Analysis of Adct-602 Pre-Clinical Activity in B-Cell Lymphoma Models and Identification of Potential Biomarkers for Its Activity

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 10-11
Author(s):  
Eugenio Gaudio ◽  
Chiara Tarantelli ◽  
Luciano Cascione ◽  
Filippo Spriano ◽  
Gaetanina Golino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphoma Cell ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Travel Grant

Introduction. CD22 is a cell surface marker expressed by the vast majority of normal and neoplastic B-cells. ADCT-602 is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) composed of Emab-C220, an engineered version of the anti-CD22 humanized IgG1 antibody epratuzumab, site-specifically conjugated to SG3249, which includes the DNA minor groove crosslinking pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer SG3199 linked to the antibody via a protease-cleavable linker (Zammarchi et al, ASH 2016). ADCT-602 is currently being tested in a phase I/II clinical trial (NCT03698552) in recurrent or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients. Here, we assessed its in vitro anti-lymphoma activity, also exploring for potential biomarkers and mechanisms of resistance. Methods. Fifty-seven human lymphoma cell lines were exposed to ADCT-602, an isotype-control ADC and the PBD dimer SG3199 as single agents for 96h, followed by MTT proliferation assay and IC50 calculation. Quantum Simply Cellular (QSC) microspheres were used for the quantitative determination of cellular CD22 antigen expression (Bangs Laboratories. Inc). Differences in IC50 values among lymphoma subtypes were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Statistical significance was defined by P values of 0.05 or less. Sensitivity analysis to ADCT-602 was performed by integrating different omics data, such as Illumina HT-12 microarray data (GSE94669), HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel data (GSE103934) and DNA copy number variations. Results. The median IC50 for ADCT-602 was 200 pM (95%C.I, 90-400 pM) in 48 B-cell lymphoma lines (including three Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines), and 1850 pM in nine T-cell lymphoma lines (95%C.I, 700-15000 pM). ADCT-602 was more active in B- than in T-cell lymphomas, as expected based on the pattern of CD22 expression (P < 0.005). Focusing on B-cell lymphomas, ADCT-602 in vitro activity was not correlated with its target expression measured both at the cell surface protein level (absolute quantitation, n=48, r=0.06 P=ns) and at the RNA level (Illumina HT-12 arrays, n=42, r=0.28, P=ns; HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel, n=36, r=0.24, P=ns). In vitro activity was stronger in marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) cell lines than other B-cell lymphoma models (median IC50s 62.5 vs 312.5 pM; P = 0.03) as well as in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines with BCL2 and MYC translocations (DHT DLBCL) versus DLBCL with none or a single translocation (median IC50s 25 vs 400 pM, P = 0.03). No associations were seen with TP53 status or other histology (mantle cell lymphoma, DLBCL, DLBCL cell of origin). We then exploited the gene expression profiling data using the Illumina HT-12 microarray gene expression technology. Within all the B-cell lymphoma cell lines (sensitive, n= 25; resistant, n= 23) we identified 1.207 genes down-regulated (FC-) and 1,104 genes up-regulated (FC+) in resistant cell lines. To delineate the pathways associated with the different degrees of sensitivity to ADCT-602, we performed a gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA; GSEA hallmarks and c2.common pathways) on the pre-ranked limma data. Transcripts up-regulated in resistant cell lines were enriched of genes coding for proteins involved in respiratory electron transport, oxidative phosphorylation and proteasome. Conversely, transcripts up-regulated in the sensitive cell lines were enriched of genes coding for proteins involved in inflammation, chemokine signaling, p53 response, IL2/STAT5 signaling, hypoxia, TGF-beta and interferon response. Similar gene signatures were picked up using the HTG platform, which can be applied to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded clinical specimens, despite the smaller number of investigated genes. Conclusion. ADCT-602 showed in vitro anti-tumor activity across a large panel of B-cell lymphoma models of various histology. Expression signatures and other features (MZL or DHT DLBCL histology), but not the expression levels of its target, were associated with different sensitivity to the ADC. Our data supports the clinical evaluation of ADCT-602 in patients with B-cell lymphoma in addition to B-ALL. Disclosures Zucca: Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Celltrion Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stathis:PharmaMar: Other: Travel Grant; Member of the steering committee of the trial of this abstract: Other; Loxo: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Cellestia: Research Funding; Roche: Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Other, Research Funding; Bayer: Other, Research Funding; Merck: Other, Research Funding; Pfizer: Other, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Other, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutcis: Other, Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Travel Grant. Van Berkel:ADC-Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zammarchi:ADC-Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bertoni:ADC-Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bayer AG: Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Menarini Ricerche: Consultancy, Research Funding; NEOMED Therapeutics 1: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector ASA: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Other: travel grant; Amgen: Other: travel grant.

scholarly journals Targeting MYC-Driven B-Cell Lymphoma By Inhibition of the Histone Methyltransferase DOT1L

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2839-2839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anagha Deshpande ◽  
Benson Chen ◽  
Parham Ramezani-Rad ◽  
Alessandro Pastore ◽  
Luyi Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphoma Cell ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Genome Wide

Abstract Aberrant activation of the MYC proto-oncogene is a recurrent feature in human B-cell lymphomas of diverse sub-types, correlating with adverse prognosis and therapy resistance. Direct pharmacological MYC-targeting has proved difficult, but recent studies have shown that targeting chromatin regulators critical for MYC-driven oncogenesis may provide alternative avenues for therapeutic intervention. Recently, it has been demonstrated that MYC-driven oncogenesis in certain solid tumors is dependent on the histone 3 lysine 79 (H3K79) methyltransferase DOT1L. We hypothesized that B-cell lymphomas with hyperactive MYC-signaling might be responsive to DOT1L inhibition. In order to test this hypothesis, we tested the effect of the DOT1L inhibitor Pinometostat (EPZ-5676) on a panel of human B-cell lymphoma cell lines featuring elevated MYC. Pinometostat treatment reduced global H3K79 methylation levels, accompanied by a time and dose-dependent decrease in proliferation of several Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines including P493-6, Daudi and Raji. We observed that key MYC-target genes including CDK4, PPAT and NPM1 were significantly downregulated upon Pinometostat treatment, suggesting that DOT1L is required for the transcriptional activation of MYC-target genes in these cells. Pinometostat-treated B-lymphoma cells showed a significant decrease of cells in S-phase compared to controls as assessed by BrdU-labeling assays. Similar results were also obtained in a panel of B-cell lymphoma cell lines with MYC-rearrangements including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell lines Jeko-1, JVM2, Mino-1 and Maver-1 and the diffused large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell line Karpas 422. Next, we sought to investigate whether the DOT1L-dependence of MYC-driven B-cell lymphoma could be reproduced in a well-defined model of MYC-driven B-cell lymphoma. Towards this end, we utilized a mouse model in which expression of the Cre recombinase from a B cell specific promoter leads to ectopic expression of a transgenic human MYC allele and concomitant deletion of the tumor suppressor Pten in B cells. Similar to our in vitro studies, Pinometostat treatment led to a significant reduction in proliferation of B-cell lymphoma cells from these mice with an IC50 of 0.5 µM. Furthermore, we sought to ascertain whether these findings reflected on-target effects related to DOT1L inhibition. Therefore, we deleted DOT1L using CRISPR/Cas9 in B-cell lymphoma cell lines and assessed the effect on proliferation using competitive-proliferation assays. We observed that DOT1L-deletion progressively diminished the relative growth of anti-DOT1L sgRNA-expressing P493-6 and Jeko1 cells compared to non-targeted cells invitro. In order to test the requirement for DOT1L in lymphoma propagation in vivo, we performed intravenous injections of equal number of Jeko-1 cells with either anti-DOT1L or anti-Renilla control sgRNAs into sub-lethally irradiated non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency mice (NOD/SCID) mice. Mice injected with control anti-Renilla sgRNAs succumbed to disease with a median latency of 34 days while the latency of disease in the anti-DOT1L sgRNA cohort was 45 days. In summary, DOT1L depletion significantly delayed disease latency in this invivo disseminated model of B-cell lymphoma (P=0.02). We then performed transcriptomic analyses of Pinometostat-treated B-cell lymphoma cell lines compared to DMSO-treated counterparts using RNA-seq. Gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of RNA-seq data from three different B-cell lymphoma cell lines demonstrated that Pinometostat treatment significantly decreased the expression of MYC-target genes. In order to investigate the intriguing role of DOT1L in regulating MYC-target gene expression, we used ChIP-seq to assess the genome-wide occupancy of MYC following DOT1L inhibitor treatment. Strikingly, our studies demonstrated that DOT1L inhibition significantly reduced the chromatin occupancy of MYC. Taken together, our experiments demonstrate the role of DOT1L in MYC-driven B-cell lymphoma pathogenesis invitro and invivo. Furthermore, our genome-wide studies demonstrate the importance of DOT1L for genomic MYC occupancy. Based on these findings, we propose that therapeutic DOT1L targeting may be a viable strategy in MYC-driven B-cell lymphoma. Disclosures Weigert: Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Rickert:Pfizer: Employment. Ren:Elli Lilly: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arima Genomics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deshpande:Salgomed Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; A2A Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

A Phase II Lysa Study of Obinutuzumab Combined with Lenalidomide for Advanced Untretated Follicular B-Cell Lymphoma in Need of Systemic Therapy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 446-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Gilles Andre Salles ◽  
Rene-Olivier Casasnovas ◽  
Pierre Feugier ◽  
Krimo Bouabdallah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Travel Grant

Abstract BACKGROUND: Obinutuzumab is a type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis, and direct cell death better than rituximab. Given promising results with lenalidomide and rituximab (R2), we assessed the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide combined with obinutuzumab (GALEN)in a large phase Ib/II study in separate patient populations (NCT01582776). In relapsed/refractory follicular B-cell lymphoma (FL), we found the GALEN regimen might be even more efficient than R2 while retaining a similarly manageable safety profile. Here, we report the results for the phase II part assessing efficacy and safety of GALEN in advanced untreated FL patients (pts) in need of systemic therapy. METHODS: Eligible pts had grade 1-3a FL and required systemic therapy per GELF criteria. Induction treatment consisted of lenalidomide (LEN) 20 mg on day (d) 1-21 of a 28-d cycle for the first cycle and on d2-22 of a 28-d cycle from cycles 2 to 6. Obinutuzumab (GA) 1000 mg was given IV on d8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1 and d1 of cycles 2 to 6. Responding pts then received maintenance with LEN at 10 mg on d2-22 every 28d for 12 cycles and GA 1000 mg every 8 wk for 12 cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary study endpoint was complete response (CR)/CR unconfirmed (CRu) rate by investigator assessment at the end of induction according to 1999 IWG criteria. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and CR according to IWG 2007, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS: 100 pts with WHO FL gr 1-2 (91%) and 3a (9%) according to local pathology reports were enrolled between October 2015 and February 2017. Median age was 60.5 years (range, 32-89), 43% had FLIPI score ≥3, 89% stage III/IV, and 31% bulky disease (>7 cm). All 100 pts were evaluable for safety and efficacy. At a median follow-up of 2.1 years, 96 pts (96%) completed induction, 41 completed maintenance, 36 were ongoing in maintenance, and 23 prematurely discontinued treatment due to disease progression (n=12, including 2 during induction), toxicity (n=6, including 2 during induction), concurrent illness (n=3), consent withdrawal (n=1), or other cause (n=1). At the end of induction, 61 pts had regression by more than 75% of sum of the product of the greatest diameters (SPD) of target lesions and 83/97 (85.6%) with PET assessment were PET negative (Juweid criteria) including 79/93 (84.9%) with a 5PS (Deauville scale) score of 1-3. Sixteen pts with SPD regression >75% and 25 pts with negative PET were conservatively downgraded to PR due to missing bone marrow evaluation, leading to 47% CR/CRu rate and 59% CR rate at the end of induction per IWG1999 and 2007 criteria, respectively. Response rates at the end of induction, PFS, DOR and OS are summarized in the Table and Figure. Most common AEs (>10% of pts) during induction (% all gr/% gr 3/4) were neutropenia (43/42), asthenia (35/2), constipation (32/0), infusion-related reactions (23/3), diarrhea (21/2), rash (21/2), cough (18/0), nausea (13/0), pruritus (12/1), weight decrease (12/0), bronchitis (11/0), muscle spasms (11/1), and pyrexia (11/0). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 2% of pts. Eight second primary malignancies were reported in 8 pts, including 2 deemed unrelated since they were misdiagnosed at baseline. Three (3%) pts had died, 1 each due to lymphoma, toxicity of additional treatment, and intestinal adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: The immunomodulatory GALEN regimen is highly effective with no unexpected toxicity in advanced, untreated FL pts in need of systemic therapy and has the potential to challenge immunochemotherapy in this setting. Disclosures Morschhauser: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Scientific Lectures. Salles:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Feugier:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cartron:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria. Maerevoet:abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grant; roche: Other: travel grant; takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grant; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tilly:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria. Haioun:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Houot:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

scholarly journals FT596: Translation of First-of-Kind Multi-Antigen Targeted Off-the-Shelf CAR-NK Cell with Engineered Persistence for the Treatment of B Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 301-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jode P Goodridge ◽  
Sajid Mahmood ◽  
Huang Zhu ◽  
Svetlana Gaidarova ◽  
Robert Blum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees

Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived effector cells offer distinct advantages for immune therapy over existing patient- or donor- derived platforms, both in terms of scalable manufacturing from a renewable starting cellular material and precision genetic engineering that is performed at the single-cell level. iPSC derived natural killer (iNK) cells offer the further advantage of innate reactivity to stress ligands and MHC downregulation and the potential to recruit downstream adaptive responses. These unique features form the basis of our multi-antigen targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) CAR-iNK cell product candidate, termed FT596, which is further combined with additional functionality to enhance effector function. FT596 is consistently manufactured from a master iPSC line engineered to uniformly express an NK cell-calibrated CD19-targeting CAR (CD19-CAR), an enhanced functioning high-affinity, non-cleavable CD16 (hnCD16) and a recombinant fusion of IL-15 and IL-15 receptor alpha (IL-15RF) for cytokine-autonomous persistence. The design of the CD19-CAR involved exploiting the intrinsic polyfunctionality of NK cells, which function by engaging multiple signaling pathways activated through combinations of distinct germline encoded receptors. Using this approach, the transmembrane region of activating receptor NKG2D, combined with the intracellular signaling domains of SLAM co-receptor 2B4 and CD3ζ, proved the most effective in triggering antigen specific functional responses in NK cells. Chimerization of an anti-CD19 scFv onto this NKG2D-2B4-CD3ζ signaling platform produced specific in vitro recognition of CD19+ B cell lymphoma cells in short-term and long-term NK cytotoxicity assays (>80% and <40% clearance of tumor cells at 60H, p<0.001 respectively). The functionality of the CD19-CAR was further enhanced in combination with autonomous IL-15 signaling. Introduction of the IL-15RF enabled expansion of iNK cells without addition of soluble cytokine and greatly improved longevity and functional persistence of iNK cells both in vitro and in animal models. Moreover, iNK cells modified with IL-15RF showed enhanced functional maturation, including upregulated expression of effector molecules such as granzyme B. iNK cells with both CD19-CAR and IL-15RF resulted in enhanced CAR functionality in vitro, and mouse models for B cell malignancy demonstrated that treatment with iNK cells engineered with CD19-CAR and IL-15RF were curative against B cell lymphoma (p<0.002), when compared with iNK cells alone or iNK cells modified with CD19-CAR alone. In combination with hnCD16, co-expression of CD19-CAR and IL15-RF culminates in iNK cells capable of dual-specificity through combinatorial use with monoclonal antibodies to tackle antigen escape. In long term killing assays, FT596 alone demonstrated equivalent levels of CD19 targeted anti-tumor activity as primary CD19-targeted CAR (CAR19) T cells when tested against CD19+ CD20+ B lymphoblast target cells and demonstrated enhanced levels of activity when used in combination with anti-CD20 (rituximab). When targeting CD19- CD20+ B lymphoblast target cells and used in combination with rituximab, only FT596 was able to effectively eliminate the CD19 antigen escaped target cell (64% vs 30% clearance of tumor cells at 36H vs rituximab alone). In vivo FT596 showed equivalent levels of tumor cell clearance as primary CAR19 T cells against the CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line NALM6 and CD19+CD20+ Burkitts lymphoma cell line RAJI, and enhanced clearance of RAJI tumor cells in combination with rituximab (p=0.0002). Furthermore, utilizing an allogenic human CD34 engrafted NSG mouse model, FT596 demonstrated improved survival and safety over primary CAR19 T cells, either as a monotherapy or as a combination therapy with rituximab versus RAJI tumor cells. Together, these studies demonstrate FT596 provides a multi-antigen targeting, potent and persistent engineered immune cell that is derived from a master iPSC line which utilizes the intrinsic versatility of NK cells to enable a highly effective combination therapy in a single, standardized, scalable, off-the-shelf platform and supports the rational for a first-of-kind Phase I Study as a monotherapy and in combination with CD20-targeted mAbs including rituximab in subjects with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma and leukemia. Figure Disclosures Goodridge: FATE THERAPEUTICS: Employment. Mahmood:Fate Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Gaidarova:Fate Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Bjordahl:Fate Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment. Cichocki:Fate Therapeutics, Inc: Research Funding. Chu:FATE THERAPEUTICS: Employment. Bonello:Fate Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment. Lee:Fate Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment. Groff:FATE THERAPEUTICS: Employment. Meza:FATE THERAPEUTICS: Employment. Malmberg:Vycellix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fate Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Miller:Moderna: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dr. Reddys Laboratory: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CytoSen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fate Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; OnKImmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GT BioPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kaufman:FATE Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Valamehr:Fate Therapeutics, Inc: Employment.

scholarly journals Impact of Interim FDG-PET (iPET) in the Outcomes of Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Receiving DA-EPOCH-R

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2898-2898
Author(s):  
Vania Phuoc ◽  
Leidy Isenalumhe ◽  
Hayder Saeed ◽  
Celeste Bello ◽  
Bijal Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
End Of Treatment

Introduction: 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) remains the standard of care for baseline and end of treatment scans for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, the role of interim FDG-PET remains not as well defined across aggressive NHLs, especially in the era of high-intensity chemoimmunotherapy. Interim FDG-PET (iPET) can serve as an early prognostic tool, and prior studies evaluating the utility of iPET-guided treatment strategies primarily focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Classification criteria systems assessing response also differ between studies with no clear consensus between use of Deauville criteria (DC), International Harmonization Project (IHP), and the ΔSUVmax method. Methods: This study evaluates our institutional experience with iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with or without Rituximab) in aggressive NHLs. We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who started on DA-EPOCH ± R between 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018 for aggressive NHLs. Response on interim and end-of-treatment (EOT) scans were graded per DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods, and progression free survival (PFS) probability estimates were calculated with chi-square testing and Kaplan Meier method. PFS outcomes were compared between interim negative and positive scans based on each scoring method. Outcomes were also compared between groups based on interim versus EOT positive or negative scans. Results: We identified 70 patients with aggressive NHLs who received DA-EPOCH ± R at our institute. The most common diagnoses were DLBCL (61%) followed by Burkitt's lymphoma (10%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (9%), plasmablastic lymphoma (7%), gray zone lymphoma (6%), primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma (1%), primary effusion lymphoma (1%), and other high-grade NHL not otherwise specified (3%). Of the 43 patients with DLBCL, 21/43 (49%) had double hit lymphoma (DHL) while 7/43 (16%) had triple hit lymphoma (THL), and 3/43 (7%) had MYC-rearranged DLBCL while 2/43 (5%) had double expressor DLBCL. Thirty nine out of 70 (56%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 58.39 years (range 22.99 - 86.86 years). Most patients had stage IV disease (49/70, 70%), and 43/70 (61%) had more than one extranodal site while 45/70 (64%) had IPI score ≥ 3. Forty-six out of 70 (66%) received central nervous system prophylaxis, most with intrathecal chemotherapy (44/70, 63%). Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) had iPET available while 6/70 (9%) had interim computerized tomography (CT) scans. Fifty-six out of 70 (80%) had EOT PET, and 4/70 (6%) had EOT CT scans. Sustained complete remission occurred in 46/70 (66%) after frontline DA-EPOCH ± R (CR1), and 12/70 (17%) were primary refractory while 5/70 (7%) had relapse after CR1. Four of 70 (6%) died before cycle 3, and 3/70 (4%) did not have long-term follow-up due to transition of care elsewhere. Median follow-up was 15.29 months (range 0.85 - 60.09 months). There was significantly better PFS observed if iPET showed DC 1-3 compared to DC 4-5 (Χ2=5.707, p=0.0169), and PFS was better if iPET was negative by IHP criteria (Χ2=4.254, p=0.0392) or ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=6.411, p=0.0113). Comparing iPET to EOT PET, there was significantly better PFS if iPET was negative with EOT PET negative (iPET-/EOT-) compared to iPET positive with EOT negative (iPET+/EOT-), and iPET+/EOT+ and iPET-/EOT+ had worse PFS after iPET-/EOT- and iPET+/EOT- respectively. This pattern in iPET/EOT PFS probability remained consistent when comparing DC (Χ2=30.041, p<0.0001), IHP (Χ2=49.078, p<0.0001), and ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=9.126, p=0.0104). These findings fit clinical expectations with positive EOT scans indicating primary refractory disease. There was no significant difference in PFS when comparing DLBCL versus non-DLBCL (Χ2=3.461, p=0.0628) or DHL/THL versus non-DHL/THL diagnoses (Χ2=2.850, p=0.0914). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a prognostic role of iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R for aggressive NHLs. Significant differences in PFS were seen when graded by DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods used in prior studies and when comparing interim versus EOT response. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures Bello: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Chavez:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Characterization of two new high-grade B-cell lymphoma cell lines with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements that are suitable for in vitro drug sensitivity studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 1043-1052
Author(s):  
Marie-Sophie Dheur ◽  
Hélène A. Poirel ◽  
Geneviève Ameye ◽  
Gaëlle Tilman ◽  
Pascale Saussoy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Drug Sensitivity ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphoma Cell ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Sensitivity Studies

Phase II Study Of Anti-CD19 Antibody Drug Conjugate (SAR3419) In Combination With Rituximab: Clinical Activity and Safety In Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (NCT01470456)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4395-4395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Sophie de Guibert ◽  
Jehan Dupuis ◽  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background SAR3419 is a humanized anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to maytansin DM4, a potent cytotoxic agent. SAR3419 targets CD19, an antigen expressed in the majority of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The recommended dose for single agent SAR3419 was previously determined to be 55 mg/m2 administered IV every week for 4 weeks, then bi-weekly. In phase I, clinical activity was shown mainly in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). (Trial funded by Sanofi). Methods Patients (pts) with a CD20+ and CD19+ DLBCL relapsing or refractory (R/R) after at least 1 standard treatment including rituximab and not candidate for or who already underwent transplantation, were eligible. Refractory disease was defined as unresponsive to or progressing within 6 months of regimen completion. Fresh (or recent formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) biopsy was required before SAR3419 start. Pts received 375 mg/m2 of rituximab (R) IV and 55 mg/m² of SAR3419 on day 1, 8, 15, 22 (35-day cycle 1), followed by bi-weekly R and SAR3419 at the same doses for 2 additional 28-day cycles, provided there was no disease progression or other study discontinuation criteria met. The primary objective was the overall response rate (ORR) following Cheson 2007 criteria, with the first tumor assessment being done 42 days after the last study treatment administration. Secondary objectives were: safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and correlation of the antitumor and biological activity of the combination with tumor biomarker status. Results Fifty-three pts were enrolled, 52 treated. Median age was 66.5 years (range 38-85), 50% were male; 23%, 33% and 40% of patients had received 1, 2 or ≥3 prior chemo/immunotherapy regimens for DLBCL, respectively. Of the enrolled patients, 3.8% had received no prior regimen for DLBCL and therefore were excluded from primary analysis for efficacy. Seventy-three percent had stage III/IV disease, 59% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and 63% had bulky disease. Sixty percent were refractory to first regimen (primary refractory), 16% were refractory to last regimen and 24% were relapsed pts. The ORR in the per-protocol population (n=45) was 31.1% (80% confidence interval (CI): 22.0% to 41.6%). Among the 14 responders, 5 had progressed at the time of analysis, with duration of response beyond 6 months for 3 of them. The ORR was 58.3% (80% CI: 36.2% to 78.1%) for patients with relapsed DLBCL (n=12), 42.9% (80% CI: 17.0% to 72.1%) for pts refractory to last regimen (n=7) and 15.4% (80% CI: 6.9% to 28.4%) for primary refractory pts (n=26). Overall survival and PFS data are not yet mature. Biomarkers and PK data will be presented at the meeting. The most common (≥10%) all grades non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were asthenia (25.0%), nausea (21.2%), cough (19.2%), diarrhea (17.3%), weight decrease (17.3%), vomiting (15.4%), dyspnea (15.4%), abdominal pain (13.5%), back pain (13.5%), pyrexia (13.5%) and constipation (11.5%). Related grade 3-4 TEAEs were: 1 syncope, 1 bronchospasm, 2 neutropenia and 1 anemia. No TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation, no grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy or grade 3-4 ocular events were observed. Two pts experienced grade 2 keratitis, both rapidly recovered with local treatment. Hematological toxicity was moderate, with grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 15.7% and 9.8% pts, respectively. No complications related to neutropenia were reported. Grade 3 transaminase increase was observed in 1 patient. Conclusions The combination of SAR3419 plus R showed moderate ORR in R/R DLBCL; however the study population was of poor prognosis (60% refractory to first line therapy). In the relapsed DLBCL patients a higher ORR was observed. SAR3419 plus R presented with a favorable safety profile. Further investigations on biomarker expression are ongoing to identify a sub-group of pts who could have better benefited from this combination. Disclosures: Coiffier: Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Phase II of SAR3419. Ribrag:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cartron:LFB: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Casasnovas:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hatteville:Sanofi: Employment. Zilocchi:Sanofi: Employment. Oprea:Sanofi: Employment. Tilly:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Poor Outcomes Among Patients Failing Dose-Adjusted EPOCH in Aggressive Lymphoma: A Collaborative, Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1518-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie Vandermeer ◽  
Allison M Winter ◽  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Ryan D. Cassaday ◽  
Brian T. Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Among patients with aggressive B-NHL who fail RCHOP, about half respond to standard salvage regimens and may proceed to curative-intent, transplant-based therapy. However, whether pts failing more intensive regimens such as dose-adjusted, infusional EPOCH benefit from standard salvage regimens is unclear. We hypothesized that such patients comprise a higher-risk cohort, facing inferior response rates and outcomes using standard salvage regimens. We undertook a collaborative study to assess response rates and survival among pts failing EPOCH for aggressive B-NHL, to inform patient management and design of clinical trials in this setting. Methods Pharmacy records and institutional databases were queried, identifying pts receiving EPOCH over the last 10 years at the University of Washington/SCCA and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for combined analysis. Under IRB approval, patient characteristics, histology, outcome with EPOCH, time to EPOCH failure, response to salvage, and overall survival were analyzed. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, B-cell-lymphoma unclassifiable, HIV-associated B cell lymphoma, and transformed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included. Pts receiving <2 cycles EPOCH, or who had inadequate follow-up (<3 months), were excluded. Failure of EPOCH was defined as failure to respond or progression during therapy, need for initiation of salvage therapy, or death during therapy of any cause. Adverse events or treatment change due to toxicity were not included in the definition of failure. JMP 11 was used to generate kaplan-meier survival estimates. Results 124 pts with aggressive B-NHL receiving EPOCH were identified. 54 had not relapsed, and among 70 remaining da-EPOCH failures, 37 met the above inclusion criteria. Median age was 55. 27% were female, and 23 received EPOCH as first-line therapy. All but 3 received rituximab with EPOCH. Histologies were primarily DLBCL in 22/37 (60%) and BCL-U in 12/37 (32%) carrying a MYC translocation; most of these harbored additional translocations in BCL2 and/or BCL6 (10/12). However, data regarding MYC rearrangement was not available for all pts. 2 had HIV-associated B-NHL and 3 had PMBCL. With 18 months follow up, the median time to EPOCH failure was 5 months. Only 3 EPOCH failures occurred late (>12 months). Median OS from the date of EPOCH failure was 10 months (Figure 1). Those receiving EPOCH as first-line therapy (23) had a median OS of 14 months from EPOCH failure, as opposed to 4 months for those receiving EPOCH as salvage therapy (log-rank p=.01). Salvage chemotherapy regimens after EPOCH were diverse, and generally ineffective; 6/28 (21%) regimens produced a response (Table 1). Among patients failing EPOCH within a year, platinum-containing salvage (RICE/RDHAP) was effective in only 2/13 patients (15%). 9 patients did not receive any salvage, most of whom died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice care. Conclusions A relatively low overall response rate (21%) was observed in this retrospective analysis of patients failing EPOCH. Analogous to early RCHOP failure in the CORAL study, those failing EPOCH within a year may face inferior outcomes with platinum-based salvage therapy. While combined from two institutions, our data represent a modest sample size and require confirmation. If verified, examination of mechanisms of resistance to EPOCH, and selecting EPOCH failures for clinical trials of novel targeted therapies and transplant-based approaches, may prove critical. Table 1. Salvage Therapy for REPOCH failures Regimen: response/total number treated Notes Response to any salvage: 6/28 (21%) Some patients received more than 1 chemo salvage; responses were tabulated per regimen. RICE: 4/12 2/3 alive post transplant(1 auto 1 allo; 1 declined transplant and survived; 1 died) RDHAP: 1/6 Gemcitabine-based: 0/5 HyperCVAD (Part A and/or B): 1/5 Survivor had CNS only relapse, received regimen B and transplant 9- received no systemic treatmen; most died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent/Abbott: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMarin: Research Funding; Piramal: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Hill:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Till:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Phase I/Ib Study of the Novel Immunotoxin MT-3724 in Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin's B-Cell Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5112-5112
Author(s):  
Paul A Hamlin ◽  
Catherine S. Diefenbach ◽  
David J. Valacer ◽  
Jack Higgins ◽  
Michelle A. Fanale
Keyword(s):  
B Cells ◽  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dose Cohort ◽  
Mixed Response

Abstract Background CD20 is selectively expressed on the surface of early pre-B-cells, remains throughout B-cell development, and is then lost from plasma cells. Because CD20 is present on the majority of B-cell lymphomas, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (MAb) therapy is widely employed in the treatment of NHL. However a majority of NHL patients eventually become refractory to CD20 MAb(s). Resistance mechanisms may include increased MAb catabolism, initial or post treatment selection of low CD20 expressing tumor cells, trogocytosis of surface CD20, failure of MAb effector mechanisms and/or impaired patient immune cell function. MT-3724 is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of a CD20 binding variable fragment (scFv) fused to the enzymatically active Shiga-like toxin-I A1 subunit (SLT-I A1). SLT-I A1 is an N-glycosidase that catalytically inactivates 60S ribosomal subunits causing inhibition of protein synthesis. Upon its scFv binding to cell surface CD20 in vitro, SLT-I A1 forces MT-3724 internalization which then routes in a predictable fashion to the cytosol and irreversibly inactivates the cell ribosomes triggering cell death. MT-3724 has been shown to specifically bind and kill CD20+ malignant human B-cells in vitro and non-human primate (NHP) B-cells in vivo. MT-3724 was tested for safety in healthy NHPs: 6 intravenous (IV) doses of MT-3724 were given over 12 days at doses of 50, 150, and 450 mcg/kg. There were no deaths or effects on serum chemistries in the NHP studies. The major observed toxicity (inappetence) resolved within 48 hours of last dose. There was a significant, dose-dependent NHP B-cell depletion by Day 3 at all doses. Given the preclinical activity and mechanism of action, a Phase I/Ib study of MT-3724 was initiated in NHL. Methods MT-3724 is being tested for safety and tolerability in a first-in-human, open label, ascending dose study (3 + 3 design) in sequential cohorts of 5, 10, 20 and 50 mcg/kg/dose. Eligible subjects who previously responded to a CD20 MAb containing therapy followed by relapse/recurrence of NHL receive 6 doses by 2 hour IV infusions over the first 12 days of a 28 day cycle (first cycle). With continued safety, tolerability and lack of tumor progression, subjects may receive up to 4 additional 6-dose cycles (21 days) with tumor assessments after cycles 2, 4 and 5. Dose escalation is based on < 33% dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed during the first 28 day cycle. Results Three NHL subjects (2 transformed DLBCL, 1 FL) have completed at least one cycle in the 5 mcg/kg/dose cohort with no protocol DLTs or infusion related reactions and are evaluable for safety. Non-DLTs included grade (Gr) 2-3 transient hyperglycemic episodes related to pre-infusion corticosteroid therapy (n=1); transient Gr 4 neutropenia, possibly related to MT-3724 during cycle 1, week 4 (n=1); Gr 4 hypercalcemia and acute kidney injury with Gr 3 hypophosphatemia during cycle 1, week 4 due to leukemic disease progression (n=1). Subject 1 completed 5 cycles of therapy, with a partial response achieved post cycle 2 sustained through cycle 5; Subject 3 had a mixed response (both subjects had transformed DLBCL). Three subjects have now initiated treatment in the 10 mcg/kg/dose cohort with updated data to be presented at the meeting. Conclusions MT-3724 at 5 mcg/kg/dose has been safely administered for up to 5 cycles in this first-in-human study in relapsed/refractory NHL subjects. Treatment with the 10 mcg/kg cohort has commenced with continuing dose ascension planned. There is early evidence of clinical activity. Disclosures Diefenbach: Gilead: Equity Ownership, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen Oncology: Consultancy; Idera: Consultancy; Immunogen: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Valacer:Molecular Templates: Employment. Higgins:Molecular Templates: Employment. Fanale:Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Nanatinostat (Nstat) and Valganciclovir (VGCV) in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive (EBV +) Lymphomas: Final Results from the Phase 1b/2 VT3996-201 Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 623-623
Author(s):  
Bradley M. Haverkos ◽  
Onder Alpdogan ◽  
Robert Baiocchi ◽  
Jonathan E Brammer ◽  
Tatyana A. Feldman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 1B

Abstract Introduction: EBV can be associated with several types of lymphomas, with reported frequencies of up to 8-10% in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 30-100% in peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) subtypes, 80% in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and 15-30% in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), with adverse impact on outcomes. Nanatinostat (Nstat) is a Class-I selective oral HDAC inhibitor that induces the expression of the lytic BGLF4 EBV protein kinase in EBV + tumor cells, activating ganciclovir (GCV) via phosphorylation. This results in GCV-induced inhibition of viral and cellular DNA synthesis and apoptosis. Herein we report the final results from this exploratory study for patients with R/R EBV + lymphomas (NCT03397706). Methods: Patients aged ≥18 with histologically confirmed EBV + lymphomas (defined as any degree of EBER-ISH positivity), R/R to ≥1 prior systemic therapies with an absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0×10 9/L, platelet count ≥50×10 9/L, and no curative treatment options per investigator were enrolled into 5 dose escalation cohorts to determine the recommended phase 2 doses (RP2D) of Nstat + VGCV for phase 2 expansion. Phase 2 patients received the RP2D (Nstat 20 mg daily, 4 days per week + VGCV 900 mg orally daily) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or withdrawal. Primary endpoints were safety/RP2D (phase 1b) and overall response rate (ORR) (phase 2); secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics, duration of response (DoR), time to response, progression free survival and overall survival. Responses were assessed using Lugano 2014 response criteria beginning at week 8. Results: As of 18 June 2021, 55 patients were enrolled (phase 1b: 25; phase 2: 30). Lymphoma subtypes were DLBCL (n=7), extranodal NK/T-cell (ENKTL) (n=9), PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (n=5), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (n=6), cutaneous T cell (n=1), HL (n=11), other B cell (n=3), and immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (IA-LPD) (n=13), including PTLD (n=4), HIV-associated (n=5), and other [n=4: systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=2), common variable/primary immunodeficiency (n=2)]. Median age was 60 years (range 19-84), M/F 35/20, median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-11), 76% had ≥2 prior therapies, 78% were refractory to their most recent prior therapy, and 84% had exhausted standard therapies. EBER positivity ranged from &lt;1 to 90% in 42 tumor biopsies with central lab review. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of all grades were nausea (38%), neutropenia (34%), thrombocytopenia (34%), and constipation (31%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs in &gt;10% of patients included neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (20%), and lymphopenia (14%). Dose reductions and interruptions due to treatment-related AEs were reported in 14 (25%) and 16 (29%) patients, respectively. Only 1 patient had to discontinue therapy. There were no cases of CMV reactivation. For 43 evaluable patients (EBER-ISH + with ≥ 1 post-treatment response assessment) across all histologies, the investigator-assessed ORR and complete response (CR) rates were 40% (17/43) and 19% (8/43) respectively. Patients with T/NK-NHL (n=15; all refractory to their last therapy) had an ORR of 60% (n=9) with 27% (n=4) CRs. Two patients (ENKTL and PTCL-NOS) in PR and CR respectively were withdrawn at 6.7 and 6.6 months (m) respectively for autologous stem cell transplantation. For DLBCL (n=6), ORR/CR was 67%/33% (both CRs were in patients refractory to first-line R-CHOP). For IA-LPD (n=13), ORR/CR was 30%/20% (PTLD: 1 CR, other: 1 CR, 1 PR). For HL (n=10), there was 1 PR (4 SD). The median DoR for all responders was 10.4 m, with a median follow-up from response of 5.7 m (range 1.9-34.1 m). For the 17 responders, 8 lasted ≥ 6 months. Conclusions: The combination of Nstat and VGCV was well-tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile and shows promising efficacy in patients with R/R EBV + lymphomas, particularly in refractory T/NK-NHL, a heterogeneous group of aggressive lymphomas with dismal outcomes, with multiple durable responses. Further evaluation of this novel combination therapy for the treatment of recurrent EBV + lymphomas is ongoing in the phase 2 VT3996-202 trial. Disclosures Haverkos: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Baiocchi: Prelude Therapeutics: Consultancy; viracta: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Codiak Biosciences: Research Funding; Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy. Brammer: Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. Feldman: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Other: Study investigator. Brem: Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SeaGen: Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KiTE Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys/Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Scheinberg: Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Alexion pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Joffe: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy. Katkov: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. McRae: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Royston: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Rojkjaer: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Porcu: Viracta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kiowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; DrenBio: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Safety of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Elderly Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 96-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dahlia Sano ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Nathan H. Fowler ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
F. B. Hagemeister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Car T ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy product that was FDA approved for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after at least two lines of systemic therapy. In the pivotal ZUMA-1 study, the best overall response (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates observed in 108 patients treated with axi-cel were 82% and 58%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of the patients remain in ongoing response (Neelapu et al. N Eng J Med 2017). Analysis of efficacy outcomes in patients <65 years (N=81) and ³65 years (N=27) showed that the ORR and ongoing response at 12 months were comparable between the two subgroups (Neelapu et al. N Eng J Med 2017). Whether the safety is also comparable between the two subgroups is unknown. Here, we report safety outcomes in elderly patients (³65 years) with large B-cell lymphoma treated with axi-cel at our institution. Methods We retrospectively analyzed and reviewed the data from patients treated with axi-cel at our institution. Patients had a diagnosis of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL), and transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL). Patients were treated with conditioning chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for 3 days followed by axi-cel infusion after 2 days of rest at a dose of 2 x 106 CAR+ T cells/kg body weight. Patients were monitored for toxicities for at least 7 days in the hospital after CAR T infusion and those who had at least 30 days of follow-up after axi-cel were considered to be evaluable for safety. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological toxicity termed as CAR-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES) were graded according to the CARTOX grading system (Neelapu et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018). Results A total of 61 patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received axi-cel at our institution were included. Of these, 44 (72%) patients were <65 years of age and 17 (28%) patients were ³65 years of age. The baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. ORR and CR rates at Day 30 were comparable between the two groups. CRS was common in both groups and was observed in 83% and 91% of the patients in the older and younger age groups, respectively. But most CRS events were grade 1-2. Grade 3 or higher CRS was observed in 18% vs. 11% in the older vs. younger age groups (P=0.67). One patient with a history of autoimmune disease in the elderly group died of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). CRES was observed in 58% and 71% of the patients in the older and younger age groups, respectively. Grade 3 or higher CRES was observed in 29% vs. 39% in the older vs. younger age groups (P=0.58). Median hospitalization period for axi-cel CAR T-cell therapy was comparable between the two groups. Conclusions Our results suggest that response rates are comparable between the elderly and younger age groups at day 30 after axi-cel therapy. Importantly, toxicities due to CRS and/or CRES after axi-cel CD19 CAR T cell therapy are comparable between the elderly (³65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Nastoupil: Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Juno: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therappeutics: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Fowler:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Samaniego:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wang:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Westin:Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apotex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document