scholarly journals Identification of Small Molecule Kinase Inhibitors That Potently and Reversibly Block Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Proliferation and Cytotoxicity

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2068-2068
Author(s):  
Parmeshwar Amatya ◽  
Matthew L. Cooper ◽  
Alun J Carter ◽  
John F. DiPersio
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: Despite remarkable clinical efficacy, CAR-T therapy has been limited by life threatening toxicities in over 30% of patients.1, 2 Toxicities primarily manifest as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) characterized by an early phase with fever, hypotension and elevations of cytokines including IFNγ, GM-CSF, TNF, IL-10, and IL-6 and a later phase associated with life-threatening or life-ending neurologic events. We hypothesized that reversible inhibition of CAR mediated signaling will enable controllable regulation of CAR-T cell activity in vivo and mitigate CAR-T mediated toxicities. There are specific protein kinases such as the SRC kinases, LCK, and ZAP-70 that are known to be involved in various cellular signaling pathways, especially T cell receptor mediated signaling and may also be appropriate targets for modulating (both enhancing and inhibiting) CAR-T function in a rapid and reversible fashion in vivo. Our hypothesis is that small molecule inhibitors of TCR signaling and downstream pathways could be identified using specific high throughput screens. Methods: To identify novel inhibitors of CAR-T cell proliferation, we developed a high throughput kinase inhibitor screen to identify compounds that reversibly inhibit CAR-T function. T cells containing a third generation CAR targeting CD19 cells (CAR19) and CD19+ tumor cells (Ramos cells expressing both GFP and luciferase) were incubated at an effector to target ratio of 1:1 in 96 well plates in the presence of 1µM of each inhibitor. After 24 hours, tumor cell death induced by CAR-T was measured using bioluminescence (BLI) imaging. Small molecules that inhibited CAR-T proliferation and cytotoxicity were determined by assessing the BLI signal in each well. Results: A protein kinase inhibitor library (Selleckchem, Texas) containing 644 independent compounds was tested (Figure 1). Of the 644 kinase inhibitors tested, 32 were found to be potent inhibitors of CART19 cell activation and cytotoxic killing of CD19+ target tumor cells, reducing anti-tumor viability in 24 hours by >50% compared to vehicle control. Compounds such as Nintedanib (C3), Dasatinib (C9), and Saracatinib (C12), all SRC kinase inhibitors, were able to inhibit cell killing by 99%, 84%, and 76% respectively. Next we assessed the reversibility of CAR-T cell mediated killing upon removal of inhibitors from the cultures. Reinitiation of potent, anti-tumor activity was observed within 24 hours after inhibitor removal, confirming reversible nature of CAR-T cell inhibition by the three most potent compounds. Conclusions: Recent publications (Weber et al Blood Adv, 2018, Westermann et al. Sci Transl Med, 2019) have also shown that dasatinib can reversibly suppresses CAR-T cell cytotoxicity, cytokine secretion, and proliferation in vitro and in vivo. 3, 4 Here we confirm the reports of others regarding dasatinib and that show for the first time that reversible inhibition of CAR-T activity by kinase inhibitors is not limited solely to dasatanib, but is observed with other small molecules targeting many different kinases. This work further demonstrates the potential applications of tyrosine kinase inhibitors as a safety switch to modulate CAR-T cell toxicity. 1. Maude, NEJM 2014 2. Davila, SciTransMed 2014 3. Mestermann SciTransMed 2019 4. Weber. Blood Adv 2019 Disclosures Cooper: Wugen: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. DiPersio:WUGEN: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; RiverVest Venture Partners Arch Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellworks Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Bioline Rx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Macrogenics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Development and Evaluation of a Human Single Chain Variable Fragment (scFv) Derived Bcma Targeted CAR T Cell Vector Leads to a High Objective Response Rate in Patients with Advanced MM

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 742-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L Smith ◽  
Sham Mailankody ◽  
Arnab Ghosh ◽  
Reed Masakayan ◽  
Mette Staehr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) rarely obtain durable remissions with available therapies. Clinical use of BCMA targeted CAR T cell therapy was first reported in 12/2015 for RRMM, and based on small numbers, preliminary results appear promising. Given that host immune anti-murine CAR responses have limited the efficacy of repeat dosing (Turtle C. Sci Trans Med 2016), our goal was to develop a human BCMA targeted CAR T cell vector for clinical translation. We screened a human B cell derived scFv phage display library containing 6x1010 scFvs with BCMA expressing NIH 3T3 cells, and validated results on human MM cell lines. 57 unique and diverse BCMA specific scFvs were identified containing light and heavy chain CDR's each covering 6 subfamilies, with HCDR3 length ranges from 5-18 amino acids. 17 scFvs met stringent specificity criteria, and a diverse set was cloned into CAR vectors with either a CD28 or a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. Donor T cells transduced with BCMA targeted CAR vectors that conveyed particularly desirable properties over multiple in vitro assays, including: cytotoxicity on human MM cell lines at low E:T ratios (>90% lysis, 1:1, 16h), robust proliferation after repeat antigen stimulation (up to 700 fold, stimulation q3-4d for 14d), and active cytokine profiling, were selected for in vivo studies using a marrow predominant human MM cell line model in NSG mice. A single IV injection of CAR T cells, either early (4d) or late (21d) after MM engraftment was evaluated. In both cases survival was increased when treated with BCMA targeted CAR T cells vs CD19 targeted CAR T cells (median OS at 60d NR vs 35d p<0.05). Tumor and CAR T cells were imaged in vivo by taking advantage of luciferase constructs with different substrates. Results show rapid tumor clearance, peak (>10,000 fold) CAR T expansion at day 6, followed by contraction of CAR T cells after MM clearance, confirming the efficacy of the anti-BCMA scFv/4-1BB containing construct. Co-culture with primary cells from a range of normal tissues did not activate CAR T cells as noted by a lack of IFN release. Co-culture of 293 cells expressing this scFv with those expressing a library of other TNFRSF or Ig receptor members demonstrated specific binding to BCMA. GLP toxicity studies in mice showed no unexpected adverse events. We generated a retroviral construct for clinical use including a truncated epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFRt) elimination gene: EGFRt/hBCMA-41BBz. Clinical investigation of this construct is underway in a dose escalation, single institution trial. Enrollment is completed on 2/4 planned dose levels (DL). On DL1 pts received cyclophosphamide conditioning (3g/m2 x1) and 72x106 mean CAR+ T cells. On DL2 pts received lower dose cyclophosphamide/fludarabine (300/30 mg/m2 x3) and 137x106 mean CAR+ T cells. All pts screened for BCMA expression by IHC were eligible. High risk cytogenetics were present in 4/6 pts. Median prior lines of therapy was 7; all pts had IMiD, PI, high dose melphalan, and CD38 directed therapies. With a data cut off of 7/20/17, 6 pts are evaluable for safety. There were no DLT's. At DL1, grade 1 CRS, not requiring intervention, occurred in 1/3 pts. At DL2, grade 1/2 CRS occurred in 2/3 pts; both received IL6R directed Tocilizumab (Toci) with near immediate resolution. In these 2 pts time to onset of fever was a mean 2d, Tmax was 39.4-41.1 C, peak CRP was 25-27mg/dl, peak IL6 level pre and post Toci were 558-632 and 3375-9071 pg/ml, respectively. Additional serum cytokines increased >10 fold from baseline in both pts include: IFNg, GM CSF, Fractalkine, IL5, IL8, and IP10. Increases in ferritin were limited, and there were no cases of hypofibrinogenemia. There were no grade 3-5 CRS and no neurotoxicities or cerebral edema. No pts received steroids or Cetuximab. Median time to count recovery after neutropenia was 10d (range 6-15d). Objective responses by IMWG criteria after a single dose of CAR T cells were observed across both DLs. At DL1, of 3 pts, responses were 1 VGPR, 1 SD, and 1 pt treated with baseline Mspike 0.46, thus not evaluable by IMWG criteria, had >50% reduction in Mspike, and normalization of K/L ratio. At DL2, 2/2 pts had objective responses with 1 PR and 1 VGPR (baseline 95% marrow involvement); 1 pt is too early to evaluate. As we are employing a human CAR, the study was designed to allow for an optional second dose in pts that do not reach CR. We have treated 2 pts with a second dose, and longer follow up data is pending. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Smith: Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: BCMA targeted CAR T cells, Research Funding. Almo: Cue Biopharma: Other: Founder, head of SABequity holder; Institute for Protein Innovation: Consultancy; AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP: Consultancy. Wang: Eureka Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xu: Eureka Therapeutics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Park: Amgen: Consultancy. Curran: Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Dogan: Celgene: Consultancy; Peer Review Institute: Consultancy; Roche Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liu: Eureka Therpeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Brentjens: Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (liso-cel) for Treatment of Second-Line Transplant Noneligible (TNE) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): Initial Results from the PILOT Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2882-2882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison R. Sehgal ◽  
John Godwin ◽  
John Pribble ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Jerill Thorpe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Large B Cell

Background: Patients (pts) with R/R aggressive large B cell NHL who fail first-line therapy with immunochemotherapy and are ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have a poor prognosis. Available treatment options include platinum/gemcitabine-based or bendamustine-based regimens in combination with rituximab, with or without radiotherapy, or clinical trials. However, long-term outcomes remain poor due to lack of a curative option. Liso-cel is an investigational, anti-CD19, defined composition, 4-1BB CAR T cell product administered at target doses of CD4+ and CD8+ CAR T cells. In the ongoing TRANSCEND NHL 001 study of liso-cel as third- or later-line treatment for pts with R/R large B cell NHL, preliminary data showed high overall response rates with a low incidence of grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events (NEs) (Abramson et al, ASCO 2018). The open-label, phase 2 PILOT study is assessing the safety and efficacy of liso-cel as second-line therapy in TNE pts (NCT03483103). PILOT is the first study evaluating CAR T cell therapy focusing on this pt population. Methods: Eligible pts had R/R large B cell NHL (diffuse large B cell lymphoma [DLBCL], not otherwise specified [NOS], de novo or transformed indolent NHL, high-grade lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 [double/triple-hit lymphoma], or follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 3B) and had received only 1 prior line of immunochemotherapy containing an anthracycline and a CD20-targeted agent (eg, R-CHOP). Pts had to be deemed ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy followed by HSCT by meeting at least 1 of the following TNE criteria while still fulfilling the criteria for CAR T cell therapy: age ≥70 years, ECOG PS of 2, and/or impaired pulmonary (DLCO ≤60% but SaO2 ≥92% on room air and CTCAE ≤1 dyspnea), cardiac (LVEF ≥40% and <50%), renal (creatinine clearance >30 and <60 mL/min), or hepatic function (AST/ALT >2 and ≤5 ×ULN). Liso-cel was administered at a target dose of 100×106 CAR+ T cells after lymphodepletion (LD) with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide for 3 days. Pts could be treated as outpatients at the investigator's discretion. Results: At data cutoff, 10 pts had been leukapheresed, and 9 pts had LD followed by liso-cel infusion; 1 pt is awaiting liso-cel treatment. Liso-cel was manufactured successfully in all pts. Five pts were infused and monitored as outpatients. Median age was 71 (range, 64-79) years; 5 pts were male. Histology included DLBCL NOS (n=7) and transformed FL (n=2); 2 pts had triple-hit, one of whom had transformed from FL. Five pts had relapsed from, and 4 pts had disease refractory to, prior therapy. Median SPD and LDH were 26.6 cm2 and 201 U/L, respectively. Four pts had high tumor burden with SPD ≥50 cm2 (n=4) and/or LDH ≥500 U/L (n=1). The median Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score was 3 (range, 0-3). Six pts had 1 or more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) grade ≥3, which were primarily cytopenias. Three pts had prolonged grade ≥3 cytopenias at Day 29. Two pts had infections of any grade; no pts had grade ≥3 infections. No pts had CRS or NEs, and no pts received tocilizumab, corticosteroids, or vasopressors. There were no cases of macrophage activation syndrome, tumor lysis syndrome, infusion reactions, or grade 5 TEAEs. Among the 5 pts treated and monitored as outpatients, none were admitted to hospital for adverse events within the first 29 days post liso-cel infusion. All 9 pts achieved an objective response. Four pts achieved complete response; all are ongoing. Five pts achieved partial response (PR), with 2 PRs ongoing. Results were similar in inpatient vs outpatient pts. Median follow-up was 3.5 months. Median (range) time to peak CAR T cell expansion was 10 (7-21) days. Conclusions: These preliminary safety and efficacy data from the ongoing phase 2 PILOT study suggest that liso-cel can be successfully administered, including in the outpatient setting, as second-line therapy in pts with R/R aggressive B cell NHL who were ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and HSCT by prespecified criteria. Updated safety and efficacy data with longer follow-up will be presented. Disclosures Sehgal: Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Juno/Celgene: Research Funding. Pribble:Celgene/Juno: Employment. Wang:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Thorpe:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hildebrandt:Axim Biotechnologies: Equity Ownership; Abbvie: Equity Ownership; GW Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Endocyte: Equity Ownership; Clovis Oncology: Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; CVS Health: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Axim Biotechnologies: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Sangamo: Equity Ownership; Cellectis: Equity Ownership; Bluebird Bio: Equity Ownership; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Equity Ownership; crispr therapeutics: Equity Ownership; IDEXX laboratories: Equity Ownership; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Procter & Gamble: Equity Ownership; Vertex: Equity Ownership; Scotts-Miracle: Equity Ownership; Takeda: Research Funding; Bayer: Equity Ownership; Astellas: Other: Travel; Kite Pharma: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Novartis: Equity Ownership; Aetna: Equity Ownership; Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Cardinal Health: Equity Ownership; Novartis: Equity Ownership; Insys Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Immunomedics: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Predictors of T Cell Expansion and Clinical Responses Following B-Cell Maturation Antigen-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy (CART-BCMA) for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1974-1974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam D. Cohen ◽  
J. Joseph Melenhorst ◽  
Alfred L. Garfall ◽  
Simon F Lacey ◽  
Megan Davis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) MM is associated with progressive immune dysfunction, including reversal of CD4:CD8 T cell ratio and acquisition of terminally-differentiated T cell phenotypes. BCMA-directed CAR T cells have promising activity in MM, but the factors that predict for robust in vivo expansion and responses are not known. In a phase 1 study of CART-BCMA (autologous T cells expressing a human BCMA-specific CAR with CD3ζ/4-1BB signaling domains) in refractory MM patients (median 7 priors, 96% high-risk cytogenetics), we observed partial response (PR) or better in 12/25 (47%) (Cohen et al, ASH 2017, #505). Recently, we demonstrated in CLL pts receiving CD19-directed CAR T cells that certain T cell phenotypes prior to generation of the CAR T product were associated with improved in vivo expansion and clinical outcomes (Fraietta et al, Nat Med 2018). We thus sought to identify pre-treatment clinical or immunological features associated with CART-BCMA expansion and/or response. Methods: Three cohorts were enrolled: 1) 1-5 x 108 CART cells alone; 2) cyclophosphamide (Cy) 1.5 g/m2 + 1-5 x 107 CART cells; and 3) Cy 1.5 g/m2 + 1-5 x 108 CART cells. Phenotypic analysis of peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells, frozen leukapheresis aliquots, and phenotype and in vitro kinetics of CART-BCMA growth during manufacturing were performed by flow cytometry. CART-BCMA in vivo expansion was assessed by flow cytometry and qPCR. Responses were assessed by IMWG criteria. Results: Responses (≥PR) were seen in 4/9 pts (44%, 1 sCR, 2 VPGR, 1 PR) in cohort 1; 1/5 (20%, 1 PR) in cohort 2; and 7/11 (64%, 1 CR, 3 VGPR, 3 PR) in cohort 3. As of 7/9/18, 3/25 (12%) remain progression-free at 11, 14, and 32 months post-infusions. As previously described, responses were associated with both peak in vivo CART-BCMA expansion (p=0.002) as well as expansion over first month post-infusion (AUC-28, p=0.002). No baseline clinical or MM-related characteristic was significantly associated with expansion or response, including age, isotype, time from diagnosis, # prior therapies, being quad- or penta-refractory, presence of del 17p or TP53 mutation, serum hemoglobin, BM MM cell percentage, MM cell BCMA intensity, or soluble BCMA concentration. Treatment regimen given before leukapheresis or CART-BCMA infusions also had no predictive value. We did find, however, that higher CD4:CD8 T cell ratios within the leukapheresis product were associated with greater in vivo CART-BCMA expansion (Spearman's r=0.56, p=0.005) and clinical response (PR or better; p=0.014, Mann-Whitney). In addition, and similar to our CLL data, we found that a higher frequency of CD8 T cells within the leukapheresis product with an "early-memory" phenotype of CD45RO-CD27+ was also associated with improved expansion (Spearman's r=0.48, p=0.018) and response (p=0.047); Analysis of manufacturing data confirmed that higher CD4:CD8 ratio at culture start was associated with greater expansion (r=0.41, p=0.044) and, to a lesser degree, responses (p=0.074), whereas absolute T cell numbers or CD4:CD8 ratio in final CART-BCMA product was not (p=NS). In vitro expansion during manufacturing did associate with in vivo expansion (r=0.48, p=0.017), but was not directly predictive of response. At the time of CART-BCMA infusion, the frequency of total T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, B cells, and CD3+CD56+ cells within the PB or BM was not associated with subsequent CART-BCMA expansion or clinical response; higher PB and BM CD4:CD8 ratio pre-infusion correlated with expansion (r=0.58, p=0.004 and r=0.64, p=0.003, respectively), but not with response. Conclusions: In this study, we found that CART-BCMA expansion and responses in heavily-pretreated MM patients were not associated with tumor burden or other clinical characteristics, but did correlate with certain immunological features prior to T cell collection and manufacturing, namely preservation of normal CD4:CD8 ratio and increased frequency of CD8 T cells with a CD45RO-CD27+ phenotype. This suggests that patients with less dysregulated immune systems may generate more effective CAR T cell products in MM, and has implications for optimizing patient selection, timing of T cell collection, and manufacturing techniques to try to overcome these limitations in MM patients. Disclosures Cohen: Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Melenhorst:Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy: Research Funding; novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Casi Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Shanghai UNICAR Therapy, Inc: Consultancy. Garfall:Amgen: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Bioinvent: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lacey:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Patents & Royalties; Parker Foundation: Research Funding; Tmunity: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding. Davis:Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Inc.: Patents & Royalties. Vogl:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy. Pruteanu:Novartis: Employment. Plesa:Novartis: Research Funding. Young:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Levine:Novartis: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; CRC Oncology: Consultancy; Incysus: Consultancy; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Brammer Bio: Consultancy; Cure Genetics: Consultancy. June:Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celldex: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Stadtmauer:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy. Milone:Novartis: Patents & Royalties.

scholarly journals Safety and Anti-Tumor Activity of CD5 CAR T-Cells in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 199-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
LaQuisa C. Hill ◽  
Rayne H. Rouce ◽  
Tyler S. Smith ◽  
Lina Yang ◽  
Madhuwanti Srinivasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
T Cell Malignancies

Introduction: We describe a Phase I dose escalation study (NCT03081910) of autologous CD5-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CD5 CAR T) therapy for relapsed or refractory (r/r) T-cell leukemia and lymphoma. Establishing a CAR T cell platform to target neoplasms of T-cell origin has been hindered by the shared expression of most targetable antigens on both malignant and normal T lymphocytes, which can promote CAR T cell fratricide. CD5 is one such pan-T cell surface marker present in ~85% of T-cell malignancies. We developed a second-generation CD5-specific CAR with CD28 costimulatory endodomain that produces minimal and transient fratricide when expressed in T cells. We designed this study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of treating patients with r/r T-cell malignancies with these CD5 CAR T cells as a bridge to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Secondary objectives of our study included evaluating the antitumor response, in vivo expansion, persistence of CD5 CAR T cells, as well as their impact on normal T-cell numbers and function. Patients and methods: CD5 CAR T cells were generated from autologous PBMCs using gammaretroviral transduction and cryopreserved. We detected no residual malignant cells in the CD5 CAR T cell products by flow cytometry. To date, we have treated a total of 9 patients (8 adults and 1 adolescent; age 16-71 years [median 62 yrs]) with CD5+ r/r T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL; n=4) or T-non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (T-NHL; n=5) on dose levels 1 and 2. All patients were transplant-eligible with an identified allogeneic HSCT donor, yet unable to proceed due to residual disease. All patients had been heavily pretreated, with a median of 5 (range 2 -18) prior lines of therapy. Two patients had previously failed allogeneic HSCT. Patients received cytoreductive chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by a single dose of CD5 CAR T cells. We evaluated adverse events, clinical responses, and in vivo expansion and persistence pre and post-infusion. Results: Three patients received CD5 CAR T cells on dose level 1 (1x107 CAR T cells/m2) and 6 on dose level 2 (5x107 CAR T cells/m2). In all patients treated, CAR T cells reached peak expansion in peripheral blood (PB) 1-4 weeks following infusion, followed by a gradual contraction in most patients (Figure 1). CD5 CAR T cells were present in lymph node and marrow biopsies in patients with T-NHL and T-ALL, respectively, and were also detected in a CSF sample in 1 T-ALL patient. After cytoreduction and CAR T cell infusion, we observed decreased PB CD3+ cell numbers but this ablation was never complete. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 3/9 patients (all at dose level 2). Grade 1 CRS was observed in 2 patients. One patient experienced Grade 2 CRS and Grade 2 neurotoxicity, which resolved after administration of tocilizumab and supportive care, respectively. Two patients had prolonged cytopenias at 6 weeks, 1 of whom had viral reactivation (CMV and BK virus) requiring antiviral therapy. On disease re-evaluation 4-8 weeks post-CD5 CAR T cell infusion, 4 of 9 evaluable patients obtained an objective response (1 of 3 on DL1 and 3 of 6 on DL2). Complete responses (CR) were achieved in 3 patients, one with angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL), one with peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL), and one with T-ALL. Two of these patients did not wish or were unable to proceed to planned HSCT and relapsed with their underlying CD5+ malignancy at 6 weeks and 7 months post-infusion. The remaining patient is currently undergoing work-up for HSCT (Figure 2). An additional patient with extensive AITL was classified as a mixed response (Figure 3) due to the appearance of a new PET-avid lesion. This patient received a second infusion of CD5-CAR T cells, proceeded to HSCT, and remains in CR at 125 days post-transplant. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that CD5 CAR T cells are safe and can induce clinical responses in heavily treated patients with r/r CD5+ T-ALL and T-NHL without inducing complete T-cell aplasia. Importantly, elimination of malignant T cells by CD5 CAR T cells may allow previously ineligible patients to proceed to HSCT. Disclosures Rouce: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria. Grilley:Allovir: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Marker Therapeutics: Consultancy; Tessa: Consultancy. Heslop:Marker Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Allovir: Equity Ownership; Gilead Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding. Brenner:Allovir: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Marker Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; T Scan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Memgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Allogene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Potent Synergy between Combination of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) Therapy Targeting CD19 in Conjunction with Dendritic Cell (DC)/Tumor Fusion Vaccine in Hematological Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3227-3227
Author(s):  
Marzia Capelletti ◽  
Jessica Liegel ◽  
Maria Themeli ◽  
Tuna Mutis ◽  
Dina Stroopinsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: CAR T cells have demonstrated unique potency for tumor cytoreduction and the potential for durable response in patients with advanced hematological malignancies. However, disease relapse remains a significant concern due to the emergence of antigen negative variants, tolerization of CAR T cell populations and lack of T cell persistence. We have developed a personalized cancer vaccine in which patient derived tumor cells are fused with autologous dendritic cells such that a broad array of tumor antigens is expressed in the context of DC mediated co-stimulation. Vaccination of patients with acute leukemia and multiple myeloma has been associated with the durable expansion of tumor specific lymphocytes in the bone marrow and peripheral blood, targeting of residual disease, and durable remission. We postulated that vaccination with DC/tumor fusions would enhance CAR T cell efficacy through the expansion of T cell clonal populations targeting tumor cells via the native TCR and the vaccine mediated enhancement of T cell activation and persistence. In addition, ex vivo engineered CAR T cells provide a substrate of functionally competent T cells with cytoreductive capacity in the setting of advanced disease. In the present study, we examined the potential synergy between CAR T cells targeting CD19 and syngeneic DC/tumor fusions. Methods/Results: CAR T cells and DC/tumor fusions were studied in the context of a murine A20 lymphoma model. CD19 CAR T cells were established through retroviral transduction of a CD19 CAR construct expressing CD28 and 41BBL syngeneic DC/A20 fusions were generated as previously described. Vaccine stimulated T cells were generated by coculturing splenocyte derived T cells with syngeneic DC/A20 fusion cells over a period of three days in a 10:1 ratio in the presence of low dose IL2. While CD19 CAR T cells effectively lysed a subset of A20 cells in a CTL, the addition of vaccine educated T cells increased the percentage of tumor cells undergoing CTL mediated lysis (20% vs 34%). We subsequently examined the interaction of vaccine and CAR T cells ex vivo using the IncuCyte S3 Live-Cell Analysis System which allows for live cell visualization of lysis of A20 cells over time. We studied the impact of combining vaccine educated and CAR T cells as well as an individual T cell population that underwent sequential vaccine mediated stimulation followed by transduction with the CD19 CAR. While vaccine educated and CAR T cells demonstrated potent lysis of A20 cells over time, coculture with either combined vaccine educated and CAR T cells or sequentially vaccine educated and transduced T cells demonstrated the highest levels of cytotoxicity that was maintained over time (1786 and 2338 signal overlap count per image at 23 hours compared to 123 of the control). Enhanced lysis by combined vaccine stimulation and CAR T cells was similarly demonstrated in another tumor cell line, 5TGM1, a multiple myeloma cell line transduced to express CD19. Cytotoxic killing of the 5TGM1-CD19 cells was most pronounced when combining vaccine educated and CAR T cells as compared to CAR T cells alone (33% vs 14%). Consistent with the broad targeting of vaccine educated as compared to the CAR T cell population, wild type 5TGM1 cells were recognized by the DC/tumor fusion stimulated cells in contrast to CAR T cells alone (40% vs. 8%). We subsequently examined the capacity of vaccine educated T cells in conjunction with CAR T cells to target A20 cells in an immunocompetent murine model. Mice were challenged with 1 x 10(6) A20 Mcherry-Luc and lymphoma engraftment was demonstrated at Day 7. Animals were then treated with 3 x 10(6) T cells consisting of CAR T cells, vaccine educated T cells or the combination. Serial bioluminescence imaging demonstrated greatest reduction in tumor burden using combined CAR T and vaccine educated T cells with 4/5 animals without BLI evidence of disease at day 13 after tumor challenge. Conclusions: In in vitro and immunocompetent murine models, we have demonstrated that combined therapy with T cells stimulated by DC/tumor fusions and CAR T cells exhibited potent lysis of murine lymphoma and myeloma cells as compared to the efficacy of CAR T cells or vaccine educated T cells alone. These findings suggest potent synergy between these modalities that may overcome recognized pathways of resistance including the broadening of the tumor specific response and vaccine mediated activation of CAR T cell populations. Disclosures Themeli: Covagen: Consultancy. Mutis:Janssen Research and Development: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Onkimmune: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding. Munshi:Adaptive: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Kufe:Genus Oncology: Equity Ownership; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria; Nanogen Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hillstream BioPharma: Equity Ownership; Victa BioTherapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Canbas: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosenblatt:BMS: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Merck: Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Other: Advisory Board ; Parexel: Consultancy; Imaging Endpoint: Consultancy; Partner Tx: Other: Advisory Board; Dava Oncology: Other: Education; Celgene: Research Funding. Sadelain:Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Employment; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Avigan:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partners Tx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partner Tx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Parexel: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Comparison of Efficacy and Toxicity of CD19-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells Alone or in Combination with Ibrutinib for Relapsed and/or Refractory CLL

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 299-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Gauthier ◽  
Alexandre V. Hirayama ◽  
Kevin A. Hay ◽  
Daniel Li ◽  
James Lymp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Cell Immunotherapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
T Cell Immunotherapy

Abstract Background We reported durable responses to CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell therapy (JCAR014) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients (pts) after prior failure of ibrutinib (Turtle, JCO 2017; NCT01865617). In those pts, ibrutinib was not administered during CAR-T cell immunotherapy. Continuation of ibrutinib through leukapheresis, lymphodepletion and CAR-T cell therapy may prevent tumor progression after ibrutinib withdrawal, mobilize tumor into the blood, improve CAR-T cell function, and decrease cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Methods We conducted a phase 1/2 study of CD19 CAR-T cell immunotherapy in R/R CLL pts and established a regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine (Cy/Flu) lymphodepletion followed by JCAR014 at 2 x 106 CAR-T cells/kg (Turtle, JCO 2017). We then compared outcomes of these pts (No-ibr cohort) with a subsequent cohort that received Cy/Flu with 2 x 106/kg JCAR014 CAR-T cells with concurrent ibrutinib (420 mg/d) from at least 2 weeks prior to leukapheresis until at least 3 months after JCAR014 infusion (Ibr cohort). Dose reduction was permitted for toxicity. CRS was graded by consensus criteria (Lee, Blood 2014) and neurotoxicity and other adverse events were graded by CTCAE v4.03. Response was evaluated according to 2008 IWCLL criteria. Results Seventeen and 19 pts were treated in the Ibr and No-ibr cohorts, respectively. Pt characteristics were comparable (Table 1). Progression on ibrutinib was noted in 16 (94%) and 18 pts (95%) in the Ibr and No-ibr cohorts, respectively, and prior ibrutinib intolerance was reported in 1 pt in each cohort. The time to intolerance or failure of ibrutinib prior to treatment with JCAR014 was longer, and the pre-leukapheresis LDH was lower in the Ibr compared to the No-ibr cohort. The median follow-up in responders was 98 and 764 days in the Ibr and No-ibr cohorts, respectively. Administration of ibrutinib with Cy/Flu and JCAR014 was well tolerated in most pts; ibrutinib was reduced or discontinued in 6 pts (35%) at a median of 21 days after JCAR014 infusion. In the Ibr cohort, 1 pt with grade 2 CRS developed fatal presumed cardiac arrhythmia and 1 pt developed a subdural hematoma in the setting of trauma and thrombocytopenia. No differences in the incidences of grade ≥3 cytopenias were observed. Concurrent ibrutinib administration did not appear to affect the frequency or severity of neurotoxicity. Although the proportions of pts with grade ≥1 CRS were similar between cohorts (76% vs 89%, P = 0.39), the severity of CRS (grade ≥3 CRS: Ibr, 0%; No-Ibr, 26%; P = 0.05) and serum peak IL-8 (P = 0.04), IL-15 (P = 0.003) and MCP-1 (P = 0.004) concentrations were lower in the Ibr cohort. However, we found comparable CD8+ (P = 0.29) and higher CD4+ (P = 0.06) CAR-T cell counts in blood in the Ibr cohort. Sixteen pts (94%) and 18 pts (95%) in the Ibr and No-ibr cohorts, respectively, have completed response assessment. We observed a higher proportion of responders (complete and partial remission) by IWCLL criteria in the Ibr compared to the No-ibr cohort (88% vs 56%, respectively, P = 0.06). Ten of 12 pts (83%) with lymph node disease before treatment with Cy/Flu and JCAR014 in the Ibr cohort achieved CR or PR by IWCLL imaging criteria, compared to 10/17 pts (59%) in the No-ibr cohort (P = 0.23). The proportion of pts with pretreatment bone marrow (BM) disease who had no disease by flow cytometry after CAR-T cell immunotherapy was similar in the Ibr compared to the No-ibr cohort (75% vs 65%, P = 0.71). However, among pts with no disease by BM flow cytometry after CAR-T cell immunotherapy, a higher proportion of pts in the Ibr cohort had no malignant IGH sequences at 4 weeks (83% vs 60%, respectively, P = 0.35). We performed univariate logistic regression analysis for response by IWCLL criteria and variables with P < 0.10 were considered for stepwise multivariable analysis (Table 2). In the multivariable analysis, the Ibr cohort and a lower pre-treatment SUVmax on PET imaging were each associated with a higher probability of response by IWCLL criteria (Ibr cohort, OR = 14.02, 95%CI [0.52-379.61], P = 0.05; SUVmax, OR = 1.31 per SUV unit decrease, 95%CI [1.05-1.67], P < 0.001). Conclusion Administration of ibrutinib from 2 weeks before leukapheresis until 3 months after JCAR014 was well tolerated in most pts. This approach might decrease the incidence of severe CRS and improve responses in pts with R/R CLL. Disclosures Hirayama: DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Hay:DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Li:Juno Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lymp:Juno Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Till:Mustang Bio: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kiem:Magenta: Consultancy; Homology Medicine: Consultancy; Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Shadman:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; Mustang: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. Cassaday:Merck: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Spouse Employment, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Acharya:Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria. Riddell:Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; NOHLA: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maloney:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria. Turtle:Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics / Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Aptevo: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caribou Biosciences: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy.

scholarly journals PD-1 Inhibitor Combinations As Salvage Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients Progressing after Bcma-Directed CAR T Cells

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1973-1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Bernabei ◽  
Alfred L. Garfall ◽  
J. Joseph Melenhorst ◽  
Simon F Lacey ◽  
Edward A. Stadtmauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Hla Dr ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Autologous T cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) specific for B-cell maturation antigen (CART-BCMA cells) show activity in refractory MM, but relapses remain common. Anti-PD-1 antibodies (Abs) augment CAR T cell activity pre-clinically, and induced CAR T cell re-expansion and responses in DLBCL patients progressing after CD19-specific CAR T cells (Chong et al, Blood 2017). The IMiDs lenalidomide (len) and pomalidomide (pom) may enhance efficacy, but also toxicity, of both CAR T cells and PD-1 inhibitors in MM. Elotuzumab (elo) has clinical anti-MM activity in combination with IMiDs and dexamethasone (dex), and synergizes with anti-PD-1 Ab in pre-clinical models. Methods: We previously described outcomes of 25 subjects enrolled on our phase 1 study of CART-BCMA cells in relapsed/refractory MM (Cohen et al, ASH 2017, #505). We identified and retrospectively reviewed 5 subjects who progressed after CART-BCMA and received a PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab (pembro)) combination as their next therapy. Responses were assessed by IMWG criteria. CART-BCMA levels were assessed by flow cytometry and qPCR pre-treatment, 2-4 weeks after first pembro dose, then q4 weeks until progression. Pembro dosing was 200mg every 3 weeks; dex dosing was 20-40mg/week. Results: Characteristics of the 5 subjects are in the Table. Median prior lines was 9; all had high-risk cytogenetics. All were refractory to pom, 2 to pembro/pom/dex, and 1 to elo. Best response to CART-BCMA was PR in 2, MR in 2, and PD in 1. Median time from CART-BCMA to pembro-based therapy was 117 days. All patients still had CART-BCMA cells detectable by qPCR, with 2 (pts. 07 and 21) still detectable by flow, at initiation of salvage therapy. The first pt. (02) received pembro/pom/dex and had MR but progressed at 2 months, with no detectable CART-BCMA re-expansion. The second pt. (07) had rapidly-progressing kappa light chain MM 2 months post-CART-BCMA and had previously progressed on pembro/pom/dex. He started elo/pembro/pom/dex and had MR at day 12 (free kappa 1446 to 937 mg/L), associated with robust expansion of CART-BCMA cells (875.64 to 20505.07 copies/µg DNA by qPCR; 0.7% to 6.4% of peripheral CD3+ cells by flow). Re-expanded CART-BCMA cells were predominantly CD8+ and highly activated (89% HLA-DR+, up from 18% pre-therapy). This response was short-lived, however, with progression 1 week later, and return of CART-BCMA levels to baseline at week 5. Three subsequent subjects then received elo/pembro/dex with either len or pom; with 2 MR and 1 SD, and PFS of 3 to 4 months. None had re-expansion of CART-BCMA cells. Non-specific immune modulation was observed and included altered CD4:CD8 T cell ratio (n=5), increased NK cell/decreased T cell frequency (n=4), and HLA-DR upregulation on CAR-negative T cells (n=2). More detailed phenotyping of CART and other immune cells, including PD-1 expression, is ongoing. With regard to toxicity, pt. 02 had self-limiting low-grade fevers and myalgias 4 weeks after pembro/pom/dex, associated with mild elevation in ferritin/CRP, suggestive of mild CRS. No other CRS was noted, including pt. 07 despite CART-BCMA re-expansion. One patient (17) developed recurrent expressive aphasia starting 2 months after elo/pembro/pom/dex, without signs of CRS and no observed expansion of CART-BCMA cells in blood or CSF. This resolved with stopping therapy and brief steroid taper. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that a PD1-inhibitor combination can induce CAR T cell re-expansion and anti-MM response in a MM patient progressing after CART-BCMA therapy. Since this patient previously progressed on pembro/pom/dex, the observed clinical activity was likely related to the CAR T cells, with elotuzumab also possibly contributing. However, this effect was very transient; re-expansion occurred infrequently (1/5 patients); and neurotoxicity was observed (though its relationship to the CAR T cells is unclear). This makes it difficult to endorse this specific salvage regimen. Nonetheless, this proof-of-principle observation suggests that a subset of patients may respond to checkpoint blockade or other immune-modulating approaches following BCMA CAR T cell therapy, meriting further study. Table. Table. Disclosures Garfall: Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Bioinvent: Research Funding. Melenhorst:novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Shanghai UNICAR Therapy, Inc: Consultancy; Casi Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy: Research Funding. Lacey:Parker Foundation: Research Funding; Tmunity: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Patents & Royalties; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding. Stadtmauer:Janssen: Consultancy; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Vogl:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy. Plesa:Novartis: Research Funding. Young:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Levine:Novartis: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Incysus: Consultancy; Cure Genetics: Consultancy; CRC Oncology: Consultancy; Brammer Bio: Consultancy. June:Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celldex: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Milone:Novartis: Patents & Royalties. Cohen:Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Fresh Versus Cryopreserved/Thawed Bispecific Anti-CD19/CD20 CAR-T Cells for Relapsed, Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4465-4465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirav N. Shah ◽  
Fenlu Zhu ◽  
Dina Schneider ◽  
Winfried Krueger ◽  
Andrew Worden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Viability ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction Chimeric Antigen Receptor modified T (CAR-T) cell therapies have revolutionized the relapsed, refractory B cell malignancy landscape. Due to the complex steps involved with cell production, some third-party companies require T cells to be cryopreserved prior to shipping, while most manufacturers deliver modified CAR-T cells to the treating center in a cryopreserved state. This is vastly different to the approach taken with traditional cell based therapies, specifically allogeneic transplant (allo-HCT), an immunological treatment that relies on a graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect to prevent disease relapse. Historically, "fresh" stem cells were felt to be superior to cryopreserved products due to concerns that cryopreservation may damage T cells and other mononuclear cells delaying engraftment and limiting GVT reactivity. As a result, in clinical practice most allo-HCT products are still given as fresh infusions without cryopreservation. In a Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the safety of a bispecific anti-CD19, anti-CD20 CAR (LV20.19CAR), CAR-T cells were produced in a point-of-care fashion utilizing the CliniMACS Prodigy device. Local manufacturing allowed flexibility to administer either fresh LV20.19CAR-T cells without cryopreservation, or if indicated, thawed CAR-T cells post-cryopreservation. Methods Patients (pts) were treated on a Phase 1 dose escalation + expansion trial (NCT03019055) to demonstrate safety of 41BB/CD3z LV20.19CAR-modified T cells for adults with relapsed, refractory B cell NHL including DLBCL, MCL, FL, and CLL. The starting dose was 2.5x10^5 cells/kg with a target dose of 2.5x10^6 cells/kg. All pts received low dose fludarabine (30 mg/m2) x 3 days +cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) x 1 day for lymphodepletion. In the Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts, pts received fractionated CAR-T cells over two days (30% on Day 0 and 70% on Day+1), while expansion cohort pts received CAR-T cells as a single infusion. The goal for all pts was to infuse fresh CAR-T cell prior to cryopreservation, however, CAR-T cell could be cryopreserved and infused at a later date for clinical / logistical reasons. Results A total of 20 pts received LV20.19CAR T cell therapy (Table 1). Fourteen pts received fresh CAR-T cells immediately post-harvest, 5 pts received post-thaw CAR-T cells, and 1 patient received a mixed fresh/cryopreserved product and was not included in this analysis. Reasons for cryopreserved administration was delay due to active infection (N=3), patient preference (N=1), and unexplained neutropenia (N=1). Among 19 evaluable pts, the CR rate (79% vs 40%), mean ferritin, mean CRP, and incidence of CRS and neurotoxicity were all higher in the fresh infusion group (Table 1), but not statistically significant. In terms of LV20.19 CAR-T product characteristics, mean cell viability at infusion was 93% for the fresh infusion group versus 63% for cryopreserved pts (p<0.01). Point-of-care administration allowed final cell doses to be adjusted for diminished viability among pts receiving cryopreserved product. Figure 1 demonstrates the in-vivo expansion and persistence of LV20.19CART cells among fresh versus post-thaw pts. The peak percentage of CAR-T cells within the CD3 compartment was higher in pts given fresh cell infusions (Figure 2), but was not statistically significant (p=0.08). Conclusions Cryopreservation is known to diminish cell viability and increase clinical costs associated with freezing and storage. To date, there is limited clinical data evaluating outcomes of pts receiving fresh CAR-T cells compared to thawed CAR-T cells post-cryopreservation. Although it is presumed that in-vivo CAR-T cell activity is comparable in both scenarios, among our pts, both cell viability and in-vivo expansion favored pts who received a fresh infusion. Unlike third-party CAR-T cell products where viability is unknown at the time of infusion, we adjusted the final dose to accommodate decreased cell viability. CR rates and incidence of CRS and NTX were higher among fresh infused pts suggesting greater in-vivo activity, although findings were not statistically significant, partially a result of the small sample size. While our findings are limited by small numbers in each cohort and variability in cell dose and diagnosis, these data suggest that cryopreservation of CAR-T cells may impact clinical responses and is a logistical step that needs further investigation. Disclosures Shah: Cell Vault: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Oncosec: Equity Ownership; Lentigen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Exelexis: Equity Ownership; Geron: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board; Incyte: Consultancy; Oncosec: Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory Board. Zhu:Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Schneider:Lentigen Technology, A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Krueger:Lentigen Technology, A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Worden:Lentigen Technology, A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Hamadani:Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Medimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dropulic:Lentigen Technology, A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Hari:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Vault: Equity Ownership; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Johnson:Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Cell Vault: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Anti-Bcma CAR-T Cells Show Tumour Specific Killing Against Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells from Different Genomic Sub-Groups

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1834-1834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana M Metelo ◽  
Ieuan Walker ◽  
Agnieszka Jozwik ◽  
Charlotte Graham ◽  
Charlotte Attwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Relevant Model ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: Autologous anti-BCMA CAR-T cells have been successfully used in clinical trials for the treatment of relapsed refractory Multiple Myeloma (rrMM), achieving high initial response rates (>80%). However, in some patients these therapeutic responses were not sustained long-term and patients relapsed within 12-18 months1,2. Poor T cell fitness leading to early CAR-T cell exhaustion as well as BCMA negative tumour escape are thought to be factors contributing to treatment failure. In this study we describe for the first time the activity of an allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR-T cell product derived from young healthy donors (HD) against primary MM cells using patient bone marrow (BM) biopsies. In addition, we compare the performance of HD and MM patient-derived anti-BCMA CAR-T cells. Results: We have developed a clinically relevant model to test the efficacy of allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR-T cells against primary MM cells. This ex vivo platform uses bulk BM biopsies from MM patients to represent the heterogeneity seen in MM tumours in vivo, including their complex genomic background and unique immunosuppressive microenvironment. Newly diagnosed patients and rrMM patients with high risk genetics are included in the cohort. Using this model we show that allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR-T cells efficiently eliminate primary MM cells after 4 hours of co-culture, in a dose-dependent manner (n=9). These allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR-T cells specifically target BCMA-expressing primary MM cells (including samples with low BCMA levels and high risk genomic abnormalities, with specific anti-BCMA CAR-T cell killing of 13-73%), whilst not affecting non-tumour cells in the BM microenvironment. Moreover, we show that anti-BCMA CAR-T cells become significantly activated after exposure to CD138+ MM cells (>50% CD25+ T cells versus <10% CD25+ T cells against negative controls) and release a range of cytokines detected in the cell culture media by Luminex (including IFNγ, TNFα, IL8, GMCSF, IL-13, IL-12, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, RANTES, IL-5, IFN-α and IL-7). Finally, we compare the T cell profile of rrMM-derived anti-BCMA CAR-T cells (n=6) versus HD-derived anti-BCMA CAR-T cells (n=6), showing that HD-derived anti-BCMA CAR-T cells have a higher CD4/CD8 ratio (0.684 vs. 0.334, p<0.05), increased percentage of naïve CD4 T cells (13.6% vs. 5.05%, p<0.05) and naïve CD8 T cells (34.13% vs. 4.43%, p<0.05) and generate an expanded population of activated CD25+ T cells after exposure to MM cells. In contrast, MM-derived anti-BCMA CAR-T cells express increased levels of TIGIT (a checkpoint inhibitory molecule involved in MM relapse) and have a large percentage of permanently dysfunctional T cells (CD101+CD38+CD8+), which might affect their T cell fitness and persistence in vivo. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR-T cells are therapeutically active against primary MM cells, in a clinically relevant model that includes the BM microenvironment and different MM genomic subgroups. HD-derived anti-BCMA CAR-T cells were shown to have distinct phenotypic and functional characteristics compared to MM-derived anti-BCMA CAR-T cells. This work lends further support to the development of a first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial for the treatment of rrMM patients using this allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy. 1 Raje N et al. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(18):1726-1737. 2 Zhao WH et al. J Hematol Oncol. 2018; 11(1):141. Disclosures Metelo: Pfizer: Research Funding; Allogene: Research Funding. Jozwik:Servier: Research Funding. Graham:Servier: Research Funding; Gillead: Other: Funding to attend educational meeting. Cuthill:Amgen: Other: Conference support; Takeda: Other: Conference support; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Bentley:Allogene Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boldajipour:Pfizer: Employment. Sommer:Allogene Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sasu:Allogene Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Benjamin:Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Allogene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Eusapharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Immunotherapy with T-Cells Engineered with a Chimeric Antigen Receptor Bearing a Human CD19-Binding Single Chain Variable Fragment for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1415-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Gauthier ◽  
Alexandre V. Hirayama ◽  
Kevin A. Hay ◽  
Alyssa Sheih ◽  
Barbara S. Pender ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background We previously reported high response rates and durable remissions in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; Turtle, JCI 2016) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; Turtle, Sci Transl Med 2016) treated with CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor T (CD19 CAR-T) cells. In a subset of pts, we identified CD8+ T cell responses to epitopes in the murine CD19-binding single chain variable fragment (scFv) of the CAR that could limit CAR-T cell persistence and responses to subsequent infusions. In an effort to reduce the potential for immune CAR-T cell rejection, the murine CD19-binding scFv of the CAR was replaced with a fully human scFv linked to 4-1BB and CD3z signaling domains (JCAR021; Sommermeyer, Leukemia 2017). Here we report the initial clinical results of immunotherapy with JCAR021. Methods We initiated a phase I trial investigating lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2/d and fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d for 3 days (Cy/Flu) followed by infusion of JCAR021 in pts with R/R ALL and aggressive NHL (NCT03103971). Pts were enrolled into 1 of 3 cohorts: high marrow burden ALL (HMB; > 5% blasts in bone marrow [BM] before lymphodepletion); low marrow burden ALL (LMB; ≤ 5% blasts in BM before lymphodepletion); and NHL. The starting dose was 7x104 JCAR021 cells/kg for the HMB ALL cohort, and 7x105 JCAR021 cells/kg in both the LMB ALL and NHL cohorts. Dose escalation/de-escalation follows a modified toxicity probability interval algorithm (Guo, Contemp Clin Trials 2017). Responses in the NHL cohort and in the HMB/LMB ALL cohorts were determined by the Lugano criteria (Cheson, JCO 2014) and the 2018 NCCN guidelines, respectively. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded according to consensus criteria (Lee, Blood 2014) and neurotoxicity was graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Results Pt characteristics are detailed in Table 1. As of June 15, 2018, 9 pts were enrolled on the trial. Two pts did not receive JCAR021: one pt was excluded after aggressive NHL was reclassified as indolent after pathology review and one pt had no detectable disease upon pre-treatment restaging. The 7 pts who received JCAR021 had a median age of 63 years (range: 29 - 69). Both pts in the LMB ALL cohort had bulky extramedullary disease (> 5 cm diameter). One patient (LMB ALL cohort) had failed two allogeneic transplants and one patient (HMB ALL cohort) had failed an allogeneic transplant prior to treatment with JCAR021. Four of 4 pts in the NHL cohort and 2 of 2 pts in the LMB ALL cohort received 7x105 JCAR021 cells/kg. The pt treated in the HMB ALL cohort received 7x104 JCAR021 cells/kg. No pt in any cohort developed grade ≥ 3 CRS. All ALL pts developed grade 2 CRS. No pts with NHL developed CRS; one pt in the NHL cohort who had CNS disease prior to CAR-T cell immunotherapy developed grade 3 neurotoxicity in the absence of CRS. We did not observe other neurologic events. No other grade ≥ 3 non-hematopoietic organ toxicity was observed and all 7 treated pts have completed response evaluation. Four weeks after infusion of a low dose of JCAR021, both patients in the LMB ALL cohort had undetectable marrow disease by high resolution flow cytometry and regression of bulky extramedullary disease (1 complete response [CR] and 1 partial response [PR] by PET-CT). One pt treated with a low dose (7x104 cells/kg) of JCAR021 in the HMB ALL cohort did not achieve CR (decrease in BM blasts from 79.8% to 29.5%) but CNS disease was cleared by flow cytometry. In the NHL cohort, we observed objective responses in 2 of 4 patients (1 CR, 1 PR). JCAR021 was detected in blood by flow cytometry and/or quantitative PCR for up to 112 days after infusion. Conclusion JCAR021 appears to have a favorable toxicity profile in R/R ALL and NHL pts. JCAR021 cells expanded in vivo and have persisted in all pts. We observed responses at very low doses of CAR-T cells in ALL pts with bulky disease. This trial continues to enroll to define optimal dosing and determine the safety and efficacy of JCAR021. Disclosures Hirayama: DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Hay:DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Till:Mustang Bio: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kiem:Homology Medicine: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Shadman:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mustang: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Cassaday:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Spouse Employment, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Acharya:Teva: Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding. Riddell:NOHLA: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Maloney:Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria. Turtle:Aptevo: Consultancy; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Caribou Biosciences: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics / Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document