Validation of the Ottawa Score in Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism. the Predicare Cohort Study

Introduction Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a difficult to treat condition in patients with cancer with a persisting risk of recurrent VTE during anticoagulant treatment with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Recent data suggest that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) are associated with a lower risk of recurrence but a higher risk of bleeding in these patients. Predicting the risk of recurrent VTE with LMWH may help to select the best treatment option. We conducted a prospective multicenter observational cohort study in cancer patients with VTE treated with tinzaparin for 6 months in order to validate the Ottawa score (NCT03099031) and search for additional risk of recurrent VTE. The Ottawa score is composed of 5 variables, female sex (+1), lung cancer (+1), breast cancer (-1) cancer stage 1 (-2) and previous DVT (+1). A score ≤0 is associated with a low risk of recurrent VTE. Methods Adult cancer patients with recent diagnosis of documented symptomatic or incidental VTE (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) treated with tinzaparin for 6 months were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic VTE within the first 6 months of treatment with tinzaparin. Other endpoints were symptomatic recurrent VTE, major bleeding, heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), all-cause mortality within 3 and 6 months. All events were adjudicated by a Central Adjudication Committee. Time-to-event outcomes were estimated by the Kalbfleisch and Prentice method to take into account the competing risk of death. Cumulative incidences were presented with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). To validate the Ottawa score, the area under the curve (AUC) and its 95% CI were calculated on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis; the most discriminant cut-off was then determined by calculating the Youden index. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify additional predictive factors of recurrent VTE to those included in the Ottawa score using the Fine and Gray method and adjusted on factors included in the Ottawa score. Hazard ratio and their 95% CI were calculated. Results A total of 409 patients were included and analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis; the median age was 68 years and 51% of patients were males. 60.4% of patients had a PE (with or without DVT) .64% received chemotherapy at inclusion or in the month before inclusion. Lung (31.3%) and digestive track (18.3%) cancers were the most common cancer types and 67.0% had stage IV cancers. According to Ottawa score, 58% of patients were classified at high clinical probability of recurrence (score ≥ 1). During the 6 months treatment period, 23 patients had a recurrent VTE, yielding a cumulative incidence of 6.1% (95% CI 4.0-9.3) with a median time for recurrent VTE of 33 days. The recurrence rate of VTE was estimated to 7.8% (95% CI 4.9-12.5) for patients classified at high risk of recurrence according to the Ottawa score (score ≥ 1) compared to 3.8% (95%CI 1.6-8.9) for other patients (Ottawa score < 1). AUC of the Ottawa score was 0.60 (95% CI 0.55-0.65). In multivariable analysis, none of the potential risk factors for recurrent VTE was significantly associated with recurrent VTE at 6 months. During the 6 months treatment period, 15 patients had a major bleeding and 2 patients experienced a HIT. At 3 and 6 months, 104 and 144 patients had died yielding a cumulative incidence of 26.1%, (95% CI 21.8-30.4) and 37.8% (95% CI 32.8-42.9), respectively. The main cause of death was underlying cancer. Conclusion In this prospective cohort of patients with cancer receiving LMWH for VTE, the Ottawa score did not accurately predict recurrent VTE. No other clinical predictor of recurrent VTE was identified in this study. Disclosures Meyer: Bayer: Other: travel support; LEO pharma: Other: travel support, Research Funding; SANOFI: Other: travel support, Research Funding; BMS-Pfizer: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Girard:Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Scotté:LEO Pharma A/S: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Tesaro: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pierre Fabre Oncology: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lamblin:Leo Pharma: Employment. Laporte:Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boston scientific: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo-Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Primary Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer and Central Venous Catheter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146904 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2139-2139

Author(s):

Allen Li ◽

Willem Brandt ◽

Cameron Brown ◽

Tzu-Fei Wang ◽

Rick Ikesaka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Venous Catheter ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Central Venous ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Patients With Cancer

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of mortality in patients with cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and healthcare expenditure. The risk of VTE is also increased following the insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC) for chemotherapy deliverance and supportive care. The risks and benefits of primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer and newly inserted CVC are unclear. Objective We sought to assess the rates of VTE and major bleeding complications to determine the safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in adult patients with cancer and a CVC. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and all EBM was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult patients with cancer and a CVC receiving primary thromboprophylaxis or observation/placebo were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were total VTE and major bleeding episodes, respectively. Results A total of 9 RCTs (3155 patients) were included in the analysis. The total rates of VTE were significantly lower in patients receiving primary thromboprophylaxis compared to those not receiving primary prevention (7.6% vs. 13%; Odds Ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.82, p < 0.01, I² = 52%) (Figure 1). The rate of major bleeding complication was not increased in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis (0.9% vs. 0.7%; OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.29 to 4.40, p = 0.87, I² = 32%) (Figure 2). Conclusions Primary thromboprophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of VTE without increasing the risk of major bleeding complications in patients with cancer and CVC. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo Pharma: Research Funding. Ikesaka: LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wells: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria. Carrier: Servier: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aspen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Low Dose Apixaban As Secondary Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients, 30 Months Follow-up

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148105 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3231-3231

Author(s):

Trine-Lise Hannevik ◽

Herish Garresori ◽

Jorunn Brekke ◽

Tone Ronnaug Enden ◽

Hege Froen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Incidence Rate ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Full Dose ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background: Apixaban is a treatment option for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. There are no data on the effect of low dose apixaban after 6 months treatment. We wanted to assess the efficacy and safety of apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily as prophylaxis for recurrent VTE after 6 months initial treatment with full-dose apixaban. Patients and methods: We included 298 patients with cancer and any type of VTE. All patients were treated with full dose apixaban for the first 6 months. After 6 months, all patients with active cancer continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily and were followed for the next 30 months. The primary endpoint of efficacy was recurrent VTE, the primary safety endpoint was major bleedings. Clinically relevant non-major bleedings was a secondary endpoint. The endpoints are reported as incidence rates or fractions with 95% confidence intervals, and as Kaplan-Meier plots. Results: During the first 6 months of full-dose anticoagulation 12 of 298 patients had recurrent VTE (4.0%, 95% confidence interval 2.1-6.9), 16 experienced major bleeding (5.4%, 95% CI 2.8-7.9%), and 26 patients experienced one or more episodes of CRNMB (8.9%, 95% CI 5.5-12) as previously reported. 1 Of the 298 patients included, 196 continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months. During treatment from 6 to 36 months with low-dose apixaban 15 of 196 (7.6%, 95% CI: 4.4-12) patients had recurrent VTE, 7 (3.6%, CI: 1.5-7.2) patients experienced major bleeding and 16 (8.2%, 95% CI: 4.7-13) patients experienced CRNMB. The highest incidence rate of both recurrent VTE and major bleedings were seen during the first month of full-dose apixaban (Table 1). After the dose reduction of apixaban, the incidence rate of recurrent VTE increased slightly during 6 to 12 months while the incidence rate of major bleeding decreased during the same time-period. After 12 months the incidence rate of both recurrent VTE and major bleeding was low and remained low during the entire 30 months follow-up (Table 1 and Figure 1). The Kaplan-Meier plot of the composite endpoint of recurrent VTE or major bleeding did not change after dose-reduction. After about 9 months treatment (i.e. 3 months on low dose apixaban) the Kaplan-Meier curve of the composite endpoint flattened out. Conclusion: Dose reduction of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months of full dose anticoagulation resulted in a small increase in recurrent VTE, but a marked decrease in major bleedings during the 6-12 months period. After approximately 9 months the frequency of recurrent VTE and major bleedings remained low compared with the first 6 months of full-dose treatment. Reducing the dose of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months of full-dose treatment appears safe and effective. References 1. Hannevik TL, Brekke J, Enden T, et al: Thrombosis and bleedings in a cohort of cancer patients treated with apixaban for venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res, 2020 Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hannevik: Pfizer/Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garresori: Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria. Froen: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Porojnicu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Ghanima: Bayer, BMS/Pﬁzer: Research Funding; Amgen, Novartis, Pﬁzer, Bristol Myers Squibb, SOBI, Griffols, Sanoﬁ: Honoraria; Amgen, Novartis, Pﬁzer, Principia Biopharma Inc- a Sanoﬁ Company, Sanoﬁ, SOBI, Griffols, UCB, Argenx: Consultancy. Dahm: Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Risk Stratification for the Development of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4728.4728 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4728-4728 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Arabesque Parker ◽

Erica A. Peterson ◽

Agnes Y. Y. Lee ◽

Carine de Wit ◽

Marc Carrier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

High Risk ◽

Risk Stratification ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Risk ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Patients

Abstract Introduction: No method of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk stratification exists for hospitalized cancer patients. The Khorana score is a validated tool in outpatients with cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the Khorana score for predicting development of VTE in cancer patients during admission to hospital. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data collected from healthcare records of consecutive, medically-ill cancer patients hospitalized between January and June 2010 in 3 academic medical centers in Canada. Objectively diagnosed symptomatic VTE during hospitalization, anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis (TP), and Khorana score variables were collected for every patient. Patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation at admission, and those with incomplete data were excluded. The risk of VTE based on Khorana score category was evaluated using logistic regression. Continuous data were compared using a Student's t-test and expressed using the means and standard deviations. Categorical data were compared using the Pearson Chi-square test and were expressed as percentages. Statistical significance was defined as alpha less than 0.05. Results: 1398 patients were included. Mean age was 61.6 years, 51.2% were male, and mean BMI was 25.9 kg/m2. The most frequent tumor types were non-small cell lung carcinoma (12.7%) followed by lymphoma (10.9%). The median length of stay was 6 days (range 0-114 days). The most frequent reasons for hospitalization were chemotherapy (22.3%) followed by pain and palliation (21.4%). 34.5% received anticoagulant TP (n = 483/1398). The incidence of VTE was 2.9% (41/1398) overall, 5.4% (9/166) in high, 3.2% (26/817) in moderate, and 1.4% (6/415) in low Khorana score risk groups. High risk patients were significantly more likely than low risk patients to have VTE (p=0.016; OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4-11.2). There was no difference in VTE incidence between patients who received anticoagulant TP and those who did not (3.5% vs 2.6%, p = 0.345). Patients with high risk Khorana score were more likely to receive anticoagulant TP than those with low risk Khorana score (46.4% vs. 23.9%, p <0.001, OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.9-4.0). Total incidence of major bleeding was 1.8% (25/1398). There was no difference in major bleeding between patients who received anticoagulant TP and those who did not (1.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.787). Conclusion: The Khorana score is predictive of VTE development in cancer patients who are hospitalized for medical illness and may be a useful tool for tailoring inpatient anticoagulant prophylaxis. Disclosures Lee: LEO: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Carrier:BMS: Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Research Funding. Wu:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Two Years Versus Six Months of Oral Anticoagulation after a First Episode of Unprovoked Pulmonary Embolism: The Padis PE Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.lba-3.lba-3 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. LBA-3-LBA-3

Author(s):

Francis Couturaud ◽

Olivier Sanchez ◽

Gilles Pernod ◽

Patrick Mismetti ◽

Patrick Jego ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pulmonary Embolism ◽

Placebo Group ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Composite Outcome ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Entire Study ◽

Warfarin Group ◽

Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background: Patients with a first episode of unprovoked pulmonary embolism have a high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) after anticoagulation is discontinued. Prolongation of anticoagulant therapy beyond the initial period of 3 to 6 months is associated with a significant reduction of recurrent VTE, but an excess of bleeding events. In addition, most studies assessing prolonged treatment did not follow the patients after treatment had been stopped. Thus, the optimal duration of anticoagulation in patients with a first unprovoked pulmonary embolism remains uncertain. Method: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, we compared an additional 18 months of warfarin (target International Normalized Ratio, 2 to 3) with placebo in patients with a first episode of unprovoked pulmonary embolism that had been initially treated with a vitamin K antagonist for 6 uninterrupted months. In both groups, all patients were followed up for an additional median period of 2 years after treatment had been stopped. Primary outcome was the composite of recurrent VTE or major bleeding during the 18-month treatment period. Secondary outcomes included the composite outcome during the entire study period (i.e. 18 months plus a median follow-up of 2 years), deaths not caused by pulmonary embolism or major bleeding and the components of the composite outcome during the treatment period and during the entire study period. All outcomes were centrally adjudicated. Results: A total of 371 patients were included in the study and analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. During the treatment period, the composite outcome occurred in 6 of 184 patients (3.3%) in the warfarin group and in 25 of 187 patients (13.5%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.55; p=0.0004). Recurrent VTE occurred in 3 (1.7%) patients in the warfarin group and in 25 (13.5%) in the placebo group (HR, 0.11; 95%CI, 0.03-0.37); major bleeding occurred in 4 (2.2%) patients in the warfarin group and in 1 (0.5%) in the placebo group (HR, 4.07; 95%CI, 0.45-36.38). Two deaths not related to the study outcome occurred in each group. During the entire median study period of 41 months, the composite outcome occurred in 33 (20.8%) patients in the warfarin group and in 41 (23.5%) in the placebo group (HR, 0.76; 95%CI, 0.48-1.20; p=0.24) (Figure 1). Recurrent VTE occurred in 28 (17.9%) patients in the warfarin group and in 39 (22.1%) in the placebo group (HR, 0.67; 95%CI, 0.41-1.08); major bleeding occurred in 6 (3.5%) patients in the warfarin group and in 4 (2.5%) in the placebo group (HR, 1.57; 95%CI, 0.44-5.55). Thirteen (11.9%) patients died in the warfarin group, four deaths being related to recurrent VTE and one to major bleeding; six (3.6%) patients died in the placebo group from a cause unrelated to recurrent VTE or bleeding (p=0.08). Of the 67 episodes of recurrent VTE, 52 (77.6%) were pulmonary embolism and 58 (86.6%) were unprovoked. Conclusion: After 6 months of anticoagulation for a first episode of unprovoked pulmonary embolism, extending anticoagulation for an additional 18 months was associated with a major reduction in the risk of recurrent VTE or major bleeding during the treatment period. However, this benefit was not maintained after discontinuation of anticoagulation. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00740883). Figure 1. Cumulative risk of the composite outcome (recurrent VTE or major bleeding) over the entire study period Figure 1. Cumulative risk of the composite outcome (recurrent VTE or major bleeding) over the entire study period Disclosures Couturaud: Astra Zeneka: Co-investigator in clinical trial, Co-investigator in clinical trial Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Co-investigator in clinical trial Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sanchez:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mismetti:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; boerhinger ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jego:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; actelion: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Parent:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lorillon:Astra Zeneka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, symposium invitation Other; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Girard:Leo Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lacut:Bayer-Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Leroyer:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Investigator in COPD clinical trials, Investigator in COPD clinical trials Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneka: Investigator in asthma clinical trials Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Decousus:Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Meyer:Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding; LEO Pharma: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Mottier:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clinical Impact and Course of Anticoagulant-Related Major Bleeding in Cancer Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2611.2611 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2611-2611 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Noémie Kraaijpoel ◽

Nick van Es ◽

Suzanne M Bleker ◽

Marjolein P Brekelmans ◽

Elise S Eerenberg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Clinical Presentation ◽

Clinical Course ◽

Vitamin K Antagonists ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Anticoagulant Treatment ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a frequent complication in cancer patients. During anticoagulant treatment for VTE, the risk of major bleeding events (MBE) is 2- to 6-fold higher in cancer patients than in those without cancer. It is unknown whether the clinical presentation and course of anticoagulant-related MBE in cancer patients differ from patients without cancer. Methods Individual patient data from 4 randomized controlled phase III trials in which factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) were compared with vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of VTE were used for the present analysis. The severity of the clinical presentation and clinical course of anticoagulant-related MBE were compared between patients with and without cancer. Using predefined criteria, the severity of the clinical presentation and course of MBE were classified into four categories by independent adjudicators, who were blinded to treatment allocation. Category 1 indicates a mild clinical presentation or course, while category 4 indicates a severe presentation or course (Table 1). A one-stage meta-analysis was used to estimate crude odds ratios (ORs) and ORs adjusted for age, sex, and type of anticoagulant treatment with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effect of cancer on the severity of the clinical presentation and course. For this analysis categories 3 and 4 were combined. We also explored the cause and site of bleeding in these patients. Results The study group comprised 290 patients with MBE, of whom 50 (17%) had active cancer or were diagnosed with cancer during follow-up. The clinical presentation was judged to be severe (category 3 or 4) in 38% of patients with cancer and 44% of patients without cancer (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.47-1.72). Clinical course was judged to be severe in 20% and 25% of patients with and without cancer, respectively (adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.35-1.61) (Table 2). The bleeding pattern varied significantly between the two groups (p=0.002); cancer patients more often had gastrointestinal (52% vs. 35%) and vaginal (14% vs. 6%) MBE, whereas intracranial (19% vs. 6% and retroperitoneal (5% vs. 0%) MBE occurred more often in patients without cancer (Table 3). MBE was related to the tumor site in 40% of cancer patients. Conclusion The findings of the present study indicate that the clinical presentation and course of anticoagulant-related MBE are not more severe in cancer patients than in patients without cancer, which is reassuring for physicians who treat cancer-associated VTE. Disclosures Eerenberg: Sanquin: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Baxter: Consultancy. Middeldorp:Aspen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy; Sanquin: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cohen:Takeda: Consultancy; Leo Pharma: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Department of Health: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Medscape: Speakers Bureau; UK Government Health Select Committee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Colation to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism: Other: Founder; NHS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Aspen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ONO: Consultancy, Honoraria; XO1: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Lifeblood: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding in Patients with Cancer Associated Thrombosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142805 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 18-18

Author(s):

Doaa Attia ◽

Xuefei Jia ◽

Mailey L Wilks ◽

Barbara Tripp ◽

Christopher D'Andrea ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cleveland Clinic ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Recurrent Vte ◽

Cancer Associated Thrombosis

Background: The treatment paradigm for cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) has evolved over recent years from using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Some randomized trials suggest decreased rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in CAT patients treated with DOACs compared to LMWH but also reported increased rates of bleeding. The Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center has been treating cancer thrombosis in a centralized CAT clinic since 2014. Here we report our rates of bleeding and recurrent VTE in cancer patients treated with anticoagulation. Methods: We prospectively followed cancer patients referred to our clinic from 8/2014-10/2019. A total of 1548 patients were referred to the clinic, of whom 462 were diagnosed with an acute VTE. VTE events, including deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and visceral thrombosis, were noted. The comparison of bleeding rates (defined using ISTH criteria for major and clinically relevant non major bleeding, CRNMB) among treatment groups (LMWH vs DOACs) was examined using chi-square test. Rate of recurrent VTE was analyzed using a competing model in which death was treated as a competing risk. Results: The study population comprised 462 patients with acute VTE with a mean age of 62.67±12.23 and 51.8 % males. Of these, 234 (52.9%) received LMWH, 161(36.4%) received DOACs, and 47 (10.6%) received other agents including warfarin for initial anticoagulation. Overall, the 6-month, 1 year, and 2-year VTE recurrence rate was 5.9%, 6.6%, 7.9%, respectively. Recurrent VTE rates were similar for LMWHs, DOACs and other agents (P>0.05). Of 368 patients for whom follow-up data was available, 74 (16.7%) had bleeding event , of which 25 (33.8%) had major bleeding and 49 (66.4%) had CRNMB at 6 month follow-up with no difference across three treatment groups (p=0.56). Conclusion: In this real-world practice setting, rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding were similar for DOACs and LMWH suggesting that with careful patient selection the concern for higher bleeding with DOACs in cancer patients can be safely overcome. Disclosures McCrae: Momenta Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Rigel: Consultancy; Dova: Consultancy. Khorana:Merck: Research Funding; Medscape: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Pharmacyte: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Array: Other: Research funding (to institution); Janssen: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Leap: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Dalteparin Thromboprophylaxis in Cancer Patients at High Risk for Venous Thromboembolism: A Randomized Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.427.427 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 427-427 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Alok A. Khorana ◽

Charles W. Francis ◽

Nicole Kuderer ◽

Marc Carrier ◽

Thomas L. Ortel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Primary Efficacy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Intention To Treat ◽

Efficacy Outcome ◽

Risk Patients

Abstract Background: Ambulatory cancer patients at high-risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be identified using a validated risk score. We evaluated the benefit of outpatient thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin in such high-risk patients in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Methods: Cancer patients at high risk for VTE (Khorana score ≥3) and initiating a new systemic chemotherapy regimen were screened for VTE and, if negative, randomized to either dalteparin 5000 units daily subcutaneously or no prophylactic anticoagulation for 12 weeks. Subjects in both arms were screened with lower extremity ultrasounds every 4 weeks on study. Primary efficacy endpoint was any VTE over 12 weeks and primary safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding events over 13 weeks. The study was terminated due to poor accrual. Results: Of 117 enrolled patients, 19 were not randomized due to the presence of VTE on initial screening (N=10, 8.5%) or for other reasons (N=9). The mean age was 59 years with 46% female and 54% male, similar in both arms. The most common primary sites of cancer were pancreas, gastro-esophageal junction, lung and lymphoma. Over three-fourths of patients in each arm had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.Of 98 patients randomized, VTE occurred in 12% (N=6/50) of patients on the dalteparin arm and 21% (N=10/48) on the control arm (hazard ratio, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-1.89) (absolute risk reduction 9%, relative risk reduction 42%, number needed to treat = 12). Major bleeding was similar (N=1) in each arm but clinically relevant bleeding was higher in the dalteparin arm (N=7 versus 1 in the control arm) (HR = 7.0, 95% CI 1.2-131.6). There was no difference in overall survival. Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis is associated with a non-significant reduced risk of VTE with no effect on major bleeding or survival but increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding in this underpowered study population. The Khorana score successfully identifies patients with high incidence of VTE both at baseline and during study. The high incidence of baseline VTE suggests that consideration should be given to screening high-risk patients in clinical practice prior to starting systemic therapy. Future studies should continue to focus on risk-adapted approaches to reduce the burden of VTE in cancer. (Funded by NIH/NHLBI R01HL095109; clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00876915). Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients Enrolled in the PHACS trial Dalteparin Observation Total Enrolled (n) Baseline VTE, n (%) DVT PE Other reasons for not randomizing Randomized (n) Age, mean (SD), y --- --- --- --- --- 50 60 (10) --- --- --- --- --- 48 58 (12) 117 10 (9%) 6* (5%) 4 (3%) 9 98 59 (11) Gender, n (%) Female 21 (42%) 24 (50%) 45 (46%) Male 29 (58%) 24 (50%) 53 (54%) Primary Tumor Site, No. (%) Gynecologic 4 (8%) 4 (8%) 8 (8%) Colorectal 1 (2%) 3 (6%) 4 (4%) GE junction 8 (16%) 4 (8%) 12 (25%) Lung 6 (12%) 7(15%) 13 (27%) Genitourinary 2 (4%) 0 (0%) 2 (2%) Lymphoma 5 (10%) 2 (4%) 7 (15%) Breast 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 2 (2%) Pancreatic 19 (38%) 17 (35%) 36 (37%) Gastric 4 (8%) 6 (13%) 10 (10%) Other 0 (0%) 4 (8%) 4 (4%) Previous history of VTE, n (%) 4 (8%) 2 (4%) 6 (6%) *NOTE: 1 subject had both DVT and PE at baseline screening Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE pulmonary embolism; VTE, venous thromboembolism; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Figure 1. Cumulative Incidence Curves for the Primary Efficacy Outcome in the Intention-to-Treat Population, According to Study Arm. Figure 1. Cumulative Incidence Curves for the Primary Efficacy Outcome in the Intention-to-Treat Population, According to Study Arm. Disclosures Khorana: Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Randomized trial of dalteparin as prophylaxis. The drug is approved for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis but not for prophylaxis.. Francis:Eisai: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria; NHLBI: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy. Kuderer:Hospira: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Carrier:Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Ortel:Instrumentation Laboratory: Consultancy; Instrumentation Laboratory: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Wun:Janssen: Consultancy. Iyer:Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentec: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Lyman:Amgen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Use of Anticoagulants of Patients with Cancer-Associated Thrombosis Beyond 6 Months ; The Uscat Study, a 432-Patient Retrospective Non-Interventional Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124745 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3664-3664

Author(s):

Isabelle Mahe ◽

Ludovic Plaisance ◽

Céline Chapelle ◽

Silvy Laporte ◽

Benjamin Planquette ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Anticoagulant Treatment ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Index Event ◽

Cancer Associated Thrombosis ◽

Support Research

Introduction Few data are available about the treatment and complications beyond 6 months and up to 12 months in Cancer-associated Thrombosis (CAT) patients initially treated with low-molecular-weight (LMWH). Study objectives were to document the prescription and use of the anticoagulant treatment beyond 6 months and up to 12 months in CAT patients initially treated with tinzaparin and to measure clinical outcomes. Methods Adult CAT patients with solid tumor, previously included in 2 prospective cohort studies (AXA - NCT02898051; PREDICARE - NCT03099031) and still alive at the end of the initial 6-month treatment period with tinzaparin were eligible to participate in this retrospective non-interventional French multicenter study. Main study outcome was the description of the anticoagulant treatment in the management of CAT patients in usual medical care from the 6th month to the 12th month. Secondary objectives included the incidence of VTE recurrence, bleeding and deaths. A sample size of 250 to 300 patients was considered appropriate to allow analyses of 6-to-12-month data post-index event based on descriptive statistics. Results A total of 432 patients aged 66.5±12.7 years of whom 52.1% female alive at the end of AXA and PREDICARE 6-month treatment period were included in this retrospective study; 332 patients were followed up to 12 months while 96 patients deceased before the end of the study and 4 patients were lost-to-follow-up. Most patients (91.9%) had a single-site cancer. Cancers were mostly solid tumors and primary sites were colorectal (21.6%), lung (20.1%) or breast (16.8%); a proportion of 82.1% of patients had stage III or IV malignancy while cancer was progressing in 51.2% of patients. Beyond 6 months, the anticoagulant treatment was maintained in 290 of 421 (68.9%) patients of whom 241 (83.1% [95% CI: 78.3%; 87.2%]) patients were treated with a LMWH and 233 (80.3%) with tinzaparin, 32 (11.0%) and 13 (4.5%) patients were treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), respectively. The anticoagulant treatment was discontinued in 131 of 421 (31.1%) patients of whom 63 patients had already stopped the anticoagulant before 6 months while 68 patients stopped the anticoagulant treatment at 6 months. Mean treatment duration with LMWH beyond 6 months was 121.6 ± 65.6 days representing a mean total treatment duration of 288.4 ± 85.0 days since the index event. Between 6 and 12 months, 24 (5.7%) patients experienced a VTE recurrence corresponding to a cumulative incidence of 8% [95% CI: 4.2%; 15.1%], while 11 (2.7%) patients had a major bleeding corresponding to a cumulative incidence of 2.6% [95% CI: 1.3%; 5.1%]. VTE recurrence was more frequent in patients with colorectal and lung cancer while major bleeding was more frequent in patients with colorectal cancer (Table) A total of 96 (22.3%) deaths corresponding to a cumulative incidence of 30.7% [95% CI: 22.3%; 30.7%] were reported of which 55 (12.8%) related to cancer, 1 (0.2%) to bleeding and 8 (1.9%) to another cause while the cause of death was not documented for 32 (7.5%) patients. Clinical outcomes according the type of cancer are summarized in the Table. Conclusion These results reporting the clinical course up to 12 months of a large cohort of patients still alive at the end of the initial 6-month period following the VTE index event, provide data contributing to the clinician's therapeutic decision when facing a patient completing 6 months of anticoagulant for a CAT. Site of cancer has to be taken into account when assessing the risk of subsequent VTE recurrence and bleeding. Disclosures Mahe: BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; LEO Pharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau. Laporte:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo-Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boston scientific: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bertoletti:Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS-Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Aspen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Couturaud:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Falchiero:Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Roche: Speakers Bureau. Falvo:Medtronic: Consultancy; Toshiba: Consultancy; Leo-Pharma: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Meyer:Bayer: Other: travel support; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; LEO pharma: Other: travel support, Research Funding; SANOFI: Other: travel support, Research Funding; BMS-Pfizer: Other: travel support, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Rate of Clonal Hematopoiesis in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-151696 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4297-4297

Author(s):

Tamanna Haque ◽

Arletta Lozanski ◽

Tzyy-Jye Doong ◽

Ying Huang ◽

Rui Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Reference Sequence ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Clonal Hematopoiesis ◽

Male Patients ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third most common cardiovascular disease with an incidence over 1% in the elderly. About 50% of VTE is unprovoked, which is associated with higher rates of recurrent VTE and complications such as post-thrombotic syndrome. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) refers to recurrent somatic mutations associated with hematologic malignancies that are present in otherwise healthy individuals. CH is more common with increased age, occurring in more than 10% of people over the age of 70 and has been associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease. The rates of CH in patients with VTE or complications arising from this is not known. Methods Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with VTE were enrolled at the Ohio State University Thrombosis Clinic between 2017 and 2020. Clinical data was obtained at the time of routine clinic follow-up or ad hoc, and a research blood sample was collected with routine blood work. DNA extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed for the presence of CH via error corrected next generation sequencing (NGS) using the Ion Gene Studio S5 System. A custom AmpliSeq panel IAH150087 was designed to detect CH, which included whole gene sequencing and hotspots in 25 common genes associated with myeloid malignancies, including DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, among others, with a sequencing depth of up to 50,000X. Data was collected and analyzed using Ion Torrent S5/GS-S5 Instrument with Torrent Suite 5.12.0 version. Final analysis of sequence data was performed using combination of software: Variant Caller v.5.12.10-1, IGV5.01 (0) and Ion Reporter v.5.12.3.0. The hg19 reference sequence was used to assess for deviation. CH was defined as a variable allele frequency ≥ 2%. Two sample t-test and chi-square test were used to compare patients with and without CH for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results A total of 167 patients are included the study. Median age is 60.3 years and 55% of patients are female. 80% of patients are white. The majority of patients have unprovoked VTE (81%); 23 patients (13.8%) have VTE associated with cancer. 84% of patients were treated with a direct oral anticoagulant. Over the median follow-up duration of 400 days, 7 patients had recurrent VTE and 19 patients had a total of 21 bleeding events (7 major bleeding and 14 clinically relevant non-major bleeding [CRNMB] by ISTH criteria). Overall, 22 patients (13.2%) have detectable CH. Patients with CH are significantly older than those without CH (mean age 70 vs 59, p <0.0001). There is a trend towards increased CH rate in male patients (17% of male patients vs 10% of female patients with CH). There are no other differences in baseline characteristics among patients with and without CH, including type or location of VTE or cancer status. Among the 144 VTE patients without cancer, the median age is 60 years old and the CH rate is also 13.2%. In this group, the mean age of patients with CH is 12 years older than those without CH (70.5 years vs 58.4 years, p <0.0001). No other significant baseline characteristics are noted. 30 distinct CH mutations are noted in these 22 patients. Most patients have a single gene mutation (77%). Gene mutations in DNMT3A are the most common (46%), followed by TET2 (13%), and PPM1D (10%) (see figure). Most mutations are missense (57%), followed by nonsense (30%) and insertion/deletion mutations (13%). One patient has a JAK2 V617F mutation without known history of myeloproliferative disease. 8 CH patients with serial samples collected over a median duration of 136 days (range 91 - 490 days) showed no significant change in CH clone size over time. Patients with CH have no differences in rates of recurrent VTE or arterial thrombosis compared to those without CH. Patients with CH have a trend towards increased rate of combined major bleeding and CRNMB events (23% vs 10%, p=0.14). Patients with CH also had a trend towards increased mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (mean 93.5 vs 90.7, p=0.13), although no other cytopenias or differences in complete blood count parameters were noted. Conclusion The CH rate in patients with VTE was not found to be much higher than what might be expected by age alone. We found no change in the CH rate after excluding cancer patients. A larger VTE population with age-matched controls will better determine the CH rate in patients with VTE. CH can be a consideration in designing future clinical VTE studies that assess bleeding risk. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Byrd: Vincerx Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Newave: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Trillium, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics, Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria. Wang: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Two Doses of Apixaban for the Extended Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.lba-1.lba-1 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. LBA-1-LBA-1 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Giancarlo Agnelli ◽

Harry Roger Buller ◽

Alexander Cohen ◽

Madelyn Curto ◽

Alexander S. Gallus ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Primary Efficacy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Primary Efficacy Outcome ◽

Extended Treatment ◽

Safety Outcome ◽

Efficacy Outcome

Abstract Abstract LBA-1 Background: Apixaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide a simple, fixed-dose regimen for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of two doses of apixaban (2.5 or 5 mg twice daily) with placebo for the extended treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients who have completed 6 to 12 months of prior anticoagulant therapy. Methods: This randomized, double-blind study (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00633893) compared two apixaban doses (2.5 or 5 mg twice daily) with placebo for 12 months in patients with venous thromboembolism who had completed 6–12 months of anticoagulation. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism or all-cause mortality. Secondary efficacy outcomes included (a) the composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolism or venous thromboembolism-related death, and (b) the composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, venous thromboembolism-related death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular-related death. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding; the secondary safety outcome was major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Results: The study included 2486 patients: 829, 840, and 815 randomized to placebo, apixaban 2.5 mg, and apixaban 5 mg, respectively. Rates of the primary efficacy outcome were 11.6% in the placebo group, compared with 3.8% and 4.2% in the apixaban 2.5 mg and 5 mg groups, respectively (absolute risk differences of 7.8% and 7.4%, respectively; 95% confidence intervals 5.3% to 10.3% and 4.8% to 10%, respectively; p<0.001 for both comparisons). Other outcomes are detailed in the Table. Conclusions: Both doses of apixaban reduced the risk of symptomatic recurrent fatal or non-fatal venous thromboembolism by approximately 80% without increasing the rate of major bleeding. In addition, both apixaban doses reduced arterial thrombotic events. The lower apixaban dose may be preferred for extended treatment, because of the trend for less clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Disclosures: Agnelli: Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Buller:Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-aventis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Isis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Thrombogenics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cohen:Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZenica: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boheringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mitsubishi Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Schering Plough: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Curto:Pfizer: Employment. Gallus:Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bayer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; boehringer-Ingelheim: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Johnson:Pfizer: Employment. Porcari:Pfizer: Employment. Raskob:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy; Quintiles: Consultancy; National Blood Clot Alliance: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Weitz:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text