in in Vitro Models of T Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4356-4356
Author(s):  
John S Manavalan ◽  
Ipsita Pal ◽  
Aidan Pursley ◽  
George A. Ward ◽  
Tomoko Smyth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Tnf Alpha ◽  
Sensitive Cell ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: The PTCL are a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas originating from mature T-lymphocytes. They are aggressive diseases, often resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Despite the fact that a number of new agents have been approved, treatment paradigms tailored to the biology of the disease have yet to emerge. Tolinapant (ASTX660) is a potent antagonist of both cellular and X-linked inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (cIAP1/2 and XIAP), and is presently in phase I/II trials in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas (NCT02503423). IAP antagonists enhance tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily mediated apoptosis (Ward GA, et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018), are potent anti-tumor immune enhancers and induce markers of immunogenic cell death such as damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs; Ye W, et al, Oncoimmunology, 2020). Objectives: We explored the sensitivity of a range of T-cell lymphoma (TCL) cell lines to tolinapant. We establish the synergy coefficient between tolinapant and the HDAC inhibitor, romidepsin, and interrogated the molecular basis of their synergistic interaction. Methods: A panel of human T-cell lymphoma cell lines were tested in proliferation assays (CellTiterGlo) for sensitivity to tolinapant in the presence or absence of 10ng/ml of TNF alpha. For combination studies, with tolinapant and romidepsin, each drug was tested at the IC10 and IC40 concentrations in the presence or absence of TNF alpha. Synergy scores using the Excess over Bliss (EOB) model were calculated using SynergyFinder (Aleksandr Ianevski et al; Nucleic Acids Research, 2020). Additionally, the effects of tolinapant and romidepsin on the IAPs and caspases were analyzed by western blots. TNFR1 receptor expression and induction of DAMPs were also analyzed by flow cytometry. Results: TCL Lines demonstrated varying sensitivities to tolinapant in the presence or absence of TNF alpha. The most sensitive cell lines, ALK+ ALCL and SUP-M2, had IC50 concentrations ranging from 200nM ± 100nM to 20nM ± 1nM in the absence or presence of TNF alpha, respectively, at 24, 48 and 72hrs, while a resistant CTCL cell line HH had an IC50 concentration of over 20mM, even in the presence of TNF alpha. Interestingly, using western blot analysis, we found that the presence of TNF alpha increased the levels of cIAP1 in the tolinapant sensitive SUP-M2 cell line, but not in the resistant HH cell line. However, there was a concentration dependent decrease in cIAP1 but not in XIAP in both cell lines treated with tolinapant. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that tolinapant increases the expression of TNFR1 and DAMPs in a dose dependent manner on the sensitive SUP-M2, but not in the resistant HH cells. In combination experiments, using the EOB model, tolinapant plus romidepsin was found to be synergistic in the absence of TNF alpha, at 36hrs, in both the sensitive cell line SUP-M2 and the resistant cell line HH. In the presence of TNF alpha, synergism was seen only in the sensitive cell line SUP-M2 and antagonistic in the HH cell line (Fig. 3). In the tolinapant plus romidepsin treated samples, cIAP1 levels decreased in the SUP-M2 cell line, in the absence of TNF alpha, however, addition of TNF alpha did not alter the levels of cIAP1 in the SUP-M2 cells. The cIAP1 levels decreased in the HH cells treated with the combination, in both the presence or absence of TNF alpha (Figure). Our findings indicate that the synergy of the tolinapant plus romidepsin is not dependent on the presence of TNF alpha. Conclusion: Tolinapant has demonstrated potent cytotoxic effects against a broad range of TCL lines both as a monotherapy and in combination with the HDAC Inhibitor, romidepsin. In in vitro studies, T cell lymphoma cell lines demonstrated varying sensitivity to tolinapant with certain cell lines being more resistant, even in the presence of TNF alpha. Interestingly, the addition of romidepsin appeared to overcome the intrinsic resistance to tolinapant in the absence of TNF alpha. These data provide the rationale to continue to explore the combination of tolinapant and romidepsin in vivo and to investigate additional combinations with T-cell specific agents (e.g. pralatrexate, belinostat, azacitidine and decitabine). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Smyth: Astex Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Sims: Astex Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Loughran: Kymera Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioniz Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Keystone Nano: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dren Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marchi: Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Myeloid Therapeutics: Honoraria; Astex: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kymera Therapeutics: Other: Scientific Advisor.

scholarly journals Nanatinostat (Nstat) and Valganciclovir (VGCV) in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive (EBV +) Lymphomas: Final Results from the Phase 1b/2 VT3996-201 Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 623-623
Author(s):  
Bradley M. Haverkos ◽  
Onder Alpdogan ◽  
Robert Baiocchi ◽  
Jonathan E Brammer ◽  
Tatyana A. Feldman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 1B

Abstract Introduction: EBV can be associated with several types of lymphomas, with reported frequencies of up to 8-10% in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 30-100% in peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) subtypes, 80% in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and 15-30% in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), with adverse impact on outcomes. Nanatinostat (Nstat) is a Class-I selective oral HDAC inhibitor that induces the expression of the lytic BGLF4 EBV protein kinase in EBV + tumor cells, activating ganciclovir (GCV) via phosphorylation. This results in GCV-induced inhibition of viral and cellular DNA synthesis and apoptosis. Herein we report the final results from this exploratory study for patients with R/R EBV + lymphomas (NCT03397706). Methods: Patients aged ≥18 with histologically confirmed EBV + lymphomas (defined as any degree of EBER-ISH positivity), R/R to ≥1 prior systemic therapies with an absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0×10 9/L, platelet count ≥50×10 9/L, and no curative treatment options per investigator were enrolled into 5 dose escalation cohorts to determine the recommended phase 2 doses (RP2D) of Nstat + VGCV for phase 2 expansion. Phase 2 patients received the RP2D (Nstat 20 mg daily, 4 days per week + VGCV 900 mg orally daily) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or withdrawal. Primary endpoints were safety/RP2D (phase 1b) and overall response rate (ORR) (phase 2); secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics, duration of response (DoR), time to response, progression free survival and overall survival. Responses were assessed using Lugano 2014 response criteria beginning at week 8. Results: As of 18 June 2021, 55 patients were enrolled (phase 1b: 25; phase 2: 30). Lymphoma subtypes were DLBCL (n=7), extranodal NK/T-cell (ENKTL) (n=9), PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (n=5), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (n=6), cutaneous T cell (n=1), HL (n=11), other B cell (n=3), and immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (IA-LPD) (n=13), including PTLD (n=4), HIV-associated (n=5), and other [n=4: systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=2), common variable/primary immunodeficiency (n=2)]. Median age was 60 years (range 19-84), M/F 35/20, median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-11), 76% had ≥2 prior therapies, 78% were refractory to their most recent prior therapy, and 84% had exhausted standard therapies. EBER positivity ranged from &lt;1 to 90% in 42 tumor biopsies with central lab review. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of all grades were nausea (38%), neutropenia (34%), thrombocytopenia (34%), and constipation (31%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs in &gt;10% of patients included neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (20%), and lymphopenia (14%). Dose reductions and interruptions due to treatment-related AEs were reported in 14 (25%) and 16 (29%) patients, respectively. Only 1 patient had to discontinue therapy. There were no cases of CMV reactivation. For 43 evaluable patients (EBER-ISH + with ≥ 1 post-treatment response assessment) across all histologies, the investigator-assessed ORR and complete response (CR) rates were 40% (17/43) and 19% (8/43) respectively. Patients with T/NK-NHL (n=15; all refractory to their last therapy) had an ORR of 60% (n=9) with 27% (n=4) CRs. Two patients (ENKTL and PTCL-NOS) in PR and CR respectively were withdrawn at 6.7 and 6.6 months (m) respectively for autologous stem cell transplantation. For DLBCL (n=6), ORR/CR was 67%/33% (both CRs were in patients refractory to first-line R-CHOP). For IA-LPD (n=13), ORR/CR was 30%/20% (PTLD: 1 CR, other: 1 CR, 1 PR). For HL (n=10), there was 1 PR (4 SD). The median DoR for all responders was 10.4 m, with a median follow-up from response of 5.7 m (range 1.9-34.1 m). For the 17 responders, 8 lasted ≥ 6 months. Conclusions: The combination of Nstat and VGCV was well-tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile and shows promising efficacy in patients with R/R EBV + lymphomas, particularly in refractory T/NK-NHL, a heterogeneous group of aggressive lymphomas with dismal outcomes, with multiple durable responses. Further evaluation of this novel combination therapy for the treatment of recurrent EBV + lymphomas is ongoing in the phase 2 VT3996-202 trial. Disclosures Haverkos: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Baiocchi: Prelude Therapeutics: Consultancy; viracta: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Codiak Biosciences: Research Funding; Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy. Brammer: Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. Feldman: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Other: Study investigator. Brem: Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SeaGen: Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KiTE Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys/Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Scheinberg: Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Alexion pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Joffe: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy. Katkov: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. McRae: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Royston: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Rojkjaer: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Porcu: Viracta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kiowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; DrenBio: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document