scholarly journals Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban, LMWH and Warfarin Among Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Patients with Active Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of VTE Risk Scale

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 327-327
Author(s):  
Alexander T Cohen ◽  
Allison Keshishian ◽  
Theodore Lee ◽  
Gail Wygant ◽  
Lisa Rosenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
High Risk Cancer ◽  
Similar Risk ◽  
Active Cancer

BACKGROUND: Cancer is an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the strongest predictor for all-cause and pulmonary embolism-related mortality. VTE risk is 4-7 times higher in cancer patients compared to non-cancer patients. Different cancer types are associated with different risk of VTE. Cancers of the brain, pancreas, stomach, liver, lungs, and kidneys-and hematologic malignancies-have the strongest association with the occurrence of VTE. The Khorana risk score based on the cancer type, blood counts, and body mass index is one of the VTE risk scales to predict the risk of thrombosis in cancer patients. This study evaluates the risk of major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding, and recurrent VTE (non-fatal and fatal) among VTE patients with active cancer prescribed apixaban, low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), or warfarin stratified by VTE risk. METHODS: A pooled study using four US commercial insurance claims databases identified VTE patients diagnosed with active cancer (defined as cancer diagnosis [any stage] or cancer treatment [chemotherapy, radiation, and cancer-related surgery] within 6 months before or 30 days after VTE diagnosis) who initiated apixaban, LMWH, or warfarin within 30 days following the first VTE event (01SEP2014-31MAR2018). Patients were followed to the earliest of: health plan disenrollment, death, index therapy discontinuation, switch to another anticoagulant, study end, or a maximum of 6 months. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance treatment cohorts. A subgroup analysis using a modified Khorana VTE risk scale (cancer type only) was conducted. Patients were classified as very high risk (stomach, brain, or pancreas), high risk (lung, lymphoma, gynecologic, bladder, testicular, renal cell carcinoma), or other (all remaining cancer types) depending on their cancer type. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, and recurrent VTE. The statistical significance (P<0.10) of the interaction between treatment and different levels of VTE risk was evaluated. RESULTS: After applying the selection criteria, 3,393 apixaban, 6,108 LMWH, and 4,585 warfarin patients were identified with mean ages of 65, 64, and 64 years, respectively. After IPTW, all patient characteristics were balanced. Among all VTE cancer patients after IPTW, 15% of patients had very high-risk cancer and 40% patients had high-risk cancer. In the main analysis, apixaban patients had a lower risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, and recurrent VTE compared to LMWH. Warfarin patients had a similar risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, and recurrent VTE compared to LMWH. Apixaban patients had a lower risk of recurrent VTE and a similar risk of MB and CRNM bleeding compared to warfarin (Figure). When stratifying by the VTE risk scale, study findings were generally consistent with the primary analysis and across the different subgroups. No significant interactions were observed for MB or CRNM bleeding (Figure). Two significant interactions were evident for recurrent VTE: apixaban trended towards a lower risk of recurrent VTE compared to LMWH across all three subgroups, but the magnitude of the difference was larger in the other cancer group vs. very high risk and high risk cancer groups. For warfarin vs. LMWH, different trends in recurrent VTE risk were observed among patients with different VTE risk levels (Figure). CONCLUSION: Across subgroups of VTE cancer patients with different VTE risk levels, apixaban had a lower risk of recurrent VTE compared to warfarin and a lower risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, and recurrent VTE compared to LMWH consistent with the overall results. Warfarin patients had a similar risk of MB and CRNM bleeding compared to LMWH. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of anticoagulants in high-risk subgroups of VTE cancer patients. Figure Disclosures Cohen: Aspen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ONO: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Consultancy; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; TRN: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; UK Government Health Select Committee: Other: advised the UK Government Health Select Committee, the all-party working group on thrombosis, the Department of Health, and the NHS, on the prevention of VTE; Temasek Capital: Consultancy; Boston Scientific: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Lifeblood: Other: advisor to Lifeblood: the thrombosis charity and is the founder of the European educational charity the Coalition to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy; GLG: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; McKinsey: Consultancy; Navigant: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; ACI Clinical: Consultancy. Keshishian:STATinMED Research: Other: I am a paid employee of STATinMED Research which is a paid consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.. Lee:Pfizer Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wygant:Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Employment. Rosenblatt:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Stock Owner ; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Employment. Hlavacek:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Mardekian:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Wiederkehr:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Sah:STATinMED Research: Other: I am a paid employee of STATinMED Research which is a paid consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.. Luo:Pfizer Inc.: Employment.

scholarly journals Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban, LMWH, and Warfarin Among Venous Thromboembolism Patients with Active Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Four US Claims Databases

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 326-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander T Cohen ◽  
Allison Keshishian ◽  
Theodore Lee ◽  
Gail Wygant ◽  
Lisa Rosenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Select Committee ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
High Risk Cancer ◽  
Similar Risk ◽  
Active Cancer

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients. The treatment of cancer-associated VTE carries a significantly greater risk of major bleeding (MB) and recurrent VTE compared to that in non-cancer patients. CHEST Guidelines suggest the use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) over a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients diagnosed with VTE and cancer. The last decade has seen an emergence of non-VKA anticoagulants (NOACs) for the treatment of VTE. Despite completed and ongoing clinical trials, there is a lack of real-world evidence comparing the effectiveness and safety of LWMH with VKAs and NOACs among VTE patients with active cancer. Therefore, this study evaluates the risk of MB, clinically relevant non-MB (CRNMB), and recurrent VTE (fatal or non-fatal) among VTE patients with active cancer prescribed apixaban, LMWH, or warfarin in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Four US commercial insurance claims databases were used to identify VTE patients with active cancer (defined as cancer diagnosis or cancer treatment [chemotherapy, radiation and cancer-related surgery] within 6 months before or 30 days after VTE diagnosis) who initiated apixaban, LMWH, or warfarin within 30-days following the first VTE event (01SEP2014-31MAR2018). Patients who used LMWH as bridging therapy for warfarin (≤14 days before or after warfarin initiation) were classified as warfarin users. Patients were followed to the earliest of: health plan disenrollment, death, index therapy discontinuation, switch to another anticoagulant, study end, or a maximum of 6 months. Additional analysis using all available follow-up was also conducted. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance treatment cohorts. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the risk of MB, CRNMB, and recurrent VTE. RESULTS: After applying all eligibility criteria, 3,393 apixaban, 6,108 LMWH, and 4,585 warfarin patients were identified with mean ages of 65, 64, and 64 years, respectively. After IPTW, all patient characteristics were balanced. The mean follow-up was 105, 88, and 113 days for apixaban, LMWH, and warfarin, respectively. Among the weighted VTE cancer population, 51% of the patients had metastatic cancer and 77% of patients received cancer treatment. Further, 15% of patients had very high-risk cancer (brain, stomach, or pancreas), and 40% patients had high-risk cancer (lung, lymphoma, gynecologic, bladder, testicular, renal cell carcinoma). Apixaban patients had a lower risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, and recurrent VTE compared to LMWH. Apixaban patients also had a lower risk of recurrent VTE and a similar risk of MB and CRNM bleeding compared to warfarin. Warfarin patients had a similar risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, and recurrent VTE compared to LMWH (Figure). When the entire available follow-up period (mean follow-up was 137, 106, and 166 days for apixaban, LMWH, and warfarin, respectively) was used, the trends were similar to the 6-month analysis for apixaban vs. LMWH and warfarin vs. LMWH. However, apixaban patients were associated with a lower risk of both MB and recurrent VTE compared to warfarin patients. CONCLUSION: VTE patients with active cancer initiating apixaban had significantly lower risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, and recurrent VTE compared to LMWH patients. Apixaban patients also had a lower risk of recurrent VTE compared to warfarin patients. These results may be helpful for clinicians in evaluating different anticoagulation treatments for VTE patients with active cancer. Further studies are needed to evaluate these outcomes between different anticoagulation treatment options. Figure Disclosures Cohen: Lifeblood: Other: advisor to Lifeblood: the thrombosis charity and is the founder of the European educational charity the Coalition to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism; ONO: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; TRN: Consultancy; UK Government Health Select Committee: Other: advised the UK Government Health Select Committee, the all-party working group on thrombosis, the Department of Health, and the NHS, on the prevention of VTE; Temasek Capital: Consultancy; ACI Clinical: Consultancy; Navigant: Consultancy; McKinsey: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy; Aspen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boston Scientific: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; GLG: Consultancy; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Keshishian:STATinMED Research: Other: I am a paid employee of STATinMED Research which is a paid consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.. Lee:Pfizer Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wygant:Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Employment. Rosenblatt:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Stock Owner ; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Employment. Hlavacek:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Mardekian:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Wiederkehr:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Sah:STATinMED Research: Other: I am a paid employee of STATinMED Research which is a paid consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.. Luo:Pfizer Inc.: Employment.

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention with Semuloparin in Cancer Patients Initiating Chemotherapy: Benefit-Risk Assessment by VTE Risk in SAVE-ONCO

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 206-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel George ◽  
Giancarlo Agnelli ◽  
William Fisher ◽  
Ajay Kakkar ◽  
Michael R Lassen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Benefit Risk Assessment ◽  
Bayer Healthcare ◽  
High Risk Cancer

Abstract Abstract 206 Background: Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy are at increased risk for VTE. Recent oncology guidelines emphasize the need for randomized studies with VTE risk assessment in these patients (Streiff MB, et al. JNCCN. 2011;9:714–777). Semuloparin is a new ultra-low-molecular-weight heparin with high anti-factor Xa and minimal anti-factor IIa activities. The SAVE-ONCO study investigated semuloparin vs placebo for VTE prevention in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with metastatic or locally advanced cancer of lung, pancreas, stomach, colon-rectum, bladder or ovary initiating a chemotherapy course, were randomized to once-daily subcutaneous semuloparin 20 mg or placebo until change of chemotherapy. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, any non-fatal pulmonary embolism, or VTE-related death. The main safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding (major and non major). Baseline VTE risk was assessed by a score specifically developed and validated in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients (Khorana AA, et al. Blood. 2008;111:4902–7). According to this predictive model a score of 2 was assigned to very high-risk cancer sites (pancreatic or gastric), a score of 1 was assigned to high-risk cancer sites (lung, ovarian, or bladder cancer) and 1 is added to the score for each of the following parameters: platelet count ≥350 × 109/L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL and/or use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents, leukocyte count >11 × 109/L, and body mass index ≥35 kg/m2. Results: Among the 3212 patients randomized, the majority had lung (36.6%) or colorectal (28.9%) cancer and approximately two-thirds had metastatic cancer. In total, 550 (17.4%) of patients enrolled were at high risk of VTE, 1998 (63.2%) were at moderate risk, and 614 (19.4%) were at low risk (VTE risk score of ≥ 3, 1–2, or 0 points, respectively). All risk groups were well balanced between the treatment groups. Median treatment duration was approximately 3.5 months. Overall, semuloparin significantly reduced VTE or VTE-related death by 64% (p<0.0001; Table) vs placebo. The treatment effect was consistent across various levels of VTE risk (interaction p-value=0.6048; Table). Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 2.8% and 2.0% of the patients in the semuloparin and placebo groups, respectively (Table). The incidence of major bleeding was similar: 1.2% and 1.1% patients in the semuloparin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–1.99). No increased incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was observed with semuloparin vs placebo across various levels of VTE risk (interaction p-value=0.9409; Table). Conclusions: In cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, thromboprophylaxis with semuloparin was consistently associated with a favorable benefit-risk profile across various levels of VTE risk, but greatest in moderate to high risk patients. Antithrombotic prophylaxis should be considered in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy, particularly in those who are at moderate to high risk of VTE. Disclosures: George: Viamet: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Medivation: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ipsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Dendreon: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; GSK: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Research Funding; Exelixis: Research Funding. Agnelli:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; sanofi-aventis: Honoraria. Fisher:Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; sanofi-aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kakkar:Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ARYx Therapeutics: Consultancy; Canyon: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria. Lassen:Astellas Pharma Europe: Consultancy; Bayer HealthCare AG: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Merck Serono: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Protola Pharma: Consultancy; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy. Mismetti:sanofi-aventis: served as a member of Steering Committees. Mouret:Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Honoraria; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lawson:Sanofi: Employment. Turpie:Astellas Pharma Europe: Consultancy; Bayer HealthCare AG: Consultancy; Portola Pharma: Consultancy; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy.

Effectiveness and safety of apixaban, low-molecular weight heparin, and warfarin among high-risk subgroups of venous thromboembolism patients with active cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Cohen ◽  
A Keshishian ◽  
T Lee ◽  
G Wygant ◽  
L Rosenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Event Type ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Similar Risk ◽  
Active Cancer

Abstract Background Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) carries a high risk for recurrent events and major bleeding (MB) which further increases among some high-risk subgroups of patients. Purpose This study evaluates recurrent VTE and MB among VTE patients with active cancer within 6 months of initiating apixaban, low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), or warfarin stratified by cancer type, cancer treatment, and VTE characteristics. Methods Four US commercial insurance claims databases were pooled to identify VTE patients with active cancer (defined as ≥1 claim with cancer diagnosis [any stage] or cancer treatment [chemotherapy, radiation, and cancer-related surgery] within 6 months before to 30 days after VTE diagnosis). Patients who initiated apixaban, LMWH, or warfarin within 30 days following the first VTE event (01SEP2014–31MAR2018) were included. Treatment cohorts were balanced using stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios of recurrent VTE and MB for each subgroup stratification: metastatic diagnosis, cancer treatment, chemotherapy, upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, and VTE event type (PE with or without deep vein thrombosis [DVT] versus DVT only). Statistical significance (P&lt;0.10) of the interaction between the subgroup strata and outcomes were evaluated. Results A total of 3,393 apixaban, 6,108 LMWH, and 4,585 warfarin patients were identified with a mean follow-up of 105–166 days across cohorts. After IPTW, all patient characteristics were balanced. In the overall population, apixaban had a lower risk of recurrent VTE and MB vs. LMWH. Warfarin had a similar risk of recurrent VTE and MB vs. LMWH. Apixaban had a lower risk of recurrent VTE and a similar risk of MB vs. warfarin (Figure). Analyses stratified by metastatic diagnosis, cancer treatment, chemotherapy, VTE event type, and GI cancer show generally consistent results across the subgroups (most of the p values for interaction &gt;0.10) and with the overall population. There was a significant interaction in cancer treatment strata: apixaban trended towards a lower risk of MB vs. LMWH with or without cancer treatment; however, patients without cancer treatment had a larger difference vs. patients with cancer treatment. Two significant interactions were observed in metastatic diagnosis strata: apixaban and warfarin had a lower risk of recurrent VTE vs. LMWH in patients without a metastatic diagnosis whereas apixaban and warfarin had similar risk of recurrent VTE vs. LMWH in patients with a metastatic diagnosis (Figure). Conclusion Across these high-risk subgroups of VTE cancer patients, apixaban generally had a lower risk of recurrent VTE and MB vs. LMWH and lower risk of recurrent VTE compared to warfarin. Warfarin patients generally had a similar risk of recurrent VTE and MB vs. LMWH. The findings are generally consistent with the overall population results. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Pfizer Inc. and Britstol-Myers Squibb Company.

Impact of Hypomethylating Agent Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Chromosome 3 Abnormalities

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1705-1705
Author(s):  
David Sallman ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Amy E. DeZern ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chromosome 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Monosomy 3 ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background In myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), abnormalities of chromosome 3 (i.e. inversion 3 (inv(3)), translocation 3q (t(3q)), or deletion 3q (del(3q)) represent a poor-risk karyotype in the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with 3q abnormalities, patients with inv(3)/t3;3 represented the most unfavorable group with a median overall survival (OS) of 10.3 months (Lugthart et al., 2010). We previously presented a single institution experience regarding outcomes of MDS patients with chromosome 3 abnormalities. Here, we sought to further define outcomes of chromosome 3 abnormalities in MDS and address the impact of hypomethylating agents (HMA) on outcome in multiple institutions. Patients and Methods Patients were identified through the MDS Clinical Research Consortium and were included if they had a WHO diagnosis of MDS, MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), therapy related MDS (t-MDS), or AML (20-30% myeloblasts) and had any karyotypic abnormality involving chromosome 3. Data analyzed included baseline demographics, disease characteristics, IPSS/IPSS-R scores, treatment and outcome. Responses to HMA therapy were evaluated using International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for overall survival. Results A total of 413 patients were identified with a median age at diagnosis of 67 years. WHO classification was as follows: 9% RA/RARS, 12% RCMD, 26% RAEB-1, 31% RAEB-2, 2% MDS/MPN, 7% MDS Unclassified, 13% AML; 34% had t-MDS. Overall, 97% of patients were higher risk by IPSS-R (i.e., intermediate to very high risk) with a median blast % in bone marrow of 8%. Distribution of cytogenetic abnormalities were inv(3) (10%), del(3q) (12%), t(3q) (18%), monosomy 3 (22%), 3p abnormalities (22%), and other chromosome 3 changes (17%). Median OS for the cohort was 12.0 months (95% C.I. 10.8 to 13.9 months) and 31% of patients without AML transformed to AML. IPSS-R was predictive of median OS across subgroups (P < 0.00001). The specific cytogenetic abnormality was predictive for survival (P < 0.00001) with median OS for t(3q) 19 months, inv(3) 13 months, del(3q) 13 months, 3p 10 months, monosomy 3 9 months, and other 3 abnormalities 11 months. There was no survival difference between patients with translocations of 3q21 versus 3q26 (median OS 18 months versus 18.6 months, P = 0.96). Patients with an isolated chromosome 3 abnormality had significantly improved OS (25.1 months versus 10.9 months (P < 0.00001). Complex karyotype (>/= 3 abnormalities) was observed in 74% of patients and was associated with decreased OS (11 months versus 21 months, P < 0.00001). Of patients who received HMA therapy (48%), the overall response rate was 46% (17% hematological improvement (HI), 7% PR, 20% CR, 2% marrow CR (CRm) with stable disease in 23%). Median OS with and without HMA was 15.5 months versus 8.4 months (p=0.038). In int-2/high risk patients by IPSS, HMA treated patient had a median OS of 14.0 months versus 7.6 months for patients not treated with HMAs (P = 0.005) with no benefit for HMAs in lower-risk patients (median OS 24.5 months with HMA versus 38.7 months without; P =0.41). Cox regression modeling with HMA therapy, IPSS and clinical site confirmed the HMA OS benefit in higher-risk patients (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.53-0.89; P = 0.005), but showed decreased OS in lower-risk patients (HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.03-3.92; P = 0.04). Allogeneic transplantation was performed in 18% (n=75) of patients, with median OS of 18 months versus 10 months in non-transplanted patients (P < 0.00001). Conclusion In this large cohort of patients with MDS and oligoblastic AML associated with chromosome 3 abnormalities, survival was heterogeneous but overall poor, with isolated chromosome 3 abnormality and t(3q) patients having a more favorable OS than patients with other chromosome 3 anomalies. MDS patients with 3p changes have poor outcomes. Although some patients with chromosome 3 respond to HMA therapy, the overall survival remains poor and novel approaches are needed. Disclosures Sekeres: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Steensma:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy. Lancet:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy; Kalo-Bios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. List:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Komrokji:Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacylics: Speakers Bureau.

Dalteparin Thromboprophylaxis in Cancer Patients at High Risk for Venous Thromboembolism: A Randomized Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 427-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok A. Khorana ◽  
Charles W. Francis ◽  
Nicole Kuderer ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
Thomas L. Ortel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Efficacy Outcome ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background: Ambulatory cancer patients at high-risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be identified using a validated risk score. We evaluated the benefit of outpatient thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin in such high-risk patients in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Methods: Cancer patients at high risk for VTE (Khorana score ≥3) and initiating a new systemic chemotherapy regimen were screened for VTE and, if negative, randomized to either dalteparin 5000 units daily subcutaneously or no prophylactic anticoagulation for 12 weeks. Subjects in both arms were screened with lower extremity ultrasounds every 4 weeks on study. Primary efficacy endpoint was any VTE over 12 weeks and primary safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding events over 13 weeks. The study was terminated due to poor accrual. Results: Of 117 enrolled patients, 19 were not randomized due to the presence of VTE on initial screening (N=10, 8.5%) or for other reasons (N=9). The mean age was 59 years with 46% female and 54% male, similar in both arms. The most common primary sites of cancer were pancreas, gastro-esophageal junction, lung and lymphoma. Over three-fourths of patients in each arm had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.Of 98 patients randomized, VTE occurred in 12% (N=6/50) of patients on the dalteparin arm and 21% (N=10/48) on the control arm (hazard ratio, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-1.89) (absolute risk reduction 9%, relative risk reduction 42%, number needed to treat = 12). Major bleeding was similar (N=1) in each arm but clinically relevant bleeding was higher in the dalteparin arm (N=7 versus 1 in the control arm) (HR = 7.0, 95% CI 1.2-131.6). There was no difference in overall survival. Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis is associated with a non-significant reduced risk of VTE with no effect on major bleeding or survival but increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding in this underpowered study population. The Khorana score successfully identifies patients with high incidence of VTE both at baseline and during study. The high incidence of baseline VTE suggests that consideration should be given to screening high-risk patients in clinical practice prior to starting systemic therapy. Future studies should continue to focus on risk-adapted approaches to reduce the burden of VTE in cancer. (Funded by NIH/NHLBI R01HL095109; clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00876915). Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients Enrolled in the PHACS trial Dalteparin Observation Total Enrolled (n) Baseline VTE, n (%) DVT PE Other reasons for not randomizing Randomized (n) Age, mean (SD), y --- --- --- --- --- 50 60 (10) --- --- --- --- --- 48 58 (12) 117 10 (9%) 6* (5%) 4 (3%) 9 98 59 (11) Gender, n (%) Female 21 (42%) 24 (50%) 45 (46%) Male 29 (58%) 24 (50%) 53 (54%) Primary Tumor Site, No. (%) Gynecologic 4 (8%) 4 (8%) 8 (8%) Colorectal 1 (2%) 3 (6%) 4 (4%) GE junction 8 (16%) 4 (8%) 12 (25%) Lung 6 (12%) 7(15%) 13 (27%) Genitourinary 2 (4%) 0 (0%) 2 (2%) Lymphoma 5 (10%) 2 (4%) 7 (15%) Breast 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 2 (2%) Pancreatic 19 (38%) 17 (35%) 36 (37%) Gastric 4 (8%) 6 (13%) 10 (10%) Other 0 (0%) 4 (8%) 4 (4%) Previous history of VTE, n (%) 4 (8%) 2 (4%) 6 (6%) *NOTE: 1 subject had both DVT and PE at baseline screening Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE pulmonary embolism; VTE, venous thromboembolism; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Figure 1. Cumulative Incidence Curves for the Primary Efficacy Outcome in the Intention-to-Treat Population, According to Study Arm. Figure 1. Cumulative Incidence Curves for the Primary Efficacy Outcome in the Intention-to-Treat Population, According to Study Arm. Disclosures Khorana: Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Randomized trial of dalteparin as prophylaxis. The drug is approved for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis but not for prophylaxis.. Francis:Eisai: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria; NHLBI: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy. Kuderer:Hospira: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Carrier:Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Ortel:Instrumentation Laboratory: Consultancy; Instrumentation Laboratory: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Wun:Janssen: Consultancy. Iyer:Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentec: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Lyman:Amgen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Validation of the Ottawa Score in Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism. the Predicare Cohort Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 167-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Meyer ◽  
Celine Chapelle ◽  
Philippe Girard ◽  
Florian Scotté ◽  
Anne Lamblin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Support Research

Introduction Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a difficult to treat condition in patients with cancer with a persisting risk of recurrent VTE during anticoagulant treatment with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Recent data suggest that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) are associated with a lower risk of recurrence but a higher risk of bleeding in these patients. Predicting the risk of recurrent VTE with LMWH may help to select the best treatment option. We conducted a prospective multicenter observational cohort study in cancer patients with VTE treated with tinzaparin for 6 months in order to validate the Ottawa score (NCT03099031) and search for additional risk of recurrent VTE. The Ottawa score is composed of 5 variables, female sex (+1), lung cancer (+1), breast cancer (-1) cancer stage 1 (-2) and previous DVT (+1). A score ≤0 is associated with a low risk of recurrent VTE. Methods Adult cancer patients with recent diagnosis of documented symptomatic or incidental VTE (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) treated with tinzaparin for 6 months were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic VTE within the first 6 months of treatment with tinzaparin. Other endpoints were symptomatic recurrent VTE, major bleeding, heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), all-cause mortality within 3 and 6 months. All events were adjudicated by a Central Adjudication Committee. Time-to-event outcomes were estimated by the Kalbfleisch and Prentice method to take into account the competing risk of death. Cumulative incidences were presented with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). To validate the Ottawa score, the area under the curve (AUC) and its 95% CI were calculated on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis; the most discriminant cut-off was then determined by calculating the Youden index. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify additional predictive factors of recurrent VTE to those included in the Ottawa score using the Fine and Gray method and adjusted on factors included in the Ottawa score. Hazard ratio and their 95% CI were calculated. Results A total of 409 patients were included and analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis; the median age was 68 years and 51% of patients were males. 60.4% of patients had a PE (with or without DVT) .64% received chemotherapy at inclusion or in the month before inclusion. Lung (31.3%) and digestive track (18.3%) cancers were the most common cancer types and 67.0% had stage IV cancers. According to Ottawa score, 58% of patients were classified at high clinical probability of recurrence (score ≥ 1). During the 6 months treatment period, 23 patients had a recurrent VTE, yielding a cumulative incidence of 6.1% (95% CI 4.0-9.3) with a median time for recurrent VTE of 33 days. The recurrence rate of VTE was estimated to 7.8% (95% CI 4.9-12.5) for patients classified at high risk of recurrence according to the Ottawa score (score ≥ 1) compared to 3.8% (95%CI 1.6-8.9) for other patients (Ottawa score &lt; 1). AUC of the Ottawa score was 0.60 (95% CI 0.55-0.65). In multivariable analysis, none of the potential risk factors for recurrent VTE was significantly associated with recurrent VTE at 6 months. During the 6 months treatment period, 15 patients had a major bleeding and 2 patients experienced a HIT. At 3 and 6 months, 104 and 144 patients had died yielding a cumulative incidence of 26.1%, (95% CI 21.8-30.4) and 37.8% (95% CI 32.8-42.9), respectively. The main cause of death was underlying cancer. Conclusion In this prospective cohort of patients with cancer receiving LMWH for VTE, the Ottawa score did not accurately predict recurrent VTE. No other clinical predictor of recurrent VTE was identified in this study. Disclosures Meyer: Bayer: Other: travel support; LEO pharma: Other: travel support, Research Funding; SANOFI: Other: travel support, Research Funding; BMS-Pfizer: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Girard:Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Scotté:LEO Pharma A/S: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Tesaro: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pierre Fabre Oncology: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lamblin:Leo Pharma: Employment. Laporte:Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boston scientific: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo-Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Low Dose Apixaban As Secondary Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients, 30 Months Follow-up

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3231-3231
Author(s):  
Trine-Lise Hannevik ◽  
Herish Garresori ◽  
Jorunn Brekke ◽  
Tone Ronnaug Enden ◽  
Hege Froen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background: Apixaban is a treatment option for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. There are no data on the effect of low dose apixaban after 6 months treatment. We wanted to assess the efficacy and safety of apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily as prophylaxis for recurrent VTE after 6 months initial treatment with full-dose apixaban. Patients and methods: We included 298 patients with cancer and any type of VTE. All patients were treated with full dose apixaban for the first 6 months. After 6 months, all patients with active cancer continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily and were followed for the next 30 months. The primary endpoint of efficacy was recurrent VTE, the primary safety endpoint was major bleedings. Clinically relevant non-major bleedings was a secondary endpoint. The endpoints are reported as incidence rates or fractions with 95% confidence intervals, and as Kaplan-Meier plots. Results: During the first 6 months of full-dose anticoagulation 12 of 298 patients had recurrent VTE (4.0%, 95% confidence interval 2.1-6.9), 16 experienced major bleeding (5.4%, 95% CI 2.8-7.9%), and 26 patients experienced one or more episodes of CRNMB (8.9%, 95% CI 5.5-12) as previously reported. 1 Of the 298 patients included, 196 continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months. During treatment from 6 to 36 months with low-dose apixaban 15 of 196 (7.6%, 95% CI: 4.4-12) patients had recurrent VTE, 7 (3.6%, CI: 1.5-7.2) patients experienced major bleeding and 16 (8.2%, 95% CI: 4.7-13) patients experienced CRNMB. The highest incidence rate of both recurrent VTE and major bleedings were seen during the first month of full-dose apixaban (Table 1). After the dose reduction of apixaban, the incidence rate of recurrent VTE increased slightly during 6 to 12 months while the incidence rate of major bleeding decreased during the same time-period. After 12 months the incidence rate of both recurrent VTE and major bleeding was low and remained low during the entire 30 months follow-up (Table 1 and Figure 1). The Kaplan-Meier plot of the composite endpoint of recurrent VTE or major bleeding did not change after dose-reduction. After about 9 months treatment (i.e. 3 months on low dose apixaban) the Kaplan-Meier curve of the composite endpoint flattened out. Conclusion: Dose reduction of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months of full dose anticoagulation resulted in a small increase in recurrent VTE, but a marked decrease in major bleedings during the 6-12 months period. After approximately 9 months the frequency of recurrent VTE and major bleedings remained low compared with the first 6 months of full-dose treatment. Reducing the dose of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months of full-dose treatment appears safe and effective. References 1. Hannevik TL, Brekke J, Enden T, et al: Thrombosis and bleedings in a cohort of cancer patients treated with apixaban for venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res, 2020 Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hannevik: Pfizer/Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garresori: Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria. Froen: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Porojnicu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Ghanima: Bayer, BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding; Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, SOBI, Griffols, Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer, Principia Biopharma Inc- a Sanofi Company, Sanofi, SOBI, Griffols, UCB, Argenx: Consultancy. Dahm: Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals How Are Patients (Pts) with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Treated? Impact on Clinical Evolution and Overall Survival: A Report from the Erasme Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5239-5239
Author(s):  
Julia Montoro ◽  
Helena Pomares ◽  
Itziar Oiartzabal ◽  
Teresa Bernal ◽  
Edgardo Barranco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Very High ◽  
Rbc Transfusion

Abstract Introduction: As MDS includes a wide range of heterogeneous neoplastic disorders, the therapeutic approaches for treatment of MDS vary greatly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of different therapies, and assess time from diagnosis to therapy initiation and pt outcomes, in an unselected Spanish population with MDS from the ERASME study. Methods : The ERASME study (CEL-SMD-2012-01) is an observational, prospective, multicenter study of pts with either MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML); disease was defined using the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. Initial pt management strategy was classified into 3 groups: active therapy (AT), such as chemotherapy and treatment with azacitidine (AZA); allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), which included pts receiving other therapies before transplantation; and observation and support (OB&SP), which included red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusions, and growth factors. Here, we present overall survival (OS) data from a prespecified interim analysis of pts with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)-defined Low- and Intermediate-1-risk (lower-risk [LR]) MDS using the Kaplan-Meiermethod. Results : A total of 207 IPSS-defined LR MDS pts (117 with Low-risk and 81 with Intermediate-1-risk MDS) were recruited from Jan 2013 to Feb 2014; median follow-up was 16.1 months (interquartile range [IQR] 11.5-19.1). Pt characteristics are described in the Table. We identified 14 pts with high-risk features (HRF) for MDS based on the presence of ≥ 1 of the following: neutropenia (n = 6; absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 × 109/L); thrombocytopenia (n = 4; platelet count < 50 × 109/L); grade 2-3 bone marrow fibrosis (n = 1); or adverse cytogenetic risk (n = 3). At baseline, 28 (14%) pts had RBC transfusion-dependence (RBC-TD), 166 (80%) were RBC transfusion-independent (RBC-TI), and 13 (6%) had missing data. Probability of RBC-TD increased over time with 41 of 166 pts having RBC-TD after 12 months. Median OS of RBC-TD versus RBC-TI pts was not reached (NR) (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.65 months-NR) versus NR (95% CI 22.93 months-NR), respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2, 95% CI 1.13-9.22; P = 0.0275). At diagnosis, 117 (57%) pts (including 4 with HRF) were considered for OB, and 76 (37%) pts for SP (69 pts [5 HRF] for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and 7 pts [3 HRF] for RBC and platelet transfusions). Only 10 (5%) pts were considered for AT, which included AZA (n = 5; 1 HRF), lenalidomide (n = 4; 1 HRF), and alemtuzumab (n = 1). HCT was considered in 4 pts (2%; 3 with prior AZA treatment and 1 with prior chemotherapy). After 12 months, 13 (11%) of 117 OB pts switched to AT; median time to AT was 30 weeks (IQR 24.0-44.0). Of 76 pts receiving SP, 23 (30%) switched to AT; median time to AT was 23.9 weeks (IQR 16.3-39.1). Of 184 pts with Revised-IPSS (IPSS-R) scores, at 12 months' follow-up 35 had died (15 of 140 Very Low/Low-risk pts, 15 of 32 Intermediate-risk pts, and 5 of 12 High/Very High-risk pts). At 12 months, 36 of 207 (17%) LR MDS pts had died, including 6 of the 14 HRF pts. Median OS was shorter among HRF pts versus non-HRF pts (19.45 months [95% CI 5.52-NR] vs NR [95% CI NR-NR], respectively) (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.47-8.53; P = 0.0048). Median OS for IPSS-R Very Low/Low-risk and Intermediate/High/Very High-risk pts was NR (95% CI NR-NR) and 19.45 months (95% CI 11.99-NR), respectively (HR 5.4, 95% CI 2.8-10.7; P < 0.001). Conclusions : The typical treatment of LR MDS pts in Spain consists mainly of supportive care. We observed that risk of RBC-TD increased after diagnosis. These data suggest more attention should be provided at diagnosis or during follow-up of LR MDS pts with poor prognosis, and that they should be considered for more intensive treatment. Abstract presented on behalf of the ERASME Study Investigators Group. Disclosures Off Label Use: Azacitidine was used in IPSS Intermediate-1-risk patients with MDS, and lenalidomide was used in MDS patients with del(5q) plus > 1 cytogenetic abnormality. Castellanos:SCLHH: Other: Membership; SEHH: Other: Membership. Navarro:Celgene Corporation: Employment. López:Celgene SL Unipersonal: Employment, Equity Ownership, Honoraria. Valcárcel:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Risk Stratification for the Development of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4728-4728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arabesque Parker ◽  
Erica A. Peterson ◽  
Agnes Y. Y. Lee ◽  
Carine de Wit ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Introduction: No method of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk stratification exists for hospitalized cancer patients. The Khorana score is a validated tool in outpatients with cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the Khorana score for predicting development of VTE in cancer patients during admission to hospital. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data collected from healthcare records of consecutive, medically-ill cancer patients hospitalized between January and June 2010 in 3 academic medical centers in Canada. Objectively diagnosed symptomatic VTE during hospitalization, anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis (TP), and Khorana score variables were collected for every patient. Patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation at admission, and those with incomplete data were excluded. The risk of VTE based on Khorana score category was evaluated using logistic regression. Continuous data were compared using a Student's t-test and expressed using the means and standard deviations. Categorical data were compared using the Pearson Chi-square test and were expressed as percentages. Statistical significance was defined as alpha less than 0.05. Results: 1398 patients were included. Mean age was 61.6 years, 51.2% were male, and mean BMI was 25.9 kg/m2. The most frequent tumor types were non-small cell lung carcinoma (12.7%) followed by lymphoma (10.9%). The median length of stay was 6 days (range 0-114 days). The most frequent reasons for hospitalization were chemotherapy (22.3%) followed by pain and palliation (21.4%). 34.5% received anticoagulant TP (n = 483/1398). The incidence of VTE was 2.9% (41/1398) overall, 5.4% (9/166) in high, 3.2% (26/817) in moderate, and 1.4% (6/415) in low Khorana score risk groups. High risk patients were significantly more likely than low risk patients to have VTE (p=0.016; OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4-11.2). There was no difference in VTE incidence between patients who received anticoagulant TP and those who did not (3.5% vs 2.6%, p = 0.345). Patients with high risk Khorana score were more likely to receive anticoagulant TP than those with low risk Khorana score (46.4% vs. 23.9%, p <0.001, OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.9-4.0). Total incidence of major bleeding was 1.8% (25/1398). There was no difference in major bleeding between patients who received anticoagulant TP and those who did not (1.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.787). Conclusion: The Khorana score is predictive of VTE development in cancer patients who are hospitalized for medical illness and may be a useful tool for tailoring inpatient anticoagulant prophylaxis. Disclosures Lee: LEO: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Carrier:BMS: Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Research Funding. Wu:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis Beyond 6 Months of Anticoagulation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3458-3458
Author(s):  
Shyam K Poudel ◽  
Chandana A Reddy ◽  
Deborah Y Park ◽  
Mailey L Wilks ◽  
Vicki Pinkava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Cancer Associated Thrombosis ◽  
Active Cancer

Introduction Randomized trials of venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in cancer have primarily focused on the initial 6-month period and the risk/benefit of additional anticoagulant therapy beyond this time point has not been fully evaluated. Current guidelines recommend continuing full dose anticoagulation after 6 months in patients who have ongoing active cancer and/or those undergoing anti-neoplastic treatment. This recommendation, however, is based on little evidence. Here, we describe clinical outcomes of patients who have completed at least 6 months of anticoagulation. Our aim was to compare VTE recurrence, bleeding rate, and overall survival in patients who continued vs. discontinued anticoagulation after the initial 6-month treatment period. Methods We evaluated a prospective cohort of patients referred to the Cleveland Clinic cancer-associated thrombosis clinic from 8/2014-12/2018. We evaluated clinical characteristics, VTE recurrence, bleeding (major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) as defined by ISTH criteria), and overall survival in patients who continued vs. discontinued anticoagulation after 6 months. Low-risk for recurrent VTE was defined as not having active cancer and not receiving systemic therapy. Statistical methods included t-tests, chi-squared tests, Cox model, and log rank test where appropriate. Multivariable analysis was performed to analyze outcomes of interest. Results The study population was comprised 284 (73.2%) patients who were followed 6 months after the initial VTE event. Of these, 93 (32.7%) did not continue anticoagulation beyond 6 months, and 191 (67.3%) continued anticoagulation treatment (table 1). Anticoagulation was discontinued for the following reasons: low risk (n=33, 35.5%), bleeding (n=12, 12.9%), clinical decision (n=4, 4.3%) and other including financial reasons (n=43, 46.2%; table 2). In patients who continued anticoagulation, 86/191 (45%) had stage IV disease and the most frequent cancers were hematologic malignancies (58/191, 30.4%) and gastrointestinal cancers (37/191, 19.4%). Low molecular weight heparin was the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant (110/191; 57.6%) followed by direct oral anticoagulants (68/191, 35.6%). There was no difference in the rate of recurrent VTE in patients who remained on treatment beyond six months (23/191; 12%) vs. those who stopped treatment at six months (11/93; 11.8%; p= 0.81; figure 1). In patients who continued anticoagulation 6-12 months after the initial treatment period, 13/191 (6.8%) had a bleeding event (major bleeding n=4, CRNMB n=9). There was 1 major bleed and no CRNMB in the group that stopped anticoagulation. After multivariable analysis, recurrent VTE was associated with worse overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.88; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.06-3.35, p=0.03]. Discussion This prospective analysis found no difference in the rate of recurrent VTE and more bleeding in patients who continued anticoagulation, although recurrent VTE rates were high in both cohorts. Furthermore, a recurrent VTE event was associated with worse overall survival. Emerging data with DOACs may alter recurrence rates and the ability to continue treatment beyond 6 months. Although limited by a small study population, this study adds to available data regarding outcomes beyond six months of treatment. Future studies should focus on exploring the outcomes of extending anticoagulation and better identifying patients at risk for recurrent VTE. Disclosures McCrae: Rigel Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dova Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Khorana:Janssen: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document